Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 64
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    859

    2013 Salsa Warbird, Ridden, Reviewed.

    Spent some time on the aluminum and titanium Warbirds on Saturday. Detailed thoughts after the jump.

    Short version: Impressive handling, great (amazing) vibration dampening, clever design, careful attention to details. Both frames ride very well; the Ti frame is other-worldly. Frame clearance easily for 40c tires...maybe 42s. Fork clearance for 38s...maybe 40s. Maybe.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    89
    Nice review! Very helpful for everything except the bank balance!

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1
    Great review, thanks

  4. #4
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,220
    Looked at and rode the same titanium Warbird you did yesterday. (It's E-Fred's bike from Salsa Cycles)

    It hasn't got the proper wheels or fork. (The fork is actually a Whiskey carbon fork)

    We actually did mount Clement X'Plor MSO tires in that bike. These are listed as 40mm tires, but mine, which have been ridden quite a bit, still measure as 38mm tires. There is minimal clearance with MSO's. You could run them in dry conditions and probably be fine, but mud? Not likely to be a good scenario.

    Otherwise I mostly agree with your take. Great geometry, the titanium definitely rides better than the aluminum, but then, it should, shouldn't it?

    One note: The titanium frame is not noodly at all. When mashing up some steep single track yesterday, the bottom bracket area was not flexing much, if at all. It rides stiffer than a lot of titanium mountain bikes I've been on, but it still feels like a Ti bike, if that makes sense.

    The aluminum one is even stiffer. Zero loss of efficiency there. A true racer's rig.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ®andyA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    454
    Great stuff Lawfarm! Thanks for your work. I think I like that Ti Warbird as my next all-road bike.
    Randy

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    9
    Thanks for this. Very interesting indeed.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    184
    Hm. There sure are some familiar frame features on that alu frame. Some things in the tube shaping that REALLY remind me of the Chili...

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Slonie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    154
    Thanks for the impressions! I'm definitely looking forward to trying one of these out...

    It's pretty interesting how the prototype had fender eyelets and top-routed cables. Ah, what could have been...

    http://www.dirtragmag.com/webrag/ana...-kanza-200-rig

    (link via Guitar Ted, in another thread)

  9. #9
    Recovering Weight Weenie
    Reputation: Padre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,766
    Is the War Bird a cross bike, a road bike or some hybrid of the two? I can't tell yet. Help the naive!

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    859
    Quote Originally Posted by Padre View Post
    Is the War Bird a cross bike, a road bike or some hybrid of the two? I can't tell yet. Help the naive!
    None of the above.

    In my opinion, the top tube is too high (and BB too low?) to make a good cross bike. Then again, I use a Vaya for cross, so what do I know.

    The geometry is not optimized for road use...although if you slapped some 23 or 25s on it, it would probably do acceptably well in a pinch.

    It's got a more stable geometry and a frame that's set up to give greater vibration dampening than either a road or cross bike. It's kind of in a class by itself.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JonathanGennick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,235
    Quote Originally Posted by Padre View Post
    Is the War Bird a cross bike, a road bike or some hybrid of the two? I can't tell yet. Help the naive!
    It is road bike optimized for gravel roads rather than for pavement.

    It looks like the sort of road bike that I could take through a pothole, or down a curb, and that appeals to me.

  12. #12
    Recovering Weight Weenie
    Reputation: Padre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,766
    Quote Originally Posted by JonathanGennick View Post
    It is road bike optimized for gravel roads rather than for pavement.

    It looks like the sort of road bike that I could take through a pothole, or down a curb, and that appeals to me.
    Thanks!

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Hand/of/Midas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,681
    Can not wait to build one up.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    54
    What is the weight difference of the Warbird Ti vs the Vaya Ti?

    Can anyone quantify the speed difference of the two bikes assuming the same wheel-set?

    I love the Warbird for speed on gravel but I love the Vaya for the ability to accommodate wider tires and ability to mount racks and fenders.

    How much slower is a Vaya really?

    Thanks

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    859
    Quote Originally Posted by xxxxx View Post
    What is the weight difference of the Warbird Ti vs the Vaya Ti?

    Can anyone quantify the speed difference of the two bikes assuming the same wheel-set?

    I love the Warbird for speed on gravel but I love the Vaya for the ability to accommodate wider tires and ability to mount racks and fenders.

    How much slower is a Vaya really?

    Thanks
    First...there is no more Vaya Ti. Not this year, at least. It was discontinued. I hope it's back next year, but no news yet. There is now the stainless steel Vaya Travel. And if you're hoping to find one in a store somewhere--good luck. I don't think there are many out there.

    Second, if you were comparing frame weight to frame weight, straight up, without forks or any components, the weights would probably be pretty close. I'd guess the Warbird weighs a bit more, given the oversized headtube and larger frame main triangle within a set size. If you add in the Vaya Ti's steel fork versus the Warbird's carbon ENVE fork, things might get a bit more equalized.

    Third--speed. A Vaya or a Warbird is as fast as you can pedal it. There are differences in the geometry that affect the handling, certainly. There are differences in the frame that affect how they handle rough surfaces, undoubtedly. But neither bike is faster than the other, until you pedal it faster.

    If you build up a dream Vaya Ti and a dream Warbird Ti, and put them both on gravel, in a race, my guess is that the Warbird would feel more at home, given that it was designed specifically for that purpose and has been optimized for that purpose. The Vaya would probably feel a bit lazier--at bit less racy. But by no means would either bike be slow. The Warbird has been put together as a purpose-built bike, with design decisions made for racing and grinding gravel. The Vaya makes more compromises, and is more versatile. Either can be fast.

    It will be curious to see if Salsa responds to some of the public concerns about the Warbird by adding fender and/or rack mounts in 2014.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    54
    Thank you for the thoughtful response and I enjoy reading your blog.

    I have my eye on a Vaya Ti that is still in a store. I'm torn between the Warbird and Vaya,

    From a 12 hour comfort perspective is one inherently more comfy than the other?

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    859
    Quote Originally Posted by xxxxx View Post
    Thank you for the thoughtful response and I enjoy reading your blog.

    I have my eye on a Vaya Ti that is still in a store. I'm torn between the Warbird and Vaya,

    From a 12 hour comfort perspective is one inherently more comfy than the other?
    I haven't spent 12 hours on a Warbird--so that's hard to say. I will say that, based on how the one I did spend a little time on felt, if you can get the fit right, it will be a very comfortable rig.

    When I got my Vaya, I thought fender mounts were important. I have a set of fenders that have been on the bike 3 times. Frankly, when it rains, I get wet. Riding in the varied conditions that I ride in, I would end up getting rocks caught in the fenders, having the 'emergency releases' on the fenders pop, would get them buried with mud, etc.

    I also thought that the rack mounts were important. For camping or overnight stuff, they make perfect sense. For other rides...even long, loooong rides, I've found that I prefer a frame bag and an oversized seatbag (like my Porcelain Rocket Booster Rocket)...and likely a stem bag as well. And for overnights, a handlebar bag could be pressed into service as well (one of the rolls--again, I like Porcelain Rocket).

    If I was shopping for a bike today and could get the Vaya Ti again, I would do it in a heartbeat. There are no areas where the bike lets me down. Not one. I cannot see ever replacing it. I love it. LOVE it. Unless you're an extreme racer, I cannot see someone being disappointed with a Ti Vaya. The only complaints I've ever read are: 1) some think the steering is too slow (I can't say I agree); and, 2) the frame triangle is too small. The Warbird definitely has more room for a frame bag in the main triangle. But I'd still get a Vaya.

    If there were no Ti Vayas, and my choices were Vaya SS, Steel Vaya, Warbird Ti or Warbird Al, I'd get a Warbird Ti, without any reservations at all. As I said, the fender and rack mounts really aren't a dealbreaker for me. The sweetness of the Ti frame is a deal breaker, though. I love it. Guitar Ted has raised some legitimate concerns about tire clearance...and it looks like 38s are as big as will fit on the Warbird. That isn't a dealbreaker for me, either, as at 150# soaking wet, I'm deeply in love with my Continental Cyclocross Speeds in 700x35c that I have a hard time even looking at other tires (unless it's muddy). Even on wet gravel, loose gravel, slime...I like 35s. I can happily run my 35s at 40psi, without issue--but I'm a lightweight. (On mud, don't tell anyone, but I actually run 30c tires (Michelin Mud 2s, that measure out at about 33mm)).

    I don't think you can go wrong. If you absolutely need fender mounts (e.g. you're going to use it as a commuter bike in Portland) or rack mounts, get the Vaya Ti. If you want more versatility, get the Vaya Ti. (But do it quick, before it's gone). If you can't get a Vaya Ti, consider whether you NEED the features of the Vaya (mounts and tire clearance). If you don't need them, get a Warbird Ti.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    54
    Thanks again for the responses. I appreciate your advice. I will post back once a deal is done.

    Josh

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    870
    Quote Originally Posted by lawfarm View Post
    It will be curious to see if Salsa responds to some of the public concerns about the Warbird by adding fender and/or rack mounts in 2014.
    I agree. Do gravel racers ever use fenders? It certainly seems to me they would be useful for longer races in wet and muddy conditions. Why is it that lack of fender/rack braze-ons has become something a marker of "serious" race bikes? At least it seems that way, especially among CX bikes. Braze-ons weigh next to nothing and don't detract from performance an iota. It will be interesting to see what Salsa does since they are basically inventing a new niche here.

  20. #20
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,220
    Quote Originally Posted by bolandjd View Post
    I agree. Do gravel racers ever use fenders? It certainly seems to me they would be useful for longer races in wet and muddy conditions. Why is it that lack of fender/rack braze-ons has become something a marker of "serious" race bikes? At least it seems that way, especially among CX bikes. Braze-ons weigh next to nothing and don't detract from performance an iota. It will be interesting to see what Salsa does since they are basically inventing a new niche here.
    Gravel racers show up at Trans Iowa with fenders all the time, albeit clip on ones. My take is that the lack of fender/rack mounts do not denote a "serious race bike", but rather, they denote a "seriously not versatile bike".

    Look- the titanium frames are expensive. Wouldn't it be nice if they worked for more than just racing for some folks? Yes- some hard core racers would count every gram and not want those braze ons. They would have a training bike, and a bike they could fender/rack up other than the race rig, but not everyone is "that guy".

    Perception is everything, so making a bike like the Warbird probably is affected by how Salsa's designers and marketers felt it would be perceived in the market place. Calling it a "gravel racer" probably dictated the omission of the rack and fender mounts, along with the fact that the activities associated with rack and fender users is covered by the Vaya.

    Whatever- I see Vayas used as gravel racers all the time. Warbirds will also be used, but as lawfarm says, "it's the rider, not the bike" that makes it go. The Vaya and Warbird are both eminently capable gravel racers. Choose the one that works best for your desired goals and in the way you want to pursue those goals. That said, my take is the Warbird could have been made a bit more versatile with no expense to performance/weight goals set for it.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Hand/of/Midas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,681
    Quote Originally Posted by lawfarm View Post

    Second, if you were comparing frame weight to frame weight, straight up, without forks or any components, the weights would probably be pretty close. I'd guess the Warbird weighs a bit more, given the oversized headtube and larger frame main triangle within a set size. If you add in the Vaya Ti's steel fork versus the Warbird's carbon ENVE fork, things might get a bit more equalized.
    One thing to note, is that the Warbird uses Triple butted Ti tubing, and the Vaya was designed with tube thickness to handle the weight and stress of racks and loaded cargo.
    The Warbird doesn't have to make concessions for that stress.

  22. #22
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,220
    Quote Originally Posted by Hand/of/Midas View Post
    One thing to note, is that the Warbird uses Triple butted Ti tubing, and the Vaya was designed with tube thickness to handle the weight and stress of racks and loaded cargo.
    The Warbird doesn't have to make concessions for that stress.
    True. However, the big, rangy 58cm frame I rode on single track was no flexy. springy rig. In fact, it wasn't as plush as my titanium Mukluk with 29"er wheels on it. To my mind, the titanium Warbird I rode felt like a stiff, steel framed bike more than a titanium bike.

    Either one of these rigs, (Vaya or Warbird in titanium), will ride one heckuva lot better with tubeless tires anyway. Frame stiffness at that point is muted somewhat. And with a Vayas longer seat post extension, a titanium seat post will get back whatever smoothness you lost with the stiffer steel, touring spec tubing of the Vaya. (In fact, I know of a Vaya set up as such and it rides quite smoothly for its owner.)

    Point being that I feel either bike is capable. It comes down to what perceptions you believe and what the rider feels will work best for their stated purposes. Frame materials have some effect, but the way the titanium Warbird seems to ride, I am not ready to say there is a vast difference between it and how one could get a Vaya to ride.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Hand/of/Midas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,681
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted View Post
    True. However, the big, rangy 58cm frame I rode on single track was no flexy. springy rig. In fact, it wasn't as plush as my titanium Mukluk with 29"er wheels on it. To my mind, the titanium Warbird I rode felt like a stiff, steel framed bike more than a titanium bike.

    Either one of these rigs, (Vaya or Warbird in titanium), will ride one heckuva lot better with tubeless tires anyway. Frame stiffness at that point is muted somewhat. And with a Vayas longer seat post extension, a titanium seat post will get back whatever smoothness you lost with the stiffer steel, touring spec tubing of the Vaya. (In fact, I know of a Vaya set up as such and it rides quite smoothly for its owner.)

    Point being that I feel either bike is capable. It comes down to what perceptions you believe and what the rider feels will work best for their stated purposes. Frame materials have some effect, but the way the titanium Warbird seems to ride, I am not ready to say there is a vast difference between it and how one could get a Vaya to ride.
    We've rode the same bike.

    I was talking along the lines of frame weight, and agree tire setup makes a big differance.

    Now put my name on your T.I 9 list already.

  24. #24
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,220
    Quote Originally Posted by Hand/of/Midas View Post

    Now put my name on your T.I 9 list already.
    There are ways to get on before registration opens, especially for someone in your position.

    P.M. me if you want to discuss.......
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    54
    The deal is done. Vaya Ti is in the basement! Rode an hour on fresh gravel this morning. Really happy so far. Pictures:





    Thanks for all the advice throughout the decision making process.

    Josh

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    13

    Vaya Ti 57cm vs 58cm

    I would love to buy a Vaya Ti. I am 6'0" with a 33" inseam. That puts me smack in the middle of the range for a Vaya 57cm according to Salsa's web site. However, I can only find at 58cm Vaya Ti to buy. It seems like the difference really shouldn't be a problem--I can always change stems.
    I would love to hear your opinions.
    Thanks in advance.

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    54
    PM me for the name of a shop that has a built up Vaya Ti it is either a 57 or 58.


    Josh

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    9
    So, anyone concerned that the Warbird aluminum at $2500 has Tiagra shifters? How much more would it have cost to stick 105's on there? I would pay the difference. Its not like its spec'd so over-the-top for $2500 that that couldnt have been included. its a nice aluminum frame, but lets face it, you can have aluminum Asian produced frames made for a small price these days. A nicer one wouldnt be that much more. The orange hubs are a nice touch, but they are made by Formula which means they arent that impressive. The Sun rims are fine quality, but not anything real spendy. It would appear the biggest expense is the Enve fork, but does that really move this up to $2500 when you can get full 105 equipped bikes with fancier frame materials all day long for less money?

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    859
    I think the spec is consistent with Salsa's practice on bikes...pick parts that work.

    My Superfish came with an X7 front derailleur.

    Why?

    I assume it's a bit cheaper, but it functions identically to X9, up front.

    I suspect that if you were blindfolded, you couldn't tell the difference between Tiagra and 105 in the current generation brifters. While I agree with you from a pure aesthetic perspective on the appeal of a matching group, I'm guessing they were going for cost effectiveness, and having put my mitts on a Warbird, I'd say they succeeded. The Tiagra brifters work just fine.

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Skywalker22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    138
    Just got my warbird yesterday! Can't wait to take it's maiden ride on turkey day!!

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    89
    I too am the proud owner of a Warbird Ti frame. just gotta wait for the hubs to come to market and we'll be rolling.

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Hand/of/Midas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,681
    Quote Originally Posted by rooke54 View Post
    So, anyone concerned that the Warbird aluminum at $2500 has Tiagra shifters?
    Concerned? no. I've put well over 10,000 miles on a set, done many big events, they work great, just porky weight wise compared to Ultegra/DA.

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    184
    Buy 105's, replace, sell Tiagra. Repeat.

    I will agree though, that Tiagra showing up on a $2500 ride is a bit of a head scratcher...unless said ride is Ti, and then I kinda get it.

  34. #34
    dirtbag
    Reputation: ranier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,436

    Resurrecting thread for sake of sizing question...

    Resurrecting thread for sake of sizing question...

    So here goes... based on the Salsa sizing chart, I either fit on a 55cm (smaller side) or a 56cm (larger side). Both seem *to me at least* a bit on the large side. At 5'6", my Bianchi road bike is a 52/53cm. I would have thought that with a off roadish frame, I'd go smaller or same size. Am I wrong in this assumption? I got fitted for my Bianchi back in '99 so I'm not really versed in roadie bike sizing.

    I'm looking to throw down some coin for a Warbird Ti bike and still up in the air as far as sizing. Should I go with what Salsa recommends - me thinks 55cm - or should I go with the same size as my roadie - < or = to 53cm?

    I don't have a local dealer that has these to test fit / ride so hoping the peanut gallery can provide some advice/insight. Thanks
    Amolan

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    859
    I'm just over 6' and ride a 55" Vaya. I'd get a 55 or 56" Warbird.

    A 55 will be huge for you, I'm afraid.

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    65
    ranier -

    At 167cm that puts you between a 53 & 55, not sure where the 56 is coming from. I would check your standover using the book-in-the crotch method, and decide between those two sizes based on that.

    I'm 6' 0" and ride the 56.

    -PK@Salsa

  37. #37
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,220
    Quote Originally Posted by Zarf View Post
    ranier -

    At 167cm that puts you between a 53 & 55, not sure where the 56 is coming from. I would check your standover using the book-in-the crotch method, and decide between those two sizes based on that.

    I'm 6' 0" and ride the 56.

    -PK@Salsa
    I think with the effort to open up the main triangle to allow for frame bags and such, it kinda made these run a bit big, myself. I tried E-Freds bike and it was huge for a 58cm. Fit like a 60cm bike, and if I recall, he mentioned that as well. I typically would ride a 58cm myself, but I would likely size down on the titanium bike.

    @ranier- I would go with the smaller 53cm of the two sizes Zark/Pete is recommending, but yeah, definitely check that standover carefully!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 2013 Salsa Warbird, Ridden, Reviewed.-p1050375.jpg  

    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    65
    Quote Originally Posted by Guitar Ted View Post
    I think with the effort to open up the main triangle to allow for frame bags and such, it kinda made these run a bit big, myself. I tried E-Freds bike and it was huge for a 58cm. Fit like a 60cm bike, and if I recall, he mentioned that as well. I typically would ride a 58cm myself, but I would likely size down on the titanium bike.

    The TT length stayed the same - the reach on a 58 is what it is. The flatter top tubes are simply just an aesthetic thing everyone kept asking us to change. All that did was decrease standover. You may be mistaking more drop down to the bars as an increase in reach, perhaps - things can vary quite a lot just by a combination of stem/bars/hoods/spacers? E-Fred runs a ton of drop compared to the average dude, not to mention 120mm stems! He likes his bikes long and low.

    -PK

  39. #39
    Harmonius Wrench
    Reputation: Guitar Ted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,220
    Quote Originally Posted by Zarf View Post
    The TT length stayed the same - the reach on a 58 is what it is. The flatter top tubes are simply just an aesthetic thing everyone kept asking us to change. All that did was decrease standover. You may be mistaking more drop down to the bars as an increase in reach, perhaps - things can vary quite a lot just by a combination of stem/bars/hoods/spacers? E-Fred runs a ton of drop compared to the average dude, not to mention 120mm stems! He likes his bikes long and low.

    -PK

    Well, all I can say about the reach is that it was set up for E-Fred, (obviously), and that was what it was, not necessarily my cup of tea, but accounted for in my assessment. (Although I seem to remember he said it "fit like a 60cm bike", and I happen to concur with that.)

    The comments have more to do with the decreased standover, which as you make clear, was in an effort to address concerns of customers/dealers, I assume. At any rate, as I discussed with E-Fred, running a size smaller regains standover, and the stem length can account for the slight loss of TT length.

    To my mind this brings back a bit of seat post extension, which is good for a few reasons, comfort being one. Seat bag fitment another.

    In any case, having a professional bike shop fit you, (speaking to ranier), is your best advise before buying.
    Riden' an Smilin'
    Guitar Ted

    Blog
    RidingGravel.com

  40. #40
    dirtbag
    Reputation: ranier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,436
    Cool, thanks all for the comments. I've decided to go with the 53cm, ETT looks good as does the seat tube length. I'm not overly concerned with stand over height. You buy a bike to ride it, not stand over it so ST and ETT lengths are what matter me thinks. Looking forward to the new bike!
    Amolan

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: pulser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,785
    How would the Warbird do if I was using it for road races that had long gravel road sections? Would I lose out to the normal road bikes on the paved parts?

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    859
    Quote Originally Posted by pulser View Post
    How would the Warbird do if I was using it for road races that had long gravel road sections? Would I lose out to the normal road bikes on the paved parts?
    That's a function of your fitness. A nice Warbird will be pretty light and can be fast if your legs can push it. I'm running tubeless 38c tires on my Vaya, and am amazed at how fast it is on the road. A Warbird with a compact crank should haul right along on the road, though it won't be as efficient as a road bike on 23 or 25c tires. It will be a lot more versatile, though.

    Have you looked at the Colossal? It might be right up your alley.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: pulser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,785
    Quote Originally Posted by lawfarm View Post
    That's a function of your fitness. A nice Warbird will be pretty light and can be fast if your legs can push it. I'm running tubeless 38c tires on my Vaya, and am amazed at how fast it is on the road. A Warbird with a compact crank should haul right along on the road, though it won't be as efficient as a road bike on 23 or 25c tires. It will be a lot more versatile, though.

    Have you looked at the Colossal? It might be right up your alley.
    Well its not quite what I'm looking for. I want to do some gravel racing but I also need a good bike for the spring road races. Allot of our spring road races have dirt. WITHOUT LIMITS PRODUCTIONS | the-koppenberg

    I already have 2 road bikes And I guess I can use one of them. But it would be fun to have one fast bike that does dirt and pavment well.

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    4

    Wink Warbird 2: Bigger Tire Clearance

    Just purchased Warbird 2. The stock bike Tiagra group is UNWORTHY of this frame. I went with SRAM Rival group (shifters, Med Rear derailleur, 32-11 cassette) 34 inner chainring. Swapped cheapo Sun rims for Mavic 719s. Got rid of Clement tires, used Conti 42 cross tires, carbon Salsa seatpost, Fizik saddle. Saved .71 pounds, mostly from Rival shifters. ** note ** I measured ti vs alu frame tire clearance, and Alu has significantly bigger clearance. I am able to put 44m+, up 1.5" MTB tires on my Warbird 2.
    2013 Salsa Warbird, Ridden, Reviewed.-image.jpg

    2013 Salsa Warbird, Ridden, Reviewed.-image.jpg

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    477

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    89
    Nice rig Mehukatti! what size is it? 60cm?

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    477
    It's 56cm. I'm 184cm with 88cm inseam and was kind of in between 56cm and 58cm frame. But from experience and preference I always go with the smaller size.

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    302
    I saw a couple Ti Warbirds at last weekend's Oregon Stampede (127 miles or mostly gravel with over 9000 feet of climbing + headwinds + one actual cattle drive). They were lust-worthy machines (probably because the gorgeous ti and graphics remind me so much of my beloved El Mar Ti). I would have drooled but I was too dehydrated. Would love to get one some day.

    Rode a lot of the Stampede with a guy who was on a Fargo Ti. Nice machine too. Loved its ability to carry 5 waterbottles, which comes in handy on a long unsupported ride in the middle of nowhere.

  49. #49
    TRAIL KUBUKI CORNDOGGER
    Reputation: TwistedCrank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,972
    2013 Salsa Warbird, Ridden, Reviewed.-raccoon_really_really_want.jpg
    Nobody cares what kind of bike you ride.

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    10
    I am 6'5" and looking at some of Salsa's bigger road frames, and I noticed that the seat post on the Warbird is over 2" longer than that of the Colossal (a 60cm WB frame has a 25" seat post vs. 22.83" on the Colossal). The chainstays and wheelbase of the Warbird are also longer. The 63.5 cm seat post of the Warbird is closer to my other road bike (a 64cm Condor).

    Thing is, I won't be gravel racing - rather I am looking for a tough road bike for riding a paved highway, albeit with a lot of course rumble strip and sharp gravel shoulders, and chip seal roads closer to my destination (Vancouver-Whistler-Pemberton areas). Lots of "normal" road bikes handle the route OK, so the Colossal would probably be perfect as long as I choose my route appropriately and stayed away from the worst of the gravel, but the Warbird wouldn't be totally out of place.

    The question I have is whether a taller rider might consider the Warbird based in part on its geometry. Can any tall guys who have ridden big Salsa road frames comment on how they set up and look/ride/feel/fit relative to one another? None of the my local dealers have the 60cm bikes in stock.
    Thanks all.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •