Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,788

    FBI to Get Nuclear Weapon Neutralizer

    FBI to Get Nuclear Weapon Neutralizer
    By Jon Fox
    Global Security Newswire
    WASHINGTON — The U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration expects this year to provide the FBI with a way to disrupt the detonation of an improvised nuclear device, a tool first responders could use to put the bomb into a “standby” mode until expert teams could respond, NNSA chief Tom D’Agostino said yesterday (see GSN, Feb. 9 2007).
    “Obviously the tools themselves are highly classified,” D’Agostino said, while avoiding any specifics about the device he said could be deployed to FBI agents during this calendar year.
    If adversaries knew too much about techniques potentially used to temporarily disarm a nuclear device they could counter such techniques, he said. What D’Agostino would say, however, was that after the inclusion of $16 million in the fiscal 2008 budget he expects one of the concepts proposed by the national laboratories to become a reality this year.
    Proposals involved electrically interrupting an improvised device’s firing circuitry or chemically disrupting a critical element of a bomb.
    The idea is to give the FBI, the agency tapped for the lead during the initial response to any domestic nuclear incident, the tools where they could essentially put the improvised nuclear device in sort of a standby mode,” D’Agostino said.
    Such a delay would allow the Energy Department’s Joint Technical Operation Team, a group that assists the Defense Department’s Explosive Ordnance Disposal Team, more time to respond if a terrorist nuclear device were discovered on U.S. soil.
    According to a 2003 DOE inspector general report JTOT teams are dispatched via plane in the event of an incident.
    Outlined broadly in the president’s fiscal 2009 budget request, programs to respond to nuclear terror would receive $222 million, an increase of nearly 40 percent, although some of that boost represents a reallocation of funds.
    The lion’s share of that funding, nearly $160 million, would provide for collaborative efforts with the Homeland Security Department and the intelligence community to study “improvised nuclear device concepts,” according to the budget summary (see GSN, Feb. 5).
    D’Agostino said there would also be a focus on both continuing work on such “stabilization” technologies to render a bomb temporarily safe and nuclear forensics work, identifying the origin of nuclear material based on its isotopic characteristics.
    “That’s real money, that’s extra money that wasn’t there before,” he said, indicating he’d like to see even more of a focus in future years on nuclear counterterrorism efforts. “As we develop our next year’s budget you’ll be seeing that manifested.”
    This year, in terms of stabilization technology, getting something out to the FBI agents in the field as quickly as possible is really the goal, he said.

  2. #2
    banned
    Reputation: Juan Speeder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    709
    My wild-assed scientific guess:

    Portable EMP device based on the Vircator vacuum tube.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vircator

  3. #3
    General Rabble-Rouser
    Reputation: Karupshun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,007
    If this device did indeed disable a bomb, you would probably have to know the exact location, and be within line-of-sight, and possibly quite close for this device to work. I doubt that it could work in the vicinity of a weapon.

  4. #4
    Weiner Dog Connoiseur
    Reputation: SaxMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,002
    It's assuming that the good guys can find the device before the bad guys detonate it?

    Then again, with radiation sensors in place in cities like Washington, D.C. and New York, it's entire possible the FBI will have a "leg up" before someone tries to set off a nuclear device.
    This space available

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kingbozo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    713
    vaporware

  6. #6
    Who are the brain police?
    Reputation: Locoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    9,996
    Quote Originally Posted by Juan Speeder
    My wild-assed scientific guess:

    Portable EMP device based on the Vircator vacuum tube.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vircator
    Yeah, I'd say you're right about that.
    The Who - Glittering Girl
    Ween - The Grobe
    Yellowman - Strong Me Strong
    all your base are belong to us

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    11,272
    Brillaint Idea...

    Lets see spend billions on the tool, but spend little if any on intelligence, and prevention.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: drunkle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,899
    a $10k set of screwdrivers and a wire cutter. james bond has a set.

  9. #9
    CAN YOU DIG IT??!!??!!!??
    Reputation: man w/ one hand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,990
    Quote Originally Posted by Chewie65
    FBI to Get Nuclear Weapon Neutralizer
    By Jon Fox
    Global Security Newswire
    WASHINGTON — The U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration expects this year to provide the FBI with a way to disrupt the detonation of an improvised nuclear device, a tool first responders could use to put the bomb into a “standby” mode until expert teams could respond, NNSA chief Tom D’Agostino said yesterday (see GSN, Feb. 9 2007).
    “Obviously the tools themselves are highly classified,” D’Agostino said, while avoiding any specifics about the device he said could be deployed to FBI agents during this calendar year.
    If adversaries knew too much about techniques potentially used to temporarily disarm a nuclear device they could counter such techniques, he said.
    What D’Agostino would say, however, was that after the inclusion of $16 million in the fiscal 2008 budget he expects one of the concepts proposed by the national laboratories to become a reality this year.
    Proposals involved electrically interrupting an improvised device’s firing circuitry or chemically disrupting a critical element of a bomb.
    The idea is to give the FBI, the agency tapped for the lead during the initial response to any domestic nuclear incident, the tools where they could essentially put the improvised nuclear device in sort of a standby mode,” D’Agostino said.
    Such a delay would allow the Energy Department’s Joint Technical Operation Team, a group that assists the Defense Department’s Explosive Ordnance Disposal Team, more time to respond if a terrorist nuclear device were discovered on U.S. soil.
    According to a 2003 DOE inspector general report JTOT teams are dispatched via plane in the event of an incident.
    Outlined broadly in the president’s fiscal 2009 budget request, programs to respond to nuclear terror would receive $222 million, an increase of nearly 40 percent, although some of that boost represents a reallocation of funds.
    The lion’s share of that funding, nearly $160 million, would provide for collaborative efforts with the Homeland Security Department and the intelligence community to study “improvised nuclear device concepts,” according to the budget summary (see GSN, Feb. 5).
    D’Agostino said there would also be a focus on both continuing work on such “stabilization” technologies to render a bomb temporarily safe and nuclear forensics work, identifying the origin of nuclear material based on its isotopic characteristics.
    “That’s real money, that’s extra money that wasn’t there before,” he said, indicating he’d like to see even more of a focus in future years on nuclear counterterrorism efforts. “As we develop our next year’s budget you’ll be seeing that manifested.”
    This year, in terms of stabilization technology, getting something out to the FBI agents in the field as quickly as possible is really the goal, he said.
    Smart DOH !!! WHAT ??? Glad we aren't givin' anything away.
    "Why are you willing to take so much & leave others in need...just because you can?"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •