Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 171
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610

    Tune Your Mission Control High Speed Shim Stack: How To Guide: Pics

    ================================================== ===============
    WARNING!
    Im not responsible if you damage your fork through hamfistedness or inexperiance working on suspension
    ================================================== ===============

    Hi all

    I have a 08 Lyrik coil u-turn on my Kona Bass, i love the fork, but i have noticed that i can blow through the travel REALLY easily, and the adjustment knobs seem to have no noticeable effect on the forks performance.

    The goal i wanted to acheive in tuning the highspeed shim stack was to try and retain small bump performance, but try and increase the bottom out resistance.

    This mod is really easy, no special tools are required, and accessing the shims can be done in about 5 mins with practice.

    This guide uses a lyrik mission control damper, and i see no reason why it shouldnt work for a totem. If you do not like the outcome, it is easy to return everything to a factory setting.

    Righto, time to show DA SHIMZ !

    ================================================== ===============
    Only tools required for this mod are as follows:

    > 24mm Socket
    > 4mm hex wrench
    > 1.5mm hex wrench
    > Shifter
    > Rags
    > Digital Vernier Calipers (for measuring the shims)
    > Frosty Beverage (for afterwards of course!)

    STEP 1:
    First, we gotta remove the Mission Control Damper. Make sure that the HSC knob is set at maximum hardness (turned fully right). You can tell if its in the correct position as the blue knob will be raised off the wrench flats.



    STEP 2:
    Next you'll want to take your wrench and tighten it on the LSC Knob, then using a 4mm hex, loosen the floodgate adjuster, then the LSC knob will just lift off.





    Next using you 1.5mm hex wrench, loosen the 2 grub screws holding the HSC knob on, then lift it off. Make sure you put the adjuster knobs in a safe place and dont loose em.



    STEP 3:
    Using your 24mm socket, loosen the Mission control top cap


    Once the threads are disengaged, lift the Mission Control damper out of the stanchion, dont yank it out, rock it gently from side to side and lift it out, a tip is to press the centre bit (where the LSC konb sits) down while you lift it out, as this will drain any oil in the floodgate assembly.



    Lift it out and use a rag to wipe away the residue oil, be very careful not do damage the grey piston glyde ring, i strongly suggest you CAREFULLY remove it and place it in a safe place to ensure you dont damage it



    STEP 4:
    Now that you have completely removed the Mission Control Damper, place it on a clean workbench.


    The shim stack is sandwiched between the flared end of the black tube (which i have pulled back to reveal a little black plate which sits inside the base of the black tube) and the gold piston. When you you adjust the HSC knob to make it harder, this black plate is screwed onto the shims, basically acting as a preload adjuster on them, increasing the HSC.


    Next you are going to want to grip the threaded part of the top cap and the gold piston at the bottom, then turn the piston to the left (left from looking at the bottom of the Mission Control Damper) which will unscrew it.


    You can now access the shim's (SHIMZ! ). The HSC compression shim stack is 3 same sized shims, i dont have any measurements though as my vernier calipers died, if someone could give the measurements id be very grateful.


    Now time to tune. Seeing as i wanted more progressiveness, i used a pyramid (sort off) stack. The 2 shims below the 3 originals are 2 same sized but larger shims which i had from an old roco, as the ID hole is the same (again, sorry i dont have measurements but will post them as soon as i have them.). My stack consisted of using a stock sized base shim with the two larger ones on top, but you may tune to your liking.


    I decided to stick to 3 shims, im not certain if you can add many more as the black preload plate (HSC adjust) may grind on them if there are to many. I also recommend you keep the stock shims separate in a safe place incase you want to return to factory spec.


    Install your shims back onto the piston, make sure you get the orientation correct.


    Then screw the piston back on. This is why it was important to make sure that you turned the HSC to max before working, as this makes sure the piston is screw onto the right depth on the threads.



    Thats it your done! Only thing left to do is to reinstall the gylde ring is you removed it, screw the damper back in and put the knobs on. Now this mode may take a bit of trial and error to get a perfect setting for you. You may have to take the damper apart a couple of times to find the perfect shim setting, but dissassembly gets easier the more you do it. I was extremely lucky that my first stack was near perfect for me and my weight (65kg (metric FTW )) Also you may have to check you oil volume if a large amount of oil spilled when you pulled the damper back. Measurement is 112mL of 5wt oil.


    ================================================== ===============
    Shim Measurements:

    Stock Shims:
    Outer Diameter: 20mm
    Inner Diamter: 8mm
    Thickness: 0.10mm

    Mod Shims:
    Outer Diameter: 21mm
    Inner Diameter: 8mm
    Thickness: 0.15

    ================================================== ===============

    Ride report:

    I have a couple days of riding on this moded fork....
    and all i can say is OMFG! It feels freaken awesome, my first shim stack is bloody perfect. The fork has a plushness that rivals that of my 66, meaning small bumps are almost non exsistant. Then about 3/4 of the way down, the larger shims kick in, significantly increasing the bottom out resistance. After a couple days of drops and jumps, i have only bottomed the fork once (and it was on a VERY scrappy landing)

    The Adjustment knobs also have a MUCH more noticeable effect on the damping, even the LSC feels better, which is odd because the LSC is seperate from the High speed shim stack, oh well i anit complaining . I have noticed that the HSC knob may feel as if its stiffer and grinding a little, but its nothing to worry about, ive turned it about a billion times in the last couple of days and nothing has gone wrong.

    ================================================== ===============

    So in the end, do i like this mod?

    **** YES!

    This fork now rips alot better on my bass as im nolonger bottoming the fork by riding off a step. Ill be posting up more long term riding reports as well as the measurements of the shims i used as soon as i have a working set of vernier calipers.

    Hope you found this little mod useful
    Enjoy!
    Last edited by Nick_M2R; 08-24-2009 at 04:49 PM.

  2. #2
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Thanks for posting that. I'll keep it in mind if I end up with a Lyrik and it's not Pushed. While I like the 36, there isn't really this level of adjustability, though there is one shim.

    I hope more manufacturers offer shim tuning options.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    No prob JC, glad to hear you liked it, if you end up getting a Lyrik and tune it, let us know how it goes

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: darkzeon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    480
    Yeah, I noticed this too on my Lyric, I'm 145lbs, using the stock red spring, which is rated for a 160lbs. minimum rider. I can still bottom the fork during jumps, even with 8-10 HSC. With my current spring the fork feels a little harsh on choppy terrain. When trail riding I only use 2 clicks of HSC,LSC. Nonetheless I'm still very happy with the fork, just need a softer spring for trail riding.

    Nick - How much do you weigh, and what spring are you using red, yellow?
    Folangag

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    Im 65kg (im in australia, so metric all the way!) and use a stock red spring, gives me perfect sag

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: romar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    295
    Cool write up Nick! This sounds like just the mod I've been looking for. I'm 190Lbs.(or should I say 86.18Kg) and even with the firm spring in my Lyrik I experience a lot of pretty harsh bottom out. So if I'm understanding correctly, we're looking for different, or larger OD sizes on the shims with the same thickness?

  7. #7
    err, 27.5+
    Reputation: AL29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,944
    Seriously, did you need to put a disclaimer on this All internet information is to be taken with a grain of salt. I appreciate the documentation of the suspension you have been putting up But I wouldn't hold it against you if I damaged something following your example. What is the world coming to.
    Quote Originally Posted by saturnine
    that's the stupidest idea this side of pinkbike.

  8. #8
    www.derbyrims.com
    Reputation: derby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,787
    Excellent documentary and your choice of shims is very educational. Without any experience doing this myself, the "mushroom" stack makes logical sense for better big hit speed sensitivity bringing increased progressive compression, and maintaining milder damping for the more moderate trail riding hits.

    There was a recent post here wondering when there will be PUSH tuning for the Lyrik to gain such a wider range of speed sensitivity for rebound. I wonder if doing a similar "mushroom" stack for the rebound piston would bring similar deep travel rebound increased damping landing jumps, while maintaining faster rebound for more moderate hits when trail riding.

    Replacing a couple shims is a lot less expensive than PUSH tuning for those who are mechanically inclined. Although I know PUSH also sometimes replaces the pistons and seals with better quality and always checks slider bushing and leg alignment and more with their service.

  9. #9
    Cut Casing Whisperer
    Reputation: Mr.P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,350
    Nice one!

    Thanks for posting that up!

    This gives us another fork with tuning options.

    Lyric is on the short list now.

    P

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    Cheers for all the positive responses guys

    Comments like that make me want to post more things like this up (Coming soon will be a DHX Air rebuild Guide )

    Seriously, did you need to put a disclaimer on this All internet information is to be taken with a grain of salt. I appreciate the documentation of the suspension you have been putting up But I wouldn't hold it against you if I damaged something following your example. What is the world coming to.
    Haha Yea i know, i put that warning there for the little kids who are flat out turning a wrench who try to do some stuff to there forks, then screw it up and come crying to me about how i broke their fork

    Excellent documentary and your choice of shims is very educational. Without any experience doing this myself, the "mushroom" stack makes logical sense for better big hit speed sensitivity bringing increased progressive compression, and maintaining milder damping for the more moderate trail riding hits.

    There was a recent post here wondering when there will be PUSH tuning for the Lyrik to gain such a wider range of speed sensitivity for rebound. I wonder if doing a similar "mushroom" stack for the rebound piston would bring similar deep travel rebound increased damping landing jumps, while maintaining faster rebound for more moderate hits when trail riding.

    Replacing a couple shims is a lot less expensive than PUSH tuning for those who are mechanically inclined. Although I know PUSH also sometimes replaces the pistons and seals with better quality and always checks slider bushing and leg alignment and more with their service.
    Cheers for the comments mate
    The mushroom stack was what i was thinking from the start, when i first seen that the shim stack was 3 same sizied shims, it made perfect sense why the fork felt so linear. Because the shims didnt get larger, oil just sort of blew through them, and i reckon thats why the HSC knob had little effect. I thought that adding to larger shims on top of a stock one would give me the damping i was looking for, plush in the first 3/4 travel, then stiffen up towards the bottom, and as i said my dampening is now bang on plus the HSC Knob now feels as if its doing something. As soon as i track down a pair of calipers ill get measurements of the shims i used

    Cool write up Nick! This sounds like just the mod I've been looking for. I'm 190Lbs.(or should I say 86.18Kg) and even with the firm spring in my Lyrik I experience a lot of pretty harsh bottom out. So if I'm understanding correctly, we're looking for different, or larger OD sizes on the shims with the same thickness?
    Yep thats what you want, the shims i used are the same thickness and ID, but larger OD

    Nice one!

    Thanks for posting that up!

    This gives us another fork with tuning options.

    Lyric is on the short list now.

    P
    Cheers Mr. P
    Also thank must goto you, as your TST shim mod was what inspired me to do this, as well as provide alot of info

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247

    i want to do this mod - where to get these size shims???

    my lyrik (and totem) needs this mod. i'm doing it if i can find the shims. but what size are the shims and where to get them?

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    I dont have exact measurements for the shims, i reused some shims from my old ROCO that died because the ID was the same as the stock ones
    Try MXTech.com for shims

  13. #13
    Petty and weak
    Reputation: Gruntled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    742
    You''re a champ. I'm gonna take apart my old mission control and see what goes, if I can find a supplier for da shimz of course!
    ~ Downride and Freehill, nothing else ~

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    Righto people an update

    So far i have one 25km cross country epic and numerous runs on our new DH trail on the moded fork and all i can say is that i am in love! The dampening in this baby is so much better than before. Also nothing broken to report, its solid as a rock

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: sanjosedre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    618
    This page is definitely getting bookmarked,
    awesome stuff man i appreciate the effort & documentation.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PUSHIND's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,864
    I'm confused....are the two shims that you changed the same thickness as the originals, but just larger in diameter?

    Darren

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: flipnidaho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,615
    Is the Lyrik MC cart the same as what is used in the Totem?

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    Darren: Same thickness, larger OD

    Flip: i dont see why the totem MC would be any different, besides being slightly larger

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PUSHIND's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,864
    huh.....using a larger OD but the same thickness shouldn't produce any change especially to bottoming resistance because the shims are all bending at the same rate when stacked on top of each other. If you used a separating shim to build a two stage stack you might see something but even then it would be difficult because the shims are under preload from the HS spring and the secondary stack may be pushed into the initial stack when static.

    I'm guessing if you noticed a difference in bottoming control it's coming from a slight increase in oil level in the damper leg which would give you an increase in spring rate at the end of the stroke.

    Darren

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    Darren:
    There isnt any bottoming increase from the oil level, as i havent increased the oil level at oil, might even be a little low as you loose some oil when you remove the damper

    With regard to the shim thickness, truth be told i dont have exact measurements as my calipers have died and wont be able to buy new ones till i got to the city next weekend. As of now ive only used a REALLY old set of micrometer's, but i wouldnt trust the measurements. The new shims maybe a tad thicker, or even still you maybe correct and the BO increase is all in my head, either way it like how the fork feels now, it does have an increase in bottom out aswell as the adjusters now feel as if they are doing something

    I had considered using a two stage stack, but was worried that the HSC preload bolt would start grinding on the shims, as there where only 3 shims in there to begin with, but i may try a bit of fiddling and see what happens

    Also just to clear up in no way do i mean to sound like a prick, i actually appreciate your comments, helps me understand even more about these things and ways to improve it

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PUSHIND's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,864
    Also just to clear up in no way do i mean to sound like a prick, i actually appreciate your comments, helps me understand even more about these things and ways to improve it
    LOL.....Understood, I actually didn't take it that way.

    As for the shims, the thickness increments are 0.1mm, 0.15mm, and 0.2mm so you'd be able to tell the stiffness difference in your fingers without having to measure them. If you can't feel the difference with your fingers, they're probably the same.

    In thinking about this further, another factor maybe the height that you set the jam nut when reassembling the MC unit. Increasing or decreasing the height of the jam nut would change the static height of the HS circuit therefore influencing the damping range that you get as well as the range that the adjusters are effecting. So, if in reassembling your jam nut height was higher than how it came from the factory, you would experience the increased compression force throughout the entire range. As I sit here typing I also just realized that the jam nut height has an effect on the Floodgate range as well.....so many things to consider!

    Darren.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    Quote Originally Posted by PUSHIND
    LOL.....Understood, I actually didn't take it that way.

    As for the shims, the thickness increments are 0.1mm, 0.15mm, and 0.2mm so you'd be able to tell the stiffness difference in your fingers without having to measure them. If you can't feel the difference with your fingers, they're probably the same.

    In thinking about this further, another factor maybe the height that you set the jam nut when reassembling the MC unit. Increasing or decreasing the height of the jam nut would change the static height of the HS circuit therefore influencing the damping range that you get as well as the range that the adjusters are effecting. So, if in reassembling your jam nut height was higher than how it came from the factory, you would experience the increased compression force throughout the entire range. As I sit here typing I also just realized that the jam nut height has an effect on the Floodgate range as well.....so many things to consider!

    Darren.
    Haha cheers for that, just didnt want you to think i was being a prick bout it haha

    Yep just check the shims with my fingers in the way you described, the 2 i put in there are definitely stiffer than the stock ones, which feel really flimsy.

    Now that you mentioned it, i agree with you about the jam nut, having it set at a different point would make a difference on when the HSC engages as it changes when the oil hits it right?, i may have set it a wee bit higher

    One bloke on pinkbike said i sould remove the Floodgate base plate from the bottom so i get full use from my mod as MUCH more oil will flow through it, although i dont really want to loose the platform, makes the 25km desert races much more bearable

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PUSHIND's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,864
    Yep just check the shims with my fingers in the way you described, the 2 i put in there are definitely stiffer than the stock ones, which feel really flimsy.

    Now that you mentioned it, i agree with you about the jam nut, having it set at a different point would make a difference on when the HSC engages as it changes when the oil hits it right?, i may have set it a wee bit higher
    Okay, with that being the case then you've effectively shifted the force curve on compression. The positive is that the increase in compression force will be better for single impacts, the negative being that you'll decrease initial bump sensitivity and cause the fork to be less reactive to impacts such as breaking bumps. This is exactly why we often install new pistons into forks and shocks. It allows us to balance the two by using firmer shimming for control, but different port volume and shape to allow the shims to open more rapidly under bump forces.

    Funny thing is, doing what you're doing is what got me my start more than 20 years ago in a garage in Northern Maine. I'm still playing with the same stuff, just now with the advantage of powerful software programs, on-board data logging, and a suspension dynamometer!

    Best of luck!

    Darren

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    100

    Hey Darren-Totem Service

    Hey Darren!
    Any word on Totem tuning at Push?

  25. #25
    www.derbyrims.com
    Reputation: derby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,787
    Thanks Darren! Very interesting analysis. Your years of tweaking shocks is worth every dollar of a PUSH tune, and really much more.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    Righto people, an update, i finally have measurements of the shims

    the stock shims measurements are as follows:

    Outer Diameter: 20mm
    Inner Diameter: 8mm
    Thickness: 0.10mm

    And my replacement shim measurements are as follows:

    Outer DIameter: 21mm
    Inner Diameter: 8mm
    Thickness: 0.15mm

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bjj4202000's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    101
    Quote Originally Posted by PUSHIND
    huh.....using a larger OD but the same thickness shouldn't produce any change especially to bottoming resistance because the shims are all bending at the same rate when stacked on top of each other. If you used a separating shim to build a two stage stack you might see something but even then it would be difficult because the shims are under preload from the HS spring and the secondary stack may be pushed into the initial stack when static.

    I'm guessing if you noticed a difference in bottoming control it's coming from a slight increase in oil level in the damper leg which would give you an increase in spring rate at the end of the stroke.

    Darren
    Of note--I have tuned a couple of forks (motor bikes) with greater OD shims of original thickness to achieve greater compression damping (my logic being less flow around the edges of the shim causing greater deflection). This does not affect bottom out resistance but could give a similar effect if there is greater compression. I will digress, however, both instances involved open bath systems so my results may not be relevant here.

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    257
    Nick_M2R, congrats on the topic and the mod!!!

    Keep us posted on our feeling on it!

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    Cheers Marcolino!

    This mod has really livened up my lyrik, it nolonger bottoms going of steps, the compression dials now have a noticeable effect on the damping, and it has much more bottom out resistance, this thing now rocks on my Bass, a very worthwhile little mod

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation: romar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    295
    So, I'm finally getting to this mod on my Lyrik as it's been feeling kinda dead lately. After I had the MC apart I was inspecting the piston. Looking through the HSC port holes I noticed some gunky looking stuff inside the piston. So I dug a little deeper into the piston by removing the inner c-clip and found this:



    It appears to be some sort of o-ring or seal although it feels a bit to brittle and if it is, what is it supposed to seal? As you can tell it is way distorted and blocking the ports in the piston. Anyone have any clues what this is supposed to look like?

  31. #31
    Calm Like a Bomb
    Reputation: pipes10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,074
    It's part of the Floodgate system. The first pic is all four pieces (from a Totem and Lyrik), while the second pic shows the part in question in new condition (again one from a Totem and one from a Lyrik, they are just flipped to show both sides).
    Attached Images Attached Images
    2017 Carbon Troy
    2016 Carbon Django
    2016 Wilson
    2016 Farley 5

    2016 T4R Trail Premium

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Gman086's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    4,282
    What would you accomplish by removing the floodgate? Seems to me there would be no noticable diff between running with the adjuster fully open versus removing it altogether? I think a lot of users just don't get that the adjuster has an affect even with floodgate off. I can't imagine running with no floodgate; would dive like crazy then and you'd bottom out way too easily! Correct me if I'm wrong.

    Have FUN!

    G MAN
    "There's two shuttles, one to the top and one to the hospital" I LOVE this place!!!

  33. #33
    Nightmare on Lyrik st. VI
    Reputation: amrgb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    818
    I think a lot of users just don't get that the adjuster has an affect even with floodgate off
    That's the whole point of removing the floodgate. You like the additional low speed compression given by the floodgate even when it is set to open. Others don't. Many people who removed the floodgate are using heavier oil to get more compression. The advantage of removing the floodgate seems to be a better sensitivity to small bumps, even with the heavier oil.
    Quote Originally Posted by TNC to whining spammer
    Don't let the nose of your saddle hit you in the @#!#X on the way out.

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Gman086's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    4,282
    Quote Originally Posted by amrgb
    That's the whole point of removing the floodgate. You like the additional low speed compression given by the floodgate even when it is set to open. Others don't. Many people who removed the floodgate are using heavier oil to get more compression. The advantage of removing the floodgate seems to be a better sensitivity to small bumps, even with the heavier oil.
    Ah! Heavier weight oil would make sense then! Lot of different ways to skin a cat. I do like how mine (Lyrik Solo Air) feels now tho but do need more bottom out resistance for FR... so what to do? Probably just add a thicker shim like the OP suggested? I can prevent bottom out by cranking the HS comp damping in more than 6 clicks but then it's harsh over square edge hits.

    Thanks,

    G
    Last edited by Gman086; 09-10-2009 at 10:39 AM.
    "There's two shuttles, one to the top and one to the hospital" I LOVE this place!!!

  35. #35
    Nightmare on Lyrik st. VI
    Reputation: amrgb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    818
    If you are willing to try, I think you could put more oil in the air chamber to make it more progressive. I haven't tested this theory yet, because I'm having constant problems with the fork and I can't even ride for long enough trouble free to tune the damn thing (right now I have oil migrating from the lowers to the damper, can you believe that).

    I opened a thread to discuss that, and one concern that was raised, is the extra oil migrating to the negative chamber, negating the benefit of adding oil or even screwing up the spring rate even more.
    Quote Originally Posted by TNC to whining spammer
    Don't let the nose of your saddle hit you in the @#!#X on the way out.

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    114
    Romar, that hard o-ring piece looked the same misshaped way in my lyrik too. I took that as evidence that oil flow was pushing it against the high speed ports and hence misshaped it, and that people on here where right about it limiting oil flow. I took mine out.

    Funny how everyones view on how the damping of the lyrik needs to be changed are different. I thought small bump sensitivity and also low speed damping was to stiff so I run 2.5wt oil in the damper with the low and high speed full fast. Like that alot. But I do have the UT coil with the RS suggested spring for my weight and seems like some run a lighter spring than RS recomendations.

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation: romar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    295
    Thanks all for your comments, and pipes10 thanks for the pic. I'm going to run the fork without the floodgate guts, play around with some different oil weights and see how it is.

  38. #38
    aka dan51
    Reputation: d-bug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    5,925
    To add to pipes10's post.
    I just removed my MC this weekend. Haven't had a chance to ride it yet, but I took some pics of the process.
    1. before removal
    2. the 4 pieces you remove, from left to right.
    -retaining ring
    -brass plunger
    -rubber o-ring
    -shim
    3. after it's been removed
    Attached Images Attached Images

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Karve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,437
    Quote Originally Posted by romar
    So, I'm finally getting to this mod on my Lyrik as it's been feeling kinda dead lately. After I had the MC apart I was inspecting the piston. Looking through the HSC port holes I noticed some gunky looking stuff inside the piston. So I dug a little deeper into the piston by removing the inner c-clip and found this:



    It appears to be some sort of o-ring or seal although it feels a bit to brittle and if it is, what is it supposed to seal? As you can tell it is way distorted and blocking the ports in the piston. Anyone have any clues what this is supposed to look like?
    Here is an explanation of what that does - the weird squashed thing looks like its the blow off valve on the floodgate.

    http://autobus.cyclingnews.com/tech....of_piston_body

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    So by removing the floodgate, do we basically turn our damper into a copy of the new mission control DH damper?

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,889
    Quote Originally Posted by Nick_M2R
    So by removing the floodgate, do we basically turn our damper into a copy of the new mission control DH damper?
    little more than that. The dh dampener has high/low speed rebound on a larger shaft moving more oil.

    I was looking for more bottom out resistance and ended up putting the floodgate back in to slow things down a bit.

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247

    a belated "thanks"....

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick_M2R
    Righto people, an update, i finally have measurements of the shims

    the stock shims measurements are as follows:

    Outer Diameter: 20mm
    Inner Diameter: 8mm
    Thickness: 0.10mm

    And my replacement shim measurements are as follows:

    Outer DIameter: 21mm
    Inner Diameter: 8mm
    Thickness: 0.15mm
    nick you're a champ! now, i'm gonna do it to mine. sorry i took so long to get back to this and thank you.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    No prob Mr.Niles, hope it works out well for ya!

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    247
    nick - one question....
    about the orientation of the shims....
    did you place your largest shim over the piston ports, or are the stock shims over the piston ports with the larger shim stacked on them?

    do this make sense? most shim stacks i've seen are pyramidal with the largest shim covering the ports, then the smaller shims are stacked on top of that in succession large-to-small, thus forming "pyramid" or "cone" shape. are yours stacked like this over the ports?

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    Yep the largest shims where placed on the piston port side, while the stock one is ontop (contacting the black jam nut)

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Karve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,437
    So is the shape of the shims actually doing any thing or is it just the fact that you are pr4eloading the HS by 50% more than before

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    Yes the shims are actually doing something.
    I wind the knobs all the way off, the fork dives all over the places, wind it on and it feels alot stiffer, the HSC now has a noticeable effect, unlike before.

    I tried fiddling round with different configs, like removing the stock shim and replacing it with a larger and thicker one to completement the others. Fork felt VERY stiff, way to rough over the bumpy stuff and it would lock up on the whoops on our little pump track

    Either way the shim mod does have an effect, the HSC adjuster now actually does something and the fork nolonger bottoms on small drops

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by Ratt
    little more than that. The dh dampener has high/low speed rebound on a larger shaft moving more oil.

    I was looking for more bottom out resistance and ended up putting the floodgate back in to slow things down a bit.
    Ratt, i didn´t understand completly...

    You mean the dh dampener is different, with more adjustments?

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nick_M2R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,610
    The Mission Control damper dosent have more adjustments. Its basically a regular Mission Control damper minus a few things. There is no floodgate in the MiCo DH, instead it is replaced with a High Flow piston, which great increases oil flow around piston/shim area, meaning a much mroe supple and plush ride for DH riding

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    114
    Nick M2R, with your current set up, how many mm of preload if any are you puting on the HS spring when HS is set to full fast or min preload? Has this changed any from stock?

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •