Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 101 to 150 of 298
  1. #101
    Where's my funny hat?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    455
    Quote Originally Posted by Supple1
    Thanks! I am 175 w/ pads and a moderate to aggresive rider
    I'd start with
    1x 18.15
    1x12.1
    1x16.1
    1x14.1
    1x12mm OD (chainring) spacer

    If you find after that you want more LS damping, go to 2x 18.15. NB the intermediate shim 12.1 gives a platform style feel to the shock; doesn't bob, but opens up easily on hits. I like it a lot. Go with redline 10wt/5wt 70:30 or 80:20 as a good place to start. Hope that helps.
    Cheers, Steve

  2. #102
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Supple1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevo the Devo
    I'd start with
    1x 18.15
    1x12.1
    1x16.1
    1x14.1
    1x12mm OD (chainring) spacer

    If you find after that you want more LS damping, go to 2x 18.15. NB the intermediate shim 12.1 gives a platform style feel to the shock; doesn't bob, but opens up easily on hits. I like it a lot. Go with redline 10wt/5wt 70:30 or 80:20 as a good place to start. Hope that helps.
    Cheers, Steve
    Awesome, thanks!

  3. #103
    Code Burr
    Reputation: thebronze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,376
    Does anyone know the purpose of the mid valve or bleed valve that is on the bottom side of the compression TST2 piston? Its one shim with a tiny spring behind it. It looks like it allows the compression circuit to bleed back into the rebound circuit. Since the spring and shim are pretty easy to open I'm wondering how adding a shim to it would effect the fork. Looks like it would slow down the bleed towards the end of the circuit and might prevent bottoming out.

  4. #104
    Cut Casing Whisperer
    Reputation: Mr.P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,339
    Quote Originally Posted by thebronze
    Does anyone know the purpose of the mid valve or bleed valve that is on the bottom side of the compression TST2 piston? Its one shim with a tiny spring behind it. It looks like it allows the compression circuit to bleed back into the rebound circuit. Since the spring and shim are pretty easy to open I'm wondering how adding a shim to it would effect the fork. Looks like it would slow down the bleed towards the end of the circuit and might prevent bottoming out.
    It is the oil return port like you speculated. It needs to be very free flowing.

    Heads up that my return shim is starting to deform due to the shim stack mod. It deformed where the oil enters the compression ports. So keep an eye on it. I'll have to put a new shim in there. It might have been due to a low oil situation I had.

    P

  5. #105
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    34
    I am thinking of buying a 2009 55 ata/tst2 does this mod still work on the 2009 dampeners?

  6. #106
    Stray Bullet
    Reputation: Nagaredama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,275
    Quote Originally Posted by bigjp
    I am thinking of buying a 2009 55 ata/tst2 does this mod still work on the 2009 dampeners?
    I asked Marzocchi USA the same question and they said, yes.

  7. #107
    Where's my funny hat?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    455
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.P
    It is the oil return port like you speculated. It needs to be very free flowing.

    Heads up that my return shim is starting to deform due to the shim stack mod. It deformed where the oil enters the compression ports. So keep an eye on it. I'll have to put a new shim in there. It might have been due to a low oil situation I had.

    P
    Hey Pat,
    FWIW, the shim in mine already had a bit of deformation before I performed the mod, so don't think that is the cause (at least not entirely). Easy enough to change though. Bronze, the rebound circuit is at the bottom of the damper ie there are separate pistons for compression and rebound (this is actually an orifice damper, not shimmed). I would be very reluctant to increase shim weight on the return side of your comp piston; as P said, it need to be very free flowing. If anything you would make it lighter, not stiffer. Note that this shim (really a check-plate) will have no effect on compression (ie bottom out resistance), only on rebound, and that in a negative way. If you want more BO resistance, either increase your spring rate, or increase HS comp damping with a less tapered (and stiffer) shim stack. Hope this helps. Cheers, Steve

  8. #108
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2
    So does anyone know if this mod can be done to the 2007 All Mountain 1 tst2 cartridge?

  9. #109
    Code Burr
    Reputation: thebronze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevo the Devo
    If you want more BO resistance, either increase your spring rate, or increase HS comp damping with a less tapered (and stiffer) shim stack. Hope this helps. Cheers, Steve
    I ran it by Tom and he advised adding 10cc oil to the left fork leg. Oil height should be 45/50mm from top when fully compressed on that side. Since I left that leg stock it was never checked and a bit below that level.

  10. #110
    Cut Casing Whisperer
    Reputation: Mr.P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,339
    Quote Originally Posted by Barnsey
    So does anyone know if this mod can be done to the 2007 All Mountain 1 tst2 cartridge?
    This mod is for the 08/09 dampers only. The 07 and earlier are completely different.

    P

  11. #111
    SLX
    SLX is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    657
    looks like all the tst2 forks are gone will this work with a 55 r?
    Leave no bolt untuned!

  12. #112
    Code Burr
    Reputation: thebronze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,376
    SLX, I think Jenson still has the xc600 with the TST2. If you need more than 140mm travel you could get the 55 R and then buy a TST cart from Zoke and perform the mod. In the past, zoke carts were really expensive though.

  13. #113
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    128

    Maybe a slightly different question..

    Hey guys, I had a question. I have been riding my 55tst w/mod for about a month now, and I love it. One thing I noticed is that I'm having trouble finding the sweet spot for my air preload. The fact that the air pressure is too low to read on my pump doesn't help. What happens is my fork will feel way too soft spring-wise, I can basically bottom it out by pushing down, so I add air. But when I get the air and sag feeling good, there is alot of added stiction that comes with it. On the trail it feels like a light propedal setting is on, and it kind of has a "clicky" feel to it.

    Are you all also getting alot of stiction issues? I think it should be broken-in by now, I have put maybe 30 hours of aggressive riding on it. Also is there a rule-of-thumb for tuning the air gap vs. actual pressurized air in the left side?

    Oh yeah if it helps, my stack is 14, 16, 17, 18, 18 and stock oil weight.

    Thanks guys, this thread kicks a$$

  14. #114
    Cut Casing Whisperer
    Reputation: Mr.P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,339
    Quote Originally Posted by cesper
    Hey guys, I had a question. I have been riding my 55tst w/mod for about a month now, and I love it. One thing I noticed is that I'm having trouble finding the sweet spot for my air preload.
    N1 on the mod.

    For air preload, someone gave me the idea to count pumps rather than read the guage as it was more accurate that way. So far it has worked perfect. For me 26 pumps of air (roughly 20psi - I'm 190 pounds geared up).

    The stiction should mellow with break in and a bath oil change.

    Turn the fork upside down for a minute and compress a few times before riding to get the oil to lube the full inside of the fork.

    Mine is butter now, but I remember the stiction.

    Now that my stiction is gone, I am riding much more on the shim stack (oil bypass minimally open) and am liking it more.

    P

  15. #115
    Code Burr
    Reputation: thebronze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,376
    I think we need our own sticker for this mod ala Push. How about "Pull" or "Yanked"

  16. #116
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    128
    Ok so I came across another question....the shim on the other side of the piston w/ the wave washer, why is it there? To me it seems like it is designed to "open" on the rebound stroke, but stay closed on the comp. stroke. Would it work to remove that shim and let all the damping be controlled by the stack?

    I just took the damper out to change shims and it turns out I still don't know everything I thought I did.

    Thanks

  17. #117
    Where's my funny hat?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    455
    Quote Originally Posted by cesper
    Ok so I came across another question....the shim on the other side of the piston w/ the wave washer, why is it there? To me it seems like it is designed to "open" on the rebound stroke, but stay closed on the comp. stroke. Would it work to remove that shim and let all the damping be controlled by the stack?

    I just took the damper out to change shims and it turns out I still don't know everything I thought I did.

    Thanks
    No. The ports which are blocked by the check plate are open on the side with the shim stack, so oil would essentially free bleed around the shims. The effect would be somewhat like having a MASSIVE orifice damper, so the shims would barely (if ever) come into play. At least thats what I think from memory of the piston. You would end up with very little LS and mid speed damping. Cheers, Steve

  18. #118
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    20

    Small bump compliance mod?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.P
    I had some shims from a previous Manitou TPC project and from MXTech.com

    Tom was a huge help in giving us the ID and max OD of the shims. See here: http://forums.mtbr.com/shocks-suspension/marzocchi-55-tst2-set-up-help-needed-393052-post4289055.html I went with a pyramid stack for a good balance of low speed and high speed compression in the shim stack.

    You can shape the stack to your needs. That is the beauty of this mod - improving your fork goes way beyond turning a knob. It is like doing what PUSH does (only without the dyno )

    What I was trying to achieve was allowing the orifice damper to still handle 50-75% of the duty, but when needed the shims would open removing any spike. The goal was to have a "platform" at what used to be lock-out (as mentioned above I did like the LO for fast climbing). This is why there are the number of shims I put in there. I might have put only 3 if I were to use the shims only for damping.

    I weigh 180.

    I just did another mod which is spring related that really opened up the small bump compliance. (I will post to another thread in a couple of days)

    P
    I was just wondering what this mod was? I'm getting ready to do the damper mod and thought I should go ahead and try this while I was at it. Thanks.

  19. #119
    Cut Casing Whisperer
    Reputation: Mr.P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,339
    Quote Originally Posted by Cesarm31
    I was just wondering what this mod was? I'm getting ready to do the damper mod and thought I should go ahead and try this while I was at it. Thanks.
    The spring mod was reducing the coil spring preload. I removed the black, 20mm tall plastic "ring" or "tube" from the top of the coil spring, and in it's place put a 10mm tall, PVC "ring", that was the same diameter.

    This had the effect of removing the 10mm of preload that was on the coil.

    I haven't posted this mod as I think the fork works better with the original preload. Tho it was more active on small bumps with the mod, it was also more divey. And after break in, I just haven't needed that extra softness. It's already butter. I discovered that there is such a thing as too much butter.



    P

  20. #120
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    20
    I see, well thanks a lot Mr. P. Oh and another question. I was wondering if you know of any any place other than MX-Tech.com, preferably in California, to order individual shims for the damper mod.

  21. #121
    Code Burr
    Reputation: thebronze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.P
    The spring mod was reducing the coil spring preload. I removed the black, 20mm tall plastic "ring" or "tube" from the top of the coil spring, and in it's place put a 10mm tall, PVC "ring", that was the same diameter.

    This had the effect of removing the 10mm of preload that was on the coil.


    P
    P, according to Marzocchi that black spacer is just a travel limiter. At least on my xc600 it was. I pulled it and i'm running the fork at 140. The 55 may be different, or it may be the same parts used on the 66 minus the spacer, who knows...

    I'm ready for the next mod. Have you guys thought about frankenforking this setup so the left side is all air? Might need a different piston and a way to limit the travel.

  22. #122
    Cut Casing Whisperer
    Reputation: Mr.P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,339
    Quote Originally Posted by thebronze
    P, according to Marzocchi that black spacer is just a travel limiter. At least on my xc600 it was. I pulled it and i'm running the fork at 140. The 55 may be different, or it may be the same parts used on the 66 minus the spacer, who knows...
    On the 55, the spacer goes on top of the spring at 160mm. Otherwise the spring does not make contact (too short - for the 140mm setting)

    Quote Originally Posted by thebronze
    I'm ready for the next mod. Have you guys thought about frankenforking this setup so the left side is all air? Might need a different piston and a way to limit the travel.
    I did a quick ride around the neighborhood, with the spring out and just air pressure. It worked, but I worried about consistency as it was using the oil as the piston, and the oil can slosh about, air get into the oil etc.

    I tried it for weight savings, ~250g for the spring, but then I would have to add oil (+ x grams) for end of stroke spring rate. So maybe even no weight savings in the end.

    I'm looking at adding an ATA cart for geometry adjustment and weight savings.

    P

  23. #123
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    20
    has anyone tried the Enduro seals and wipers on this fork yet? I'm looking to do an oil change, the damper mod, and maybe the seals in one shot. I was wondering if they really make a difference at all since mine are still good. Are they a performance mod (less stiction)or just a better seal for the longetivity of the fork internals?

  24. #124
    Code Burr
    Reputation: thebronze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,376
    Enduro's are great but the first 20 miles its murder. Feels like the fork is locked out until they are broken in. But they last so much longer and have better tolerances than the stock. Plus they have blue ones which is cool.

  25. #125
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    20
    Well since mine are still good, I think I'll wait until they start leaking before I get the enduro's. Thanks.

  26. #126
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    7
    Hey, sorry for kidnapping this thread but you guys seem to know everything it needs to help me. Bought a 55 TST2 from Jenson recently thinking they wouldn't be selling the old faulty forks anymore. Well i was wrong there, after my third day of riding i have like 2 inches of travel left, for what i've been reading something went horribly wrong in the tst chamber. But what is it? Any suggestions on how to repair it? Don't wanna wait forever to get it repaired...
    Can't believe neither Marzocchi nor Jenson took those forks out of the shelfs...

    Thanx

  27. #127
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by ddd666
    Hey, sorry for kidnapping this thread but you guys seem to know everything it needs to help me. Bought a 55 TST2 from Jenson recently thinking they wouldn't be selling the old faulty forks anymore. Well i was wrong there, after my third day of riding i have like 2 inches of travel left, for what i've been reading something went horribly wrong in the tst chamber. But what is it? Any suggestions on how to repair it? Don't wanna wait forever to get it repaired...
    Can't believe neither Marzocchi nor Jenson took those forks out of the shelfs...

    Thanx
    This happened to me last summer after a few rides in town and a trip to Colorado. Contact Marzocchi, get a RM #, mail it in and wait about two weeks (might have been a week and a half). Fork will come back better than new, as I haven't had an issue since I got it back. Now if only I could come up with the time to do this mod...

  28. #128
    Code Burr
    Reputation: thebronze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,376
    I cant narrow this stack down. Everything is cool in the rockgardens and at speed but in really tight turn the corner 3' drop ins i'm bottoming out. Heres my stack
    18
    17
    16
    16
    14
    12

    Feels like I need to stop the flow between 16-14. I think I may try putting an 18 in there. What do you guys think? I'd be happy with a little less LSC to start the travel and a lot more bottom end. Maybe 18, 16,16, 17, 14, 12. Already tried adding 10cc oil to the spring side. Still loving the fork. Props to zoke.

  29. #129
    Cut Casing Whisperer
    Reputation: Mr.P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,339
    Quote Originally Posted by thebronze
    I cant narrow this stack down. Everything is cool in the rockgardens and at speed but in really tight turn the corner 3' drop ins i'm bottoming out. Heres my stack
    18
    17
    16
    16
    14
    12

    Feels like I need to stop the flow between 16-14. I think I may try putting an 18 in there. What do you guys think? I'd be happy with a little less LSC to start the travel and a lot more bottom end. Maybe 18, 16,16, 17, 14, 12. Already tried adding 10cc oil to the spring side. Still loving the fork. Props to zoke.
    That shim stack looks pretty robust. Perhaps focus on the oil level on the spring side.

    I set my oil level based on ~10mm from bottom out on drops/jumps. When I add the shim stack compression (TST knob only 25% open) I get ~20mm from bottom out. That is my insurance for the "oh Sh*t" moments, one of which I had recently that used all travel but no "clank" bottom out.

    That air, end spring ramp up, allows us to be less heavy on the high speed compression, which is good for the high speed chunder.

    P

  30. #130
    Where's my funny hat?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    455
    Quote Originally Posted by thebronze
    I cant narrow this stack down. Everything is cool in the rockgardens and at speed but in really tight turn the corner 3' drop ins i'm bottoming out. Heres my stack
    18
    17
    16
    16
    14
    12

    Feels like I need to stop the flow between 16-14. I think I may try putting an 18 in there. What do you guys think? I'd be happy with a little less LSC to start the travel and a lot more bottom end. Maybe 18, 16,16, 17, 14, 12. Already tried adding 10cc oil to the spring side. Still loving the fork. Props to zoke.
    Hey Bronze,
    Are all the shims 0.1mm thick? If so and you want to try tweaking it further, maybe go for 18, 12, 17, 16, 16, 14 or 18, 17, 12, 16, 16, 14 and see how it works. Should open up easily for the smaller stuff, but then give you a bit more resistance to fast/big hits. Otherwise, back to oil height tuning as per P's suggestion. FWIW. Cheers, Steve

  31. #131
    Code Burr
    Reputation: thebronze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,376
    18, 12, 17, 16, 16, 18 is the ticket the low speed is so much better now. I think I went a little too aggro though and had oil leaking down the left fork leg. Might be time for some enduro's.

  32. #132
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    564
    This thread rules.

    I did this mod to my TST2 on Saturday and the high speed dampening is much better. I can just go faster through stuff without spiking. I weigh 200#'s and I used Steves shim stack.

    Now, the only probs I have are bottoming out and having to add more air to keep the fork up (which makes it harsh on low speed). I added some oil to the left leg and that helped for bottoming out, but I might try something similar to the bronzes's stack....makes sense to hold you up more. Anyway, thanks to all for this great info.

  33. #133
    Cut Casing Whisperer
    Reputation: Mr.P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,339
    Quote Originally Posted by DirtDiggler
    I did this mod to my TST2 on Saturday and the high speed dampening is much better. I can just go faster through stuff without spiking. I weigh 200#'s and I used Steves shim stack.
    Nice! Keep us posting if you do more experimenting with the shim stack

    It's great to read about these different shim stack and their results.

    P

  34. #134
    Equal opportunity meanie
    Reputation: DHidiot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,781
    Quote Originally Posted by thebronze
    18, 12, 17, 16, 16, 18 is the ticket the low speed is so much better now. I think I went a little too aggro though and had oil leaking down the left fork leg. Might be time for some enduro's.
    18 face shim, then
    12
    17
    16
    16
    18

    So you're using a 3-stage shimstack with only 6 shims?? Not to call you out or anything, but there's not a chance you're noticing each stage, much less getting any contact from deflection to that third stage. Having 18 as your top shim (not the face shim) is doing nothing more than a 16 or 17 would in the same spot too btw since your second stage is a 17 max. If you actually wanted that second stage to deflect back and get support from the 3rd stage, you'd need something much much smaller than the 2 16's in there (more like the 12's like you used for your first crossover shim).

    Or it was just a typo and I'm overthinking things....
    805

  35. #135
    Code Burr
    Reputation: thebronze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by DHidiot
    18 face shim, then
    12
    17
    16
    16
    18

    So you're using a 3-stage shimstack with only 6 shims?? Not to call you out or anything, but there's not a chance you're noticing each stage, much less getting any contact from deflection to that third stage. Having 18 as your top shim (not the face shim) is doing nothing more than a 16 or 17 would in the same spot too btw since your second stage is a 17 max. If you actually wanted that second stage to deflect back and get support from the 3rd stage, you'd need something much much smaller than the 2 16's in there (more like the 12's like you used for your first crossover shim).

    Or it was just a typo and I'm overthinking things....
    You tell me sports fan, i'm learning as I go. I ran the fork through the grinder today and bottomed it out a ton so I think i'm right back where I started. The only reason the face shim is 18mm OD is because thats what covers the OD of the piston ports. 16 or 17 would leave open port space on the piston.

    If youve got a lot of experience with shims help me out. This is what I want= plush LSC that ramps up to prevent bottoming out. I'd like to be able to flip the TST knob in the drops and not bottom out. My buddy's float glides right through at about 80% of travel being used and mines bottoming out almost every time. I was thinking of changing it to 18, 14, 18, 17, 16, 16, 12 but i'm open to suggestions

    Also, seems the more air I add the travel just gets really notchy and clunky. Is there any reason why they didnt put a standard air piston in here? Mine looks like a washer with a coil spring under it.

  36. #136
    Cut Casing Whisperer
    Reputation: Mr.P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,339
    Quote Originally Posted by thebronze
    If youve got a lot of experience with shims help me out. This is what I want= plush LSC that ramps up to prevent bottoming out. I'd like to be able to flip the TST knob in the drops and not bottom out. My buddy's float glides right through at about 80% of travel being used and mines bottoming out almost every time.
    Focus on the oil level on the spring side to effect the majority of the bottom out. It controls the end of travel spring ramp up. My oil level is around 65mm from the top, spring out, fork compressed.

    I could set the oil level properly (for me & riding) and run the damper wide open and still not bottom.

    What this means is that you can set the high speed compression to focus on high speed events, and let the air spring (oil level) handle bottom out. That way HSC feels good at speed, and you still have BO control.

    I run a pyramid shim stack as it is consistently progressive which allows me to open and easily adjust the TST port (free bleed) for LSC and use the shim stack for HSC.

    I run the TST "free bleed" only 25% open. The shim stack handles the rest.

    P

  37. #137
    Code Burr
    Reputation: thebronze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,376
    P, my oil level is 50mm from top per Tom's suggestions. I'm only bottoming it out in rock gardens w 3' steps that I have to pick slowly through. I'll try about 5 cc more on the spring side.

  38. #138
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    564
    Bronze, I put about a quarter of a cup of oil in the left leg and it solved my bottoming. I'm still having issues with the fork staying up without putting a lot of air into it. I get way too much sag.

    I wonder what would happen if i put 1 (of the four) washers back in then 18, 17, 16, 16, 14, 17. Would that defeat the purpose?

    Maybe I just need to add more shims like 18, 18,17, 17, 16, 16, 15, 15 ect.

  39. #139
    Equal opportunity meanie
    Reputation: DHidiot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,781
    Ahh no worries then.

    Generally a 5-10 shim tall stack is only going to utilize 2 stages effectively. You'd need probably 15-20 and a REALLY wide face shim to make use of a 3 stage stack (you find these on factory works MX shocks and forks). Take the total stack in your hand and try to bend it back with a needle or something to get an idea of what the range of flexbility is once they're tightened down - it's surprisingly very little and all the shims behind the face shims just provide "support" when oil is being slammed through the ports at high speeds. You'll see pretty quickly how that upper stage in the stack you mentioned probably won't be getting engaged at all. The other issue with a single face shim and a small transition shim is that the face shim blows back SUPER easy, and that it may flow oil well enough when that happens that you'll never reach a shaft speed that will make use of the support in the second stage. The compression curves for a 2-stage stack are FUNKY looking, and fairly hard to set up with any sort of precision at an amateur level.

    You are correct though, the face shim MUST match up with the outer edge of the ports.

    All the valve is doing is controlling oil flow at different shaft speeds, not shaft positions. As someone else said, tune the air volume for bottom out.

    18, 14, 18, 17, 16, 16, 12 will have a super soft low speed with mid-speed and high-speed support, if it even engages and flexes the second stage. Try a straight taper stack first, maybe 18 17 16 14 12 12, or something else "neutral" looking before you start looking into 2 stage stacks.

    Remember, LSC is what's going to control your bikes attitude and keep the front end from diving and wallowing. HSC and the mid-speed transition are going to help you through g-outs and rocks, in combination with the oil height on large enough displacements.

    Hope that isn't too convoluded.

    Side note: Many professional MX tuners refuse to use a 2-stage stack in consumer suspension because they wear REAL fast. Instead of simply pressing against one another, they are tapping and rubbing each other on every compression, so they're usually found in the more racing "works" style forks and shocks.
    805

  40. #140
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    564
    Great info DH!

    That makes sense. I think I'm going to try a taper stack like you said but double or triple up in the beggining for extra compression. I'm seeing something like this: 18,18,18,17,17,16,15,14,13,12,18,18

  41. #141
    Where's my funny hat?
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    455
    Quote Originally Posted by DirtDiggler
    Great info DH!

    That makes sense. I think I'm going to try a taper stack like you said but double or triple up in the beggining for extra compression. I'm seeing something like this: 18,18,18,17,17,16,15,14,13,12,18,18
    Just a quick note, I changed my stack to 2x18.15 then 12.1, 16.1, 14.1, as I wasn't getting enough LS damping. With the transition shim this works really well. For reference, I remember reading that shim stiffness cubes with thickness; ie a .15mm shim is about 3.4 times as stiff as a .1mm. This may help to get some of the guesswork out of the stacks and be able to quantify changes in stiffness. DD, I very much doubt the last 18mm shim in you stack is doing anything at all, I think you would be much better to remove it and place it at the start of the stack instead. Just my 2c. Glad to hear everyone is still tuning! Cheers, Steve

  42. #142
    Stray Bullet
    Reputation: Nagaredama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,275
    DHi and I modified my fork about two months ago. My stack is 18, 16, 15, 14, 12 or there abouts. I finally put a zip tie on the stanchion yesterday and went for ride. Turns out I'm only getting about 145mm of travel. I even went off some 3-4 foot drops to flat on purpose to test the fork out. When DHi and put the shim stack in when didn't put a chain ring spacer.

    I'd like to know if my shim stack or lack of spacer is causing my lack of full travel.

  43. #143
    Cut Casing Whisperer
    Reputation: Mr.P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,339
    Quote Originally Posted by Nagaredama
    DHi and I modified my fork about two months ago. My stack is 18, 16, 15, 14, 12 or there abouts. I finally put a zip tie on the stanchion yesterday and went for ride. Turns out I'm only getting about 145mm of travel. I even went off some 3-4 foot drops to flat on purpose to test the fork out. When DHi and put the shim stack in when didn't put a chain ring spacer.

    I'd like to know if my shim stack or lack of spacer is causing my lack of full travel.
    The lack of spacer would not cause loss of travel.

    Are you running the lock out knob fully closed? Or just a bit open? That is how I run mine, and due to the additional damping during drops & jumps, I had to reduce my spring side oil level to get full travel. I think I am at 75mm now from a previous 60mm. And I only get full travel on oh sh*t moments otherwise I get 150mm.

    On a side note, did the shims tighten against the piston?

    P

  44. #144
    Stray Bullet
    Reputation: Nagaredama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,275
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.P
    The lack of spacer would not cause loss of travel.
    Good to know!

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.P
    Are you running the lock out knob fully closed? Or just a bit open? That is how I run mine, and due to the additional damping during drops & jumps, I had to reduce my spring side oil level to get full travel. I think I am at 75mm now from a previous 60mm. And I only get full travel on oh sh*t moments otherwise I get 150mm.
    I've run it full open to fully closed and everywhere in between. Typically I ride it in the middle. I'll check how much oil I have in the spring side tomorrow. When I emptied the air pre-load I was able to get a bit more travel out of it by bouncing up and down on it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.P
    On a side note, did the shims tighten against the piston?
    99% sure they were. I know they weren't moving around when I tightened everything down. This week I'll take it apart and snap some pictures.

  45. #145
    Equal opportunity meanie
    Reputation: DHidiot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,781
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.P
    On a side note, did the shims tighten against the piston?

    P
    Yes, the shimstack was preloaded.
    805

  46. #146
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    212

    Help a newbie mod an '07 All Mountain 1 TST2

    Hi all, I have a 2007 Marzocchi All Mountain 1. It has ETA in the left leg and TST2 in the right leg and 160mm travel. At first I thought TST2 was compression damping, but it turns out it is just lockout with no settings in between. My problem is that I get too much fork dive and the only solution is to increase the spring rate by adding air to the ETA side, at the cost of ride harshness and travel. So, I got pretty excited when I saw this mod and I definitely want to try it so I can get adjustable compression damping with an adjustable platform. I was looking at the Rock Shox Revelation with Motion Control and Floodgate but the Marz was cheaper

    Anyway, I have never done fork mods before so I have a few basic questions:

    1. Will this mod work with my fork? The TST2 knob is different for me than for the 55, but the cartridge is probably the same (or it would not be called TST2, right?). Just want to confirm this.

    2. Where do you guys get shims of the appropriate size?

    3. Is there a way to do this mod without using a ground-down socket to remove the TST2 cartridge? I don't have easy access to a machine shop.

    4. Am I going to need fork buy fork oil (in case of a spill or whatever)? What kind of oil should I use and where can I find it? I'm 170lbs with gear if that helps.

    5. My fork is pretty new, so if I am careful I hope not to damage any seals in the disassembly/reassembly process. Should I have spare seals lying around just in case?

    Looking forward to your replies.

  47. #147
    Cut Casing Whisperer
    Reputation: Mr.P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,339
    Quote Originally Posted by derailin_palin
    Hi all, I have a 2007 Marzocchi All Mountain 1
    Sorry, the 07 is a completely different system. My understanding is that fork dive is best controlled by the spring.

    P

  48. #148
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    212
    So I guess my only option is to swap TST2 for TST micro?

    EDIT: Or perhaps replace TST2 with RC2? Thanks for the quick reply btw, great forum!

  49. #149
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    212
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.P
    Sorry, the 07 is a completely different system. My understanding is that fork dive is best controlled by the spring.

    P
    Wow you are right. The manual for 2007 forks says:

    The TST2 handles fork behaviour in compression and rebound by virtue of revolutionary system valves. The TST2 system uses a sealed cartridge completely full of oil.
    The TST2 cartridge has a valve through which it is possible to pressurise the sealed cartridge
    Damn them and their sealed carts

  50. #150
    Northeastern Rider
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    763
    Is this new bottom part included w/ the 09 tst2 forks? Where would one find these shims?
    "The original concept of freeriding was that there was no set course, goals or rules to abide by. "
    Mountain Riders

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •