Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    112

    Inbred 29er with 'short' fork

    Hi Guys,
    Anyone using an Inbred 29er with a short (445mm) AC length rigid fork and if so how does the beast handle in comparison to the standard 470mm?

    Cheers

    Steve

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Click Click Boom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    457
    Look for a Ragley TD:1

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: newdee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    121
    Resurrecting this thread.

    I was also looking into this, with the possibility of running a 440mm fork on my inbred 29er. I've seen discussion that the handling would be too twitchy, but the TD:1, with a similar setup, seems to be well loved. I cant find exact geo details of the TD:1 so i cant compare directly.

    Anyone have any experience running a 440mm fork on an Inbred 29er?

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    433
    OS bikes is kinda the same concept, you can go as low as 435mm for a hta of 74 degrees, just depends on what you're looking for I guess. Watch your weight distribution, you're steepening the sta also. Maybe with a setback seatpost and a short stem, you might not kill yourself

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: newdee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    121
    Quote Originally Posted by TampaDave View Post
    ...you might not kill yourself
    encouraging.

    I was actually going to reference the OS Blackbuck, which i read is similar. Seems like no-one has a particular beef with handling of those...

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    433
    the designer (of the on-one) responded to a similar question elsewhere by saying something like, "it'll be fine as long as you don't go off road, or around turns"

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Click Click Boom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    457
    I regret selling my TD:1
    Chumba Stella
    King Cielo
    Vassago Op Ti-For Sale
    Vassago VerHauen-For Sale
    Kestrel Legend SL
    Soma Rush
    Fuji Granfondo

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: newdee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    121
    Quote Originally Posted by TampaDave View Post
    the designer (of the on-one) responded to a similar question elsewhere by saying something like, "it'll be fine as long as you don't go off road, or around turns"
    I saw that post from Brant. I believe he included fixed gear, and the possibility of death....... Sometimes its really hard to read the sarcastic tone of otherwise serious people on a mountain biking forum.

    It would of been useful to have an even half-@ssed response from the designer.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    433
    I think the point is, he didn't design it so your weight would be that far forward. Leaving aside the endo issue for a moment, I'll bet you have issues with traction. No weight on the rear, too much on the front. Either one can break traction and slide. I don't know what yall call in in mountain biking; in motorcycling, when the front tire gives way, that's called a "high side" and it is not very refreshing.

    You can get an OS frame with fork for ~$700, which is an awesome deal. The $300 you save building a Frankenbike might not seem like such a great deal if you don't like it after one ride. Call em up, the designer is real nice. Cool guy, knows a lot (a real lot) about 29er design.

    I don't think Richards is still with On-One, not sure anyone still there is all that great a resource design-wise, so far that's been my experience anyway. He gave an interview on what he was thinking as he developed the Inbred, worth googling up. It's on the Internet somewhere.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: newdee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    121
    someone check my math here...

    I've run this frame with a Kona P2 and a Reba 100mm(51mm offset).

    with the P2, i calculate a trail of 67mm, and with an 80mm stem i would describe the handling as neutral.

    with the 51mm offset reba and a 50mm stem, i calculated a 64mm trail and the handling is super fast, borderline twitchy, and was almost un-rideable until i got the hang of it. Definitely needs a longer stem.

    with a 440mm fork with a 38mm offset, i calculated 66mm of trail, which is really close to what it is now with the p2. so aside from shifting weight slightly forward, and the lower bottom bracket (already a really high bottom bracket?), would the handling actually be affected that much?

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    12
    With Surly Instigator fork On-One Inbred 29er - Pedal Room

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •