I have both. I think for the stuff I ride, the pros of the 26" wheels usually outweight the pros of the 29", but it can go either way. I guess for some areas the 29" wheels are the clear winner, but definitely not the case in the rooty, tight, steep and technical trails of the north shore. Also, not as much fun at the bike park, obviously.
You could argue that the 26" wheels are simply more fun because the bike is more flickable and movable. But then you could argue that 29" wheels prevent frustration of getting hung up on roots trying to climb a technical section. Meh.
Someone needs to post a graph of how rolling resistance is inversely proportional to the fun factor. And my limited Calculus 3 experience tells me that the derivative of that graph would also tell us how we should all be on 23" wheels instead.... you know, cause the less proportional rolling mass.
Dudes, its a bike. Ride it, if it isn't fun you aren't doing it right.
its horses for courses... People were thinking "the xx" bike is THE best size".. Till they hit something that size wasnt meant for... Steep tight-- ugly twisty jumpy trails--- 26" is your friend... Long flowy progressive XC hammer fest type trails--- 29" is your choice.. People are starting to realize its not the bike-- but rather the right bike for the right trail that matters...
I like the 29ers just fine but still prefer my 26er. Seems more nimble in tight areas. It all depends on what you enjoy and what youre riding. Dont let fads influence your decision. Explore your options and make your own decision.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Mountain Bike Reviews Forum
15.4M posts
515.2K members
Since 1990
A forum community dedicated to Mountain Bike owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about bike parts, components, deals, performance, modifications, classifieds, trails, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!