Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 81
  1. #1
    Big Dirty
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2

    Ty Kady...upgrade, bro.

    This dude CRUSHES every Cat 1 race in Cali. The Sho -Air honch and former pro MX racer needs to get that Pro upgrade lest he begin to look like a bagger. Winning is great and all, but when you do it every weekend against top cat 1 talent (Fontana, Santa Ynez, Sea Otter...) it means you need to nut up and race with the big boys.
    Thoughts? Feelings?

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    245
    The dude is still young.. just looked at usa cycling results The dude would definitely qualify as a sandbagger..

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Clintox50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    528
    I talked with him a little bit after SOC. He just has no desire to be pro, works 50hrs a week, etc. He knows people think he's a bagger, but what's he supposed to do if he doesn't want to race pro? There's not much reward in it, and your license costs double. And besides, with running the Sho-Air team and such, he's more "Pro" than a lot of licensed pros so from a sponsorship and schwag standpoint there's no motivation for him. I'm just happy I beat his time finally at SOC! :-D
    Thank you Lord for strength, endurance, and salvation.

    Race Reports & Updates
    Team Santa Cruz / Fox Facebook Page

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    245
    Hmm. My thought would be if i won every race than what would be the Motivation.. I guess every body has there own motivations. As far as a pro license costing double maybe he should ask Sho-Air for a raise(:

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    257
    I think he is the definition of sandbagger. He won almost every race in 2008 as a semipro and downgraded to CAT 1 with the reorganization. He is still young and so doesn't have that as an excuse (I totally understand where Johnny 'O is coming from). Come on, the extra 60 bucks to race pro is about what it costs to do one kenda cup race, so don't give me that. Sure he doesn't want to move up because he won't win all the time anymore, that is just a selfish attitude. His racing CAT 1 doesn't really affect me as I'm in a different class, but I just loose respect for the guy the longer he does it.

    Hey I could go get some "W"'s in CAT 2, I mean, I work full time, have 2 kids, and can only ride 7-10 hours a week, and have a blister on my toe that makes my foot hurt sometimes. Is that Cool??

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    508
    i was at santa ynez when he came into the his 3rd lap a full 4 minutes ahead of gerry cody. but it sure is a relative topic, if ty wasnt there then would gerry be a sandbagger? he has been coming in second place this year (minus sea otter becuase he race 2 previous races that very day before the xc race but he sitll got 10th, lol) and down the line.

    and there are so many levels of pro's. he would definetly be at the bottom of the pro level. i mean, even Many Prado was lapped at the short track at sea otter.

    so i understand him not wanting to go pro just to finish at the back everytime he races.

    playing devil's advocate here, but is this a call to cat 1 guys to step it up? i know gerry cody sees it as a challenge to get faster and eventually beat ty.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Clintox50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by hobiesmith
    playing devil's advocate here, but is this a call to cat 1 guys to step it up? i know gerry cody sees it as a challenge to get faster and eventually beat ty.
    exactly.
    Thank you Lord for strength, endurance, and salvation.

    Race Reports & Updates
    Team Santa Cruz / Fox Facebook Page

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    257
    There is no black and white line, I agree. Who-ever is winning is going to be called a sandbagger until you get into the older classes like mine. BUT when you have been winning for years, by large margins, over others that have gone on to be pro then I think its time to sack up. Yeah Manny gets lapped at the short track, he's a distance guy, who HAS upgraded and wins some other pretty big races.

    hobiesmith-
    "so i understand him not wanting to go pro just to finish at the back everytime he races"

    I think this is the definition of sand bagging, is it not? Not upgrading when you more than meet all the requirements just because it doesn't suit your own agenda?

    OR
    "i know gerry cody sees it as a challenge to get faster and eventually beat ty."
    I truly respect that attitude but could we change this too
    i know TY CADY sees it as a challenge to get faster and eventually beat SID.

    That's how he gets my respect...

    Just playing devil's advocate here

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    508
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnnyboy
    There is no black and white line, I agree. Who-ever is winning is going to be called a sandbagger until you get into the older classes like mine. BUT when you have been winning for years, by large margins, over others that have gone on to be pro then I think its time to sack up. Yeah Manny gets lapped at the short track, he's a distance guy, who HAS upgraded and wins some other pretty big races.

    hobiesmith-
    "so i understand him not wanting to go pro just to finish at the back everytime he races"

    I think this is the definition of sand bagging, is it not? Not upgrading when you more than meet all the requirements just because it doesn't suit your own agenda?

    OR
    "i know gerry cody sees it as a challenge to get faster and eventually beat ty."
    I truly respect that attitude but could we change this too
    i know TY CADY sees it as a challenge to get faster and eventually beat SID.

    That's how he gets my respect...

    Just playing devil's advocate here
    ya absolutely. why isnt ty chasing max and sid and todd. and so forth. no doubt its a arugment with no clear answer. i am personal friends with nate whitman who is a back of the pack pro, and your right, that his is goal, to get as fast as tinker and then some. he got 64th out of 117 in sea otter and was excited about it. he has a great attitude. i know that ty is as strong or stronger than nate if you look at the their lap times. maybe a good rule of thumb is, if your lap times are middle of the pack that's in front of you, then maybe its time to move up.

    maybe one day i will see cat 2, but even being a newbie my conscienceness has me looking at my times to make sure that i am not sandbaggin cat 3. sometimes i feel like it when at sea otter i line up with some dudes who have huge backpacks on and baggy shorts and platform pedals, but then the other half had on racing kits and i didnt come close to podium so oh well

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    257
    There haven't been many races were the pro's a Cat 1's do the same course so Santa Ynez is the only recent comparison. His time of 1:59 would have been 13th and with other fast guys to ride with I'm sure he could have dropped that by a couple of minutes to be in the top ten. That race did have a weaker pro field however.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Clintox50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by stillhardtailing
    There haven't been many races were the pro's a Cat 1's do the same course so Santa Ynez is the only recent comparison. His time of 1:59 would have been 13th and with other fast guys to ride with I'm sure he could have dropped that by a couple of minutes to be in the top ten. That race did have a weaker pro field however.
    The pro and Cat 1 races were on different days as well. We (Cat 1's) had a lot stronger wind to deal with on those ridge tops than the pros, so there's another factor to consider.
    Thank you Lord for strength, endurance, and salvation.

    Race Reports & Updates
    Team Santa Cruz / Fox Facebook Page

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    508
    Quote Originally Posted by Clintox50
    The pro and Cat 1 races were on different days as well. We (Cat 1's) had a lot stronger wind to deal with on those ridge tops than the pros, so there's another factor to consider.
    thats no joke. i almost got blown down the hill by that wind on top of the wall

    the day the pros raced it was beautiful

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Okie Dokie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,153
    I was there the day the pros raced and it was perfect until the last lap when a steady breeze picked up.

    The next day when Cat 1s went it was about as windy a day as you can find in this area. I am sure it made a HUGE difference in times.
    Originally Posted by XC62701
    Agreed...make it longer. I want to know death is an option

  14. #14
    Birthday Collector
    Reputation: ATBScott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,580
    It's ben many years since I raced, so maybe I'm talking out my a$$, but it used to be that the top "non-pro" category raced the same course as the pros, and in some cases even started with them. Looking at the results, and seeing that the Cat 1 Men winning time was 2:36, and that the Pro Men winning time was 1:23 is to me, either a mis-print, timing error or a boggling blunder on the course director's choice of routes / # of laps for the classes. If not, then there needs to be some class in between Cat 1 and Pro! I remember the "Expert/Elite" class winner often finishing Top 20 and about 10 - 15 min behind the Pro winner over a 30-mile course. Here we see the Pro time at nearly 1/2 the Cat 1 time. Is the disparity that great these days?

    There needs to be a step that encourages the fastest Cat 1 to see a result that is realistically close enough to the "contenders" in the class above to make the move and step up. If I was winning at the "top class" of the amateur class, and was so far off the Pro times that there was no way I could see myself making the top 20% of that class, I would avoid paying higher fees to race as well. Having the top amateur racers ride the same course as the pros lets them at least compare effort over distance and make an educated decision to move up. It used to be that moving up and racing/contending in the next class was status enough to make you want to advance.
    R.I.P. Corky 10/97-4/09
    Disclaimer: I sell and repair bikes for a living
    http://www.endlesscyclesonline.com

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by hobiesmith
    playing devil's advocate here, but is this a call to cat 1 guys to step it up? i know gerry cody sees it as a challenge to get faster and eventually beat ty.
    A call to Cat 1 guys to step it up?

    I rode my heart out at SOC. I've been on a bike every chance I get, my mountain bike, my road bike, or my commuter. Mostly its been the commuter, but my commute isn't one to scoff at. I've improved my diet and nutrition over the last year and arrived at SOC 15 pounds leaner than last year. I am 6' tall and raced at 160 pounds this year, so I worked hard and ate right so I would be leaner but still strong for this year. Not trying to brag, just demonstrating that I put in an honest effort to improve my race performance.

    And I am not complaining about my race results, or that I was only able to stay on Ty's wheel for a good chunk of the first lap, I am actually pretty stoked about both now knowing the caliber of rider I was racing against. So don't come down on other cat 1 riders saying we need to step it up. I think I did that over the last year, and my results prove that and I know there are others that did too.

    Sure there may be a few sandbaggers in Cat 1, I don't know who they are or really care. There are some in every category. As for Cat 1 though, I think the reclassification of the categories is more to blame. When you have pro level riders who have no incentive to race pro and no class to fit that rider, then you get very strong riders in a class that perhaps is a bit beneath their level.

    So I will continue to train hard and hope that I can eventually eek out a first place finish in my age group, then go for an overall first place finish. Until then I will keep chasing Ty's wheel as a bench mark of performance and hold nothing against him. I talked to him after the XC race at SOC as we were sorting out the race results (turns out those chips don't always work), and he seemed like a really cool guy.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    59
    Quote Originally Posted by ATBScott
    ...it used to be that the top "non-pro" category raced the same course as the pros, and in some cases even started with them. Looking at the results, and seeing that the Cat 1 Men winning time was 2:36, and that the Pro Men winning time was 1:23 is to me, either a mis-print, timing error or a boggling blunder on the course director's choice of routes / # of laps for the classes.
    The SOC CAT 1 and Pro courses were extremely different. From what I hear, they've been trying to make the Pro race more spectator friendly. Therefore they rode a lap course that regularly brought them through the race track and the CAT classes rode the normal 19 mile loop. Hence the vast difference in times.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2
    I finish near the mid to back of Cat 1 myself, but see that I would be a top 5 Cat 2 regularly. So I don't see any reward for being in Cat 2, plus I won my out several years ago and just can't bring myself to move back down. Ok, it's pride, but whatever. I feel racing against faster competition makes us better, seems like pretty basic logic.

    If this guy wants to bag it then so be it, he is putting a cap on his own talent and potential. I don't personally need W's to feel satisfaction and accomplishment, but that's me. I don't know this guy personally, but we all have our own agendas and goals for racing. His may be that W's make him feel good, as they should. For me, racing against faster riders makes me feel good and gives me a sense of accomplishment. I don't buy the job/family thing, the fact of the matter is a majority of the Pro class riders also have full time jobs and families too!
    Honestly, I'm on the fence with this guy, moving up to Pro is a reality check he may not be ready for mentally. My guess is he knows this and Cat 1 glory ain't so bad.

    Thanks for letting me add my nickel.

  18. #18
    Birthday Collector
    Reputation: ATBScott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,580
    Quote Originally Posted by stinkerpeter
    The SOC CAT 1 and Pro courses were extremely different. From what I hear, they've been trying to make the Pro race more spectator friendly. Therefore they rode a lap course that regularly brought them through the race track and the CAT classes rode the normal 19 mile loop. Hence the vast difference in times.
    That makes some sense of the times - but overall doesn't make sense from the standpoint of the racers - at least IMO... The Pro races should be at least as long and hard as the CAT 1 race. Even if it is a different course, the distance and amount of climbing, singletrack, etc... should be as much or more than the CAT 1 riders navigate. One of the things about races like the Sea Otter, Whiskeytown, etc... is that the long course that "gets you out there" still feels like old-time MTB racing. The shorter, multi-lap courses don't really have the same feel. I didn't like them and stopped racing years ago, partly because of the change to the format. All that said, it is difficult to put on a long, open-country race, accessing participants involved in bad crashes, and even enforcing the route when there is a maze of trails like Fort Ord offers. Long races aren't spectator-friendly, and people showing up make for more potential income for the race promoters if they have concessions, etc... - so I can see where they want that.

    Perhaps a class can be created for CAT 1 racers who have had some level of success in the class, but don't want to go Pro, or want to "test the waters" a bit. Maybe the same or a few dollars higher entry fee as CAT 1 - ride with the Pros, but do not participate in the prize money for the Pro class. Maybe a qualification such as, "3 or more podium placings in the last season", or "5 or more top-ten" placings will give you the option to enter the class. You are only required to stay there if you podium - if not you can move down to CAT 1 again with no penalty. It might be a nice way for someone who thinks they can compete see how much more (if any) they need to race as a Pro. Maybe dredge up that old "Pro-Am/Elite" category, and have it's own placings apart from the Pro and CAT 1 classes. It doesn't even need to be at every race, but the big events with big class participation would be a great place to let these fast guys race against the Pros, but still have a chance to win their class. Just my .02
    R.I.P. Corky 10/97-4/09
    Disclaimer: I sell and repair bikes for a living
    http://www.endlesscyclesonline.com

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by ATBScott
    Perhaps a class can be created for CAT 1 racers who have had some level of success in the class, but don't want to go Pro, or want to "test the waters" a bit.
    That sounds like the Semi-pro class, that was just eliminated last year.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnnyboy
    That sounds like the Semi-pro class, that was just eliminated last year.

    Yup. And it might have been a mistake to eliminate that class from the way it sounds.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6
    Pro racers pee in a cup from time to time.
    Last edited by DirtJunkie12; 03-28-2012 at 07:36 PM. Reason: Misspelling

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    596

    USA Cycling

    Quote Originally Posted by addctd2adrnlne View Post
    Yup. And it might have been a mistake to eliminate that class from the way it sounds.
    #1 His case highlights USAC's mis-management of the sport. I would argue USAC is trying to discourage a domestic Professional economy and the elimination of semi-pro was another attempt to keep racers impoverished until they reach the UCI's global show. In countries where cycling is flourishing they have a "pro without contract" category and award National titles for it. This keeps the pool of talent deep. That is something USAC is not interested in creating.

    #2 I don't really care for sandbaggers in any category. The guy should ride pro. He would likely get clobbered at National events. For local/regional events though, he'll do just fine. I get why he's where he is, but I think it just discourages regional participation. This is definitely not a money issue.

    USAC has a bigger role in his decision than anything else.

  23. #23
    Don't be a sheep
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    3,372
    Ill add to this. At big bear last year as were heading into the singletrack he (ty kady) passes me then over shoots the trail and blocks it. He turns around and starts yelling at me like its my fault to which I responded "phuck off". Sandbagger and dlck.
    "Do not touch the trim"

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    17
    After winning all 3 national titles last year (STXC, XC, and Marathon) I figured that he would finally upgrade. Well, after looking at the results from the Mellow Johnny's race, it appears that he did move up, but only into a different age group in CAT1...

    Seriously Ty, upgrade to Pro and challenge yourself! Winning every race you enter doesn't help you reach your potential, impress anyone, or earn the respect of your peers.

  25. #25
    mnoutain bkie rdier
    Reputation: rydbyk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,822
    I race against Ty each weekend. Everyone is just battling for 2nd, 3rd etc now.. But wait...2nd and 3rd usually go to guys who got podium finishes at nationals too...argh!

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Clintox50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by asphalt_jesus View Post
    #1 His case highlights USAC's mis-management of the sport. I would argue USAC is trying to discourage a domestic Professional economy and the elimination of semi-pro was another attempt to keep racers impoverished until they reach the UCI's global show. In countries where cycling is flourishing they have a "pro without contract" category and award National titles for it. This keeps the pool of talent deep. That is something USAC is not interested in creating.
    What benefit is it to USAC to keep racers "impoverished"? The "pro without contract" category is intriguing. I guess that is/was the same as semi-pro.

    Also... I can't believe this thread resurfaced...
    Thank you Lord for strength, endurance, and salvation.

    Race Reports & Updates
    Team Santa Cruz / Fox Facebook Page

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6
    Again. Pro Racers Pee In A Cup From Time To Time. Anyone? Do i have to spell it out? Dude is more than suspect. Strange looking fellow. Something is not right about him. Arrogant judgmental individuals will be judged harshly.
    At a certain point I moved up to Pro. Mr. Kady said i shouldn't have moved up. Uh.... i had more than 5 top 5 results at Nationals as a semi slow. As well as several years of finishing in the top 3 at Ca State Championship. (So cal centric races ugh...) I felt like it was time to move up. The guy will argue his reasoning and never for a second waiver. Thus...........Sorry Mr Kady. You're alone in your feelings about racing and upgrades, you're a first class sandbagger. #1 on the list Nationally. You should be so proud.

    Oh and the elimination of the semi pro class enabled racers who didn't earn or deserve to be "pro" to get the upgrade. USA cycling is horrible. It is without a doubt a rich persons sport or one that we as lower middle class have a irrational devotion to. Just my judgmental 2 cents.

  28. #28
    XCdude
    Reputation: moab63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,229

    He is not sand bagging, the US cycling say's so

    There is no official category he needs to move up to. He is in his aged category, so he is fast get use to it. Train more and you might catch him. There is no real reason(incentive), for him to move up to pro, cost more money to race pro. He is not going to get a contract from anyone by getting 10-15 in a pro race because of his age.

    Is always the same thing if people get beat, the the winners must upgrade or they dope, hell maybe both.

    I live in southern cal, I seen him race many times and yes he is fast, I also seen Justin, Marco Eric, Ben and many other guys that are fast, and they won't take it easy on anybody is(war).

    They reason people race is to measure yourself, and it show's you that you need to get better to get on the box. At this level is all for fun is a 5.00 dollar trophy but if you want it, you have to be willing to put up or shutup. Enough rambling.

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    596
    Quote Originally Posted by Clintox50 View Post
    What benefit is it to USAC to keep racers "impoverished"?.
    If a rider can get paid well just riding races around their country (ex. U.S.) why would they want to travel all over the world chasing races? The perceived value of obtaining a UCI WorldTour (whatever they call it now) classification goes down.

    Were you around when NORBA was doing most of the sanctioning? They had a flourishing domestic pro economy. And then USAC acquired it and all of that ended.

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Clintox50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by asphalt_jesus View Post
    If a rider can get paid well just riding races around their country (ex. U.S.) why would they want to travel all over the world chasing races? The perceived value of obtaining a UCI WorldTour (whatever they call it now) classification goes down.

    Were you around when NORBA was doing most of the sanctioning? They had a flourishing domestic pro economy. And then USAC acquired it and all of that ended.
    Wouldn't the World Cup and World Champs be a draw to those with the capabilities and financing? And the Olympic hunt? Road cycling has a pretty good domestic pro program (I think) yet we're still a decent part of the world scene.

    I started riding bikes in '05 so post NORBA. So unfortunately I never experienced the MTB "good ol' days."
    Thank you Lord for strength, endurance, and salvation.

    Race Reports & Updates
    Team Santa Cruz / Fox Facebook Page

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    596
    Quote Originally Posted by moab63 View Post
    cost more money to race pro. He is not going to get a contract from anyone by getting 10-15 in a pro race because of his age.
    The guy has thousands of dollars in gear and yet he's going to get sensitive about an extra +/-$100? Seriously?

    Most "pro" riders in the U.S. aren't making barista wages, if anything at all. If they are darn lucky they get a bike and some clothes. Not even a travel reimbursement. Most are simply getting Bro Deal pricing on the gear they must purchase to represent themselves as "pro."

    I don't think it's controversial to suggest that as a "pro" at local races, he'll still get his beloved podium. National races he'd get hammered. He likes to sandbag.

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6
    Moab63. You have failed to make a valid point. I believe I'm not the only one here who has beat said sandbagger more than a few times before we moved up. You come off as if you see him as being picked on by the ones he beats. He made himself irrelevant as he never moved up. Make a point. Justify his silly little sandbagging. Let's hear it. He is by definition a sandbagger and that is obnoxious to most everyone. Not just those whom he beats. Bring his name up on a group ride of racers and the laughs start Rollin. And it's not war. That's a ridiculous statement. Do you yell throw elbows and freak out while racing? Kinda think you might be that guy. Boo to your war analogy.
    Last edited by DirtJunkie12; 04-05-2012 at 06:36 PM.

  33. #33
    XCdude
    Reputation: moab63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,229

    If anyone here can file a protest to get him to Cat up

    do it, but according to US cycling he is 100% legal and in his category. So using the we get beat logic, a 50 year old who beats all the other 50 year olds should also cat up to "PRO".

    According to the rules only master racers up to 34 are required to cat up to pro.

    Ok I got an idea call US cycling and tell them to make a new rule: The Ty category if anyone in any category wins more than a few times in a year they have to go PRO(reargdless of age).

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    301
    it seems really strange that someone would sandbag that hard, obviously there is some interesting psychology behind it. maybe it helps make up for all the supercross main events that he didn't make.
    something about the west coast...it makes me wanna ride

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6
    Dude has been a bagger since 2008. how old is he? Your argument (moab63) is again not valid or even close to the specific reality of one Ty Kady. Everyone else but Moab guy is getting a little laugh in here. My two cents are getting old as is listening to your logic. I'm out.

  36. #36
    XCdude
    Reputation: moab63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,229

    He is 35

    I dont know the guy is just a silly.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Ty Kady...upgrade, bro.-ty.png  


  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    596
    Quote Originally Posted by moab63 View Post
    do it, but according to US cycling he is 100% legal and in his category. So using the we get beat logic, a 50 year old who beats all the other 50 year olds should also cat up to "PRO".
    It's not MTB, but Steve Tilford only races his age group for 'cross nationals and Worlds. Otherwise he races Pro, 1-2 on the road. The way he writes it any UCI points disqualifies you for your age group nationals title. He races in the Pro, 1-2 fields most of the time. That's about as good a model as we've got as long as USAC continues to make everything so difficult. Ty should do the same thing in the dirt.

  38. #38
    injured reserve list
    Reputation: Scrub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    577
    You guys do realize that this thread was resurrected from 2 years ago right?
    You're not entitled to anything until you work hard and earn it. CMQ

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    596
    Quote Originally Posted by Clintox50 View Post
    Road cycling has a pretty good domestic pro program (I think)
    Going off topic....

    USACDF does not. The expenses of their development program are entirely funded by the Bank of Mom and Dad. There's no discount either. Rates are comparable to doing it all yourself. USAC has no accountability or control over USACDF either.

    Get picked for World's MTB? You pay for all of it including the mandatory stay at USAC's lodgings.

    So, there's money being generated by USACDF, but for what remains a closely guarded secret. Meanwhile, OBRA is graduating racers into the UCI's show at a substantial discount to USACDF.

  40. #40
    LMN
    LMN is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    4,311
    Quote Originally Posted by asphalt_jesus View Post
    Get picked for World's MTB? You pay for all of it including the mandatory stay at USAC's lodgings.
    You know that is the norm for just about all nations?

    Actually the US like all other nations has differing levels of support. The top riders are fully funded whereas the development riders have to pay their own way. Which doesn't always make sense because the top riders can usually get their Pro teams to pay, but that is the way it works.

    The US is unique in the size of the team it sends. It is the only country that always sends as many riders as it can. Other countries do not send all their riders. As an example for 2012 Canada has 8 spots available for elite women at worlds, but only 4 will be sent.
    "The best pace is suicide pace, and today is a good day to die." Steve Prefontaine

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: packfill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    291
    Moab63, if you're 50 years old and beating everybody, you have the right to race a faster age group.
    Last edited by packfill; 04-19-2012 at 10:57 PM.

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1
    Is this for real? You guys have nothing better to do but keep talking about me, two years after this post was started?

    While I believe everyone is entitled to their own opinion, certainly there's more productive things you could be doing with your time? To suggest I'm either a doper (DirtJunkie come have me tested down at my office any day of the week) or that I have emotional issues, when you are the ones sitting online, behind a computer screen worrying why I don't go pro on a two page thread about me?? That's bizarre......

    Feel free to come meet me face to face and expression your discontent. I'm not hiding out at the races, so why should you that seem to really be so emotional over this topic.

    For those who don't have the same concept as I of what it means to be a "pro" athlete and all that is involved, I'm sorry for you. But I'm not giving up a steady 40 hour a week job, health insurance or my new home so I can attempt to have another pro career, like I've already tried in MX.

    Best of luck to all of you.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: BoiseBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    719
    Quote Originally Posted by Ty 358 View Post
    Is this for real? You guys have nothing better to do but keep talking about me, two years after this post was started?

    While I believe everyone is entitled to their own opinion, certainly there's more productive things you could be doing with your time? To suggest I'm either a doper (DirtJunkie come have me tested down at my office any day of the week) or that I have emotional issues, when you are the ones sitting online, behind a computer screen worrying why I don't go pro on a two page thread about me?? That's bizarre......

    Feel free to come meet me face to face and expression your discontent. I'm not hiding out at the races, so why should you that seem to really be so emotional over this topic.

    For those who don't have the same concept as I of what it means to be a "pro" athlete and all that is involved, I'm sorry for you. But I'm not giving up a steady 40 hour a week job, health insurance or my new home so I can attempt to have another pro career, like I've already tried in MX.

    Best of luck to all of you.

    Too bad, Ty.

    I even read your article in the mountainbike mag the other day and I still don't agree with you. I work in the medical field with several other local pro's who also work with me in the medical field. We work just as many hours as you do and they still ride pro, not Cat 1 where they were consistantly finishing 1st. Your argument holds no water.

    The more stories I read about you defending yourself, the more I think that you have an ego problem and are scared to ride "pro".

    The cost of racing should have nothing to do with things as you obviously get "pro deals" already and likely get your entry fees paid for as well by the team.

    Just because it is technically legal, does not make it ethical!
    Nut up and do the right thing!
    BoiseBoy

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,935
    Quote Originally Posted by Ty 358 View Post
    Is this for real? You guys have nothing better to do but keep talking about me, two years after this post was started?

    While I believe everyone is entitled to their own opinion, certainly there's more productive things you could be doing with your time? To suggest I'm either a doper (DirtJunkie come have me tested down at my office any day of the week) or that I have emotional issues, when you are the ones sitting online, behind a computer screen worrying why I don't go pro on a two page thread about me?? That's bizarre......

    Feel free to come meet me face to face and expression your discontent. I'm not hiding out at the races, so why should you that seem to really be so emotional over this topic.

    For those who don't have the same concept as I of what it means to be a "pro" athlete and all that is involved, I'm sorry for you. But I'm not giving up a steady 40 hour a week job, health insurance or my new home so I can attempt to have another pro career, like I've already tried in MX.

    Best of luck to all of you.

    Hey Ty, just saw this stuff pop up and was sitting around doing nothing here at Sea Slaughter so I figured I would post up....

    Don't stress it dude. If it wasn't you riding out in front of the pack wondering why everyone else was so slow, it would be someone else! You aren't doing anything wrong. Last year everyone was hassling me about going "Pro" because I was winning. Thanks to you and Marco all the pressure is off of me now!

    Good luck today! Gonna be a hot one out there on those long gravel roads!!!!!
    Try to be good.

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    301
    good luck Ty!
    Last edited by uncreative; 04-20-2012 at 11:28 AM.
    something about the west coast...it makes me wanna ride

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    29
    Maybe USAC should downgrade some pros to give Ty some competition. I race pro with a full time job because it motivates me by exposing my weaknesses. But honestly, if USAC told me I had to downgrade to cat 1 (along with a lot of other working "pros"), I would have no problem with that because I'm really not that fast. A policy where the bottom third of all ranked pros get downgraded at the end of the year would make cat 1 stronger and give incentive for newer pros to keep working hard.

    I imagine some cat 1 racers might be upset by such a policy.

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,935
    Quote Originally Posted by RiKMc View Post
    Maybe USAC should downgrade some pros to give Ty some competition. I race pro with a full time job because it motivates me by exposing my weaknesses. But honestly, if USAC told me I had to downgrade to cat 1 (along with a lot of other working "pros"), I would have no problem with that because I'm really not that fast. A policy where the bottom third of all ranked pros get downgraded at the end of the year would make cat 1 stronger and give incentive for newer pros to keep working hard.

    I imagine some cat 1 racers might be upset by such a policy.
    not really. CAT1 Nationals has been dominated by ex-pros. there are a few local pros i know are about my speed and i wouldn't mind having them in CAT1 where we all get to finish our races instead of getting pulled....

    also if you check yesterday's results, Marco beat Ty by several minutes. i was pretty dominant in my AG last year and I was over 13 minutes back from Marco in 4th. nothing wrong with filling that 13 minutes with ex local pros IMO. would provide for better racing IMO.
    Try to be good.

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    17
    What a surprise for Sea Otter 2012... Ty and Marco destroy their CAT1 group by more than 10 minutes, and are the fastest CAT1 riders of the day by a large margin!

    Ty, by your logic, there should only really be a handful of actual "Pro" riders in the US since only a few of them make enough from riding to train full time and not hold down some sort additional employment. Correct? The remainder of the "working pro" riders should just downgrade to CAT1, since they are not making a living by riding bikes, right?

    Your continued domination of CAT1 basically offends the core values of Sportsmanship, Integrity, and Fair Play. Somewhat like clubbing baby seals or shooting fish in a barrel, there just isn't any Honor in what you guys are doing.

  49. #49
    mnoutain bkie rdier
    Reputation: rydbyk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,822
    Quote Originally Posted by boulderbikes View Post
    What a surprise for Sea Otter 2012... Ty and Marco destroy their CAT1 group by more than 10 minutes, and are the fastest CAT1 riders of the day by a large margin!

    Ty, by your logic, there should only really be a handful of actual "Pro" riders in the US since only a few of them make enough from riding to train full time and not hold down some sort additional employment. Correct? The remainder of the "working pro" riders should just downgrade to CAT1, since they are not making a living by riding bikes, right?

    Your continued domination of CAT1 basically offends the core values of Sportsmanship, Integrity, and Fair Play. Somewhat like clubbing baby seals or shooting fish in a barrel, there just isn't any Honor in what you guys are doing.
    So now Marco needs to turn pro? Who cares about this unless they are forcing YOU off the podium. I don't mind that I end up mid-pack as opposed to "closer" to the podium because of guys like Marco, Justin and Ty. If anything, these guys inspire me to train harder Keep up the good work fellas.

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    245
    Look how many years Tinker or Ned could have dominated there age group class, but no most of the time they challenge themselves with the pros...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •