Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    76

    Fox Float CTD rear shock/Spark 900 frame

    I'm seriously considering swapping to a Float CTD rear shock, on my 2013 Spark 900 Premium and I would like to get the remote shock variant .

    1) Does the 2013 Scott Twinloc lever (ie the Twinloc lever with longer levers and configured for a DT Nude2) work with CTD remote set-up - is the cable pull the same between Trail/Traction-Mode and Climb/Lok-out?

    2) Which Velocity/Rebound/Boost Valve tune settings are other users running?

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    85
    Did you ever get an answer on any of this? I want to do the same.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    76
    Yes, I've been running a CTD rear shock since May and the difference is night and day, compared to the Nude 2.

    The twinloc lever operates the damping modes perfectly, so no problems there.

    I bought the shock on eBay and then had Fox UK custom tune it for me. I'm running:

    Rebound Tune - M
    Compression Tune - F
    Climb Tune - F
    Boost Valve pressure - 250psi
    1 aircan volume spacer

    I'm 6'/155Ibs and ride cross country, and the shock tune is absolutely spot on for me.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    85

    Fox Float CTD rear shock/Spark 900 frame

    Thank you so much! My fork is at fox getting the fit damper, 2015 seal heads and kashima stanchions. I've been talking to them, and fox thinks there might be some clearance issues with their rear shock on my 2013 930 frame. I'm assuming our frames are identical dimensionally. Is your shock a 6.5 x 1.5? Can you a pic of your rear shock set up? Thanks.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    76
    There are NO clearence issues fitting this shock, and yes, my shock is 165X38mm. I think the clearence issues may arise when you try and a 2014 Fox Nude shock to a 2013 frame.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    85
    Do you run on the high or low setting?

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    76
    I've run both settings without any issues.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by leathernuts View Post
    Thank you so much! My fork is at fox getting the fit damper, 2015 seal heads and kashima stanchions. I've been talking to them, and fox thinks there might be some clearance issues with their rear shock on my 2013 930 frame. I'm assuming our frames are identical dimensionally. Is your shock a 6.5 x 1.5? Can you a pic of your rear shock set up? Thanks.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    how did you make out?

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    85
    Quote Originally Posted by MasterOMayhem View Post
    how did you make out?
    I had everything done last year, and it was worth it! Bike feels competely different, much more active yet effecient when I lock it out. BUUUUUTTT, about 2 weeks ago, decended in full open, got to the bottom, and went to trail and then to climb mode, and the rear would not firm up. So its actually (rear shock) at Fox right now. THe only thing different Im going to do this round is invert the rear shock, that way I will have clearence for my water bottle. Actually we got it back and mounted in that position and it looked fine and the cable routing was fine, but then we realized it was still not firming up, so it went back. In the pic besides the fork and shock, I also converted to 1 x 10.
    Fox Float CTD rear shock/Spark 900 frame-img_0013.jpg

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    85
    one more thing, when mounted as seen in the pic, mine did hit in the low posistion when compressed. However, when we invert the shock, it can go in either position, but I like high anyways.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    31
    cool thanks for the pics... which fork are you running and do you have any issues with the twinloc

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    85
    no issue with the twin lock. Thats my original fox evolution fork redone by Fox to 2015 factory float specs and I put the black fox sticker which is why you cant see the label.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    31
    cool. i have the 900 spark SL with a rockshock fork, with the scott damper. it was a PITA to get the right damper. so i will try the fox rear with rockshock front...

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    85

    Fox Float CTD rear shock/Spark 900 frame

    I'll post another pic once its remounted.


    Sent from my iPhone 6 Plus using Tapatalk

Similar Threads

  1. Scott Spark 950 2014 - rear shock question
    By z3n0mal4 in forum Scott Sports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-09-2014, 03:53 PM
  2. 2012 Spark 29er rear shock upgrade?
    By JonMX5 in forum Scott Sports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-08-2014, 07:14 AM
  3. Rear shock linkage modification Scott spark
    By andrepsz in forum Weight Weenies
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-07-2014, 09:17 AM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-16-2013, 03:37 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-23-2013, 02:22 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •