|
Forum rules for users, dealers, manufacturers HERE>> .
NOW OPEN 2009 Virtual Tradeshow Booths:
BH,
Chumba Racing,
Diamondback,
Edge,
Ellsworth,
Ergon,
Felt,
Formula,
Fox Racing Shox,
Fuji,
Giro/Easton/Blackburn,
Gu Energy,
Ibis,
Jamis,
KHS,
Kona,
Knolly,
Look ,
Lupine Lighting,
Motobecane,
Norco,
Panaracer,
Park Tool,
Pedro's,
Pivot Cycles ,
Race Face ,
Ritchey Design,
Santa Cruz,
SRAM ,
Syncros,
True Precision,
Turner,
WTB ,
X-Fusion
|
|
 |
|
07-14-2006
|
#1
|
|
mtbr member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3
|
Did I buy a woman's bike?
I just bought a giant atx-860 in red at an amazing price, dont know what year probably 99 in red with a CU 92 frame. The frame looks like it might be the type of frame that you would find on a woman's bike but i'm not sure. How can I tell? I can't find no info on this bike whatsoever...
|
|
|
07-14-2006
|
#2
|
|
Don't be a sheep
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,896
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ninetynine
I just bought a giant atx-860 in red at an amazing price, dont know what year probably 99 in red with a CU 92 frame. The frame looks like it might be the type of frame that you would find on a woman's bike but i'm not sure. How can I tell? I can't find no info on this bike whatsoever...
|
What do you mean womens frame, like a step through? The Giant ATX line was their performance hardatil line and did not come in a step through or even "womens specific" design. Your probably aren't familiar with MTB style frames as they have much more sloping top tubes for more clearance. The only thing I can think is that you purchased a much too small frame.
EDIT: If it looks like this you just purchased a small frame, I hope your about 5' tall.
__________________
You're fat and 29" tires are not going to change that.
Last edited by Rivet : 07-14-2006 at 01:37 AM.
|
|
|
07-14-2006
|
#3
|
|
mtbr member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3
|
I see, well it says 14.5 so im guessing thats the size, im quite short 5"6. The bike cost me 175 canadian dollars!
|
|
|
07-14-2006
|
#4
|
|
Ride Instigator
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,016
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ninetynine
I see, well it says 14.5 so im guessing thats the size, im quite short 5"6. The bike cost me 175 canadian dollars!
|
Kinda like buying a pair of shoes real cheap...not a bargain if it doesn't fit  .
With your height at 5'6" I'd guess that you'd fit into a medium size frame. You probably don't have a womans frame there but it is for a very small person.
__________________
I'm growing older but not up
My metabolic rate is pleasently stuck
Let these winds of change blow over my head
I'd rather die while I'm living then live while I'm dead
|
|
|
07-14-2006
|
#5
|
|
Doesntplaywellwithmorons!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,670
|
A 14.5" frame would be for someone from oh, 5'0 to 5'4 maybe. 5'6 you'd typically see on at least a 15.5/16" size, maybe as much as a 17" depending on the brand.
|
|
|
07-14-2006
|
#6
|
|
mtbr member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,157
|
If it fits and you enjoy riding it, why would you care?
__________________
Ride
Eat
Drink
Sleep
Repeat as needed
|
|
|
07-14-2006
|
#7
|
|
noMAD man
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,978
|
These classifications...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ninetynine
I just bought a giant atx-860 in red at an amazing price, dont know what year probably 99 in red with a CU 92 frame. The frame looks like it might be the type of frame that you would find on a woman's bike but i'm not sure. How can I tell? I can't find no info on this bike whatsoever...
|
are somewhat of a joke from the manufacturers IMO. Unless a frame has pink flowers or big letters "LADY'S BIKE" painted in lavender on the top tube, it's just a frame with a different top tube to seat tube ratio. The accepted standard men's bike assumes longer torso/shorter leg ratio, while the standard women's bike assumes the opposite. The problem is that many men and women fit the reverse sizing assumption. When different sizing is offered on the same frame, manufacturers should just desigate the ratio difference in some standard manner so that a guy with long legs and short torso has a better option. I notice that fewer and fewer of these "women specific" bikes are coming with "girly" paint jobs and graphics, and I think more and more women are appreciative of this. Manufacturers shouldn't assume that women just want an adult sized Barbie bike.  At our shop, we've sold several women's geometry bikes to guys who had the longer leg/shorter torso build. Those bikes had no graphics or paint jobs that set them apart from the men's bikes in any "feminine" way. Ninetynine, if your Giant fits you and the frame isn't dolled up with girly graphics and a pink basket, I'd ride it until until that lifetime subscription to "Good Housekeeping" ran out. 
|
|
|
07-14-2006
|
#8
|
|
mtbr member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DeeEight
A 14.5" frame would be for someone from oh, 5'0 to 5'4 maybe. 5'6 you'd typically see on at least a 15.5/16" size, maybe as much as a 17" depending on the brand.
|
Actually, i'm 5'7 and ride a 15". And it almost too big. Why? Because I have short legs. Plus, there's a such thing as adjustable seat posts and switching stems.
|
|
|
07-14-2006
|
#9
|
|
mtbr member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 26
|
I think some of the Giant bikes just have that "look". I recently purchased a new Giant Rainier (19") and never even gave the sloping crossbar any thought until I rode the bike over to my buddies house the day I bought it. His first words were "why did you buy a girl's bike?" After spending $600+ on a bike, that's not what you want to hear!!
But after thinking about it, I don't care what others think of the bike. I rode 5 bikes the day I decided to purchase the Rainier, and this one came out on top in comfort, ride, and features. Alot of the higher $$ full suspension bikes have similar looks. Ride it and enjoy!!
Here's a pic of my bike. It has similar geometry as the atx above.

Last edited by tnGreg : 07-14-2006 at 07:54 PM.
|
|
|
07-14-2006
|
#10
|
|
Chillin the Most
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,938
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tnGreg
I think some of the Giant bikes just have that "look". I recently purchased a new Giant Rainier (19") and never even gave the sloping crossbar any thought until I rode the bike over to my buddies house the day I bought it. His first words were "why did you buy a girl's bike?" After spending $600+ on a bike, that's not what you want to hear!!
But after thinking about it, I don't care what others think of the bike. I rode 5 bikes the day I decided to purchase the Rainier, and this one came out on top in comfort, ride, and features. Alot of the higher $$ full suspension bikes have similar looks. Ride it and enjoy!!
Here's a pic of my bike. It has similar geometry as the atx above.

|
Actually, thats how the new Rainier's look. Personally, I like the new top tube design, reminds me of the Meistro line. Congrats.
|
|
|
07-15-2006
|
#11
|
|
Yoooleeeaaaaahna Victoria
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 819
|
No...
Greets,
No, you did not buy a bike made for a woman; you bought a small-frame bike. A friend with whom I used to ride whilst in university in the USA owned a Giant ATX-860 and it was a quite sweet bike for the time. Indeed, it is a small frame but certain not a gender-specific bike.
If the bike fits your body, then be happy! I ride a custom Litespeed which might equate to a similar size. I have quite long legs but a very short upper body, thus the need for a short top-tube span with good stand-over height.
Julianna
__________________
Een minuut stilte is niet genoeg. Wat doe jij tegen agressie en geweld? (A minute silence is not enough. What do you against aggression and violence?)
|
|
|
07-15-2006
|
#12
|
|
I wear two thongs
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,662
|
My hardtails a 14" and Im 5'9" I just have a long stem and seatpost but the bike is super nimble in the woods.
__________________
Hiking is just walking where its okay to pee... Sometimes old people go hiking by accident.
-Demetri Martin-
If you have a Shimano FH-40 freehub body disassembly tool that you can sell..give...let me borrow pm me.
|
|
|
07-15-2006
|
#13
|
|
Bike Pimp
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 246
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ninetynine
I just bought a giant atx-860 in red at an amazing price, dont know what year probably 99 in red with a CU 92 frame. The frame looks like it might be the type of frame that you would find on a woman's bike but i'm not sure. How can I tell? I can't find no info on this bike whatsoever...
|
Oh My God!!!! Dude, that's a chick's bike!
Kidding
go ride it and stop worrying.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Photo Caption Contest
(sponsored by Maxxis)
|
Enter here
|
|
|