Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 100 of 103
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    107

    Does size really matter?

    Anybody out there still think that 26" wheels are still the way to go for just plain fun?

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,149
    Why let other people define what's fun for you? Shouldn't you be the judge of that? Ride whatever you got and enjoy it. If you need a new ride, demo different bikes with different wheel sizes and decide for yourself based on your own experience on your own terrain.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    261
    They're all fun when you ride them...we're talking about bikes here right?!...

  4. #4
    Ridin' Furry
    Reputation: Huskywolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    312
    INB4 29ers vs 26ers debate.

  5. #5
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,416
    They see me rollin' they hatin'..


  6. #6
    Rogue Exterminator
    Reputation: kjlued's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,956
    Why is it that the guys that believe size doesn't matter always have smaller ones?

    BTW, on a serious note, I hear plenty of guys that have 26" bikes out on the trails say their next bike will be a 29er but I have never heard a guy on a 29er say he wants a 26er.
    I wonder why that is?

  7. #7
    No Stranger to danger....
    Reputation: Tone's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    4,596
    Maybe you need to ask this question in the womens section of the forum....cheers
    Dont ever let the truth get in the way of a funny story....

  8. #8
    Serenity now!
    Reputation: PixieChik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    239
    I have a 29er and I think my next bike is going to be 26".

  9. #9
    No Stranger to danger....
    Reputation: Tone's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    4,596
    Quote Originally Posted by kjlued View Post
    Why is it that the guys that believe size doesn't matter always have smaller ones?

    BTW, on a serious note, I hear plenty of guys that have 26" bikes out on the trails say their next bike will be a 29er but I have never heard a guy on a 29er say he wants a 26er.
    I wonder why that is?
    Ive heard plenty say it, in fact a member here that rides xc comps on a 29er said to me a week ago that he was really looking forward to buying a new 26er, as he was missing the fun he had on his
    Dont ever let the truth get in the way of a funny story....

  10. #10
    No Stranger to danger....
    Reputation: Tone's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    4,596
    duplicate post.
    Last edited by Tone's; 10-25-2012 at 04:06 AM.
    Dont ever let the truth get in the way of a funny story....

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    897
    Quote Originally Posted by PixieChik View Post
    I have a 29er and I think my next bike is going to be 26".
    Same I have a 29er and 26 Next bike will be 26.

  12. #12
    Clyde on a mission!
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    719
    Quote Originally Posted by kjlued View Post
    BTW, on a serious note, I hear plenty of guys that have 26" bikes out on the trails say their next bike will be a 29er but I have never heard a guy on a 29er say he wants a 26er.
    I wonder why that is?
    Because the hype currently says you have to have a 29" or even better a 650b to be cool so it would show signs of individual thought to publicly wish for a 26" and that's just too scary for most.

    By the way, as long as 29" bikes generally costs 10-15% more than their similarly spec'ed 26" counterparts, I'd say 26" are more fun as they allow for more after ride brew.

  13. #13
    ******
    Reputation: monzie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,990
    It ain't the size that counts, *******--it's what you do with it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Tone's View Post
    Id scrap the passion forum all together, its a breeding ground for unicorn milkers, rainbow chasers and candy cotton farters.

  14. #14
    no trees are safe
    Reputation: Millfox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    501
    Its not the size its the technique that makes it good... well thats what my sister is telling me.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,453
    29" wheels allowed me to return to my first love....Hardtail

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: lpranger467's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    149

    29-26

    After Outerbike I will never own a 29 again, I rode a dozen high end bikes and kept going back to 26's. Its the only bike that made me laugh out loud while riding..Now I will say that the 29 would have worked better on some of the rocky trails where the 26 beat me up,,but I would still go 26 hands down.. My only issue with 26 is that HT's seem to have a much shorter wheelbase than FS so if you want stability you have to pay more and get a FS

  17. #17
    crash test dummy
    Reputation: FullyTorque's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    85
    My girlfriend says my 9 is just too big for her. She's more comfortable with a 6.
    I meant to do that.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,121
    I've ridden a few 29'ers, but I'll never purchase one. Maybe if I become a lycra wearing tryhard, but until then... no.

  19. #19
    the train keeps rollin
    Reputation: snowdrifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,213
    26" bikes for sale
    beaver hunt

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Rev Bubba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,745

    I'm happy with my 26"

    My 26" custom steel hardtail is all I need. Sometimes I ride my 26" FS but the only thing that holds me back is my ability and age, not my wheel size.

    Never use your equipment as an excuse amigo.

    Buy what you want but don't expect miracles just because you buy the latest and greatest. A crappy rider will still be a crappy regardless of what they bring to the trail and a great rider will still put us to shame no matter what they ride.

  21. #21
    No Stranger to danger....
    Reputation: Tone's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    4,596
    Quote Originally Posted by Millfox View Post
    Its not the size its the technique that makes it good... well thats what my sister is telling me.
    Its always good to have a sister to get some early practice in with, i did and now im married to her with 3 kids, the kids have a few inbred traits and deformities, but they will get over it....
    Dont ever let the truth get in the way of a funny story....

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 53119's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Tone's View Post
    Its always good to have a sister to get some early practice in with, i did and now im married to her with 3 kids, the kids have a few inbred traits and deformities, but they will get over it....
    forest full of family trees with no branches makes for amusing trails, tone! sounds like a 26er would be better for that no question.

    to the op - bike industry is fickle. first (26) less is more then(29) more is too much so now (650b) we're at a little less than too much. i like 26. i like the suspension to be the variable.

  23. #23
    inner peace to make peace
    Reputation: TrailNut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,280
    I really enjoy riding my old crusty cro-molly butted steel hardtail, with numerous dings and dents, from the last Century that has had rear disc boss welded/brazed on and have all components replaced multiple times (still on the 2nd headset, a King).

    if this bike got stolen, i'd build up another steel 26er HT and gladly spend the $3~$4K to do so.

    I'm not curious about 29er....unless Mark Wier or other Downieville DH racers start winning on 29ers. I want wheelsets that are light yet strong enough for jumps -- so yes: wheel size , selection, and strength does matter somewhat. Even on a 26er HT I damage rear wheels and get pinch flats if not using tubeless. My guess is that many 29er are not riding the rough rocky descends, but I really do not know.

    I am curious about a real light (steel or ti') cyclo-cross road bike to "taste" some cross races.
    Last edited by TrailNut; 10-25-2012 at 08:58 AM.
    “Everyday is a good day,” from the Blue Cliff Records, Yun-men (864-949 AD).

  24. #24
    FX4
    FX4 is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    452
    Quote Originally Posted by kjlued View Post
    Why is it that the guys that believe size doesn't matter always have smaller ones?

    BTW, on a serious note, I hear plenty of guys that have 26" bikes out on the trails say their next bike will be a 29er but I have never heard a guy on a 29er say he wants a 26er.
    I wonder why that is?
    That's not true. I bought a 29er first, didn't particularly care for it. Turned around and bought a 26. I still have both, the 26 gets ridden 90% of the time. I just enjoy riding it more.

  25. #25
    Single Speed Junkie
    Reputation: crux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,108
    I enjoy riding the 29er at 6'2" I think the bike just fits better. Then again perhaps I'm over compensating for other areas in my life.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Blister Butt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    307

    Size doesn't matter; color does!

    I've got bikes with 26" and 29" wheels. Each has their strengths and weaknesses. I now shop for bikes with two criteria (in order of importance):

    • How's the fit?
    • Do you love the color?

    Back to basics again I guess.

    Have fun and ride!
    "You'll thank me when it's all said and done"

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tystevens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,826
    I had some good ol' fashion plain fun on my 26" wheels last Saturday. So I'm still on board.

    Related question -- does anyone here think that the difference between 26 and 29 might have been blown out of proportion somewhat? Like maybe the difference isn't THAT big? I mean, I've taken a couple laps on a 29'er (a good one, too -- a brand new '12 carbon Tallboy). It wasn't the most technical or intense terrain ever, but I put 3 or 4 miles on it, including a couple climbs, descents, and a couple quick rock gardens. Of course, the Enduro and the Tallboy are quite different bikes altogether, so it was hard to tell what was due to the wheels vs. all other aspects of the bike. But IMHO, the difference was more like vanilla vs vanilla bean ice cream, as opposed to vanilla vs chocolate like people try to make it out to be.

    Of course, there are those on MTBR that make a tubeless conversion seem like a huge change performance-wise. Where, for me, I couldn't hardly you the difference when I went from tubes to tubeless back to tube on the rear after I ripped up a sidewall. So maybe I just have an undistinguished pallet!
    '11 Specialized Enduro Expert for the trails
    '13 Felt Z4 for the road

  28. #28
    FX4
    FX4 is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    452
    I guess my assessment is its easier to cover ground fast on the 29er. Acceleration seems slower. Not as much fun in the techy stuff. The 26" bike is more responsive, handles the techy stuff better but will not clean as large of objects as well as the 29er. When I go XC riding with a friend I grab the 29er, when I go mountain biking I grab the 26er. It's just more fun to ride. I guess when push comes to shove I really don't care for the wagon wheels all that much. I suppose if you are racing they are an advantage for most guys.

  29. #29
    Never Forget 9-11
    Reputation: FujNoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    434
    I still can't figure out why one would care what others thought of their wheel size choice. All that matter is that you like what you ride.
    It's such a fine line between idiocy and genius.

  30. #30
    FX4
    FX4 is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    452
    Quote Originally Posted by FujNoob View Post
    I still can't figure out why one would care what others thought of their wheel size choice. All that matter is that you like what you ride.
    I wonder about that too. It's what you like that matters. Not anybody else.

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mudhen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    185
    I have an old Trek 820 that is a blast to ride. Probably won't sell it, no reason to give it away for what someone would pay for it today.

    But, I am totally sold on 29'ers, and just love long rides on my Carve in the country, roads, trails, whatever, the bike is just plain stupid fun!

    Very unlikely I'd go back to 26" anytime soon, too many 29'ers to buy first....

    mudhen
    "Lighten up Francis" Sgt. Hulka

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,075
    Quote Originally Posted by TrailNut View Post
    My guess is that many 29er are not riding the rough rocky descends, but I really do not know.
    Yes - you really do not know.

    I've ridden my 29ers at Northstar (lift served DH) and anywhere you can ride smaller wheels. The only real problem is that there is still a lack of heavy duty tires and longer travel forks for 29ers if you want to do downhill or freeride. Currently there is no problem at all with 29ers as all mountain or trail bikes - there are plenty of bikes in that category and plenty of us ripping it up on the most gnarly rocky downhills out there. If anything, that is where big wheels shine.

  33. #33
    Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
    Reputation: scrublover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    8,770
    Quote Originally Posted by FujNoob View Post
    I still can't figure out why one would care what others thought of their wheel size choice. All that matter is that you like what you ride.
    This.
    Florence Nightingale's Stormtrooper

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tystevens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,826
    Here is an interesting article asking some of the top designers in the mtb industry about wheel size and their plans for the future.

    The Future of 27.5 and 650b Mountain Bike Wheels | Bicycling Magazine

    Particularly interesting what Dave Turner says about 27.5 eventually killing off the 26" wheel (see page 3).
    '11 Specialized Enduro Expert for the trails
    '13 Felt Z4 for the road

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation: OscarW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,688

    ... and if we just ...

    I sold my Epic 29r in favor of my Blur LT... Not that the 29r is a bad bike/ride ,but just not for me. The 650 appeals to me more, specially for the type of trails I ride. YMMV
    Current ride(s) 2011 Santa Cruz Blur LT and a Norco Threshold SL with Di2

  36. #36
    no trees are safe
    Reputation: Millfox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    501
    Quote Originally Posted by Tone's View Post
    Its always good to have a sister to get some early practice in with, i did and now im married to her with 3 kids, the kids have a few inbred traits and deformities, but they will get over it....
    Oh lol It didn't occurred to me that someone might of take it THAT way... Um... we were more like talking about it when I was going for my... I wanted to know what she thought she had more experience... I mean not too much experience... eh.. DONT JUDGE ME!

  37. #37
    Rogue Exterminator
    Reputation: kjlued's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,956
    Quote Originally Posted by Tone's View Post
    Ive heard plenty say it, in fact a member here that rides xc comps on a 29er said to me a week ago that he was really looking forward to buying a new 26er, as he was missing the fun he had on his
    I am sure plenty do, I am just saying that I have not heard anyone say they would rather have a 26er.

    I have heard a few people say they want 650b.....but they were all on 26ers also.

    I know it all comes down to riding preference.
    That being said, buy what feels good to you and don't let anyone tell you what you should ride.

  38. #38
    Rolling
    Reputation: lidarman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    11,110
    What really matters is having too large a package on the saddle on large rides!

  39. #39
    Rogue Exterminator
    Reputation: kjlued's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,956
    Quote Originally Posted by lidarman View Post
    What really matters is having too large a package on the saddle on large rides!
    Good thing you don't have to worry about that.

  40. #40
    Abby Design & Constructio
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    121
    Quote Originally Posted by rayzer View Post
    Anybody out there still think that 26" wheels are still the way to go for just plain fun?
    29er bikes are defiantly the race choice but if you are a aggressive style rider then 26er is the way to go. 26er bikes are just plain easyer to handle and can be a lot more durable in all mountain bikes.

  41. #41
    somehow still alive
    Reputation: Hollyw00d's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    263
    Having ridden both, I prefer 26". I feel like they're more playful, and I'm not a big guy 5'7" 175, so 29" feels too big for my liking...

    So for me 26" all day. my commuter is a 26" as well and I like it.
    Not what you think.

    My videos

  42. #42
    CoolArrow
    Reputation: jhazard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,408
    Quote Originally Posted by Blister Butt View Post
    I've got bikes with 26" and 29" wheels. Each has their strengths and weaknesses. I now shop for bikes with two criteria (in order of importance):

    • How's the fit?
    • Do you love the color?

    Back to basics again I guess.

    Have fun and ride!
    yep, pretty much this. No need to debate, go ride A bike...
    Airborne Flight Crew

    Jerry Hazard – website

  43. #43
    somehow still alive
    Reputation: Hollyw00d's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by jhazard View Post
    go ride A bike...
    This!! I'm on a 48hr shift and can't ride....

    Can't wait to get home and ride.
    Not what you think.

    My videos

  44. #44
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,416
    You say potato, I say tomato.. Wait.. Just go f-ing ride and have fun!

  45. #45
    B.Ike
    Reputation: ElwoodT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,083
    I have two 29er's that I love just about equally. (rigid ss, and 1x9 ht) My next bike will likely be 26fs.

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation: col200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    268
    I'm a big guy (200 lbs, 6'2") and own both a 26" HT and a 29" HT rigid. They're definitely different beasts but both are fun as hell. Honestly, I'm keeping my 29er SS rigid because I don't think the geometry would be as fun to chuck around than my 26er.
    It's kinda funny to see how many 29ers I see at the trail. I feel old-school sometimes when I ride my brand new On-one 456Evo.

    I just ordered a 26er fatbike.

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rotten1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    263
    My next bike will be...

    A bike.

  48. #48
    tg
    tg is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: tg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,453
    Love my Satori but on race day I go with my Turner Flux....I am just old I guess...Both bikes are fun and have a place to shine.

  49. #49
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,416
    I love lamp.

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bmf032's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    218
    Quote Originally Posted by Tystevens View Post
    I had some good ol' fashion plain fun on my 26" wheels last Saturday. So I'm still on board.

    Related question -- does anyone here think that the difference between 26 and 29 might have been blown out of proportion somewhat? Like maybe the difference isn't THAT big? I mean, I've taken a couple laps on a 29'er (a good one, too -- a brand new '12 carbon Tallboy). It wasn't the most technical or intense terrain ever, but I put 3 or 4 miles on it, including a couple climbs, descents, and a couple quick rock gardens. Of course, the Enduro and the Tallboy are quite different bikes altogether, so it was hard to tell what was due to the wheels vs. all other aspects of the bike. But IMHO, the difference was more like vanilla vs vanilla bean ice cream, as opposed to vanilla vs chocolate like people try to make it out to be.

    Of course, there are those on MTBR that make a tubeless conversion seem like a huge change performance-wise. Where, for me, I couldn't hardly you the difference when I went from tubes to tubeless back to tube on the rear after I ripped up a sidewall. So maybe I just have an undistinguished pallet!
    AMEN! I own both and feel the same way.

  51. #51
    Rolling
    Reputation: lidarman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    11,110
    Quote Originally Posted by kjlued View Post
    Good thing you don't have to worry about that.
    Exactly!

  52. #52
    zrm
    zrm is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,551
    Quote Originally Posted by FX4 View Post
    I When I go XC riding........ when I go mountain biking.......

  53. #53
    zrm
    zrm is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,551
    I'll be shopping around for a new bike next year. I've tried some 29" wheel bikes and have been a bit underwhelmed, at least considering the hype. They do some things very well and others not so well. I'd like to try some 650b wheel bikes to see what they feel like but demos are hard to come by.

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    459
    It's not the size of the wheel, it's the motion of the shock that counts.
    2007 Cdale Caffeine 29er Lefty.
    "Your not going to shove you're proper grammer down are throats!!"

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JoePAz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,365
    I have 26" hard tail with v-brakes. I just did ride with two guys. One with a jet9 and the other with a rip9. Overall I did just fine keeping up. The fs bikes could be faster on the descents, but I don't care that much about being fast on the downhills. I have more fun picking way stuff. Plus and time gained on the downhill will be lost on the uphills. In the end it is more the rider.
    Joe
    '12 Santa Cruz Highball 29", '13 Santa Cruz Solo 27.5",Vassago Verhauen SS 29" XC, AM, blah blah blah.. I just ride.

  56. #56
    FX4
    FX4 is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    452
    Quote Originally Posted by zrm View Post
    Fine let me revise that. When I'm riding smooth rolling trails vs steep downhill, techy rock gardens, cleaning trees, etc... XC less than all mountain.

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iperov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    136
    depend on style

    hard mountains - 20",
    XC - 24",
    50% asphalt - 26"
    >80% aphalt - 29er
    winter XC

  58. #58
    No Stranger to danger....
    Reputation: Tone's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    4,596
    Quote Originally Posted by iperov View Post
    depend on style

    hard mountains - 20",
    XC - 24",
    50% asphalt - 26"
    >80% aphalt - 29er
    WTF??????????
    Dont ever let the truth get in the way of a funny story....

  59. #59
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,416
    Quote Originally Posted by iperov View Post
    depend on style

    hard mountains - 20",
    XC - 24",
    50% asphalt - 26"
    >80% aphalt - 29er
    My iPad sent my neg rep too soon.. Just want to let you know that it was from me. Please feel free to explain this post.. 20"???

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iperov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    136
    I can explain, but it requested by apple user... so not. When I give facts to apple users, they give me faith.
    winter XC

  61. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation: s0ckeyeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,614
    I don't mind being 3" shy of the next guy. I used to be self-conscious, but then I started wearing my lycra backwards. Now no one has to know...

  62. #62
    dwt
    dwt is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dwt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Tystevens View Post
    Here is an interesting article asking some of the top designers in the mtb industry about wheel size and their plans for the future.

    The Future of 27.5 and 650b Mountain Bike Wheels | Bicycling Magazine

    Particularly interesting what Dave Turner says about 27.5 eventually killing off the 26" wheel (see page 3).
    DT is only saying that about short travel 26". He thinks some DH riders will move up to 27.5", but not the top ones. So plenty of room for long travel 26" and 27.5" (which has virtually the same geo as 26"). 29" harder to fit with long travel forks and geo. But the roll for HT and short travel uses can't be beat.

    So there will be 3 wheel choices around for the foreseeable future. It's all rider and terrain dependent.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Old enough to know better. And old enough not to care. Best age to be.

  63. #63
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,416
    Quote Originally Posted by iperov View Post
    I can explain, but it requested by apple user... so not. When I give facts to apple users, they give me faith.
    Sign your neg rep next time. Now I'm on a PC so what exactly did your post mean? I should be riding a 20" BMX bike on mountains?

  64. #64
    the half breed devil
    Reputation: shekky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    2,990
    my 17.5" 26" ibis alibi is better for slow, tight trails with a lot of switchbacks. (mount sutro/twin peaks, waterdog lake)

    my 19" 29 marin pine mountain is better for high speed fire roads and groomed singletrack. (marin headlands, china camp state park)

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iperov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    136
    20" for hard mountains, because easy get vertical hills on LIGHTEST wheel in the world, easy accelerating, 20" is tractor style accelerate: just push and feel power of accelerate.

    29" wheel is most heavy wheel. 29er hardtail bike weight more than my 26 full suspension LMAO.
    Weight on wheels collecting muscle power for unstoppable inertia driving, long accelerate, bad braking, best for long asphalt racing. XC 29er? ROFL, no thanks, in other life.
    winter XC

  66. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation: joshman108's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    468
    Quote Originally Posted by kjlued View Post
    Why is it that the guys that believe size doesn't matter always have smaller ones?

    BTW, on a serious note, I hear plenty of guys that have 26" bikes out on the trails say their next bike will be a 29er but I have never heard a guy on a 29er say he wants a 26er.
    I wonder why that is?


    I must say my next bike is going to be a 26 for sure.

    I gave 29 a sporting chance

    I will say for sure that 29 looks more proportional.
    I cant wait for 650 to get popular.

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    421
    I am currently shopping for a 24" and a 20". My rides may be slower but getting my daughters riding is priceless.

  68. #68
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,416
    Quote Originally Posted by iperov View Post
    20" for hard mountains
    What size for soft mountains?

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,134
    26" FS = AWESOME!

    From the short demo that I had I think for my HT i am wanting 29 though.

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation: RajunCajun44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2,708
    all I know is used 26 inch wheeled bike are insanely cheap... Granted this bike has vbrakes, but I cannot believe how cheap it went for...

    Arizona Haro Custom Built Mountain Bike 26 5 lbs Marzocchi Deore XT Mavic | eBay

  71. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation: unbalanced's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by FX4 View Post
    That's not true. I bought a 29er first, didn't particularly care for it. Turned around and bought a 26. I still have both, the 26 gets ridden 90% of the time. I just enjoy riding it more.
    Ditto. 29'er are good for XC, but for me, AM riding and techy trails, 26'ers are more fun and that is why I ride.

  72. #72
    dwt
    dwt is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dwt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Tystevens View Post

    Related question -- does anyone here think that the difference between 26 and 29 might have been blown out of proportion somewhat?
    Nope. Night and Day. Not even close. I've heard more riders who think that the difference between 26" and 27.5" is insignificant, which makes more sense given the not so proportionally different size, similar geometry and the fact that 27.5" can handle he same travel without being too tall with a ridiculous wheel base. But most of those people are 29'er riders used to incredible roll, so anything smaller seems inadequate. OTOH, 26'er riders moving up to 27.5" can usually feel better roll and slightly more sluggish handling though not nearly as pronounced as 29"

    Of course, there are those on MTBR that make a tubeless conversion seem like a huge change performance-wise.
    Well it does. You don't have to be some sort of super sensitive pro to tell. Differences in wheel size, tire pressure, tire width, tire tread, geometry, and suspension are easily apparent to a rider with more than a few years experience IMO.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Old enough to know better. And old enough not to care. Best age to be.

  73. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation: coopdad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    188
    Quote Originally Posted by Hollyw00d View Post
    Having ridden both, I prefer 26". I feel like they're more playful, and I'm not a big guy 5'7" 175, so 29" feels too big for my liking...

    So for me 26" all day. my commuter is a 26" as well and I like it.
    Hollyw00d, have you tried a 650er? I am wondering if they would be a good scaled down 29 for short guys like us (I too am 5'7").
    Please visit my bike blog! And if you click a few banner ads, I wouldn't complain!
    http://realworldbiking.blogspot.com

  74. #74
    sock puppet
    Reputation: osokolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,047
    Quote Originally Posted by Tone's View Post
    Its always good to have a sister to get some early practice in with, i did and now im married to her with 3 kids, the kids have a few inbred traits and deformities, but they will get over it....
    well, if it wasn't for the same practice - you'd never see the light of the day, eh?

    just sayin'...


  75. #75
    sock puppet
    Reputation: osokolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,047

    i think i will compromise and

    start racing on 24" wheels...

    it's about time i ditch my current bike, and go for lighter wheels with better acceleration...

    size really doesn't matter. i don't care what she said...

    Quote Originally Posted by iperov View Post
    20" for hard mountains, because easy get vertical hills on LIGHTEST wheel in the world, easy accelerating, 20" is tractor style accelerate: just push and feel power of accelerate.

    29" wheel is most heavy wheel. 29er hardtail bike weight more than my 26 full suspension LMAO.
    Weight on wheels collecting muscle power for unstoppable inertia driving, long accelerate, bad braking, best for long asphalt racing. XC 29er? ROFL, no thanks, in other life.

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,149
    Hello and welcome to page 4!

    If you didn't have time to read the 3 previous pages, I've summarized the content in pictorial format below. Carry on.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  77. #77
    No Stranger to danger....
    Reputation: Tone's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    4,596
    Quote Originally Posted by iperov View Post
    20" for hard mountains, because easy get vertical hills on LIGHTEST wheel in the world, easy accelerating, 20" is tractor style accelerate: just push and feel power of accelerate.

    29" wheel is most heavy wheel. 29er hardtail bike weight more than my 26 full suspension LMAO.
    Weight on wheels collecting muscle power for unstoppable inertia driving, long accelerate, bad braking, best for long asphalt racing. XC 29er? ROFL, no thanks, in other life.
    Dont ever let the truth get in the way of a funny story....

  78. #78
    somehow still alive
    Reputation: Hollyw00d's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by coopdad View Post
    Hollyw00d, have you tried a 650er? I am wondering if they would be a good scaled down 29 for short guys like us (I too am 5'7").
    Not yet.... I really wanna ride one.

    My paramedic partner is a Cat 1 roadie and he's recommended a 650 as well..

    My hesitation is that I don't want to "fall in love" with the 650 and then have to spend a bunch of money that I don't have..
    Not what you think.

    My videos

  79. #79
    Muskoka
    Reputation: BlackCanoeDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    3,340
    Quote Originally Posted by kjlued View Post
    Why is it that the guys that believe size doesn't matter always have smaller ones?

    BTW, on a serious note, I hear plenty of guys that have 26" bikes out on the trails say their next bike will be a 29er but I have never heard a guy on a 29er say he wants a 26er.
    I wonder why that is?
    Guy that owns the LBS (so pretty much has his choice lol) in my town rode 29 for 2 yrs, but past 2 seasons has gone back to 26.
    I think lots of people buy 29 because it's "the in thing" right now, they're just running with the herd.
    https://get.google.com/albumarchive/...127?source=pwa

    RSD Bikes "The Mayor"
    Rocky Mountain Sherpa Overland

  80. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,568
    Quote Originally Posted by kjlued View Post
    Why is it that the guys that believe size doesn't matter always have smaller ones?

    BTW, on a serious note, I hear plenty of guys that have 26" bikes out on the trails say their next bike will be a 29er but I have never heard a guy on a 29er say he wants a 26er.
    I wonder why that is?
    Because the people that you talk to apparently either don't ride trails that benefit from a 26" wheel or don't have a riding style that better uses the characteristics of a 26" wheel. People willing to try it in the first place probably knew what they were getting, and didn't use the 26" wheels to their advantage. That's just you, though.

  81. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    87
    My first thought upon seeing the thread title was about frame sizes.

    Turned out to be another 26 v 29 thread. Ho hum....

    26er HT rider here, and I absolutely have fun riding it. Have brought it to some gnarly trails where a FS would be the weapon of choice. However, I am looking to get a custom built steel 29er in late 2013 or early 2014. BUT my next bike is (I hope! I hope!) would be an AM 26er rig. The future 29er HT would be my XC ride, while the FS 6-inch travel 26er would be my AM weapon of choice.

    Either way, I'll be having fun on the trails.

    I know a guy who recently sold his less-than-year-old 26er and joined the 29er bandwagon. Hell, even added mudguards and upgraded the hell out of his brandnew 29er.

    He rides his brandnew 29er MTB mostly on road. Afraid to get it muddied up on the trails. Boo hoo.
    Last edited by tryinghardrider; 10-28-2012 at 05:49 AM.

  82. #82
    Cow Clicker
    Reputation: wmac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,031
    19" wheels are really fast!

    No, YOU don't understand. You're making an ass of yourself for all of eternity.

  83. #83
    sock puppet
    Reputation: osokolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    8,047

    19"?? you gotta be kidding me...

    why would anyone use 19" wheels when 16.50B are available....

    you are not going to try to convince me that 19" wheels are going to be faster up the hard mountain than 16.50B???

    Quote Originally Posted by wmac View Post
    19" wheels are really fast!


  84. #84
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by osokolo View Post
    why would anyone use 19" wheels when 16.50B are available....

    you are not going to try to convince me that 19" wheels are going to be faster up the hard mountain than 16.50B???
    Hey, that's entering jailbait territory already.


  85. #85
    zrm
    zrm is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,551
    Quote Originally Posted by FX4 View Post
    Fine let me revise that. When I'm riding smooth rolling trails vs steep downhill, techy rock gardens, cleaning trees, etc... XC less than all mountain.
    Around here we have a wide variety of trails, some of which have all the conditions you describe within a few miles. I just call it mountain biking.

  86. #86
    FX4
    FX4 is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    452
    Quote Originally Posted by zrm View Post
    Around here we have a wide variety of trails, some of which have all the conditions you describe within a few miles. I just call it mountain biking.
    Maybe you just like being argumentative, the OP asked a question I responded with my personal view on the subject. Wasn't looking to debate your version of mountain biking.

  87. #87
    somehow still alive
    Reputation: Hollyw00d's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    263
    Today I was passed on a climb by a guy on a HT 29er... I was on my FS 26".

    He appeared to be having fun, I was definitely having fun..

    It would seem to me that both bikes are fun, just different strokes for different folks.
    Not what you think.

    My videos

  88. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    674
    I have both. I think for the stuff I ride, the pros of the 26" wheels usually outweight the pros of the 29", but it can go either way. I guess for some areas the 29" wheels are the clear winner, but definitely not the case in the rooty, tight, steep and technical trails of the north shore. Also, not as much fun at the bike park, obviously.

    You could argue that the 26" wheels are simply more fun because the bike is more flickable and movable. But then you could argue that 29" wheels prevent frustration of getting hung up on roots trying to climb a technical section. Meh.

  89. #89
    Terrain Sculptor
    Reputation: Trail Ninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,686
    Quote Originally Posted by iperov View Post
    20" for hard mountains, because easy get vertical hills on LIGHTEST wheel in the world, easy accelerating, 20" is tractor style accelerate: just push and feel power of accelerate.

    29" wheel is most heavy wheel. 29er hardtail bike weight more than my 26 full suspension LMAO.
    Weight on wheels collecting muscle power for unstoppable inertia driving, long accelerate, bad braking, best for long asphalt racing. XC 29er? ROFL, no thanks, in other life.
    I gotta get a BMX! I'd love to be able to ride up a vertical hill. They call them cliffs where I come from.
    Quote Originally Posted by Trail Ninja's Son
    You may be happy to hear that my dad has kicked cancer's ass. Now he's looking for whoever sent it.

  90. #90
    dwt
    dwt is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dwt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,169
    Brian Lopes is still a 29'er hater. Recent tweet:

    Does size really matter?-imageuploadedbytapatalk1351724917.315178.jpg


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Old enough to know better. And old enough not to care. Best age to be.

  91. #91
    FX4
    FX4 is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    452
    Quote Originally Posted by Trail Ninja View Post
    I gotta get a BMX! I'd love to be able to ride up a vertical hill. They call them cliffs where I come from.
    Wasn't entertaining the nonsense but it can be done, used to do it when I was a teenager. A jump called the wall. Straight up twenty some odd feet. Wouldn't try it on a mountain bike of any wheel size but I'm sure some of the free ride guys could manage it.

  92. #92
    parts leftover
    Reputation: schlim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,028
    Quote Originally Posted by lpranger467 View Post
    After Outerbike I will never own a 29 again, I rode a dozen high end bikes and kept going back to 26's. Its the only bike that made me laugh out loud while riding.
    I drove away from Outerbike with virtually the same feeling as you did. I rode as many 29ers as I could get my hands on, and nothing that I experienced justified the wholesale shift in the industry from the 26" to 29" chassis.

    Clearly, market demand is fueling the shift, but I think many 29er buyers are being sold a bill of goods. The larger wheel doesn't have any special magical properties that makes it faster or consume less watts, for racing or otherwise. It's just another type of bike with its own set of traits, and each of those bikes ride differently from one another.

    I owned and raced an Epic 29er this year and happily sold it at the end of the season with much relief. Hopefully its new owner feels faster or more stable or better able to roll over big rocks. I'll be on my new 24lb 26" full suspension bike, not missing the wagon wheels in the least.

  93. #93
    mtbr member
    Reputation: OscarW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,688
    Quote Originally Posted by schlim View Post
    I drove away from Outerbike with virtually the same feeling as you did. I rode as many 29ers as I could get my hands on, and nothing that I experienced justified the wholesale shift in the industry from the 26" to 29" chassis.

    Clearly, market demand is fueling the shift, but I think many 29er buyers are being sold a bill of goods. The larger wheel doesn't have any special magical properties that makes it faster or consume less watts, for racing or otherwise. It's just another type of bike with its own set of traits, and each of those bikes ride differently from one another.

    I owned and raced an Epic 29er this year and happily sold it at the end of the season with much relief. Hopefully its new owner feels faster or more stable or better able to roll over big rocks. I'll be on my new 24lb 26" full suspension bike, not missing the wagon wheels in the least.
    I had the same feeling about my Epic 29r and sold it after a few months. I like my Blur enough not to feel the need for bigger wheels. Maybe the 650b will be different but I am not getting on that bandwagon as of yet.....
    IMHO, bigger isn't always better and everyone has to make up their own mind of what works for them and what doesn't let the market dictate what is "good" for you...YMMV
    Current ride(s) 2011 Santa Cruz Blur LT and a Norco Threshold SL with Di2

  94. #94
    Terrain Sculptor
    Reputation: Trail Ninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,686
    I'd be happy with a shift back to 26". I'm having a hard time finding a used 29er to replace the one I had stolen. It would be nice to see the market flooded with sub-$200 HT 29ers.
    Quote Originally Posted by Trail Ninja's Son
    You may be happy to hear that my dad has kicked cancer's ass. Now he's looking for whoever sent it.

  95. #95
    NeedGod.com
    Reputation: Barheet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    580
    There are pros and cons to each. I own both. I like both.
    Nathan

  96. #96
    undercover brother
    Reputation: tangaroo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    880
    Someone needs to post a graph of how rolling resistance is inversely proportional to the fun factor. And my limited Calculus 3 experience tells me that the derivative of that graph would also tell us how we should all be on 23" wheels instead.... you know, cause the less proportional rolling mass.

    Dudes, its a bike. Ride it, if it isn't fun you aren't doing it right.

  97. #97
    mtbr member
    Reputation: howardyudoing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    283
    I don't see how wheel size would be different on my stationary bike.

  98. #98
    mtbr member
    Reputation: RobinGB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    356
    I just moved back to a full squish 26" a week ago.

    The reason i went a 29er to start with is i was basically having to re-learn how to ride anyways, so i had a blast monster trucking everything on my hardtail 29er. As i got faster and faster and started riding steeper terrain, i realized i really needed to get onto a full suspension if i wanted to get any faster. after trying a few 29er full sus demos and 6" travel AM 26ers i cam full circle.

    Reasons i switched back, is the trails in my area are fast, rough, tight and can be very technical.

    Things i do miss about the 29er,
    - i never got stuck in all the holes at the bottoms of steeps and short fast rolling humps.
    - monster trucking everything
    - how fast it rolls with only a little grade

    If i lived somewhere ells i may very well have stuck with the 29er though.

    Right bike, right rider, right trails. It all matters, tire size, geometry, bike fitting and sizing and colour (red ones go faster).


    and if i ever get tired of the 26er, i know i can switch over to a 650 wheelset. lol
    2012 Giant Reign 1

  99. #99
    mtbr member
    Reputation: omegachicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    56
    I ride both. I prefer 29 for ssing, 26 for trail riding with at least a 5" bike.

    Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2

  100. #100
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iperov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    136
    I carry all sizes for various types of terrain.
    winter XC

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •