Page 1 of 43 1 2 3 4 5 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 1069
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    139

    Blur LT Carbon Setup Thread

    Won't actually be 'set up' for a couple of days; but, looks really sweet out of the box! 5.68 lbs. More to come. Thanks Zach at Competitive Cyclist.

    Cheers.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    83
    ooooh! thats hot!

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    495
    you lucky bastard, but cmon 5.68lbs? Thats kinda heavy!

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    139
    Quote Originally Posted by dogo
    you lucky bastard, but cmon 5.68lbs? Thats kinda heavy!
    That is pretty porky. It was only supposed to be 5.6 lbs! Here's a photo courtesy of Competitive Cyclist.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  5. #5
    Bring on the Funk!
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    322
    What headset & fork will you be using?

  6. #6
    ...
    Reputation: Porchsong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    605

    nice!!!

    How are you going to build it up?

    Porch
    "If we were Vikings, Rocky Mountain aspen stands would be our Vahalla and its singletrack our bounty" - Mtn Flyer Mag #14

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    139
    Here's the 'build':

    Frame: Santa Cruz Blur LT Carbon, medium
    Rear Shock: Fox Float RP23
    Fork: Fox 36 Talas FIT RC2, 1.5 taper
    Saddle: WTB Devo Carbon
    Seatpost: Crank Brothers Joplin R, 30.9
    Seatpost Clamp: Santa Cruz
    Handlebar: Easton MonkeyLite XC, High Rise, 685mm
    Stem: Syntace F-119 MTB, 90mm
    Grips: Ergon GE1
    Headset: CustomTapered headset
    Shift Levers: SRAM X.0, trigger
    Front Derailleur: Shimano XT M771 Direct Mount
    Rear Derailleur: SRAM X.0, long cage
    Derailleur Cables: Gore Ride-On Sealed
    Brakes: Magura Marta SL Magnesium
    Brake Rotors: Magura SL Drilled, 180mm F & R
    Crankset: Shimano XTR Hollowtech II Crankset FC-M970, 175mm
    Chain: SRAM PC-991
    Pedals: Crank Brothers Mallet 3, Aluminum + Ti
    Cassette: Shimano XTR Cassette CS-M970, 11-34t
    Wheels: Industry Nine Enduro Flow (Stanís Flow rims)
    Tires: Continental Mountain King Protection 2.4 in., converted to tubeless (Stanís)
    Rear Skewer: DT Swiss RWS Thru Bolt, 10x135

    Cheers.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    115
    Wow, another and another amazing bike/build from you. Does this officially declare the end of the recession? I would love to know what you do to afford all these bikes.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    139
    My wife would like to know also. I'm trying to instill consumer confidence and jumpstart the recovery.

    Cheers.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    822
    So where are you heading with this build spec, there's not a great deal of difference between your LT & XC builds other than fork/ wheels, maybe spec the XC closer to it's intentions.

    My XCc (24.5lb) feels like an ultra lightweight LT2a (28.2lb) to me, so I'm curious as to what you think the LT2c will be of benefit to you over a more durable alloy frame.

    BTW if I post a LT2c here as my own send me abusive PM's as I don't believe that a carbon trailbike is the right decision for me. I understand that the carbon is strong in SC impact tests etc. but there's the everday durabilty issues that concerns me, the rear dropouts with no plated protection from skewers let alone a bolt up rear hub eek.

    I'll suffer these on a job specific bike like the XC, but a trail rig....nah.
    Last edited by Gripo; 05-19-2009 at 01:40 AM.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Pedalhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    291
    wow that looks sweet, and it's in my colour too...After demo'ing an alu LT2 at the weekend, I'm planning on placing an order for one of these carbon beauties shortly. Can't wait to see yours built up!

  12. #12
    Got A Lust for Life...
    Reputation: indyfab25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,956
    That BB junction looks super stout. I cannot wait for mine.
    I am immune to your disdain.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Black RONIN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,506
    Man, that's what I call beautiful. I thought the Mojo was kinda nice for a carbon bike, but this is beyond imagination. I'm waiting my modest and regular BLT to come, and from my experience with it, I'll probably order a BLTc next year. If a carbon Nomad doesn't show up before!

    Hey, is that a press-in BB like those on Pivot bikes?

    Congratulations, that will be a really smooth ride!
    Last edited by Black RONIN; 05-19-2009 at 09:26 AM.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    139
    Gripo: All good questions and comments. I'm not quite sure where it's headed either. I've got three bikes and I'm trying to differentiate them (like fly rods). The XCc should probably be pushed more towards XC. I'll see how it sorts out.

    Black Ronin: The BB was wrapped in masking tape. I'll have to check tomorrow. It was represented as a custom proprietary tapered headset. I don't even know who makes it.

    Almost together, except the front wheel needed a 20mm sleeve from I9. It will be here on Thurs. Raining now, but supposed to be a good Memorial Day weekend here with temperatures in the low 70's. I'll post some more pictures on Friday.

    Cheers.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,362
    Quote Originally Posted by m_driscoll
    That is pretty porky. It was only supposed to be 5.6 lbs! Here's a photo courtesy of Competitive Cyclist.
    Ahh the .08lb is the seat post clamp and the dust on the frame

    Fantastic looking frame, I'm hoping to have one by the end of the year, keep us posted on your build up.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: smittylube's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    214
    just wait till you ride it..

    your going to be sooooo stoked! I had a chance to test drive one yesterday.. incredible IMO.

    Steve

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Pedalhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    291
    Steve, tell us more!

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: smittylube's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    214
    Ok so my story is I have ridden a hard tail wicked since 1990 or 91. a year & 1/2 ago I bought an older gen1 bruja. (just to give a where I'm at sort of reference). I love the squishy of the bruja- vanilla f & r. So I have been trying out lots of different tires, forks, wheels etc. NOT very tech trails but over and over on the same trail day after day I get a pretty good feel for the changes.

    Then my buddy at my LBS is buds w the owner of SC bikes. A few weeks ago he had the XC version.. I did not get a chance to ride that, however when the offer to spin this came I jumped on it.My story is this- just returned from mendo 4 days of riding long weekend, went and grabbed the bike for my morning ride on my way to work. I checked out a few angles and heights to compare to my current bruja. BB 1 inch lower on the LT, Bars 1" lower as well, Seat to bars 1" longer, a plus as my bruja is m and the LT is L . Bars are 27 bruja 26". Seat tube angle looked identical, head tube maybe 1/2 degree more slack- almost identical. wheelbase 1" longer. I weight 170 and 5' 11" tall.

    This one had the revalation forks and RP 2.3 shock. Apparently the owner is 185lbs so I did not touch the air pressure. I did reset the orings for reference. Initial sag looked pretty much inline for starters.

    I rode Fremont older in Cupertino. I start in the prospect lot. Initial impression was climbing felt good. now I am really tired from riding for a 10 day s straight.. but it climbed well middle chain ring all the way to Maisies peak. I dropped into granny for that. Now I did not lock out anything as far as shocks go.. Then the fun begins.. So I blast down from Maisies and do my normal left and duck oder the tree branches- it feels great. then some fire road, zig zag around the rain ruts, pop a little air off the bump, then to the chopped up from the horses section.. Well I do feel the bumps but it is more like good feedback not beat you up stuff.. Then a bit more fire road and blast a right to the toyon trail single track, now this is getting good.. It is super responsive, back it here, jump off the hump, zig over to the skinny section, up, then down, the roller coaster, then small climb out, back down the next toyon section- fantastic!, a hop here, zig there, a few banks off the side, then back to fire road, through the meadow, short climb then seven springs single track downhill, then climb out. They had done some recent trail work here and for some reason installed about 15 speed bumps / jumps. this bike is tracking wonderfull, goes where you put it, pop off the bumps, then climbing it just goes great.. NO pedal bob like my bruja/vanilla. it has a great 'feedback feel' like pedaling a HT yet softens up the bumps like they are not there. The tire were more xc than what I tend to ride, but the did not slip even on the powder sections like the susp. took up what it needed and made the tires stick.
    In the end the rear had used most of the travel so the air might have been slightly too low, front used 3-3 1/2" travel. (even low rear shock pressure had less pogo when pedaling than my bruja)

    To sum it up it was a very expensive test ride for me and I have a bruja for sale..

    Also I heard they were not quite out for a few weeks or so- or at least not the large ones..

    Just my take on it. NO technical stuff involved. I just had the best ride ever IMO..

    Steve

    Disclaimer- interpret it in your own way. Hope my description compares to yours when you ride it.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: smittylube's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    214
    Quote Originally Posted by Pedalhead
    Steve, tell us more!
    What did you think of your test ride?

    you must have liked it if your going to place your order!


    Steve

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    139
    Steve: Awesome! I can't wait.

    Cheers.

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Pedalhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    291
    Awesome write-up, thanks. Makes me want to go out & ride my bike! From your description, I'm pleased to see it sounds very stiff...point & shoot...nimble, just what I'm after, but with the trail-bike angles I prefer, rather than being race-steep. From my test ride of the standard LT2, I thought it had all the good bits of my Horst Fivespot...nice angles, burly feeling but not too heavy, but also felt tighter...not as plush, but I like that, the Fivespot can be too plush & can suffer on climbs. I found the LT2 to be a lot quicker on the climbs, and I found myself in the middle ring when often I knew I'd have been in the granny on the 'Spot. I'm liking the idea of having all these features, but in a lighter, stiffer frame, so the carbon it had to be.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: smittylube's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    214
    >>>but also felt tighter...not as plush<<<

    I'm telling you the 'feedback' feel was unlike anything I had ridden before. I really think it will be unreal in the technical trails. Much more than the plush or pogo of my vanilla.

    The other thing I dont know if you caught was how much rear susp travel there was (or I used) . I think it will even climb better with it setup slightly stiffer/ more air psi in the rear...

    steve

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Pedalhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by smittylube
    >>>but also felt tighter...not as plush<<<

    I'm telling you the 'feedback' feel was unlike anything I had ridden before. I really think it will be unreal in the technical trails. Much more than the plush or pogo of my vanilla.

    The other thing I dont know if you caught was how much rear susp travel there was (or I used) . I think it will even climb better with it setup slightly stiffer/ more air psi in the rear...

    steve
    Awesome, that's what I really liked about the BLT, it felt really connected to the trail, but at the same time with a feeling of having a good amount of travel available if needed. Bearing in mind the traits of carbon over alu, I wouldn't be surprised if this one felt even more so.

  24. #24
    Bum Buzzer
    Reputation: Huck Banzai's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,988
    Quote Originally Posted by Gripo
    I'm curious as to what you think the LT2c will be of benefit to you over a more durable alloy frame.
    Im nor trying to turn this into a carbon vs.. thread, but this frame is claimed to be significantly stronger than its alu counterpart (which I have LT2 'a' XL Ano Black)

    My experience with carbon, and exposure to it in diff applications agrees with that, as do the engineers.

    Maybe Im misinterpreting, in which case - oops, but it just seems a casual allusion to a commonly held, but incorrect, belief that carbon/thermo-plastics are weaker or more prone to failure than aluminum when the opposite is true.


    Back to OP/OT - that build is sweet; Im one that would prefer a matte finish, but you cant stop the sexiness that is the BLT2c!!! Enjoy that thing!!

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    822
    Quote Originally Posted by Huck Banzai
    Im nor trying to turn this into a carbon vs.. thread, but this frame is claimed to be significantly stronger than its alu counterpart (which I have LT2 'a' XL Ano Black)

    My experience with carbon, and exposure to it in diff applications agrees with that, as do the engineers.

    Maybe Im misinterpreting, in which case - oops, but it just seems a casual allusion to a commonly held, but incorrect, belief that carbon/thermo-plastics are weaker or more prone to failure than aluminum when the opposite is true.
    I don't doubt the outright strength of carbon but could see an issue with durability/longevity. True about it's strength, how long has it been used in the aerospace industry or sports like F1/Moto GP etc. but then how often is a carbon component replaced in those arenas?

    For example the rear dropouts on the LT/XC's is all carbon without any metal protection, I can see a longevity issue with some users who may overtighten the qr's or worse would be a bolt up axle/hub that grinds into the carbon as it's tightened. Then there's the seatpost clamp area which will be crushed 1000's of times by seatpost QR's.

    Time will tell, I'm just being cautious.

Page 1 of 43 1 2 3 4 5 11 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •