Page 12 of 19 FirstFirst ... 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... LastLast
Results 276 to 300 of 465
  1. #276
    mtbr member
    Reputation: madskatingcow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    909
    SRAM set the trend for 2x10, followed by 1x11. On the road side, Shimano is the leader with well developed products. On the mountainbike side regarding drivetrains on the other hand, they have been trying to catch op for the last 5 years, with no success.

    A 2x11 sure opens extra possibilities, but I don't think the majority is waiting for this. Bummer.

  2. #277
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    844
    2x11 doesn't really open any possibilities. I have a 3x10 right now but there are pretty much no scenarios where a 22/36 is useful. If a hill is that steep, I'm walking up it.

    Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

  3. #278
    mtbr member
    Reputation: madskatingcow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    909
    Quote Originally Posted by cpfitness View Post
    2x11 doesn't really open any possibilities. I have a 3x10 right now but there are pretty much no scenarios where a 22/36 is useful. If a hill is that steep, I'm walking up it.
    Sure it does, for those that are riding 22/36, or even 20/36 up front. They can stick to a more common 24 up front.

  4. #279
    mtbr member
    Reputation: syl3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    885
    Too little, too late. IF SRAM can bring out cheap 1x11 on the X9 and X7 levels, their sales will explode.

    If all 11speed cassettes will need new freehubs, then there's no downside for the SRAM switch, you will need new freehub either way. Actually SRAM's version has the added bonus of keeping the wider flange spacing.

  5. #280
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    235
    I suppose we shouldn't judge too much on just a few images, but I see absolutely nothing interesting here. I have an XTR 980 (trail double) groupo that is fabulous, but if I ever do decide to try a single ring it will be either SRAM or a hack job with Wolftooth parts. The cassette is most disappointing -- all the hassle of a new freehub just to get a 40t cog? If I go through that, with SRAM, at least I'm getting a 10t and 42t cog.

    Di2 will probably be amazing, but at first glance, it looks like they totally misread the market on single rings. My guess is they were working on this before XX1 came out and changed everything. These days a lot of people are keen to simplify their drivetrains. And Shimano comes out with an electronic triple. Seems like bad judgement to me. Hopefully there's more to the new group.

  6. #281
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,329
    Interestingly it looks like from the photos only the front derailleur is electronic. That would make sense. Not sure I would want to destroy an electronic rd with a stick....

  7. #282
    mtbr member
    Reputation: madskatingcow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    909


    I see a left & right electronic shifter

  8. #283
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by cpfitness View Post
    This all makes me kinda wonder if shimano didnt just give up. On one hand, they know they have so much market share and plenty of people are getting by just fine with shimano 10speed 1x systems so perhaps they are just fine with it as is and are hanging their hats on their name as well as better brake products. Xx1 addressed several issues(chain retention on 1x system, low and high end range on 1x systems, weight). SRAM could justify bringing it out at top level pricing. Shimano wznts us to pay xtr level prices for what? A 40t cog? What other features is this going to have?

    Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
    Its hard for me to absolve SRAM of all wrong doing when their cassette (which is not a one-time purchase) effectively costs $400 PLUS the cost of a driver body. Than they produced defective 11 speed grip shifters that were breaking on many peoples' first ride. And finally I have heard consistent bad things about their type 2 derailleurs clunking. That's 2 of the 3 major components of their drivetrain all with huge quality problems and the other one is outragously priced. And then their brakes... don't even get me started. Shimano only has to make something that works correctly and that is what I'm going to buy. To each their own.

  9. #284
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    153
    The other thing that ticks me off about SRAM is to me it seems that they're the ones that don't care. They make defective products (09-12 Reba lowers crooked, ALL their brakes, the fragile carbon cages on their derailleurs for years...) and they don't correct the defects for multiple design generations. Literally the only SRAM things that I want are the ones Shimano doesn't (well, didn't) make - a 1-by-X drivetrain and grip shifters.

  10. #285
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WR304's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,701

    Shimano's answer to SRAM's 1x11

    Quote Originally Posted by madskatingcow View Post


    I see a left & right electronic shifter
    How do you think the new shifter action works? Push- push or maybe push forwards to shift down and then pull towards you to shift up?

    Looking at the small XTR 1x chainset picture the single ring version doesn't appear to use a narrow- wide chainring. For a 1x11 setup you may still need either a front chain guide or an aftermarket narrow-wide chainring to stop the chain coming off.

    With the front derailleur I'm wondering how many different versions there will be. Over the last few years mountain bikes have come with so many different front derailleur mounts that you'd need several designs of electronic front derailleur to fit them all. It might be that compatibility is limited to a few select bikes?

    Along the same lines you have the issue of battery placement and wiring. Some newer bikes come with what are clearly intended to be Di2 battery placements (the 2014 Specialized Epic with its SWAT toolkit for example which is a placeholder for a battery pack) but a lot of older bikes may have problems accommodating an external battery as there's no room, especially if you still want to carry a water bottle at the same time.

    Can you use an internal seatpost mounted battery at the same time as a dropper seatpost?

  11. #286
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    844

    Re: Shimano's answer to SRAM's 1x11

    Quote Originally Posted by Mutantclover View Post
    The other thing that ticks me off about SRAM is to me it seems that they're the ones that don't care. They make defective products (09-12 Reba lowers crooked, ALL their brakes, the fragile carbon cages on their derailleurs for years...) and they don't correct the defects for multiple design generations. Literally the only SRAM things that I want are the ones Shimano doesn't (well, didn't) make - a 1-by-X drivetrain and grip shifters.
    If their products are so defective, why are people buying them? I openly admit I have no sram MTB experience but I heard haters hate about sram road groups yet my force group has been amazing. Bottom line, shimano has blown a tremendous opportunity here. Yes electronic shifting is cool, I especially love the idea of not having to fiddle with my drivetrain to keep it shifting smooth but to charge a premium price just to get it? There needs to be some other benefit here. There only saving grace will be if they rapidly trickle it down to the lower levels so at least make a mechanical 11spd as well down to the slx level so people will at least start adopting the new rear wheel they will need

    Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

  12. #287
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    989
    Quote Originally Posted by madskatingcow View Post
    SRAM set the trend for 2x10, followed by 1x11. On the road side, Shimano is the leader with well developed products. On the mountainbike side regarding drivetrains on the other hand, they have been trying to catch op for the last 5 years, with no success.

    A 2x11 sure opens extra possibilities, but I don't think the majority is waiting for this. Bummer.
    I don't agree with the catch up comment in terms of shimano trying to play catch up the past 5 years on the mtb side. IMO the shimano 2x system is superior to SRAM's. Yes, they were a little later to the market with a 2x system, but they took their time and developed a system that worked better and is more durable than SRAM's.

    On top of that shimano's brakes are in a different league compared to SRAM/Avid. There is no one that will question that.

    I'll gladly wait for something that works well where I don't have pay to be the beta tester.

    Am I overwhelmed by this little leak of information on the XTR stuff... not at all. However, this is a few pictures and likely not the whole picture. I'm also not a fan of 'new' shimano 11 speed spacing. I recently upgraded to 11 speed ultegra on the road side, and fortunately all I had to do was buy a new freehub. The increase in performance over the 10 speed dura ace groupset that it replaced is HUGE. However, I don't have this option with my mountain hubs, as no one offers an 11 speed compatible freehub. This poses a problem because I would like to go to an 11 speed road group on my disc cx bike... but there's no freehub for my disc hubs (king) that allow you to run 11 speed. All these new standards do suck, especially since NOW it's likely that each manufacturer has decided to come up with their own standard. Not good for us as consumers in terms of interchangeability... but maybe that's part of their plan???

  13. #288
    mtbr member
    Reputation: madskatingcow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    909
    Quote Originally Posted by tiflow_21 View Post
    I don't agree with the catch up comment in terms of shimano trying to play catch up the past 5 years on the mtb side. IMO the shimano 2x system is superior to SRAM's. Yes, they were a little later to the market with a 2x system, but they took their time and developed a system that worked better and is more durable than SRAM's.
    Those who innovate always take a risk. If SRAM didn't come out with 2x10 or 1x11, do you think Shimano would have come out at all? You think the longer time it took them was to develop their products thoroughly or start developing? In the mtb drivetrain area, they changed from leaders to followers in my opinion. Sure, their XTR stuff is thoroughly developed and has some clever features (I've ridden XTR the past year and numerous years before, coming from X0 / XX), except for their XTR PD-M980 pedals . Love the XT / XTR brakes though, they are in a class of their own.

  14. #289
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    19
    More photos:






  15. #290
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    19




  16. #291
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    844
    Nice pics. So their strategy is simple. "Shimano 11 speed with your choice of mechanical or electronic shifting and our consistent shimano reliability and quality". Makes some sense but really isnt the point of 11 speed to be able to go to a 1x system. Seems ludicrous that they are still planning to have a 3x offering

    Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

  17. #292
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vizsladog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,320
    are you guys blind??? The description under the crank has the 1x chainring options listed.

    30t 32t 34t 36t

  18. #293
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    844

    Re: Shimano's answer to SRAM's 1x11

    Quote Originally Posted by vizsladog View Post
    are you guys blind??? The description under the crank has the 1x chainring options listed.

    30t 32t 34t 36t
    Not blind at all but it also shows decriotios for 1x 2x and 3x on the shifter and derailleur parts

    Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

  19. #294
    mtbr member
    Reputation: madskatingcow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    909
    How easy will it be to swap the front chainring with the crank still mounted on the bike? If possible at all?

  20. #295
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    133
    I like the ability to have options...I'd probably run 1x10 / 11 for local riding, but put a double up front for the times I ride up north.

    Besides, I'm pretty sure we'll see other cassette gear combos, sooner than later. Especially since XTR has split into Trail- and Race-oriented niches.

    Actually, it's been good---both for the buying public as well as for Shimano's attitude---to have SRAM give them so much grief, and taking market share. Prior to SRAM's rise, Shimano's take to the public would be, "take it or leave it...we're Shimano, we don't care because we don't have to. Where else are you going to go? SunTour?"

    Since then, they've pulled a 180, and almost give too many options.

    And still, people are kvetching...oy vey!

  21. #296
    mtbr member
    Reputation: oaklandish's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    168
    Quote Originally Posted by bog View Post
    Shimano generally isn't one to mess with things like hub spacing. You can be sure it'll be 135QR and 12X142 compatible. They definitely don't mind changing up standards a bit but pretty much always ensure that you can put it on a reasonably new frame.

    Also, I'm a huge fan of Shimano and Di2 so I'm looking forward to seeing more of this. I'd use this on my XC bike which has a double or triple crank depending on the ride (1X11 just doesn't have enough of a gear range) and I really like that Shimano has gone with a 30T option for a chainring. Absolutely perfect IMO!

    I was referring to and meant to say the flange spacing of a wider 142mm hub could be used to keep a relatively stiff wheel build. Unlike the Shimano road version that went from a 130mm hub to a 131mm. Here they really leave a very very narrow margin for getting an acceptable tension difference between the drive and non-drive sides.

    I'm basically a Shimano fan as well, but they seem to be a bit obtuse in their interpretation of what riders are actually using and wanting. I hope, as the details trickle out that they demonstrate me to be wrong. Shimano's history has not shown this to be true though.

  22. #297
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WR304's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,701

    Shimano's answer to SRAM's 1x11

    Quote Originally Posted by WR304 View Post
    With the front derailleur I'm wondering how many different versions there will be. Over the last few years mountain bikes have come with so many different front derailleur mounts that you'd need several designs of electronic front derailleur to fit them all. It might be that compatibility is limited to a few select bikes?
    To answer my own question there are two XTR Di2 front derailleurs (double and triple versions) which use a modular design and a series of adapters for High clamp, Low clamp band fittings, plus also D type and E type direct mount fittings.

    The other interesting thing on the slides is

    New Shimano Synchronised Shift
    "System communication with rear derailleur"

    SC-9050 System Information Display
    Shimano Synchronised Shift Mode Switch

    "3 shift modes available (S1/S2/Manual)

    Sus mode position indicator(Climb/Trail/Descend)"

    What that sounds like is that the Shimano XTR Di2 system when used with a front derailleur may have the seqential shifting that was on a Fairwheel bikes showbike several years ago. The idea being that you press the shifter and the system decides when to change chainrings for you.

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/...ipped-hardtail

    The Fox iCD electronic suspension system uses a Shimano battery and wiring already so it's not a great surprise that the two will integrate together.

    http://www.pinkbike.com/news/Fox-iCD...n-Earnest.html

    The next question is what about with the Rock Shox EI suspension system that comes on bikes such as the Lapierre range. Will they need two seperate batteries and wiring if you want XTR Di2 on a bike with Rock Shox EI? Rock Shox is owned by SRAM so they might not integrate.

  23. #298
    mtbr member
    Reputation: RS VR6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    819
    Any detail about needing a new freehub? The final nail in the coffin for me on XX1 was my 6 month old wheel not being able to run a Sram XD driver body.
    Cervelo S2
    Specialized Carve Pro
    Pivot Mach 5

  24. #299
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vizsladog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,320
    The description says 10/11 speed compatible free hub body. It could be the same as the neww 11 speed road hubs

  25. #300
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WR304's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,701

    Shimano's answer to SRAM's 1x11

    Quote Originally Posted by RS VR6 View Post
    Any detail about needing a new freehub? The final nail in the coffin for me on XX1 was my 6 month old wheel not being able to run a Sram XD driver body.
    On the slide for the FH-M9000 and FH-M9010 rear hubs it says:

    "11/10 speed compatible freehub body"

    The XTR cassette only has a 11 tooth smallest sprocket, which is the same as current cassettes. (One of the reasons why SRAM XX1 needed a new freehub body was because a 10 tooth smallest sprocket won't fit onto a standard freehub.) From the description and pictures it looks like the 11 speed XTR freehub will be the same as for Shimano 11 speed road hubs and cassettes.

    That will mean buying a new 11 speed freehub body but on the positive side plenty of current hubs (including DT Swiss and Chris King) should be backwards compatible, just needing a new freehub body and drive side end cap:

    http://fairwheelbikes.com/c/forums/t...mano-11-speed/

Page 12 of 19 FirstFirst ... 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •