Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 102
  1. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    43
    Are you taking too much advantage of the recently legalized recreational pot law in CO?

  2. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dropmachine.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    514
    Stuff.

  3. #28
    mtbr member extraordinair
    Reputation: Stupendous Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    920
    Its only January and we already have the post of the year
    Grit, spit, and a whole lot of duct tape!

  4. #29
    Devil Mtn Expeditions
    Reputation: Stoney22's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    129
    Quote Originally Posted by HEY HEY ITS HENDO View Post
    ... no more pedal strikes for me!
    Understatement of the year.

  5. #30
    NedwannaB
    Reputation: JMac47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    8,613
    Quote Originally Posted by Stoney22 View Post
    Understatement of the year.
    I think it was done for the recycle value of what was removed!

    OMG take the SC stickers off for sure......
    Wait,who did he tell you that?....

  6. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    719
    Quote Originally Posted by danridesbikes View Post
    2. To some extent, wouldn't the legs would operate independently? At least for forks where one side is the spring and one is the damper?



    ........your shitting me right?
    The legs might do more independently, regardless of one leg having the spring. Have you ever checked out the twisting of the legs on an older set of inverted DH forks? Also, even though the forks were single crown the I have seen in person and in photos, a 20mm thru axle didn't stop failure when arches broke.
    Then again, it may just end up a sloppy steering fork, or be just fine.
    I hope we hear back from the OP either way once some time has been put on the set up.

  7. #32
    undercover brother
    Reputation: tangaroo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    875
    Quote Originally Posted by Kronk View Post
    The legs might do more independently, regardless of one leg having the spring. Have you ever checked out the twisting of the legs on an older set of inverted DH forks? Also, even though the forks were single crown the I have seen in person and in photos, a 20mm thru axle didn't stop failure when arches broke.
    Then again, it may just end up a sloppy steering fork, or be just fine.
    I hope we hear back from the OP either way once some time has been put on the set up.
    We have not heard from the OP bc:

    A. He is terribly embarassed
    B. That death contraption failed in every way imaginable leaving him incapable of responding.

  8. #33
    Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
    Reputation: scrublover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    8,435
    Quote Originally Posted by HEY HEY ITS HENDO View Post
    ... no more pedal strikes for me!
    Learning how to ride properly and timing your pedal strokes would have been way cheaper and far less flexy.


    ...does it come in rootbeer?
    Florence Nightingale's Stormtrooper

  9. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    33
    ...this is the best thread ever! MacGyver called, he wants his bike back! And he's pissed!!

  10. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation: markymark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    460
    Heckler 26,... now 29er!  :-)-8a853ea3280a7d9cdcade330e15f98fa651a813ab022bfb2190b9cdfe6934fc7.jpg

  11. #36
    rubber side down
    Reputation: TAOS1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    341
    Name:  860586d1389054654t-heckler-26-now-29er-69er12x4.jpg
Views: 12304
Size:  63.5 KB


    TAOS on pinkbike

  12. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation: sooner518's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,612
    im thinking this has to be a joke. no one would actually do that. im guessing he had an old dual crown fork that doesnt work anymore lying around and decided to play a joke. no way that the rear wheel doesnt hit the seat tube after about 3 inches of travel, and no way that 'modified' fork will last a single drop off a curb.

  13. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Fuglio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,631
    I love it!!


    That is one cool bike!!


  14. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation: reformed roadie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,440
    Quote Originally Posted by scrublover View Post
    Learning how to ride properly and timing your pedal strokes would have been way cheaper and far less flexy.


    ...does it come in rootbeer?
    I believe that Santa Cruz's version of that color was called - and insanely appropriate here - skid mark.


    Learning how to ride has nothing to do with wanting enough BB clearance to ride your local trails. I hear this crap all the time on the inter-web, and it is a joke. If you have to focus part of your brain on where your pedals are, you are compromising.
    That being said, the OP's solution is a bit over the top.

  15. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by rglsr View Post
    Aside from the butchered fork, the BB is higher than the axles, do the math, it ain't good.
    Unless I've missed something, he hasn't altered where the axles and BB are on the frame...

    On a separate note, those photos were date stamped in Sep - I genuinely want the OP to give us an update (although I suspect it was a spoof with a fork bust beyond repair...)

  16. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    180
    time stamp for the fork cutting is right, however the OP lost the axle, so it was November before it was built, which is the time stamp on the bike pic if you click it and look closely

    i think he's 200+ miles in, ok he's not hucking or doing massive downhill runs but works fine though,

    no tyre/seat tube interference - the cable guide on the seat tube was removed

  17. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    376
    Quote Originally Posted by biker99 View Post
    Unless I've missed something, he hasn't altered where the axles and BB are on the frame...

    On a separate note, those photos were date stamped in Sep - I genuinely want the OP to give us an update (although I suspect it was a spoof with a fork bust beyond repair...)

    I think you're missing something, basic frame geometry....
    Longer I2I on rear shock = higher rear axle in relationship to bb. Single pivot rear triangle moves rear axle down in relationship to bb as shock length increases.
    Longer travel front fork/increased axle to crown = higher bb period, axle height remains constant (in relationship to ground) bb height increases as front travel/axle to crown height increases.
    Even with the 29" wheels effectively raising the axle height in relationship to the ground, that bb is ridiculously high....Check out a 29" frame, the bb has much more "drop" to maintain appropriate bb height.

  18. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: HEY HEY ITS HENDO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    713

    ....... will i die?

    Even with the 29" wheels effectively raising the axle height in relationship to the ground, that bb is ridiculously high....Check out a 29" frame, the bb has much more "drop" to maintain appropriate bb height
    ..would you care to expand on your sweeping statement?
    you could teach us all about bottom bracket height,
    why it should be where you think it should be
    advantages/disadvantages etc etc

    Cheers, Graham
    ...Scun.thorpe, UK

  19. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    376
    Quote Originally Posted by HEY HEY ITS HENDO View Post
    ..would you care to expand on your sweeping statement?
    you could teach us all about bottom bracket height,
    why it should be where you think it should be
    advantages/disadvantages etc etc

    Cheers, Graham
    Don't get me wrong, I like the crazy factor here, not trying to be a dick. A higher bb does effect the handling of the bike, 13-13.5" is fairly common for a mid travel FS frame (26, 27.5 and 29 inch) these days. Hey at least you won't have to worry about pedal strikes and run your seat low so you can put your feet on the ground....

  20. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: HEY HEY ITS HENDO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    713
    Apology accepted!

    A higher bb does affect the handling of the bike
    ...Scun.thorpe, UK

  21. #46
    Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
    Reputation: scrublover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    8,435
    Quote Originally Posted by reformed roadie View Post
    I believe that Santa Cruz's version of that color was called - and insanely appropriate here - skid mark.


    Learning how to ride has nothing to do with wanting enough BB clearance to ride your local trails. I hear this crap all the time on the inter-web, and it is a joke. If you have to focus part of your brain on where your pedals are, you are compromising.
    That being said, the OP's solution is a bit over the top.
    Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha!
    Florence Nightingale's Stormtrooper

  22. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4
    Kill it with fire!

    Reminds me of a time when I saw a dude with a monster T on a Rock Vertex XC hardtail. Like your headtube much? Didn't think so.

  23. #48
    Shortcutting Hikabiker
    Reputation: Acme54321's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    2,754
    OP probably is in the ICU after front tire plowed into the lower crown on the first big hit he took.
    "Listen here you beautiful *****, I'm about to **** you up with some truth"

  24. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: chuckeieio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    420
    I demand a video of a rocky descent!
    GTA
    Ontario

  25. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation: goldencalf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    228
    Registered pedalphile.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Heckler.5
    By J.R.A. in forum 27.5 - 650b
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-28-2013, 08:50 AM
  2. New Heckler
    By bernardo in forum Santa Cruz
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 09-04-2012, 06:54 AM
  3. Santa Cruz Heckler or HT 29er
    By motoroilmccall in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-27-2012, 08:49 PM
  4. SC Heckler
    By Tonka4x in forum Santa Cruz
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-24-2011, 10:10 AM
  5. 40 lb Heckler
    By wylyman in forum Santa Cruz
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-28-2011, 12:59 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •