Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30
  1. #1
    650b me
    Reputation: golden boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,041

    Any plans for split pivot?

    It struck me recently that with the success of Pivot's implementation of Dave Weagle's DW-Link suspension design, does Pivot have any plans to implement his Split Pivot design in a future bike? I'm not hearing much about Split Pivot....are there by chance patent issues with Trek's ABP design? Or has Pivot played with split pivot designs and decided that DW-Link is superior? Just curious....

  2. #2
    650b me
    Reputation: golden boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,041
    I should have used the Google machine before posting here. DW was awarded a patent for his split pivot design in 2007, so that's not an issue. Apparently it is easier and cheaper to manufacture than DW-Link. My guess is that Pivot has chosen to stick with DW-Link. That would be fine by me, they certainly have it dialed in!

  3. #3
    Paterfamilias
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    418
    Quote Originally Posted by golden boy View Post
    I should have used the Google machine before posting here. DW was awarded a patent for his split pivot design in 2007, so that's not an issue. Apparently it is easier and cheaper to manufacture than DW-Link. My guess is that Pivot has chosen to stick with DW-Link. That would be fine by me, they certainly have it dialed in!
    Quite the opposite. dw-link is more expensive to build, and hold tolerances than the split pivot designs.

    The dw-link is the more efficient system from Dave Weagle. Both work great, and can be tuned to function well in all different situations. dw-link is still the most versatile and efficient in pedaling, climbing and sprinting - weather you are seated or standing while pedaling.
    "The face of a child can say it all, especially the mouth part of the face".
    Jack Handy

  4. #4
    dog
    dog is offline
    sit! stay!
    Reputation: dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,103
    Quote Originally Posted by dan23 View Post
    Quite the opposite. dw-link is more expensive to build, and hold tolerances than the split pivot
    but that's what the OP said? or am I confused again?
    i need to develop my crashing skills...

  5. #5
    Paterfamilias
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    418
    Quote Originally Posted by dog View Post
    but that's what the OP said? or am I confused again?
    The OP said that the split pivot design was more expensive to make. I was correcting him with my comments...
    "The face of a child can say it all, especially the mouth part of the face".
    Jack Handy

  6. #6
    Boriqua Puneta
    Reputation: chtorres2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    178
    Actually I read somewere (maybe Mountain Bike Action) that they were not to impressed the split pivot design. I beleive it was on a Devinci bike review... anyway they said that the DW link had better anti pedal bob caracteristics. I havent tried any bikes with the split pivot design so I cant personally give my opinion.
    Only type of shuttle I ride....the ambulance!

  7. #7
    Pivotal figure
    Reputation: kenbentit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    5,713
    Actually the OP was correct in stating that the Split is less expensive than the DW. "Apparently it is easier and cheaper to manufacture than DW-Link". Dan still has jetlag from his "vacation" in Europe
    Desert Sunset Calls/Upward, Pain, Perseverance/Welcome Solitude

  8. #8
    I'm Slow
    Reputation: paulrb02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    329
    DW-Link is focused at canceling out pedaling forces (pedal bob or squat) From Patent: ...suspension system of the invention is capable of lowering energy loss resulting from squat by producing an anti-squat response."

    Split Pivot is about canceling out braking forces (brake jack) From Patent: "...link arrangement to control suspension movement by manipulating braking forces present in the link during decelration."

    So each link system has its applications. I don't see Pivot using a Split Pivot design for most of their bikes though.

    DW-Link Patent: Patent US7128329 - Vehicle suspension systems - Google Patents

    Split Pivot Patent: Patent US7717212 - Vehicle suspension systems for seperated acceleration responses - Google Patents
    RideSAMBA.com Mountain Biking in South Alabama.

  9. #9
    650b me
    Reputation: golden boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,041
    MBA not impressed?!? Whoa....

    Ken, thanks for correcting the corrector. Apparently Dan isn't "whethering" the jetlag very well.

    Paul, thanks for the patent links.

  10. #10
    Pivotal figure
    Reputation: kenbentit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    5,713
    Weather sounds so much like whether when you listen to the voices in your head
    Desert Sunset Calls/Upward, Pain, Perseverance/Welcome Solitude

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    293
    BH Bikes have a Split Pivot system, so I'd guess that given the relationship between the two, if they were going to do anything, it would be to bring in the BH Split-Pivots rather than design their own...

    I know that my LBS here in Aus, being both a Pivot & BH dealer, will be getting the BH 650b model in when it's available

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation: gticlay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    6,594
    It would be pretty cool if Pivot did a less expensive 187mm travel bike park frame with split pivot.
    "It looks flexy"

  13. #13
    _dw
    _dw is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,270
    Hi guys,

    First time in a while for me posting!

    There are some new Split Pivot models coming soon, for example the new Morewood bikes using my design, and the BH 27.5" wheeled bike just launched at Eurobike, and there will be more options next year as well.

    I can't let the cat out of the bag with Pivot, but we are always working on new dw-link Pivot frames. Did you see the Mach4 carbon?!! That thing is one heck of a ride, seriously. I've been on a test mule for what seems like an eternity and it has amassed hundreds of miles beyond what I needed to do for damper tuning and spec. I really enjoy that bike.

    Whether it's dw-link, Split Pivot, or Delta, I put the same attention to detail and years of experience behind every bike that I design. I think that coupled with the unique tastes of my partners we have been able to develop a really wide range of products to suit the even wider range of riding styles, and riding preferences out there. A properly set up test ride is always the key to getting a feel for what works for any rider.

    Take care,

    Dave
    dw★link
    Split Pivot
    @daveweagle -Twitter

  14. #14
    650b me
    Reputation: golden boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,041
    Mach4 carbon? Haven't heard about that one. I'm waiting for the 650b version.

    Keep up the great work, Dave!

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,656
    Yeah, not even a Google search shows any rumors or test mule pics.

  16. #16
    Paterfamilias
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    418
    Quote Originally Posted by _dw View Post
    Did you see the Mach4 carbon?!! That thing is one heck of a ride, seriously. I've been on a test mule for what seems like an eternity and it has amassed hundreds of miles beyond what I needed to do for damper tuning and spec. I really enjoy that bike.
    Dave meant Mach 429 Carbon!
    There is no Mach 4 Carbon...
    "The face of a child can say it all, especially the mouth part of the face".
    Jack Handy

  17. #17
    the train keeps rollin
    Reputation: snowdrifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,203
    Quote Originally Posted by dan23 View Post
    Dave meant Mach 429 Carbon!
    There is no Mach 4 Carbon...
    DW, how is the 429c on the east coast? The Bottom Bracket seems low for trail riding in the rocks.
    beaver hunt

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: smilinsteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    6,799
    Split pivot design is just a single pivot with no advantage over older seatstay pivot ("faux bar" although I hate that term) bikes.
    (Yikes)

    Not that there is anything wrong with bikes like that if they are tuned right, but split pivot just looks like an over complication with no benefit.

    And that marketing BS about how a pivot at the axle has magical properties compared to a pivot an inch above or an inch forward of the axle is just gobbildy goook.

  19. #19
    Paterfamilias
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    418
    Quote Originally Posted by snowdrifter View Post
    DW, how is the 429c on the east coast? The Bottom Bracket seems low for trail riding in the rocks.
    There is no need to be confused.

    Mach 429 Alloy with 120 fork has a BBH of 13.10
    Mach 429 Carbon with 120 fork has a BBH of 13.00

    Not sure a tenth of an inch is going to cause you any problems on the rocks on the east coast. We have ZERO problems on the rocks in the desert.

    Trust that skilled riders have tested and spent hundreds of hours on this geometry, and ridden it on gnarly trails in Moab, Fruita, not to mention our own back yard in Phoenix.
    "The face of a child can say it all, especially the mouth part of the face".
    Jack Handy

  20. #20
    c'est la vie
    Reputation: Maluco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    131

    Weagle sues Trek over suspension patent

    "If I should die darling in your arms, what a lovely way to go..." Don Felder -All of You

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: smilinsteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    6,799
    I'd love to see the judge throw out that case. I'm sick of all these completely obvious variations on a simple mechanical device getting awarded patents when there is absolutely nothing novel about them.
    I really think that is the proper outcome. Who was first? Doesn't matter because its not a patentable design. Case closed now GTFO.

  22. #22
    > /dev/null 2&>1
    Reputation: Procter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,484
    Just curious, I wonder why split pivot doesn't fall under the horst link patent, I believe now owned by Specialized? I guess moving the pivot 20mm to the hub center is enough to make the difference?

  23. #23
    I'm Slow
    Reputation: paulrb02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    329
    Quote Originally Posted by ddprocter View Post
    Just curious, I wonder why split pivot doesn't fall under the horst link patent, I believe now owned by Specialized? I guess moving the pivot 20mm to the hub center is enough to make the difference?
    The math is a bit complicated, but its moves the forces from the frame (horst link is on the chainstay) and moves them to the axle. This dramatically changes how the forces react with frame, and more importantly how the those forces get translated into the shock.

    So its not really that its 20mm apart, its that the pivot is the axle, vs away from the axle.
    RideSAMBA.com Mountain Biking in South Alabama.

  24. #24
    Chillin the Most
    Reputation: RED5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,029
    Specialized's FSR patent is very specific so it leaves a lot of leeway, thats why companies like Ellsworth dont pay royalties to Spec.

  25. #25
    DLd
    DLd is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,005
    Quote Originally Posted by paulrb02 View Post
    The math is a bit complicated, but its moves the forces from the frame (horst link is on the chainstay) and moves them to the axle. This dramatically changes how the forces react with frame, and more importantly how the those forces get translated into the shock.

    So its not really that its 20mm apart, its that the pivot is the axle, vs away from the axle.
    Yes, seriously, there's a world of difference between the pivot being on the chainstay, or seatstay, or at the axle. Horst-link allows for a slightly different wheel-path, and does a pretty good job of isolating brake forces from the suspension, that is it's main benefit, not isolating pedaling forces from the suspension obviously, or spec never would have needed to come up with the brain. The faux-bar has the same wheel path as a single pivot, and doesn't do much if anything to isolate braking forces but allows some tuning of leverage rates, with the added bonus that some people won't notice the difference between the two and will figure they're both the same. The split-pivot obviously will have the same wheel path as a single pivot with the same main pivot location, but one could see how it could allow for the isolation of the braking forces. Pedaling response for faux-bars and split-pivots will have more to do with the location of the main pivot and leverage rates, shock setup and platform, than whether they are split or faux, at least in a general sense. So I would say split-pivot adds isolation of braking forces over a faux, but other traits depend on the skill of the suspension designer. Split-pivot has the benefit of DW's knowledge and experience, whereas you don't know how much thought was put into pivot placement on many faux-bars, so I would count that as a big plus for split-pivot.
    "Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and fads and popular opinion."-Jack Kerouac

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •