Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    58

    Anyone felt they needed 120mm for rear shock on the M429C?

    Just curious - my shock and fork are at Fox getting a rebuild so I took my a Trek Rumblefish Elite out yesterday. The bike has 120mm front and back.

    I have to say that I was a different rider. More aggressive. Even my riding buddy noticed I was tackling stuff much more aggressively and I was only 1 second short of a PR going down a rocky section and I haven't ridden this bike for almost 6 months. The bike was just more predictable and I was having a blast.

    FOX has come back with their plan and apparently the damper in the front is shot and there is some kind of air / oil issue in the back. How this translated in the actual ride characteristics was there was no real difference in CTD modes and a feeling of too much bouncing / bucking in technical sections (slow or fast). At high speeds downhill (over 20mph) the bike just skips over rocks rather than complying with the terrain. Then of course on climbs there was no lockout on the front or rear shocks. Rebound and psi were set to 25 percent sag and about half way out for both front and rear shocks. Compared to bikes in store with same shocks, mine felt totally different. Bikes in store had clear difference between CTD and seemed to want to utilize the entire stroke where mine would fight back from using the entire stroke. Tire pressure dialed to 25f / 30r psi on both bikes.

    So - when the suspension is working properly did you ever feel you needed more travel in the rear shock? If not is it possible to swap out a 100mm shock for a 120 on the M429C? General consensus is the DW Link seems to add an apparent 1 inch of travel but just looking for experiences with this bike when the suspension is working as designed. Thanks.

  2. #2
    Pivotal figure
    Reputation: kenbentit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    5,669
    If you change the shock to a 120mm stroke the tire is going to hit the seat tube under compression OR the rocker will hit it at full extension.
    Desert Sunset Calls/Upward, Pain, Perseverance/Welcome Solitude

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Trail_Blazer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,480
    Maybe your shock needs to be custom tuned for you by Push.

  4. #4
    OriginalDonk
    Reputation: OriginalDonk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    203
    I've ridden both bikes in question and recognize that ride preferences are subjective. For me the Mach 429c was the better bike by a wide margin climbing, descending, and riding swoopy mixed terrain. The DW outperformed the ABP of the Trek across the board and the geo of the Pivot leant itself toward more aggressive line choices on the descents. There's a reason why a lot of guys run the 429c in enduro racing.

    My question to OP is how long has it been since you serviced your suspension. If the fork damper is shot and the rear shock is cavitated it sounds like you may be well beyond the service interval of both and are experiencing suboptimal suspension performance. The fact that bikes in the shop felt significantly different also suggests the same.

    Looks like you live in San Diego where there's a fair amount of chunk but the 429c should be able to handle most of that terrain with 100mm rear and 120mm front unless you're really lettin' it rip. I say give it another comparison with the recently serviced suspension and let us know how it goes.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    58

    Anyone felt they needed 120mm for rear shock on the M429C?

    Thanks OD - I think you are spot on. I will post up next week once shocks come back and I get my bike back.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Trail_Blazer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,480
    My DWlink bike had same issue until shock rebuilds.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    233
    I dont think the 429 needs +20mm, but it should could use another +30MM,
    Mach 529 is what I have been wanting for quite a while..that way there is a clear separation from CC/trail bike to more trail/AM. BMC looks like they nailed one, on paper

    I have ridden the M429C a bunch of times and its great but as a heavier rider that rides a variety of terrain I just need more travel for my one and only bike.

    I have a tallboy LTC and 135mm is pretty capable, but i really miss pivots DW suspension..

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    58

    Anyone felt they needed 120mm for rear shock on the M429C?

    Just revisiting this - got shocks back from Fox and they installed all 2015 internals. The difference in ride is night and day. Hit all sorts of PRs on my last ride. Now have plush when I want it and lockout when I want it.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Trail_Blazer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,480
    Nice move.

Similar Threads

  1. New rear shock advice needed
    By thrower78 in forum Shocks and Suspension
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-11-2014, 01:51 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-24-2013, 07:33 PM
  3. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 11-16-2011, 06:41 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-07-2011, 06:01 PM
  5. Another rear shock needed (8.75x2.75)
    By Blatant in forum Arizona
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-20-2011, 08:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •