Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 100 of 116

Thread: Colossal

  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,018

    Colossal

    Anybody in line to get one? When will they be available?

    This bike ticks all the boxes for me.

    I love the color. I love the panel graphics like my current La Cruz and like the older Salsas. Disc brakes. ENVE tapered carbon fork. Road bike only. It's got everything I need/want.


  2. #2
    Birthday Collector
    Reputation: ATBScott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,587
    88Rex - the Colossal is available - your dealer should have them if they put them on the season's order. If they were late in line, they should be getting them soon. We started getting them about 3 weeks ago. Very cool bike - steel-smooth and comfortable. The Ti bikes are not showing up until sometime in December - at least the best estimate! This would be a great bike for the Randonneur or light "credit card" tourist. Not light enough to be a racer, but for the 99% of us who rarely (or don't) ever race, it one of the nicer production steel bikes designed to do a lot of things fairly well. The roads around here are often chip-sealed and the slightly larger tire really helps in making those micro-vibrations disappear.

    Depending on where you are, there should be a Salsa demo day scheduled sometime in your area. Hopefully they or the dealer will have a Colossal your size and you can give it a spin. This bike is not particularly light, but rides a lot lighter than it is. Like an El Mariachi, the handling just feels "right" almost as soon as you get on it. It is kind of like a bit-edgier Casseroll with disc brakes, and a bit less tire clearances.
    R.I.P. Corky 10/97-4/09
    Disclaimer: I sell and repair bikes for a living
    http://www.endlesscyclesonline.com

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,018
    Quote Originally Posted by ATBScott View Post
    88Rex - the Colossal is available - your dealer should have them if they put them on the season's order. If they were late in line, they should be getting them soon. We started getting them about 3 weeks ago. Very cool bike - steel-smooth and comfortable. The Ti bikes are not showing up until sometime in December - at least the best estimate! This would be a great bike for the Randonneur or light "credit card" tourist. Not light enough to be a racer, but for the 99% of us who rarely (or don't) ever race, it one of the nicer production steel bikes designed to do a lot of things fairly well. The roads around here are often chip-sealed and the slightly larger tire really helps in making those micro-vibrations disappear.

    Depending on where you are, there should be a Salsa demo day scheduled sometime in your area. Hopefully they or the dealer will have a Colossal your size and you can give it a spin. This bike is not particularly light, but rides a lot lighter than it is. Like an El Mariachi, the handling just feels "right" almost as soon as you get on it. It is kind of like a bit-edgier Casseroll with disc brakes, and a bit less tire clearances.


    Sounds good. I'll have to see what my LBS has to offer in regards to Sasla.

    FWIW, my intentions for the bike are, ironically, my go fast bike and race bike. I had a BMC that was light, fast, and great, BUT didn't quite give me that lively feel. It was a "race" bike that wasn't fun to ride/race. My La Cruz, although not a "race" bike, is more fun to race and ride. I sold the BMC and upgraded the La Cruz. My La Cruz is running double duty.......CX racer and Road Racer. The Colossal would fill my role of racer perfectly. I would expect to have it around 19lbs with my race wheels (just a bit lighter than my La Cruz) . Light enough for me....

    I'm a bit of an oddfellow.

  4. #4
    Master of the Obvious
    Reputation: Angus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    497
    Yep the Colossal has me salivating for sure. I am saving my pennies currently and hope there are some left in Jan-Feb when I should have enough duckets to get one!
    Check out my Blog!
    Yes ! I am posting on my Blog again! come visit!

  5. #5
    get down!
    Reputation: appleSSeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,183
    What are these going to weigh?
    Rudy Projects look ridiculous

    visit my blog, BEATS, BIKES & LIFE

  6. #6
    Master of the Obvious
    Reputation: Angus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    497
    Quote Originally Posted by appleSSeed View Post
    What are these going to weigh?

    This is purely speculative on my end as I have not seen one yet, but I would be willing to bet between 20-21 lbs would cover it going by the parts, and considering the average weight of a chromo frame.

    I am not turned off by the weight as I know it will do everything I want and more.
    Check out my Blog!
    Yes ! I am posting on my Blog again! come visit!

  7. #7
    Birthday Collector
    Reputation: ATBScott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,587
    So - a 56cm weighs in at 21 Lbs 10 Oz without pedals, according to the Park Scale here at the shop. More than I would have guessed after riding the bike, but not from picking it up.
    R.I.P. Corky 10/97-4/09
    Disclaimer: I sell and repair bikes for a living
    http://www.endlesscyclesonline.com

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,018
    So about 22.5 lbs with pedals. Sounds about right. Definitely has some potential for weight loss.

  9. #9
    Birthday Collector
    Reputation: ATBScott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,587
    Ti version with Ultegra!!!
    R.I.P. Corky 10/97-4/09
    Disclaimer: I sell and repair bikes for a living
    http://www.endlesscyclesonline.com

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 1-bar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    1,466
    Quote Originally Posted by 88 rex View Post
    Anybody in line to get one? When will they be available?

    This bike ticks all the boxes for me.

    I love the color. I love the panel graphics like my current La Cruz and like the older Salsas. Disc brakes. ENVE tapered carbon fork. Road bike only. It's got everything I need/want.


    Man that is gorgeous!!!
    2017 Spec Epic Expert WC
    2016 Trek Superfly SS (32x21)

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    14
    Has anybody picked up a Colossal lately? I'd love to read a recent review!

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    235
    I'm building my Ti Collosal tomorrow. CAN NOT WAIT...

    I'll post a review early next week.... Shooting for sub 8kg build...

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: No_Roads's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    93
    Quote Originally Posted by Macbeth View Post
    I'm building my Ti Collosal tomorrow. CAN NOT WAIT...

    I'll post a review early next week.... Shooting for sub 8kg build...
    Can't wait to hear about it! This bike is on top of my list for a spring purchase.
    "The more you ride your bike, the less your ass will hurt." - Surly Blog

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    235
    Crappy iPhone pic, but today is the best day ever... This thing is AMAZING...

    More details soon, I promise...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Colossal-484889_10151235785808862_454669483_n.jpg  


  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    512
    wow, that is a sick looking bike

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: No_Roads's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    93
    Quote Originally Posted by Macbeth View Post
    Crappy iPhone pic, but today is the best day ever... This thing is AMAZING...

    More details soon, I promise...
    Its awesome looking. How does it ride? What do you think the weight came in at?
    "The more you ride your bike, the less your ass will hurt." - Surly Blog

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by No_Roads View Post
    Its awesome looking. How does it ride? What do you think the weight came in at?
    Rides amazing... Previous to the Colossal I was on a Cannondale Synapse HiMod... The Colossal is just as smooth but a bunch snappier and handles SO much better... Best decending bike I have ever owned...

    Build kit is SRAM Force, Stans Alpha 340 Disc wheels with Hutchinson Intensive 25s set up tubeless. Total weight with cages, pedals and garmin mount is 8.3kg... Heavier than my Synapse for sure, but the wheel and tyre combination is lighter and it FEELS like a much lighter bike to ride...

    SO happy...

    Adam

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    128
    I'll be looking to try one of these this spring as well. For me, the question will be whether or not I like the ride better than my vaya. I ride the vaya almost exclusively on the road and bike paths, but I am running some cushy 42s... Might be hard to give those up.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,018
    Quote Originally Posted by seewhatididther View Post
    I'll be looking to try one of these this spring as well. For me, the question will be whether or not I like the ride better than my vaya. I ride the vaya almost exclusively on the road and bike paths, but I am running some cushy 42s... Might be hard to give those up.


    LOL.....I'd gues it probably rides a little different than your Vaya...especially with 42's.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    128
    Quote Originally Posted by 88 rex View Post
    LOL.....I'd gues it probably rides a little different than your Vaya...especially with 42's.
    IKR? Everything else I ride is harsh by comparison! I'd still like to try one though. I need to toughen up!

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    235
    I work at a Salsa dealer, and I'll be interested to hear feedback about Colossal vs. Vaya...

    At the moment my assumption is that we won't sell many steel Colossals as I think they are gonna be quite heavy, and the Vaya 2 is LOADS more versatile for not much of a weight penalty...

    Will be interesting...

  22. #22
    wish I was out riding
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    43
    more builds of colossals anyone?
    also, anyone knows how much does the steel frame weighs?

    thanks

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2

    Good job!

    Quote Originally Posted by BuntyMan View Post
    more builds of colossals anyone?
    also, anyone knows how much does the steel frame weighs?

    thanks
    I'm a week in and a number of rides down with the steel colossal. It's stock right now and weighs in just under 23lbs (56cm). This bike ROCKS.

    to reiterate a comment earlier, it is SO smooth and solid when going mach speeds down hills. And although not the ti version, it still has that getup and go feeling that i find so inherent in ti bikes.

    going to ride the 28's for a while, but may move down to 25's later. we'll see. The only way to seriously knock a few lb's off the total weight is a wheelset upgrade. otherwise you're only nipping at it with post, stem, cranks, brakes etc (not that those won't come in time, too).

    I'm a steel rider, and when i got on this whip, it was like a dream ride.

    Thinking about that when Chris king releases his road disk hubs

  24. #24
    wish I was out riding
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    43
    sweet! lots of info here!
    can I ask you a couple of questions if you don't mind?
    how tall are you/inseam? From the website, I should go with the 56cm frame, too. But being new at this "road bike malarky" I could use some help! Also, what stem length?

    I wonder how much do the stock wheelset weighs... I've eyed a couple that are around 3.3 lbs (1500 g) and I was wondering if that's acceptable, or not.

    anyway, thanks for your post! very helpful!

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2
    Everybody's body and riding styles are different. I have long legs, a short torso and long arms, so I had to put a 120mm stem in place of the 100mm that was on there, and set the saddle pretty far back with an upwards tilt (but this is very specific to my riding style and feel, i tend to slide forward and prefer to lay nice and long).

    In all honesty, I'd try to ride the bike and feel it out. That's the best way to know. Otherwise, I'm ~5'10 & 143lbs and dont' know my inseam.

    I think frame size comes down to one simple question –*do you want to feel like you're riding in the bike, or on top of the bike. I prefer the former.

    Acceptability of weight? To whom? I'm totally happy with the weight of the bike. I'm not a racer, so an 18lb bike isn't really something i *need.* sure, in time, it could be nice to lighten the bike up a bit, but it's already a very reasonably weighted steel bike considering the component spec it comes with. And when climbing, I don't feel the weight, especially with the gearing of the apex. I tackled the manayunk wall two days ago, and i'll tell you, it wasn't the weight of the bike that deterred me from summiting that beast… : ]

  26. #26
    wish I was out riding
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    43
    I am not a racer. At the moment I am using a on-one 29er, without suspension and singlespeed (36*15).... using it on the road with 700*40. so I am not exactly concerned about weight in general. And like you I often find hills that I cannot climb and weight is not the reason why..
    But, if I buy a different bike, well I want it to be different (does this make sense?). By looking online I saw that the frame of the colossal weighs not far the one of my inbred... now I don't need a super racer-13lb bike, but maybe an 18 could be what I would like (with all respect for your ideas, that is), given that I am already covered should I need a "tourer" (by adding gears to my current bike).

    And thanks for the info re. sizing. I am very similar so at least I would know what size to choose!

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    254
    I put in an order for a TI model on Friday... Gonna build it up with campagnolo centaur (10sp)

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    229
    Post some pics when you get it! I'm slightly tempted by the steel Colossal sitting at the LBS, but not tempted quite enough to bite. It's a beautiful bike though.

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    254
    10-4 I will

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nakedbabytoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    946
    Joining the ranks soon Just bit the bullet on a special order one from my LBS today. CAN. NOT. WAIT.
    I bought a Casseroll instead a few months back and didn't so much as regret it as I found myself longing for the flash and dash of the Colossal. So after months of talking myself out of it, I placed the Cass up for sale and a deposit on the Colossal.
    I'll post pics about this time next week!

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    65
    Another soon-to-be Colossal rider here - just ordered a 58 ti frame built up with Force and Stans Alpha 340 wheels. Kept the salsa bars/stem/seatpost spec'd on the factory bike though I did step down to 25 tires. No idea what it'll weigh in at and not really concerned - goal is a comfortable all-day-rider that will go up and down really well. Pics to follow when it shows up.

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    10
    ^That's going to be sweet! Anybody with a 60cm post pics!

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nakedbabytoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    946
    Gonna be a long weekend. Expecting delivery Monday morning and buildup later that day by my LBS, pickup by 5pm close.
    I got the steel version, size 51(I am a short female rider) and will stay stock except I think it begs for a King headset in anodized orange. Time crunch with racing season coming, so I probably will wait and make the headset switch at the first full tuneup after cable stretch and seating of parts.

    You guys that got Ti, since this is sortof a new from drawing board nitche category bike & geo, were you concerned at all that you might not like it? I briefly gave the Ti some consideration but that was my fear.

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    65
    I don't think the Colossal is that niche, aside from the discs. If I had a little fatter budget I'd have bought the Vamoots I've always wanted - if everything I've read is true though the Colossal will scratch that itch perfectly.

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nakedbabytoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    946
    Ah, okay. Perhaps I was getting bowled over by all the talk that this was some new bike geo or something came up with by Salsa designers and testers.
    So just a road bike with disks....got cha!

    Whelp, either way....here he is(yes, "he", I call it my cheater bike since I sold my plush easy going Casseroll for my spicey stallion racer)

    I haven't ridden it for more than a few blocks at this point. My LBS got behind and it didn't get finished until 8pm last night then I had family obligations afterwards. So tonight is the shakedown ride of 20 miles. It defianately is more aggressive!

    Stock so far. I have an orange King headset on order to put on at first tuneup.

    Colossal-image.jpg

    Colossal-image.jpg

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    754
    What's with the platform pedals?

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nakedbabytoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    946
    I do not like clipless or flats & straps. I have rode both, tried both, was not fond of either system. Platforms with pins work best for me and my Converse All Stars as my biking shoes on all my bikes(unicycle, cargo, fatbike, and road).

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 1-bar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    1,466
    Nakedbabytoes - beautiful bike! If I wasn't so invested in my current road bike, I'd snap up a steel Colossal in a heart beat!
    2017 Spec Epic Expert WC
    2016 Trek Superfly SS (32x21)

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    65

    Colossal

    Nice bike babytoes! Look forward to your first ride report

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nakedbabytoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    946
    First ride report:
    24.75 miles in 1:30. Rode intown paved bike trails that wind all around Lincoln Nebraska.
    Great weather at 80 degrees with low humidity and light breezes from the South at 5-7mph.

    The bike rides fast. It accelerates quickly and corners very well. The ride quality was exactly as I had hoped, right in between my plush steel 38c Casseroll and my 23c Quintana Roo Carbon Fiber tri bike. Yes, you feel the road but it actually is in a good way as it reminds you that you are going fast on a bike. But after 24 miles, I don't feel like I need an Advil and ice on my back! The fit is aggressive but not uncomfortably so, an aero position was easy to achieve and hold, yet riding upright and enjoying the view was equally as easy and rewarding. The coolest part is that both my big water bottles fit in the frame triangle! I had to choose one long and one short on my Cass and my Roo only allowed one bottle cage in the small aero triangle, making you mount extras behind your seat or in the tri bars infront of you.

    The SRAM double tap shifters are definately cool but will take some getting used to. I had Tiagra before and the brake levers were involved in downshifting. With SRAM white, the double tap shifters do both up & downshifts. I do like the solid feel of the brake levers, something I never got used to with the Tiagra and the movement in them, even when you didn't want to shift and just brake. The shifting was crisp and quick, quiet operation although the ratchet clicks in the freewheel are very loud when coasting(maybe because the rest of the bike is so quiet and the tires make no noise on the pavement).

    The bars are not as comfy as the short & shallows that were on the Cass, mainly due to the lack of the "ergo" section in the curl portion. Apparently I used this area more than I realized! But the rest of the bar is adequate and has good width and girth.

    The brakes are good and quiet riding. They stop well and feather quite easily on downhills.

    I really liked the ride of this bike and the geo worked well. It was everything I hoped it would be and then some! The 51 fit me solidly at 5'3" and the bike is very light and responsive for my 115lbs of "bigness"! It will work well as a casual riding bike with some get up & go, a road machine for piling on the miles and not taking all day to do it, along with racing my duathlons and a few road races.

    The steel rides exceptionally well and the carbon fork smoothes out the road vibration. It was quite easy to hit mid 20s on the flats and maintain that speed for long stretches. Everything I was looking for in a bike. Very very happy. This one is a winner!

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    229
    Quote Originally Posted by Nakedbabytoes View Post
    I do not like clipless or flats & straps. I have rode both, tried both, was not fond of either system. Platforms with pins work best for me and my Converse All Stars as my biking shoes on all my bikes(unicycle, cargo, fatbike, and road).
    I'm actually pretty similar in that regard; not really interested in clipless. So, what platforms are those? I keep looking for good ones to put on my Fargo.

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nakedbabytoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    946
    They are VP-001 anodized sealed bearing platforms with screw in pins. They are pretty wide and flat, but thin. I also have Tioga Spyder Ds on my Pugsley, slightly smaller foot area but they are thicker and I would also recommend those as well.

    I have some Eastern Pro BMX type pedals with screw in pins on my Unicycle. I wouldn't recommend them for a bike. They are heavy and thick and the foot area is huge. But they work well on a unicycle where weight isn't an issue and you have to mount free standing and want a large foot target.

    My cargo bike has cruiser type flats, no pins, made by Valvert. Barefoot or sandal riding was the reason for that choice. We take family rides on it to the park or swimming pool.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nakedbabytoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    946
    So I have a crushed rock quarter century ride on Saturday night and thought that it might be sortof freaky deaky to put some knobbies on the Colossal for better cornering and general grip.
    So I bought some 700x28 Kenda Karvs, was worried about front fork clearance, and this is what you get:
    Colossal-image.jpg

    Lol! Now, I dunno why I find this so funny but I do. The bike is a "Colossal" which usually means BIG(I do realize the bike is named after a local hangout near Salsa HQ) and mine is tiny being a 51. Then you add baby knobbies and the whole bike is a goofy joke in itself.
    But anywho, if you are looking for grippy bumpy tires that will fit the Colossal, Kenda Karvs at 700c x 28c will fit and fit with clearance room.

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    89
    I think its to do with the fact its a colossal road bike to conquer the blacktop.

    My dad's ti version has the 28c challenge Parigi Roubaix with a little more clearance but it rides like a cloud. Additionally it will dominate the dry clay based dirt roads around here as well.

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    65
    Got home yesterday and my new Colossal was waiting for me. Got it unboxed and put together pretty quickly but ran out of daylight. Made it out for about an hour today for a shakedown ride and short answer is I'm very pleased! Verbose details below:

    A little background for context...I'm coming off a Litespeed Vortex I've been riding for the last ten years. For some reasons I can explain and a few that I can't I wanted to stick with titanium. Was truly lusting after a Moots Vamoots but still couldn't quite stomach the bill, maybe in a few years. I'll be 40 next month and wanted something a little more relaxed than the Litespeed but not full-blown touring bike - stumbled across the Colossal and was more or less hooked once I found out about the ti version.

    Ordered up a custom build with full Force & Stans Alpha 340 wheels with 25mm tires. I'm 6'1" and 190lbs, ordered a 58cm frame. Considered spec'ing a 160 vs 140mm rotor on the front, but ultimately went with 140. Using the scientific, carefully calibrated fish scale it came to 18-ish lbs, could be 19. I'm not a weight weenie so wasn't too concerned but am pleased with where it fell. I'm big enough that I can break delicate things.

    Impressions - it does exactly what I wanted it to. Very stable yet lively and quick enough feeling I don't feel like I've gone straight to a beach cruiser. Need to put some more miles on it before I play with swapping anything to dial in the fit, but it feels pretty damn good out of the box. Did a fair bit of climbing on my short ride and it felt great in and out of the saddle. Some good downhills too - got up to around 40mph and handled it easily. The roads around here can be variable in the quality of the surface and this bike feels very smooth over the irregularities. I doubt it's any one factor which delivers the ride, no doubt a result of the cumulative effect of the frame, fork, geometry and slightly chunky tires.

    Only two minor gripes. I'm not massively impressed with the BB7s (yet). I'm used to the full hydro on my mtn bikes and the more precise modulation they seem to offer. Maybe as the pads get a little more broken in they'll feel more powerful or maybe I just need to get used to them - either way stopping power was adequate but I'm left wondering if, based on my weight, I should have gone with a 160mm rotor on the front. I'll have much better feedback after the Death Ride!

    Second gripe is a minor one given that it's aesthetic, but on a frame with this price tag something I would think would have been done better - the head badge doesn't seem to be attached squarely, seems to be mounted a bit off to one side. Silly I know and I doubt anyone (beyond me) would even notice it, but it's such a a nice looking bike a little imperfection jumps out at me. Are those just glued on? Something I can fiddle with once I get the guts to pry on it?

    Anyway, pics...

    Colossal-img_4410.jpg

    Colossal-img_4413.jpg

    Colossal-img_4411.jpg

    Colossal-img_4415.jpg

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    184
    Nice!

    That's about how I'd do it too - except I'm not a real fan of SRAM road groups, so I'd probably do an Ultegra compact group. Bummer about the "little details" - but you're right - for what you're paying, and for the premium level claims, it oughtta be perfect. The devil is in the details, and I've found that to be the Achilles heel for most the Q brands - great ideas, great execution, but the little things do get overlooked sometimes. QC is a bit lax.

    The C is on my short list of bikes to test.

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mattbryant2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,162
    Nice bike, but you must peel the rim stickers.

  48. #48
    wish I was out riding
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    43
    man that bike is sexy

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nakedbabytoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    946
    Whew...whew! Nice ride!
    That really looks sharp! Salsa makes a decent quality Ti frame, a good entro until you can get that Moots! Go earn it by riding the crap outta the Colossal! Your BB7s will break in nicely but no, they certainly aren't hydros.

    A week + into my 2, absolutely ZERO compliants. The little curls too some getting used to hand wise but now they make sense considering the bike, I actually quite like them now. I have 150 miles on my Garmin's "Colossal" bike's log, so for a week and a half, I guess that is pretty decent. I have my first Duathlon with it Sunday, can't wait to compare the numbers on my ride from last year. I had a carbon fiber tri bike but it was so uncomfortable and twitchy that I bet I beat my time on steel this year.
    2014 Big Dummy
    2015 Salsa Beargrease Carbon 1
    2015 Ice Cream Truck

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    435
    Quote Originally Posted by Nakedbabytoes View Post
    I do not like clipless or flats & straps. I have rode both, tried both, was not fond of either system. Platforms with pins work best for me and my Converse All Stars as my biking shoes on all my bikes(unicycle, cargo, fatbike, and road).

    Sounds like you and I have the same setup. I love my all stars and platforms.

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    65
    Stealth mode engaged - stickers peeled. Defnitely looks better, thanks for the suggestion

  52. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Nakedbabytoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    946
    Nice vick! Pics of stealth mode are required of course!

    Blew away last year's bike part of the Du by over 5 minutes on the steel Colossal, 38:26 @ 12 miles. Who says carbon fiber is faster Lol! Okay, maybe my training was better this year. But the ride was way more enjoyable and stable. I'm happy, he's a keeper!
    2014 Big Dummy
    2015 Salsa Beargrease Carbon 1
    2015 Ice Cream Truck

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    65
    Got in a longer ride yesterday, lots more time to get dialed into things. Lots of good descending and the BB's are breaking in nicely, much better feel now. Very glad I went with the 25 tires rather than 28s - big enough they complement the smooth characteristics of the frame & fork materials without feeling like I'm lugging around unnecessary bulk. Not that 28s are necessarily bulky, they're just wider than what suits my style of riding. Really enjoying the Force compact group - the double tap thing only took a couple of shifts to figure out and is very easy to adapt to.

    Thinking the only thing missing at this point is some red Salsa skewers.

    Overall I think I accomplished what I hoped to, which is set up a well-balanced and versatile performance touring bike.

    As requested, wheels peeled...
    Colossal-photo-1-.jpg

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    184
    Looks TERRIFIC!

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    35
    I'm looking reaaaal hard at a colossal 2 steel complete. How are you liking the geometry vick? The Ti you've got looks awesome but I see you described it as a touring focused bike. I'm really looking to go quick but I'm not worried about weight so much. I think your Ti comes in lighter than a Madone 5 which is pretty impressive IMO (18 lbs). I'm going to try to find one to test out here in Michigan so maybe I can report back with my thoughts next week.

  56. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    65
    Loving the Colossal! I should re-phrase - it's not a touring bike, it's a road bike with relaxed geometry compared to the Litespeed Vortex I came off of. That means I can ride it all day comfortably and the handling stays manageable when I get tired. I just rode the Death Ride on it and felt comfortable from start to finish - it handled everything from the grinding climbs to 50+mph descents beautifully. The disks demonstrated their value diving into yet another corner after 5+ miles of relatively high speed descending.

    In Michigan I don't know if I'd argue that the disks are all that worthwhile unless you ride in the rain alot. I appreciate the power they offer on the descending that can be done in the Sierra but if I was living someplace flatter I probably wouldn't have gone for them.

    The geometry and ride though are spot on for where I'm at with my road riding - between the ti frame, carbon fork and 25 tires it simply handles less than perfect paved surfaces well and remains pretty comfortable on long rides.

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    65
    Forgot to mention - I've gotten lots of compliments along the lines of "Hey, sweet cyclocross bike!"

    My reply, "It's not a cyclocross bike, it's a road bike", at which point they scan the frame and disk brakes again and display puzzled looks.

    Kind of begs the question - does it matter what it is exactly or what we call it if it does what you want it to do?

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    229
    I've gotten the same reaction on my Fargo. I'm usually like, "well, I dunno what it is really, but I love it, and some have called it a mega-cross bike, so I guess guess you're not wrong..."

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    190
    I'd love to hear some more feedback from Colossal owners, how have you been getting on?

  60. #60
    wish I was out riding
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    43
    Got a steel frameset, can't wait to have it put together!!!

  61. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GOTA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    574
    Quote Originally Posted by kaiser2 View Post
    I'd love to hear some more feedback from Colossal owners, how have you been getting on?
    I'm in Connecticut and after a difficult winter the roads are completely destroyed. Potholes everywhere, huge piles of sand on the sides and crumbling payment are everywhere. On the aluminum bikes I've been riding up until the Colossal my teeth would be chattering from all the hits and that's even with 28 tires.

    I got a 2013 steel Colossal complete in December and it's been a dream on these horrible roads. You don't lose feeling of all those bumps but the don't rattle you either. The disc brakes have been a big improvement since it's wet more days than dry. The frame also puts you into a surprisingly aggressive seat position. That makes climbing on a heavier bike not so bad because you are far enough over the front wheel.

    For anyone looking for a training or winter bike or a good long distance bike over less that good roads, the Colossal is perfect.
    He who dares....wins!

  62. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    60
    Ordered my 2013 Colossal Ti in size 53cm. Should get here on Monday. I was struggling over whether or not to go with the steel version. It's just so much more affordable. In the end, I got a great deal from a local bike shop in the Denver area for a Ti model. The extra money for better components, wheelset, and frame material sold me.

    I'll post some pictures when it gets in.

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    60
    And here are the pictures! Unfortunately, with all the busy'ness of Easter this weekend, I haven't been able to take the bike on her inaugural first ride. I did get to do a brief ride up and down my street in order to adjust the stem and saddle positions. At 5'7 and my particular body size, I'm definitely glad I went with 53cm versus a 55cm.

    For the short amount of time I've been on the bike, it feels as stiff as my carbon Litespeed. I am Clydesdale weighing in at 215 lbs, and have owned a titanium Litespeed Arenberg in the past and that bottom bracket would flex when I mash on the pedals going up hill. Time will tell, once I actually take it out on a real ride, if my Colossal Ti will do the same. But like I said, I can't tell the difference between the feel of this Ti bike versus my carbon bike and need to ride it more to give a better report.

    As far as the bike goes, I was surprised that the stem I received was the Salsa Pro Moto Ti version as opposed to the PM1 with red lettering (similar to the red lettering on the seat post), but hey, I love it. The stem is still gorgeous. I bought some Planet Bike Red anodized cages and think it compliments the titanium well. As for bar tape, I received the ugly gray salsa cork tape (what the heck, where's my Salsa black tape?) with the bike kit and my friendly neighbor gave me his unused pair of Lizard Skins Race DSP 1.8mm tape. Really like the black tape versus the stock gray tape that came it the bike.

    Alright, enough talking. I'm gonna enjoy more time with the family for this Easter weekend and will do my first real ride with the bike next weekend. Enjoy the pictures below. I know you Ti freaks like to look at welds, so check them out below.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Colossal-img_20140419_133313342.jpg  

    Colossal-img_20140419_133213002_hdr.jpg  

    Colossal-img_20140419_133140378.jpg  

    Colossal-img_20140419_133223334_hdr.jpg  


  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WiTrailRunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    191
    For those of you who saw my previous thread about buying a Colossal, yes, I wound up buying it after my trip to Minneapolis! The 2013 in Bomb Pop blue. It's even prettier in person and changes different shades of blue depending on the light. I am a chick and am 5'-5" to 5'-6" (depending on who measures me) and the 53cm fit me like a glove. It just felt right from the moment I got on. I got a killer deal on it from the Angry Catfish - $1600 on sale. That's a great shop, by the way. They treated me well and were very helpful. I have to make the trip back up to get a fitting later in the summer.

    I've only taken her on one short ride so far, but I'm in love. It's such a smooth ride and climbing/descending is rock solid. Lots of get up and go on the climbs and very stable at 30+ mph cruising down a hill. I'm going to have to get used to SRAM and not having as many gears, but the rest makes up for it.

    Totally stock at the moment, but I will most likely be switching the saddle and the tires soon. Smaller saddle bag too. I just recently had hip surgery and have to stick with platform pedals for now. But the pins are orange and match the rest of the bike!

    Colossal-10177387_10100504066788645_791324075474822533_n.jpg

    Colossal-10313350_10100504066998225_7377868998662892417_n.jpg

    Colossal-10325538_10100504066873475_6309990680648442471_n.jpg

    Colossal-10329178_10100504066948325_9149945677429833573_n.jpg

    Colossal-10414926_10100504066918385_8885975640011834549_n.jpg

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GOTA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    574
    Congrats WiTrailRunner! You're going to love it.

    It's surprising well equipped. I even kept the stock saddle for a couple of months before moving my Brooks B17 over from another bike. This was the first bike I had with SRAM Apex and 6 months in I'm still digging it. I wasn't sure since I love the Shimano Ultegra on my other bike but the Apex has really grown on me especially in hilly areas. Those BB7 brakes are also really impressive. They are much easier to adjust than the BB5 and other mechanical disc brakes.

    That steel frame is a dream if you are dealing with potholes and generally nasty roads. So much better than aluminum. Enjoy and get out there and ride!
    He who dares....wins!

  66. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation: StuntmanMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    679
    Gorgeous bike! I LOVE that color, it looks to be the same as my Horsethief 2.

    I want one of these SO bad but can't justify it. I have a cross bike which can do both cross and road duties, so I don't have a need for a road only bike. If the Colossal could take wider tires, I'd sell the cross bike and just use the Colossal for cross.

    I'm not a serious racer, but I tried a race late last season and loved it. I'm looking forward to doing more.

    I use my cross bike for long road rides, I've done up to 80 miles on it, and want to start doing centuries. I feel the Colossal would prob be ideal for that purpose, but makes the cross bike redundant. I don't need to have a bike dedicated to only a few races a year.

    Decisions, decisions.
    '15 Charge Cooker Maxi 2
    '13 Salsa Horsethief 2
    '12 Trek 6000
    '11 Ridley X-Ride
    '11 Santa Cruz Driver 8

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WiTrailRunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    191
    Thank you! I'm pretty stoked. I'm a commuter and I have a real rough patch of road for a mile or two into work, so I'll be curious to see how she does. Going to do my first commute of the year tomorrow. I have a bit of a haul at 33 miles round trip, so I wanted a faster ride for it.

    I think everyone wishes that this bike could take slightly wider tires. I guess I get that's what the Warbird is for, but I don't really get why they made the Warbird in aluminum and not steel. I didn't get a chance to test the Warbird, but I like the look of it.

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation: StuntmanMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    679
    Quote Originally Posted by WiTrailRunner View Post
    Thank you! I'm pretty stoked. I'm a commuter and I have a real rough patch of road for a mile or two into work, so I'll be curious to see how she does. Going to do my first commute of the year tomorrow. I have a bit of a haul at 33 miles round trip, so I wanted a faster ride for it.

    I think everyone wishes that this bike could take slightly wider tires. I guess I get that's what the Warbird is for, but I don't really get why they made the Warbird in aluminum and not steel. I didn't get a chance to test the Warbird, but I like the look of it.

    Yeah, I looked at the Warbird, and it looks cool, but it's not what I want. Like you said, if it was steel it would be more attractive to me.

    I'm thinking the All City Macho Man Disc might be what I want, or the new Raleigh Tamland looks good too.
    '15 Charge Cooker Maxi 2
    '13 Salsa Horsethief 2
    '12 Trek 6000
    '11 Ridley X-Ride
    '11 Santa Cruz Driver 8

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GOTA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    574
    Quote Originally Posted by StuntmanMike View Post
    Yeah, I looked at the Warbird, and it looks cool, but it's not what I want. Like you said, if it was steel it would be more attractive to me.

    I'm thinking the All City Macho Man Disc might be what I want, or the new Raleigh Tamland looks good too.
    If you are interested in the Tamland check out the lower end Tamland 1. For some reason Raleigh decided to go with a 52-36 crank and 11-32 cog on the Tamland 2. That just sounds way too racy on this kind of bike. The Tamland 1 is still uses a lot of Shimano 105 so it's still very well configured and it's about $800 cheaper.
    He who dares....wins!

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation: StuntmanMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    679
    Quote Originally Posted by GOTA View Post
    If you are interested in the Tamland check out the lower end Tamland 1. For some reason Raleigh decided to go with a 52-36 crank and 11-32 cog on the Tamland 2. That just sounds way too racy on this kind of bike. The Tamland 1 is still uses a lot of Shimano 105 so it's still very well configured and it's about $800 cheaper.
    Yeah, the 1 is the one that piqued my interest. The 2 may have a better color scheme, but is more than I would want to spend on a bike like this. And you're right, the gearing does sound a bit off.

    The other option I was kicking around was picking up a Macho Man disc frameset and building it up as budget allows.
    '15 Charge Cooker Maxi 2
    '13 Salsa Horsethief 2
    '12 Trek 6000
    '11 Ridley X-Ride
    '11 Santa Cruz Driver 8

  71. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GOTA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    574
    I've never seen a Macho Man disc in the wild but they do look good on paper. We don't have an All City dealer in the state so they just aren't around.
    He who dares....wins!

  72. #72
    PMC
    PMC is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    346
    Nice Bike!!
    I've been away from the forums riding for the last few weeks but glad to see they treated you well and that you ended up with the bike you wanted.
    Enjoy the ride! I'm jealous :^)

  73. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WiTrailRunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    191
    Quote Originally Posted by PMC View Post
    Nice Bike!!
    I've been away from the forums riding for the last few weeks but glad to see they treated you well and that you ended up with the bike you wanted.
    Enjoy the ride! I'm jealous :^)
    Dude! The damn donut shop was closed. I was so disappointed. I did, however, walk up to some bar about 5 blocks away for lunch while they swapped some stuff on the bike for me. Thanks for the info though!

    I have since put on a pair of gatorskins and swapped out the stock saddle, which did not work for me at all. (Did that stock saddle work for anyone?? I thought it was horrible.)

    Colossal-photo.jpg

  74. #74
    ADV
    ADV is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    162
    I want to add a road bike to my quiver and I think this is the bike. Road bike with bb7 brakes and built for all day comfort sign me up. I talked with my lbs today and they are going to get me a price for to steel frame. After I sell my karate monkey I am going to pull the trigger on a colossal!

  75. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GOTA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    574
    Quote Originally Posted by WiTrailRunner View Post
    Dude! The damn donut shop was closed. I was so disappointed. I did, however, walk up to some bar about 5 blocks away for lunch while they swapped some stuff on the bike for me. Thanks for the info though!

    I have since put on a pair of gatorskins and swapped out the stock saddle, which did not work for me at all. (Did that stock saddle work for anyone?? I thought it was horrible.)

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	photo.jpg 
Views:	236 
Size:	255.2 KB 
ID:	905558
    I replaced the saddle with a Brooks B17. I didn't think the stock saddle was bad but this is the kind of bike that is just perfect for a Brooks saddle.
    He who dares....wins!

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WiTrailRunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    191
    Quote Originally Posted by ADV View Post
    I want to add a road bike to my quiver and I think this is the bike. Road bike with bb7 brakes and built for all day comfort sign me up. I talked with my lbs today and they are going to get me a price for to steel frame. After I sell my karate monkey I am going to pull the trigger on a colossal!
    Yeah! You'll love it. 2014? The gray looks much better in person than it does online.

    GOTA, I've never tried a Brooks saddle, but it would definitely look nice on there.

  77. #77
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Raymo853's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    720
    Quote Originally Posted by vick View Post
    Forgot to mention - I've gotten lots of compliments along the lines of "Hey, sweet cyclocross bike!"

    My reply, "It's not a cyclocross bike, it's a road bike", at which point they scan the frame and disk brakes again and display puzzled looks.

    Kind of begs the question - does it matter what it is exactly or what we call it if it does what you want it to do?
    I assume but this time this is no longer happening as disc road brakes are becoming more normal.

    People are to apt to want to use binary indicators to classify bikes. Such as how fender eyelets are proof a bike is a touring bike and not a serious racer. By that definition, Postal ran touring bikes from 99-04.

  78. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Raymo853's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    720
    Revival of an old thread I know. But I was looking for info to decide between the steel and Ti frames to replace a 2002 IF Club Racer. Love that bike but can no longer deal with rim brakes and the less than stout rear triangle. I've decided to order the 55cm Ti version next week. Building it up with Ultegra, Haynes CX Pro brakes and Stan's Grail team wheels.

    Funny in 2002 people asked me why I bought the weird Club Racer with room for 28c tires and slacker angles than the Crown Jewel. I was told I would regret it and should have bought a Madone, S-Works, etc... After 15 years of riding that thing all year and all surfaces, I am sort of buying the same thing again. And most of those people are now either sedentary or buying gravel/endurance bikes.

  79. #79
    mtbr member
    Reputation: backcountryeti's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    605
    Just ordered a 2014 Colossal to hang out with my Fargo! Should be in this week!

  80. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation: backcountryeti's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    605

    new bike day.

    Colossal-img_4061.jpg
    This will do.

  81. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    15
    Nice bike! I really do like the colossal. "Too bad" I've chosen to go with the vaya for added versatility...

  82. #82
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GOTA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    574
    The Colossal is absolutely a road bike. Those roads could be a crumbling, pot holed mess or bumpy cobbles but they should still be roads. The Vaya is definitely more versatile but if you ride roads and like the feel of steel then the Colossal is pretty much perfect.
    He who dares....wins!

  83. #83
    mtbr member
    Reputation: backcountryeti's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    605
    Quote Originally Posted by GOTA View Post
    The Colossal is absolutely a road bike. Those roads could be a crumbling, pot holed mess or bumpy cobbles but they should still be roads. The Vaya is definitely more versatile but if you ride roads and like the feel of steel then the Colossal is pretty much perfect.
    That pretty much sums it up for me.

    I do like the Vaya, but I felt it had too much overlap with my Fargo. For my stable, the Colossal fits in perfectly.

  84. #84
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    5
    Recent Colossals have fender mounts, but I'm yet to see one built up with fenders. Does anyone have a photo (yours or otherwise)? I'm a bit skeptical about clearances.

  85. #85
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    184
    No more carbon...


  86. #86
    mtbr member
    Reputation: StuntmanMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    679
    Sharp looking bike! I miss the blue though, I really wish I had bought one last year when they were on clearance. It would have matched my Horsethief perfecrly, haha.
    '15 Charge Cooker Maxi 2
    '13 Salsa Horsethief 2
    '12 Trek 6000
    '11 Ridley X-Ride
    '11 Santa Cruz Driver 8

  87. #87
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    184
    It complements my Warbird pretty nicely...


  88. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation: StuntmanMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    679
    I normally don't care for red, but those Warbirds are sharp!
    '15 Charge Cooker Maxi 2
    '13 Salsa Horsethief 2
    '12 Trek 6000
    '11 Ridley X-Ride
    '11 Santa Cruz Driver 8

  89. #89
    mtbr member
    Reputation: a a r o n's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    73
    Colossal-img_20150425_125713837.jpgColossal-img_20150425_125802919.jpgColossal-img_20150425_125733061.jpgColossal-img_20150425_125725279.jpgColossal-img_20150425_125740007.jpg

  90. #90
    mtbr member
    Reputation: a a r o n's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    73
    Notes from the build:

    If you want to run 160mm rotors instead of 140mm, you will use the front 160-180mm shimano adapter.

    most everything else is pretty self explanatory. The lower headset isn't the most common sizing, but cane creek has a drop in unit.

    My hubs are hope pro2 evo with DT competition spokes and brass nipples rounding out the wheels. The group is dura ace 10 spd, with ultegra crank and trp spyre brakes. Cannondale C2 cockpit and seatpost. Conti gp4000 25mm tires.

    I'll stop by the bike shop some time and weigh it for reference. It's not light...but it's not super heavy either. Haven't ridden yet.... should be today or tomorrow.

  91. #91
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WiTrailRunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    191
    Looks awesome, Aaron! I love the orange almost as much as my blue color.

  92. #92
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    45
    I like the new thru axle front wheel. And going away from PF30.
    2015 Salsa Bucksaw
    2013 Salsa Colossal Steel
    1991 Trek 750

  93. #93
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GOTA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    574
    Quote Originally Posted by Triggsie View Post
    I like the new thru axle front wheel. And going away from PF30.
    Did they change from the PF30? I can't find any info on the bottom bracket for the latest model.

    I actually have the Wheels adapter in mine so I could use a Shimano 105 crankset. It works great and is a big improvement over the FSA it shipped with.
    He who dares....wins!

  94. #94
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by GOTA View Post
    Did they change from the PF30? I can't find any info on the bottom bracket for the latest model.

    I actually have the Wheels adapter in mine so I could use a Shimano 105 crankset. It works great and is a big improvement over the FSA it shipped with.
    In 2014 they changed to BB86.

    Colossal 2 | Bikes | Salsa Cycles
    2015 Salsa Bucksaw
    2013 Salsa Colossal Steel
    1991 Trek 750

  95. #95
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GOTA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    574
    Quote Originally Posted by Triggsie View Post
    In 2014 they changed to BB86.

    Colossal 2 | Bikes | Salsa Cycles
    Not as good as threaded but there have been a lot less issues with the BB86. That was a nice change
    He who dares....wins!

  96. #96
    mtbr member
    Reputation: WiTrailRunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    191
    I've done a few upgrades to my Colossal recently -- new Brooks Cambium saddle, shorter stem, and now she's even outfitted for lightweight touring.

    My boyfriend and I did a short overnight over Memorial Day weekend. 70 miles on day 1 and 60 miles on day 2. Bike handled like a dream. I could barely even tell that I was carrying gear. I continue to love this bike, although slightly bigger tire clearance would have been nice.

    Colossal-11377118_10205490187888238_8289926483504658363_n.jpg

    Colossal-11024757_10100784775820495_7628268972520383965_n.jpg

  97. #97
    PMC
    PMC is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    346
    Looks like an awesome ride and weekend!!!
    Glad you're digging the Colossal and looks like you've figured out the bike packing side of things. totally cool!

    Quote Originally Posted by WiTrailRunner View Post
    I've done a few upgrades to my Colossal recently -- new Brooks Cambium saddle, shorter stem, and now she's even outfitted for lightweight touring.

    My boyfriend and I did a short overnight over Memorial Day weekend. 70 miles on day 1 and 60 miles on day 2. Bike handled like a dream. I could barely even tell that I was carrying gear. I continue to love this bike, although slightly bigger tire clearance would have been nice.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	11377118_10205490187888238_8289926483504658363_n.jpg 
Views:	105 
Size:	83.0 KB 
ID:	991566

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	11024757_10100784775820495_7628268972520383965_n.jpg 
Views:	109 
Size:	167.6 KB 
ID:	991565

  98. #98
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Raymo853's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    720
    Quote Originally Posted by a a r o n View Post
    Notes from the build:

    most everything else is pretty self explanatory. The lower headset isn't the most common sizing, but cane creek has a drop in unit.
    I discovered this only after ordering a typical taper headset first. No matter, will find a place to use the more typical lower and race.

  99. #99
    mtbr member
    Reputation: nato_the_greato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    325
    I got a killer deal on a 2013 steel Colossal. I've had a Vaya for 5 years or so now and it's pretty much the perfect bike for me. I wanted something a bit lighter and more nimble, something more fun to ride unloaded.

    After riding the Vaya for so long though I'm having a hard time going back to skinny tires. I usually ride solo on mixed terrain so I don't really need to go fast. I'm thinking about swapping out the fork for something with more clearance though. The frame can easily fit 32s, maybe even 35s or bigger depending on the tire. However, 28s pretty much max out the fork.

    Has anyone swapped out their fork? I know the Enve forks are really fancy, but I'm not a fan of how impractical they are.
    Former bike mechanic; current idiot.

  100. #100
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Nakedbabytoes View Post
    First ride report:
    24.75 miles in 1:30. Rode intown paved bike trails that wind all around Lincoln Nebraska.
    Great weather at 80 degrees with low humidity and light breezes from the South at 5-7mph.

    The bike rides fast. It accelerates quickly and corners very well. The ride quality was exactly as I had hoped, right in between my plush steel 38c Casseroll and my 23c Quintana Roo Carbon Fiber tri bike. Yes, you feel the road but it actually is in a good way as it reminds you that you are going fast on a bike. But after 24 miles, I don't feel like I need an Advil and ice on my back! The fit is aggressive but not uncomfortably so, an aero position was easy to achieve and hold, yet riding upright and enjoying the view was equally as easy and rewarding. The coolest part is that both my big water bottles fit in the frame triangle! I had to choose one long and one short on my Cass and my Roo only allowed one bottle cage in the small aero triangle, making you mount extras behind your seat or in the tri bars infront of you.

    The SRAM double tap shifters are definately cool but will take some getting used to. I had Tiagra before and the brake levers were involved in downshifting. With SRAM white, the double tap shifters do both up & downshifts. I do like the solid feel of the brake levers, something I never got used to with the Tiagra and the movement in them, even when you didn't want to shift and just brake. The shifting was crisp and quick, quiet operation although the ratchet clicks in the freewheel are very loud when coasting(maybe because the rest of the bike is so quiet and the tires make no noise on the pavement).

    The bars are not as comfy as the short & shallows that were on the Cass, mainly due to the lack of the "ergo" section in the curl portion. Apparently I used this area more than I realized! But the rest of the bar is adequate and has good width and girth.

    The brakes are good and quiet riding. They stop well and feather quite easily on downhills.

    I really liked the ride of this bike and the geo worked well. It was everything I hoped it would be and then some! The 51 fit me solidly at 5'3" and the bike is very light and responsive for my 115lbs of "bigness"! It will work well as a casual riding bike with some get up & go, a road machine for piling on the miles and not taking all day to do it, along with racing my duathlons and a few road races.

    The steel rides exceptionally well and the carbon fork smoothes out the road vibration. It was quite easy to hit mid 20s on the flats and maintain that speed for long stretches. Everything I was looking for in a bike. Very very happy. This one is a winner!

    I realize I am hitting a two year old thread, but I am hoping you'll see this I'm getting ready to order a 51 Colossal without being able to ride it...you said you are 5'3"...what other size bikes do you have and ride? I'm struggling with what size to order. My CX bike has a 52TT and I ride a Small Niner.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Members who have read this thread: 10

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •