Home | Forums


advanced search

Forum rules for users, dealers, manufacturers HERE>> .


NOW OPEN 2009 Virtual Tradeshow Booths: BH, Chumba Racing, Diamondback, Edge, Ellsworth, Ergon, Felt, Formula, Fox Racing Shox, Fuji, Giro/Easton/Blackburn, Gu Energy, Ibis, Jamis, KHS, Kona, Knolly, Look , Lupine Lighting, Motobecane, Norco, Panaracer, Park Tool, Pedro's, Pivot Cycles , Race Face , Ritchey Design, Santa Cruz, SRAM , Syncros, True Precision, Turner, WTB , X-Fusion

Go Back   Mtbr.com Forums > Classic Forums > Beginner's Corner
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
Forum Jump:  
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #1
makeitso
mtbr member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 25
Sizing advice

Here's the basic info, I'm 5'9" with a 30.75" biking inseam (via book between legs method) and around 165 lbs. Seems that I'm more short leg, long torso type. I've been to three bike shops and have been quick fit to 17" - 19" bikes and am unsure which bike works better, and I realize that the fit can be changed by moving around the seat and changing the stem which leads me to my question... Should I go after the 17" bike and change to a longer stem or the 19" and possibly shorten the stem? The biggest problem I see on the larger bike is my lack of leg length as most of the 19" bikes have 30"+ standovers.

Here are the bikes I've tried, assume that the seats are all basically in middle position and factory stems. It'll probably be information overload.

17" Spec Rockhopper '09 - I like the body position but I find myself trying to push my backside further back on the bike a cm or so.

19" Rockhopper '10 - Felt a hair stretched out. Has a 31.4" standover so standing over the top tube right in front of the seat the bits touch but there's no pressure with feet flat on the ground.

19" Rockhopper 29er '10 - Definately felt stretched out in the 5 min parking lot ride and it's standover is probably too tall.

17" GF Wahoo '09 - Again felt a little cramped and trying to slide my butt back a little bit. A bit more upright vs the Rockhopper but still a comfortable body position.

17" GF Coriba 29er '09 - Felt more upright vs the Rockhopper but the fitment seemed pretty good.

19" GF Piranha '09 - Didn't really feel stretched out, but just felt like a big bike if that makes sense.

18.5" Trek 4500 - Felt way too upright, almost felt like a comfort bike.

19" Jamis Exile 29er '10 - Position and standover wasn't bad surprisingly but for the price I think the spec is a bit low so I might eliminate this one.

I'm coming from a 15 year old Mongoose steel rigid bike that's an 18" but for whatever reason it's too small (can't get KOP and feeling cramped but don't want to upgrade it). It's also got a bit too much forward lean for my preference. With the mindset of doing singletrack & fireroads should I go after the smaller bike and use stems and saddle position to make it larger or should I go with the larger bike and use a slightly shorter stem?

Thanks in advance as I know I put way too much info down here.
makeitso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #2
AZ.MTNS
no worries
 
AZ.MTNS's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,288
Smaller, you can change everything else to make it fit . If you dont have enough stand over room you cant fix that .
__________________
Let them know how you feel about their shill : info@setteusa.com
AZ.MTNS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #3
shenny88
mtbr member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 14
just from personal research and relatively short term experience i would strongly advice against the 19" frames... small wrecks could result in costly injuries and discomfort, plus stopping on less than perfectly flat surfaces may be a balancing act.... ps, im 5' 8" and ride a 17" and cant even imagine myself on an 18"
shenny88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #4
Dremer03
mtbr member
 
Dremer03's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,679
Your at the high end of a medium frame and could possibly fit into a large depending on the manufacturer. I ride a Large 18 inch frame and I am 5' 11", the stand over of my Reken is 29.21. I would seek out a 18 inch bike and try that out. Your old 18 inch rigid Mongoose probably feels small because it probably has a high rise quill and riser bars.
__________________
My opinion is mine, no one else's, unless they agree.
Sette Experience Promos provided by Pricepoint, Sette, and Tri-Flow
Dremer03 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #5
jride1078
Just getting into it!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
Thanks. it helps.
jride1078 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #6
makeitso
mtbr member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 25
I just went out and measured the effective top tube on the old bike and it's around 22.25" so even the 17" bikes will generally have a longer top tube. There's no geometry lists online but here's a picture of the current bike when it was setup for around town duty.

Old Bike

Is there any other bike / brands I should look at outside of these? But it seems like the consensus is going with the smaller bike.
makeitso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #7
AZ.MTNS
no worries
 
AZ.MTNS's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,288
Look at as many as you can , ride them . You will know when you find the right one .
__________________
Let them know how you feel about their shill : info@setteusa.com
AZ.MTNS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #8
laherna
mtbr member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7
I am 5-10 and have a 17" Rockhopper. Glad I picked the 17".
laherna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #9
trailville
mtbr member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by makeitso
But it seems like the consensus is going with the smaller bike.
I don't agree. I'm not saying you absolutely should get a 19" frame, but I'm 5' 9.5" and know that a 17" frame would be way too small for me. I have a bunch of bikes ranging in size between 18" and 19.5".

Standover is overrated in bike fit. If I stand flat footed over my FS bike, there really isn't any clearance, yet it's never given me a problem. Take your current bike out on some trails and intentionally hit some real steep uphills and some technical features like big rock gardens, tight switchbacks or other things that are sure to make you put your feet down. Then notice what naturally happens when you're forced to put your feet down. You'll probably find that you actually end up leaning your bike and/or will be on your toes rather than flat footed. In either case, you end up with much more clearance. In addition, the suspension itself on modern bikes gives you some protection against coming down hard on the top tube. Plus, most bikes these days are aluminum and therefore have larger diameter top tubes that also provide a little protection. Wear some padded bike shorts and you have even more protection.

What you really need to worry about in a crash is hitting the stem. Ouch!

Top tube length (ETT) is far more important in bike fit. You may want to seek out some models that come in 18" . Most manufacturers sites will list their sizes and geometry.
__________________
Warning: may contain sarcasm and/or crap made up in an attempt to feel important.
trailville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #10
xenon
mtbr member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 586
I'd recommend to choose the largest frame, that still allows you to easily sit on the rear wheel and get back up in the saddle. If you, like it sounds, are slim enough, it will, possibly, be 19" frame, rather than 17".
I am 175 cm. (5'9") myself. All but one my bikes have been L (20"), my only 18" frame felt too short to me. Yet I have my seat moved back to the limit and no problem moving my Southern end right onto the rear wheel.
xenon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #11
sponger
mtbr member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 137
I'm 5 '10" with a 30" inseam and I feel comfortable on a 18.5". My last bike, which was a 17.5" felt a bit cramped.
sponger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #12
perttime
local trails rider
 
perttime's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,255
Those seat tube measurements are pretty irrelevant.
The length is what really matters when you are on the bike.

That said, I am about 176 cm (between 5'9" and 5'10") and my bikes tend towards the Medium/17" sizes. I like a fairly "compact" sizing that lets me move around the bike very well.
perttime is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #13
AzSpeedfreek
I think I need to Upgrade
 
AzSpeedfreek's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,513
Are you buying the bike to ride it or to stand over it?

I would steer you to the frame that fits you while you are riding it, not the frame that fits you while you are standing over it. If that means that it is an 18 or 19" frame then so be it. If it takes a stem of more than 110 or 120mm long for the bike to fit you then go up in frame size.
AzSpeedfreek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Weeks Ago   #14
makeitso
mtbr member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 25
By the bikes I've rode it seems like I like a top tube around 580-600 so hopefully I can find something that falls within that range that has a viable standover height. Seems like I will be able to in the end esp if I look into used. But man, looking at the Specialized archive it seems like they changed geometries yearly!
makeitso is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump:  

Photo Caption Contest (sponsored by Maxxis)


Enter here





Latest Articles and Reviews:


Quick Poll
(sponsored by Moots)
If buying a new bike this year, will it be a:

26” XC/AM trail bike
29” XC/AM trail bike
freeride bike
downhill bike
road bike

click here to see all press and news articles



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda