Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 73

Thread: 650B Santa Cruz

  1. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation: portnoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    268

    I don't know about that...

    ...if you aren't selling bikes you aren't recouping anything-- they'll be just fine and are big enough they likely recouped those costs long ago. But it will force with them, as it has with most manufacturers I imagine, a review of the entire product line.

    As an "all-mountain" guy on a Nomad II that I love and have been on for three years in October, I still can't imagine I'll ever buy another 26er for my kind of riding. I know too many guys I've been riding with forever who are on 29ers now and can't even conceive of getting another 26er.

    I'm getting a new bike in 2013, and while I don't know exactly what bike I"m going to get I do know it won't have 26" wheels. If a 650 Nomad is on the boards then I'll wait for it. If not, as much as I love my Nomad and Santa Cruz, I'll be on another brand's bike.



    Quote Originally Posted by dopepedaler View Post
    I am sure SC is saying this as a 650b would immediately castrate and delegitimize their 26's (along with all the R & D money). They'll probably resist a 650 wheeled bike until they feel they've recouped enough revenue, on the newer carbon 26's, to justify the expense.
    I'll be along... eventually.

  2. #27
    Got A Lust for Life...
    Reputation: indyfab25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,956
    They are making one. They just are not telling folks. Hints abound. They are not stupid, after all.
    I am immune to your disdain.

  3. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,380
    Santa Cruz is typically slow to adopt new trends/technologies. They waited a long time to offer 29ers (which are now their top-selling bikes). Just a year ago they said that 142x12 isn't needed, but now they are offering it on many bikes. I'm sure they are at least thinking about 650b, if not already prototyping some.

    Would a 650b bike be a good business decision for SC? There are lots of factors to consider. Based on these forums and the fact that many are putting 650b wheels on existing SC bikes, there seems to be a good demand. Intense already offers 650b trail/am bikes with VPP suspension in both carbon and alloy. Should SC offer the same thing and try to take part of that market share, or should they try to fill another niche like a short-travel 650b XC race bike? Or maybe something longer travel like a 650b Nomad? When you consider the cost of engineering & design, prototyping, and tooling up to produce a carbon frame, you probably need a strong business case to proceed.

  4. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    823
    Quote Originally Posted by jabrabu View Post
    Santa Cruz is typically slow to adopt new trends/technologies. They waited a long time to offer 29ers (which are now their top-selling bikes). Just a year ago they said that 142x12 isn't needed, but now they are offering it on many bikes.
    Got to admit over the years they have shown to be a company of double speakers....MF was the best at it.

    650b for them will happen, most likely you'll see a Blur LT with a 23" TT, slacker H/A, lower BB and of course a tweaked TRc to fit 650's in for mud clearance.

    Betcha though they are kicking themselves for not going with swapable dropouts like Intense....would of made these wheel fads a lot easier to deal with.

  5. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    454
    Quote Originally Posted by msylvan View Post
    I'm getting a new bike in 2013, and while I don't know exactly what bike I"m going to get I do know it won't have 26" wheels. If a 650 Nomad is on the boards then I'll wait for it. If not, as much as I love my Nomad and Santa Cruz, I'll be on another brand's bike.
    Just put -1 Angleset to your old Nomad and service/tune your suspension, and it will roll over stuff better than a 650b.

  6. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    6,287
    Quote Originally Posted by msylvan View Post
    .
    I'm getting a new bike in 2013, and while I don't know exactly what bike I"m going to get I do know it won't have 26" wheels. If a 650 Nomad is on the boards then I'll wait for it. If not, as much as I love my Nomad and Santa Cruz, I'll be on another brand's bike.
    Get a 650B fork + front wheel for your Nomad for the best of both worlds...
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  7. #32
    kev
    kev is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    179

    Long term ride review?

    Noah -

    I too have an aluminum Blur LT2 and am thinking hard about the 650b mod. It looks like it has been about 6 months since your original post. Do you have any longer term impressions? As for the BB height, funny that it bugs you to have a taller BB. That is one of the reasons I want to go with the 650b wheelset. I came off of a Ventana El Saltamontes that I rode with a 125mm fork and noticed immediately that I was hitting my pedals more with my Blur LT than I did with the Ventana. Anyway - what else can you tell me about your Blur after riding it for a while? Did you keep it set up that way?

    TIA,

    kev

    Quote Originally Posted by NoahColorado View Post

    I put 650b wheels on my 2012 Aluminum LT on Friday. I rode it all weekend, here are my first impressions:

    1. Higher BB is kind of a downer, might have to knock the fork down to 130mm. (26" Reynolds Carbon AM wheels with high-volume tubeless tires, 140mm White Brothers LOOP fork: 13.6" BB, 650b Stans Flow/DT wheels with Nevegal 2.35 front and unnamed rear 2.1: 14.1" BB). I wouldn't say it's a huge deal, but it is noticeable.

    2. Carries speed a little better through semi-rough sections. Likewise, ledges seem a touch easier. The smallish rear tire rolls great, but is less than stellar in the gnar-gnar.

    3. A little slower when sprinting, but the 650b wheels are obviously heavier than my carbon 26".

    4. My standard gearing (1x10, 34t x 11-36t) felt a bit tougher - but maybe I just had an "off" weekend.

    Need more time on them to decide if they're staying on. Not a clear advantage at this point. Tallboy LTc on the way anyway.....

  8. #33
    GUIDANCE COUNSELOR
    Reputation: NoahColorado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,872
    Quote Originally Posted by kev View Post
    Noah -

    I too have an aluminum Blur LT2 and am thinking hard about the 650b mod. It looks like it has been about 6 months since your original post. Do you have any longer term impressions? As for the BB height, funny that it bugs you to have a taller BB. That is one of the reasons I want to go with the 650b wheelset. I came off of a Ventana El Saltamontes that I rode with a 125mm fork and noticed immediately that I was hitting my pedals more with my Blur LT than I did with the Ventana. Anyway - what else can you tell me about your Blur after riding it for a while? Did you keep it set up that way?

    TIA,

    kev
    Hi Kev,

    I didn't keep it setup that way. I didn't feel like there was any benefit and I much preferred my 26" wheel and tire setup on that bike (Reynolds AM Carbon wheels and Maxxis HR2 tires). I'm sure a TRc works much better as a conversion.

    I got a Tallboy LTc not long after the 650b experiment, I much prefer that bike to anything else.

    I need to get rid of the 650b wheels if anyone wants a nice, barely used set to try. Flow rims, DT Supercomp spokes, DT 350 rear hub and 440 front (with 15 and 20 caps).
    NOAH SEARS
    MRP
    TECH QUESTIONS HERE: INFO@MRPBIKE.COM

  9. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by NoahColorado View Post
    Hi Kev,

    I didn't keep it setup that way. I didn't feel like there was any benefit and I much preferred my 26" wheel and tire setup on that bike (Reynolds AM Carbon wheels and Maxxis HR2 tires). I'm sure a TRc works much better as a conversion.

    I got a Tallboy LTc not long after the 650b experiment, I much prefer that bike to anything else.

    I need to get rid of the 650b wheels if anyone wants a nice, barely used set to try. Flow rims, DT Supercomp spokes, DT 350 rear hub and 440 front (with 15 and 20 caps).
    Always wanted to try this... I may be interested...what are you looking at to get rid of 'em ?

    thx

  10. #35
    rollin
    Reputation: sriracha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    2,569
    I'm not in any hurry to jump to 650b. I have a 29'er hard tail, a 26" full suspension trail bike and a 26 dh bike.

    If I want ultimate trail speed on smooth trails, I take the 29'er. If I plan on climbing up the mountain, then mobbing down ultra rocky trails, I take the 26" trail bike.

    I don't race, so the perceived benefits of 650b are not needed by me, nor are they a big enough difference for me to jump ship on 26.

    I'm not a fan of perceived obsolescence, and therefore do not have this general feeling that 26" is not as good as the new 650b...I'll stick with a 29'er hard tail and a 26 trail machine.

  11. #36
    kev
    kev is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    179
    I'm interested in the wheels. How much are you asking for them? Thanks!

  12. #37
    rollin
    Reputation: sriracha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    2,569
    Quote Originally Posted by Gripo View Post
    Betcha though they are kicking themselves for not going with swapable dropouts like Intense....would of made these wheel fads a lot easier to deal with.

    ^^^That would be the best solution, swapable dropouts for different wheel fads...dropouts that have height offsets also, to compensate for geometry changes caused by different wheel diameters.
    I would be down with that idea.

  13. #38
    kev
    kev is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    179
    Makes sense if you have both a 29er and a 26" bike, especially if one is a TB LT and the other a Blur LT, but I am pretty much a "one bike to rule them all" guy. So for exactly the reasons you state, that you want/need a 29" for smooth trails and 26" for trail, I think a 27.5 Blur LT would be a perfect solution.

    kev

  14. #39
    kev
    kev is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    179

    Slacker angle Blur LT 650b

    So this is interesting... the links below come from another SC thread as suggestions for slacking out the HA, and slightly lowering the BB on a Blur LT. It seems to me that one of these two parts, along with the 650b wheel set would be a pretty nice set up. It takes care of one of the issues identified by some, that is, the too tall BB that results from the 650b wheels. I can imagine that the 1 degree or so slacker HA would also be a nice treatment for the Blur LT. (That is exactly what the other thread was all about.) Apparently this would put the HA right on par with the Nomad, but with shorter chain stays. The long stays are one of the reasons that I am not a big fan of the Nomad (just my opinion, so please no flames necessary...)

    Works Components - 1 0 Degree EC34 - Traditional 1 1 8 Fitment

    Burgtec Titanium Offset Shock Hardware | Burgtec
    Last edited by kev; 10-11-2012 at 02:23 PM. Reason: want to add active web links and make more clear

  15. #40
    rollin
    Reputation: sriracha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    2,569
    Quote Originally Posted by kev View Post
    Makes sense if you have both a 29er and a 26" bike, especially if one is a TB LT and the other a Blur LT, but I am pretty much a "one bike to rule them all" guy. So for exactly the reasons you state, that you want/need a 29" for smooth trails and 26" for trail, I think a 27.5 Blur LT would be a perfect solution.

    kev
    That makes sense. I've done a few "one bike to rule them all". It's nice, but I concluded that I was getting the best of neither and that it was too much of a compromise.

    I am now a "quiver of bikes to rule them all" kind of guy.

  16. #41
    rollin
    Reputation: sriracha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    2,569
    Quote Originally Posted by kev View Post
    The long stays are one of the reasons that I am not a big fan of the Nomad (just my opinion, so please no flames necessary...)
    long chainstays are what swayed me away from a long travel 29'er suspension frame and pushed me back towards a long travel 26 trail bike.

  17. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: arctic slalom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    201
    Will 650B wheels fit into a first generation blur? The one from about 6-7 years ago?
    Maah Daah Hey

  18. #43
    kev
    kev is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    179
    Well, to be honest, I have a bit of a quiver as well, though I only really ride the Blur. One son rides my old Foes FXR.. The other son rides my old Ventana El Saltamontes. I also have an original fullly rigid, steel VooDoo Bizango. So my assortment of bikes is more of a hodge podge than anything that is particularly useful to me for different types of riding the way a 29er and a 26er would be. I definitely get the idea of having more than one bike along those lines. I'm just not there at the moment.

    thumbs up back atcha.


    kev

  19. #44
    GUIDANCE COUNSELOR
    Reputation: NoahColorado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,872
    Quote Originally Posted by Kanza View Post
    Wow...carbon reynolds and unnamed rear tyres? interesting mix
    I had/have a Crossmark 650b, I think I can say that now.
    NOAH SEARS
    MRP
    TECH QUESTIONS HERE: INFO@MRPBIKE.COM

  20. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    23
    I personally can't wait until SC releases a 27.5 wheel trail bike. With any luck, they'll create one in the same vein as the TRc but with slightly more travel - you would have to match up to the Fox 34 at 140-160mm of travel, with 150 being the sweet spot. I'm betting the toughest choice for Mr. Graney is deciding how both a long(ish)-travel 27.5 trail bike can co-exist with the Nomad in their line-up. I personally think the Nomad covers the enduro/AM crowd with a few purposeful suspension choices (i.e. long fork and coil / Push link shock), while a modified Blur LTc in a 27.5/650b size would rule the pedally trails with a bit of gnar. I wouldn't be surprised to see the Nomad beefed up in some fashion (kit options, head angle, shock rate), and the Blur LTc (27.5/650 size) get a low bb with ISCG tabs, slack head angle, and an appropriately steep seat tube angle for pedalling. Although the 27.5/650 thing may influence those angles outside of what we know as normal on a 26-er (as they did with 29"). Regardless, when SC brings it, it will likely be the best one out there and I can't F'n wait!

  21. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by indyfab25 View Post
    They are making one. They just are not telling folks. Hints abound. They are not stupid, after all.
    Where have you seen the hints?

  22. #47
    007
    007 is offline
    b a n n e d
    Reputation: 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    5,394
    Quote Originally Posted by kboth View Post
    Where have you seen the hints?
    Pure speculation AFAIK. I've been following closely and know of not one single indication other than "My sister's cousin's best friend's uncles's baby momma said its coming"

    Trust me, I'm really hoping for a 650b from SC, and would be surprised if they didn't create one . . . but if history repeats itself, they're going to let the rest of the industry cut their teeth, learn from their mistakes and then release a great bike from the 1st go round. Similar to the approach they took with creating a long-travel 29er.
    Alcohol may lead nowhere, but it sure is the scenic route!

  23. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    232
    Santa Cruz isn't gonna spend the money to make. 650b until they have to. Look how bad they re eating crow about the142 rear ends. I bet if you ask mouthy Mike he ll still say they don't need it. Whatever Mike. Everyone knows your full of sh-t at this point.

  24. #49
    007
    007 is offline
    b a n n e d
    Reputation: 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    5,394
    Quote Originally Posted by RBrady View Post
    Santa Cruz isn't gonna spend the money to make. 650b until they have to. Look how bad they re eating crow about the142 rear ends. I bet if you ask mouthy Mike he ll still say they don't need it. Whatever Mike.Everyone knows your full of sh-t at this point.

    Aaaaaand everyone else also knows that he's no longer affiliated with SC bikes.
    Alcohol may lead nowhere, but it sure is the scenic route!

  25. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jazzanova's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,445
    Quote Originally Posted by OO7 View Post
    Aaaaaand everyone else also knows that he's no longer affiliated with SC bikes.
    Now, that was funny

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •