Home | Forums


advanced search

Forum rules for users, dealers, manufacturers HERE>> .
96er/650b Forum>>, Lurkers... share>>, Fat Bike Forum>>, What you do for a living>>, Tire Weight list>>, 29er FAQ>>,

NOW OPEN 2009 Virtual Tradeshow Booths: BH, Chumba Racing, Diamondback, Edge, Ellsworth, Ergon, Felt, Formula, Fox Racing Shox, Fuji, Giro/Easton/Blackburn, Gu Energy, Ibis, Jamis, KHS, Kona, Knolly, Look , Lupine Lighting, Motobecane, Norco, Panaracer, Park Tool, Pedro's, Pivot Cycles , Race Face , Ritchey Design, Santa Cruz, SRAM , Syncros, True Precision, Turner, WTB , X-Fusion

Go Back   Mtbr.com Forums > Classic Forums > 29er Bikes
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
Forum Jump:  
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-12-2005   #1
bhutata
mtbr member
 
bhutata's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 364
New 29ers, Seven Duo and Duo-Lux

I just received an email from Seven saying that for '06 they're going to offer the Duo and Duo-Lux as 29ers. Now to figure out how in the world I can scrape up the bucks to get my mitts on one of these. I've been wishing for a 29er with monolink suspension ever since I demo'd a Palamino and now someone's finally making it a reality.

Wonder if they'll have one at Interbike, I'd love to see a ride report.
__________________
A man is only a man, but a good bicycle is a ride.
bhutata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #2
Endomaniac
Appalachian Singletrack'n
 
Endomaniac's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,131
If Seven is going to build it I wonder if Maverick is going to as well. I have a hard time believing Seven would do the engineering / development on their own. Especially since Maverick is showing an interest in the 29” concept already. Its great news though. I have a couple of friends that think the Maverick suspension system is the best they have ever ridden. Our top local 24 hr. racer has 2 Turners and a Palomino, If the Palomino is working its her favorite bike to ride.
Endomaniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #3
bhutata
mtbr member
 
bhutata's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 364
I sent an email to Maverick several days ago asking about the possibility of 29" and they haven't responded. It has occurred to me this might be because they don't want to let the cat out of the bag quite yet, but who knows.

This past spring I also mentioned to the guy manning the Trek demo trailer that I'd love to see a 29" Palamino. His eyes lit up like it'd never occurred to him and he agreed the monolink suspension would be great for 29" wheels. He said he'd pass the idea along, but I'm not exactly holding my breath on Klein making the leap to big wheels anytime soon.
__________________
A man is only a man, but a good bicycle is a ride.
bhutata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #4
mcd
uh, uh...oh, i forget
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 963
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhutata
I sent an email to Maverick several days ago asking about the possibility of 29" and they haven't responded. It has occurred to me this might be because they don't want to let the cat out of the bag quite yet, but who knows.

This past spring I also mentioned to the guy manning the Trek demo trailer that I'd love to see a 29" Palamino. His eyes lit up like it'd never occurred to him and he agreed the monolink suspension would be great for 29" wheels. He said he'd pass the idea along, but I'm not exactly holding my breath on Klein making the leap to big wheels anytime soon.


HA! I just sold my palomino! I really liked it too, but hadn't ridden it in over a year. I also went over to the mav hq about a year ago and asked about a 29er design and was told no way. this has been discussed before, but i think because of the link the rear chainstays would be significantly longer to accomodate the 29er wheel. this bike already has a long(imo) wheelbase add in the funky seat post angle needed to get you over the bb...
I don't want to be a downer, especially since i would probably line up to get one if they made it, but i'm not holding my breath....please make me wrong though
__________________
disclaimer: i (NO LONGER) live with my mom...
mcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #5
toddre
mtbr member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,647
[quote=bhutata]Now to figure out how in the world I can scrape up the bucks to get my mitts on one of these.

Just sell your house and live out of your car
toddre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #6
toddre
mtbr member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhutata
This past spring I also mentioned to the guy manning the Trek demo trailer that I'd love to see a 29" Palamino. His eyes lit up like it'd never occurred to him and he agreed the monolink suspension would be great for 29" wheels. He said he'd pass the idea along, but I'm not exactly holding my breath on Klein making the leap to big wheels anytime soon.

Maybe the guys across the hall at Fisher could work with it?
toddre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #7
~martini~
Ohno you dinnit!
 
~martini~'s Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,220
This is exactly what I heard too. If this is really true.... If 7 really IS going to do this..... I may have to re-evaluate my disdain for all things 7. I typically think they're priced waaaaaaayyyyyy to high for what you get. Yeah, nice bikes and all, but they are JUST bikes. Not that Mav's are much cheaper, but I'd much rather ride a Mav than a 7.

I too had a chance to ride a monolink bike a few times and really liked the way it rode. Suits my style quite well. Perfect for 29"'s as well!
__________________

Required Disclaimer: I sell Singular - Bike Seller
Blog can be found here


~martini~ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #8
nightfire
mtbr member
 
nightfire's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 647
I was looking into getting some 29er back ends made for the ML7 shock but the bikes would still be too small for me.

At least the Seven is a true custom and the front end would fit.

P::..
nightfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #9
bhutata
mtbr member
 
bhutata's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 364
Just got another note from Seven, he said that due to limited booth space and lots of new products to show, the 29er Duo didn't make the cut for Interbike. Bummer.
__________________
A man is only a man, but a good bicycle is a ride.
bhutata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #10
Dave.
mtbr member
 
Dave.'s Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 664
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhutata
Just got another note from Seven, he said that due to limited booth space and lots of new products to show, the 29er Duo didn't make the cut for Interbike. Bummer.

Isn't Interbike all about showing what's new and innovative?! You would think they would make room for a 29er, perhaps substituting it for a 26er that maybe just has a new decal-set or a fancy gruppo. That's disappointing.
Dave. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #11
sslos
hispanic mechanic
 
sslos's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,010
Nope...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave.
Isn't Interbike all about showing what's new and innovative?! You would think they would make room for a 29er, perhaps substituting it for a 26er that maybe just has a new decal-set or a fancy gruppo. That's disappointing.
Interbike is all about selling stuff to dealers. That's it. Sometimes companies will use "new and [i]innovative" to sell their bikes, but the bottom line is all about, um, the bottom line.
I think it's pretty cool that 7 is making a Duo 29". Good on 'em.

the los
__________________
"I cahoot with no one,"
Taylor
sslos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #12
Appendage
My gloves stink
 
Appendage's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,121
Why is monolink good for 29?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhutata
I sent an email to Maverick several days ago asking about the possibility of 29" and they haven't responded. It has occurred to me this might be because they don't want to let the cat out of the bag quite yet, but who knows.

This past spring I also mentioned to the guy manning the Trek demo trailer that I'd love to see a 29" Palamino. His eyes lit up like it'd never occurred to him and he agreed the monolink suspension would be great for 29" wheels. He said he'd pass the idea along, but I'm not exactly holding my breath on Klein making the leap to big wheels anytime soon.
What is it about the monolink suspension that would lend itself particularly well to 29ers?
__________________
I dreamed I ate a 10 lb marshmallow. When I awoke, my pillow was gone.
Appendage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #13
jeff
Member
 
jeff's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,083
Email to Mav last week.

They responded by saying no time in the near future.
Jeff
jeff is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #14
bhutata
mtbr member
 
bhutata's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by Appendage
What is it about the monolink suspension that would lend itself particularly well to 29ers?
Well, this is really just my simple opinion, but I know at least a few others share it. First of all, in my limited experience, monolink frames offer incredible handling, carving turns on singletrack better than anything else I've ridden. They also make very effective use of their travel, have no bob, in general combine the best attributes of full suspension and a hardtail. Next, the suspension travel seems right for big wheels, upward and rearward, away from the front triangle. Hence, no problems with the tire contacting the seat tube. Like I said, just my humble opinion. You can take it FWIW.
__________________
A man is only a man, but a good bicycle is a ride.
bhutata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #15
MMcG
mtbr member
 
MMcG's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,807
How does that seat tube angle affect a riders positioning on that frame?

It looks to me like you'd be too far behind the bottom bracket based on that photo, especially if you had to run a fair amount of seatpost to get proper saddle height.

I'm confused. Someone care to enlighten me?
MMcG is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005   #16
neville
mtbr member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 565
No 29er

My sources say no Seven 29er for awhile yet.

As the owner of a Duo I would love to see it happen but it will be awhile.

The question of seat post adjustment, You only get to be able to go about one or two inchs up or down from the "correct" position before it effects the ride characteristics.

You could get the New Teres in a 29er.

Last edited by neville : 09-13-2005 at 07:33 AM.
neville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005   #17
bhutata
mtbr member
 
bhutata's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by neville
My sources say no Seven 29er for awhile yet.

As the owner of a Duo I would love to see it happen but it will be awhile.
Here's the info I received from Seven:

------------------------------------
Thank you for your interest in Seven Cycles. For 2006, the Duo and Duo-Lux will both be available with 29 inch wheels. We encourage you to visit your local Seven dealer to speak with them about placing your order.

Regards,

Scott Rosenthal | Customer Service | Seven Cycles, Inc.

T: (617) 923-7774 ext. 39 | F: (617) 923-7757 | http://www.sevencycles.com
-------------------------------------

And to better answer apendenge's question about the benefits of monolink suspension and MMcG's concerns about seat tube angle, I suggest you check out some of the reviews of 26" monolink bikes. Oh yeah, and as far as worries about the seat being too far back if you raise the seat, keep in mind that Seven customizes the frames, so with the right size frame to begin with, it shouldn't be a worry.

Seven Duo

Maverick ML7

Klein Palamino

The concern you read in some reviews about front derailluer issues obviously has a solution as many others are able to get it to work fine, or simply going with a Rohloff hub. I'm not sure I'd want to get a Maverick simply because I'd be hesitant to go with an intergrated headset.
__________________
A man is only a man, but a good bicycle is a ride.

Last edited by bhutata : 09-13-2005 at 11:30 AM.
bhutata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005   #18
Appendage
My gloves stink
 
Appendage's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,121
A cheap and easy fix

[quote=bhutata]
The concern you read in some reviews about front derailluer issues obviously has a solution as many others are able to get it to work fine, or simply going with a Rohloff hub. QUOTE]

"....simply going with Rohloff hub." You know, that's exactly what I do whenever I have derailleur trouble- just throw on a Rohloff. No worries! Man, sometimes I feel like poor white trash around here...wait a minute......NOOOOO!

Back to the original question- clearly monolink riders like their bikes (as do most guys who invest a ton of money in a bike- what are they gonna say? "I spent thousands on a bike that sucks"?). My question was why (or if) the monolink would be particularly well suited to the 29er application, as opposed to all the other suspension designs du jour.
__________________
I dreamed I ate a 10 lb marshmallow. When I awoke, my pillow was gone.

Last edited by Appendage : 09-13-2005 at 11:44 AM.
Appendage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005   #19
bhutata
mtbr member
 
bhutata's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by Appendage
"....simply going with Rohloff hub." You know, that's exactly what I do whenever I have derailleur trouble- just throw on a Rohloff. No worries! Man, sometimes I feel like poor white trash around here...wait a minute......NOOOOO!
OK, I had that coming. Rohloffs are a pretty good chunk of change. My point was that if you're totally paranoid about the derailleur thing, there is a viable alternative. Frankly, if you can afford a Seven frame it's probably not out of the question to think about a Rohloff.

All I can speak for is my brief personal experience and what others have to say...the monolink I rode handled better than anything else I've tried out. The ride was good and it pedaled effeciently, and that's comparing it to several other high-dollar rides I tried out the same day. Am I crazy to base such a strong opinion on one demo ride? Probably, but a lot of guys buy bikes without any chance ot try them out on the trail at all.

I'd really love to see some ride reports once these bikes are available, especially from folks that can offer comparisions to other fine machines like the Lenz models, the Asylum, Ventana, etc. At best I'm not counting on hearing about anyone straddling one of these things till next season.

I have called a couple of Seven dealers within a few hours of my house and they both talked like mountain bikes are past their heyday. No chance of finding even a 26" Duo on the floor to check out. They'd be happy to order one (duh!) but I'd be buying one sight unseen. If I can ever save up the money to get something like this, it would be nerve-wracking to me to put the bucks on the line without even seeing one.
__________________
A man is only a man, but a good bicycle is a ride.
bhutata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005   #20
bobde
mtbr member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 123
Seems like this bike is perfect for...

A Single Speed! That is if the rear shockis one of these new-fangled stable shocks that aren't affected by peddling.
bobde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005   #21
nightfire
mtbr member
 
nightfire's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 647
I'm not sure I'd want to get a Maverick simply because I'd be hesitant to go with an intergrated headset.

I would be fine with the Campag standard hiddenset headtube on the Maverick, only when fitted with an FSA or Cane Creek.

OK, I had that coming. Rohloffs are a pretty good chunk of change

True! But as my new 29er has Maverick forks and plan for a Rohloff anyway it means if I can ever get the cash for the frame I will have spread the cost!

Would it be wrong to get a Ti frame painted?

P::..
nightfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005   #22
nightfire
mtbr member
 
nightfire's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 647
I'm not sure I'd want to get a Maverick simply because I'd be hesitant to go with an intergrated headset.

I would be fine with the Campag standard hiddenset headtube on the Maverick, only when fitted with an FSA or Cane Creek.

OK, I had that coming. Rohloffs are a pretty good chunk of change

True! But as my new 29er has Maverick forks and plan for a Rohloff anyway it means if I can ever get the cash for the frame I will have spread the cost!

Would it be wrong to get a Ti frame painted?

P::..
nightfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005   #23
nightfire
mtbr member
 
nightfire's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 647
Does anyone know if Seven use a bushes with the monolink like Klein or Bearings like Maverick?

Also, I here that Klein have been shelfed, is this true??
nightfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005   #24
neville
mtbr member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightfire
Does anyone know if Seven use a bushes with the monolink like Klein or Bearings like Maverick?

Also, I here that Klein have been shelfed, is this true??
Bearings, mine is going on 2 1/2 years and still good as new. Never had any trouble with the F/D like some people have had, either.
neville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005   #25
Guitar Ted
Harmonius Wrench
 
Guitar Ted's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,838
Do you mean the Palomino?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nightfire
Does anyone know if Seven use a bushes with the monolink like Klein or Bearings like Maverick?

Also, I here that Klein have been shelfed, is this true??

If so, then the answer is yes. All '06 product shown at the Trek show was hardtail. Adroits and Attitudes only. I didn't see any "buzz" around the Kliens, as if they were an after thought. I expect Trek to fold them up for '07.
__________________
Riden' an Smilin'
Guitar Ted

Blog
www.twentynineinches.com
www.thecyclistsite.com
Guitar Ted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005   #26
lanpope
Squalor
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by neville
Bearings, mine is going on 2 1/2 years and still good as new. Never had any trouble with the F/D like some people have had, either.

Lets see a pic...

Do you like the design?

LP
lanpope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005   #27
neville
mtbr member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by lanpope
Lets see a pic...

Do you like the design?

LP
I'm pretty much moving away from gears and suspension these days, but if Seven were to do a Duo in a 29er i would think long and hard about getting one. I really do like mine and still have fun on it but more fun on my Phil's. I get my Phil 29er really soon so it will probably be number one.
I think for the riding I do up here, it's a great "trail" bike.
Here's a photo about a year ago.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC00178.JPG (150.2 KB, 1208 views)
neville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005   #28
nightfire
mtbr member
 
nightfire's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 647
Quote:
Originally Posted by neville
I'm pretty much moving away from gears and suspension these days, but if Seven were to do a Duo in a 29er i would think long and hard about getting one. I really do like mine and still have fun on it but more fun on my Phil's. I get my Phil 29er really soon so it will probably be number one.
I think for the riding I do up here, it's a great "trail" bike.
Here's a photo about a year ago.

Thanks for that Neville. One more question. Have you ridden a Maverick and how does it compaire? I am interested in the difference the Ti frame makes to the ride.

P::..
nightfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005   #29
neville
mtbr member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightfire
Thanks for that Neville. One more question. Have you ridden a Maverick and how does it compaire? I am interested in the difference the Ti frame makes to the ride.

P::..
Yes, and pretty much the same ride.
I just got a Seven over a Maverick as I allready had a couple of Seven road and CX bikes and liked the quality and company dealings.
Can't really go wrong with either.
Good luck with the bike.
One other factor was the headset.
neville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005   #30
nightfire
mtbr member
 
nightfire's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 647
http://www.sevencycles.com/bikes/fea...smountain.html

The 2006 Seven site is up. And on the options page a whole column dedicated to the 29er option. Look carefully, no Duo or Duo-Lux :-(

P::..
nightfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005   #31
neville
mtbr member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightfire
http://www.sevencycles.com/bikes/fea...smountain.html

The 2006 Seven site is up. And on the options page a whole column dedicated to the 29er option. Look carefully, no Duo or Duo-Lux :-(

P::..
Dam I was hoping my guy was wrong.
neville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005   #32
nightfire
mtbr member
 
nightfire's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 647
I still hope he is!!
nightfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005   #33
neville
mtbr member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightfire
I still hope he is!!
That would be nice, but he seldom is.%#@$&%
neville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005   #34
Fastskiguy
Dr. Frost
 
Fastskiguy's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
For me monlink<thudbuster

So somebody's got to say they aren't in love with the monlink and I guess it's going to be me. Rode one for three days in Idaho a couple of years ago (a klein) and thought it rode pretty well but not any better than a plain old hardtail with a sussy post. Maybe my legs took a little less of a shaking I guess but I was not left with a "I've gotta have this" feeling. I liked my old specialized fsr suspension better (circa 1999) and I'm diggin' a steel 29r with a thudbuster now. One thing is for sure and that is that it'll be easy to end up with a 5000$ superbike if you start with a seven duo 29!
Fastskiguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2006   #35
SlowSSer
ali'i hua
 
SlowSSer's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,696
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightfire
I still hope he is!!

the guy is incorrect. ask me again in a few weeks why i know
__________________
save internet radio!
http://www.savenetradio.org/index.html
www.pandora.com
SlowSSer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2006   #36
Guitar Ted
Harmonius Wrench
 
Guitar Ted's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,838
So.......what you are saying is.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowSSer
the guy is incorrect. ask me again in a few weeks why i know


__________________
Riden' an Smilin'
Guitar Ted

Blog
www.twentynineinches.com
www.thecyclistsite.com
Guitar Ted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2006   #37
~martini~
Ohno you dinnit!
 
~martini~'s Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,220
Silly boys, there's already been one posted 29" Seven Duo, and that was pretty early this year. He even attempted to sell it on eGay. I thought I had a pic to show, but nope. And I'm too lazy to search for it.
__________________

Required Disclaimer: I sell Singular - Bike Seller
Blog can be found here


~martini~ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2006   #38
2melow
Moderator
Moderator
 
2melow's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,577
Word is that Kent Eriksen is licensing the Maverick rear end to builf his own TI FS bikes. I heard a rumor about a Yeti rear end as well.
__________________
Moderator, Front Range Forum
I work for Niner Bikes
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Niner-...3652275?ref=ts
2melow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2006   #39
SlowSSer
ali'i hua
 
SlowSSer's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,696
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guitar Ted

what I'm sayin is a new, higher paying job plus 0% for 6 months is nice to have.


btw- google "seven duo 29er" and see what pops up. they do exist!
__________________
save internet radio!
http://www.savenetradio.org/index.html
www.pandora.com
SlowSSer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2006   #40
Soupboy
Certifiably Rad
 
Soupboy's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,548
I think the whole Seven/Mav/Palocrappo line of bikes is lame. Then again, so are those that like them.

Seriously, these bikes are overpriced weaksauce with a dash of manjuice.
__________________
Buy stuff from them: Ben Witt | Mike Curiak | Marty Larson

The SEARCH FUNCTION does indeed still work.
Soupboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006   #41
SlowSSer
ali'i hua
 
SlowSSer's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,696
soupy:

thanks for the insight.
__________________
save internet radio!
http://www.savenetradio.org/index.html
www.pandora.com
SlowSSer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2006   #42
donkey
giddy up!
 
donkey's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2melow
Word is that Kent Eriksen is licensing the Maverick rear end to builf his own TI FS bikes. I heard a rumor about a Yeti rear end as well.
You caught my ear with the Yeti bit......the ASR is the one full suspension bike that ever agreed with me. I'd be awfully tempted by a 29" version with the same attributes.
__________________
www.thepathbikeshop.com
donkey is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump:  

Photo Caption Contest (sponsored by Maxxis)


Enter here





Latest Articles and Reviews:


Quick Poll
(sponsored by Moots)
If buying a new bike this year, will it be a:

26” XC/AM trail bike
29” XC/AM trail bike
freeride bike
downhill bike
road bike

click here to see all press and news articles



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda