Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 60
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    97

    New Rip 9 Alloy vs Rip 9 RDO

    I've been researching a new bike for almost 6 weeks now. I currently ride a 29er HT, Motobecane Pro. I live in Eastern PA and enjoy technical riding. I really enjoy the rolling of my 29 but I'm over 40 and a ride at Sals (btw, Niner rep won an event there this year on the Rip) leaves me walking funny. I'm about 5' 10" and 185lbs.

    I've been reading about the differences of Alloy vs Carbon. What I haven't been able to find is a review from someone who has ridden both the new Alloy and the RDO Rip. There are several people here who have had the old Rip and upgraded to the new RDO, but isn't the new Rip different than the old?

    Weight is really of no consequence between these two. I think it really comes down to ride quality. Is the carbon $1000 better?

    I've been trying to get a demo ride but it's been very difficult. One LBS really felt strongly that the Jet was a better match for this area, but he rides a full ridged and loves it... so can that really count?

    Can someone who has ridden the same bike in both Alloy and Carbon comment on the feel? I'm more interested in the Rip, but if you have experience on the Jet I'd be interested in that also.

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,397
    I will write something up soon.
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  3. #3
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,397
    Hi,
    I have owned a 08 Jet9 alloy, 10 Jet9 alloy, 09 Rip9, 2012 Rip9, 12 Jet9 RDO, 13 Je9 RDO, Rip9 RDO & have ridden a new Rip9 Alloy.

    In a no holds bared build the Rip9 RDO is a nicer bike.

    Not so much because of the weight, But it feels stiffer & is more point & shoot & powering out of a corner, The bottom bracket feels stiffer & feels like all the power goes to the back wheel.

    This is kind of nit picking because the New Rip9 still feels much sharper than the earlier Rip9 & most other bikes I have ridden.

    Budget is a big part of what you should build, Having ridden many bikes & with many forks & wheels, This can change any bike quite a lot.

    I really like the new Pike fork & would go for it as a must have, Even if buying that fork meant no longer being able to afford the Rip9 RDO frame.

    Yes I feel that there is a greater difference between the New Pike 35 140mm fork & the Revelation 32 140mm fork than there is between the New Rip9 alloy frame & the Rip9 RDO.

    Wheels, Well that is a subject in it's self.

    The cheapest set of wheels I have for my bike is a set of Hope Hoops Arch EX wheels, So that's Hope Pro 2 evo hubs with Stan's No Tubes Arch EX rims.

    They are an Ok wheel set, Not that stiff but not to bad either, They are about med weight, not heavy & not light & the hubs are strong, But the engagement is average 12deg.

    The bike rides ok with these wheels, But nowhere near as sharp as with my best wheel set, I9 Torch Trail 32 Carbon,

    So that's Industry Nine Torch hubs, Super strong hubs with 3 deg engagement , Nice alloy spokes & Reynolds Carbon rims.

    These are quite light & yet very stiff wheels that hook up so well & make the bike feel really alive & supper point & shoot.

    Now for the bikes.

    I really liked the 09 Rip9, It Lifted my riding & made me much braver & faster, But it just felt a little heavy & not alive on the trail.

    Then came the 2012 Jet9 RDO, Man I loved this bike.

    It was just so alive on the trail, was quite Plush for a 100mm rear travel bike with it's High volume air can, It would just nail the 09 Rip9 on everything but the ruffest of tracks & the Rip9 was a little better off jumps than this bike ( Rip9 was a little more care free off jumps )

    Then came the 2013 Jet9 RDO, This was a little stiffer bike with it's 142 x 12 rear end & a less plush & harder valve setting rear shock.

    This was a very nice bike & a little more racy than the 2012 Jet9 RDO, were as the 2012 Jet9 RDO was a little more Rip9 ish.

    IMO the 2013 Jet9 RDO was closer to what the Jet9 RDO should be, Not knocking the 2012 Jet9 RDO, I loved that bike.

    It's just that if you wanted a race bike the 2013 Jet9 RDO would suit better, Were as if you didn't know if you should be on a Jet9 RDO or a Rip9, The 2012 Jet9 RDO with it's rear shock was a great mix of both bikes.

    Then came the Rip9 RDO, A bike I had been begging for, long before the Jet9 RDO even came along.

    But now I wanted a Rip9 RDO but I was used to the very alive & capable Jet9 RDO & was it going to be more capable & less alive ?

    Well I love the Rip9 RDO, It has managed to say as alive as the Jet9 RDO's, More direct ( point & shoot ) better at steep jumps, The back end doesn't kick up as much when leaving a jump so it leaves jumps flatter & is less likely to come down front wheel 1st.

    The Rip9 RDO with the same sort of build as the Jet9 RDO , really doesn't give up much if any in climbing.

    With the Rip9 RDO the seat is approx. 15mm further back ( to the rear axle ) at my seat height than on the Jet9 RDO, So on very tight & steep switch backs the front wheel is harder to keep on the ground than the Jet9 RDO, Not a super big deal, but this is about the only place that the Rip9 RDO gives up to the Jet9 RDO.

    That & on single track the Jet9 RDO may just feel just a little more alive but there is just so little in it.

    I hope this helps.
    Last edited by muzzanic; 08-16-2013 at 12:34 AM.
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    135
    Thanks for the detailed write up. I've been eyeing the new Rip 9 and Rip 9 RDO, possibly as a compliment to my 2012 Jet9 RDO. Thinking of doing an XX1 Rip9 RDO build (running 2x10 XO on the Jet9 RDO).

    One other question - I've like the WhiteBros Loop on the Jet9 RDO, great small bump compliance and still able to take the big hits. How does the ride on the Rip9 RDO with the Pike compare?

    Also, any rumors of a V2 Rip 9 RDO?

  5. #5
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,397
    Hi

    My wife has the Loop fork on her Jet9 RDO, 2 of my friends have them on there Rip9's & I ran 1 on my Jet9 RDO for a time, So I have a lot of miles on that fork.

    The Loop is a nice stiff fork & it's Through Axle setup IMO is second to none.

    It soaks up the bumps very well, But IMO it's not even in the same League as the Pike.

    The Pike is quieter Smoother & stiffer & not by a little bit, Sure that is just my thoughts but Read what the people that have moved to the Pike & they are all saying how much better it is that what they were running.


    Quote Originally Posted by Kuttermax View Post
    Thanks for the detailed write up. I've been eyeing the new Rip 9 and Rip 9 RDO, possibly as a compliment to my 2012 Jet9 RDO. Thinking of doing an XX1 Rip9 RDO build (running 2x10 XO on the Jet9 RDO).

    One other question - I've like the WhiteBros Loop on the Jet9 RDO, great small bump compliance and still able to take the big hits. How does the ride on the Rip9 RDO with the Pike compare?

    Also, any rumors of a V2 Rip 9 RDO?
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kragu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,428

    New Rip 9 Alloy vs Rip 9 RDO

    Great stuff, Muzz. Reaffirms my alloy purchase.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: five5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    461
    I actually just took a MTB trip with 4 guys.. we had in our arsenal - RIP9 RDO, 2013 RIP 9, 2012 JET9 RDO, and 2013 JET9 RDO.

    I spent about 2 hours on each at minimum..

    It all comes down to money.. how much do you have to spend?

    Yeah, Muzz is right.. if you can get a RIP9 RDO w/ Pike, Carbon Wheels, XX1, Dropper Post, and other carbon goodies... there isn't much to compare..

    But, if you don't have 8g's in your account right now, you may want to weigh this out a bit... here's my thoughts on them all.

    First I rode my 2012 J9RDO.. XO, FOX Talas, Carbon wheels, KS dropper.. I've got it set up pretty nice.. love it, climbs awesome, flies down hill... great bike.

    Next I rode the 2013 J9RDO, XO, FOX Talas, crap Easton wheels, Easton components... didn't think much different... could feel the flexy wheels under me, so the experience really wasn't great, though again, JET platform.. really nice, really fast, etc. I'm sure if it was set up like my 2012, it would be better, but in the real world, I'm not light years ahead of my 2012.

    Next RIP9 RDO... XX1, FOX Talas, Flow EX, Thompson/Niner Carbon goodies. Completely different game.. just a flat out amazing bike.. didn't lose a ton on the climbs, though it was definitely different with the longer travel, slacker front.. I had to focus a little more on keeping the front down... but when I got to the top... hold on to your hats coming down.. just flawless!!

    2013 RIP9.. XX1, Fox Float, Carbon Wheels, KS Dropper, Thompson/Carbon goodies. I'll be real honest here.. I really didn't feel a whole lot of difference in stiffness, weight, or anything. It did "Feel" different for sure, but it wasn't a bad different.. just different. It definitely sounded different, again, not bad, just different. I'll also say.. for me, Alloy just exudes confidence in me.. carbon is phenomenal.. but when I'm hitting rocks, drops, etc.. I push harder on alloy, because in the back of my mind, I'm working with metal, not carbon. I know Niner is great with their carbon, warranties are great, service is great... but nobody wants to break anything, and there's just a little doubt in the back of my mind when I'm taking a hit with a carbon bike... Alloy.. I'm have no concerns. I know they break too, but it's just a mental thing for me.

    Now, let's get real for a second.. None of us need an 8k bike.. really, none of us do. Some of us have the privilege to afford such bikes, and I'm grateful to be one of those who has the opportunity. If I'm being completely realistic.. I'm not buying the RIP9RDO.

    I'm saving that 1k, and putting it towards components... mainly the wheels. The New Alloy RIP9, with Carbon goodies is an amazing bike, and honestly, I don't think you're going to see so much difference that you won't regret going alloy, and upgrading other parts.

    My ideal build currently:

    RIP9
    Pike Fork (I have not ridden one, but many friends, Muzz, and reviews here are pretty much undeniable.)
    XX1 Drivetrain (I would have said XO1, but turns out that whole thing is a crock of crap.. I'll pay a couple hundred more for XX1)
    XT Brakes (XTR is not enough more, and the Shimano brakes kill it no matter what to me.)
    Carbon Wheels (Honestly, I don't care, Chinese Carbon laced to Chris King, Roval, I9 Torch.. pick your poison)
    Niner Trail Stem/Carbon Bars
    KS LEV Seatpost
    Whatever rubber you prefer (Grips, Seat, Tires)

    That's my 2 pennies... RIP9RDO is king, but not necessary..

  8. #8
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,397
    Well said & I agree.

    Add to this that some people just couldn't bring them self to push as hard on a $8000 bike as they would on a $5000 so even if the $8000 bike was faster, They would be faster on the $5000 version of the same bike.

    Quote Originally Posted by five5 View Post
    I actually just took a MTB trip with 4 guys.. we had in our arsenal - RIP9 RDO, 2013 RIP 9, 2012 JET9 RDO, and 2013 JET9 RDO.

    I spent about 2 hours on each at minimum..

    It all comes down to money.. how much do you have to spend?

    Yeah, Muzz is right.. if you can get a RIP9 RDO w/ Pike, Carbon Wheels, XX1, Dropper Post, and other carbon goodies... there isn't much to compare..

    But, if you don't have 8g's in your account right now, you may want to weigh this out a bit... here's my thoughts on them all.

    First I rode my 2012 J9RDO.. XO, FOX Talas, Carbon wheels, KS dropper.. I've got it set up pretty nice.. love it, climbs awesome, flies down hill... great bike.

    Next I rode the 2013 J9RDO, XO, FOX Talas, crap Easton wheels, Easton components... didn't think much different... could feel the flexy wheels under me, so the experience really wasn't great, though again, JET platform.. really nice, really fast, etc. I'm sure if it was set up like my 2012, it would be better, but in the real world, I'm not light years ahead of my 2012.

    Next RIP9 RDO... XX1, FOX Talas, Flow EX, Thompson/Niner Carbon goodies. Completely different game.. just a flat out amazing bike.. didn't lose a ton on the climbs, though it was definitely different with the longer travel, slacker front.. I had to focus a little more on keeping the front down... but when I got to the top... hold on to your hats coming down.. just flawless!!

    2013 RIP9.. XX1, Fox Float, Carbon Wheels, KS Dropper, Thompson/Carbon goodies. I'll be real honest here.. I really didn't feel a whole lot of difference in stiffness, weight, or anything. It did "Feel" different for sure, but it wasn't a bad different.. just different. It definitely sounded different, again, not bad, just different. I'll also say.. for me, Alloy just exudes confidence in me.. carbon is phenomenal.. but when I'm hitting rocks, drops, etc.. I push harder on alloy, because in the back of my mind, I'm working with metal, not carbon. I know Niner is great with their carbon, warranties are great, service is great... but nobody wants to break anything, and there's just a little doubt in the back of my mind when I'm taking a hit with a carbon bike... Alloy.. I'm have no concerns. I know they break too, but it's just a mental thing for me.

    Now, let's get real for a second.. None of us need an 8k bike.. really, none of us do. Some of us have the privilege to afford such bikes, and I'm grateful to be one of those who has the opportunity. If I'm being completely realistic.. I'm not buying the RIP9RDO.

    I'm saving that 1k, and putting it towards components... mainly the wheels. The New Alloy RIP9, with Carbon goodies is an amazing bike, and honestly, I don't think you're going to see so much difference that you won't regret going alloy, and upgrading other parts.

    My ideal build currently:

    RIP9
    Pike Fork (I have not ridden one, but many friends, Muzz, and reviews here are pretty much undeniable.)
    XX1 Drivetrain (I would have said XO1, but turns out that whole thing is a crock of crap.. I'll pay a couple hundred more for XX1)
    XT Brakes (XTR is not enough more, and the Shimano brakes kill it no matter what to me.)
    Carbon Wheels (Honestly, I don't care, Chinese Carbon laced to Chris King, Roval, I9 Torch.. pick your poison)
    Niner Trail Stem/Carbon Bars
    KS LEV Seatpost
    Whatever rubber you prefer (Grips, Seat, Tires)

    That's my 2 pennies... RIP9RDO is king, but not necessary..
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation: five5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    461

    New Rip 9 Alloy vs Rip 9 RDO

    One of the only pics I got.. Let me add.. The blue on the RIP9 RDO is just amazing!

    <a href="http://s56.photobucket.com/albums/g192/morr5/?action=view&current=null_zpsf617622a.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g192/morr5/null_zpsf617622a.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket Pictures, Images and Photos" /></a>

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kragu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,428

    New Rip 9 Alloy vs Rip 9 RDO

    Now I have to put some alloy in this thread.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    170
    I haven't ridden the alloy or carbon when i decided to buy one.

    When on holidays i passed the Niner HQ and asked if i could have a look at the bikes. In Europe we dunnot have the alloy Rip yet.

    Man i loved the looks of the RDO in a 1 on 1....so i bought plain and simple because of the looks.

    Also own a Jet 9 RDO V1 but i definitely do feel a difference bewteen the bikes. The Jet is sub 10 kg and the Rip 12 and a bit kg. The accelaration (or how it is spelled) of the Jet is imho much better even with heavier wheels then the Rip. Climbing is better on the Jet to. When climbing i have the feeling i have to put more power on the handlebar to keep the rip down.

    Descending....................RIP owns with the Pike!!!!

  12. #12
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,397
    Your weight difference is not for the same type of build because there isn't that much difference between frame weights, Not over 2kg

    If you were to compare a Jet9 RDO with likes of a Sid Fork, Light tyres & carbon seat post with a Rip9 RDO with dropper post, Heavy tyres & heavyer fork & wheels, For sure the Jet9 RDO would eat the Rip9 RDO on the climbs.

    With what I was saying I'm compering how you would build the bike if you were to only have the 1 bike , were as if you were to build one of each, It would be better to build them less alike.

    Quote Originally Posted by sand0kan View Post
    I haven't ridden the alloy or carbon when i decided to buy one.

    When on holidays i passed the Niner HQ and asked if i could have a look at the bikes. In Europe we dunnot have the alloy Rip yet.

    Man i loved the looks of the RDO in a 1 on 1....so i bought plain and simple because of the looks.

    Also own a Jet 9 RDO V1 but i definitely do feel a difference bewteen the bikes. The Jet is sub 10 kg and the Rip 12 and a bit kg. The accelaration (or how it is spelled) of the Jet is imho much better even with heavier wheels then the Rip. Climbing is better on the Jet to. When climbing i have the feeling i have to put more power on the handlebar to keep the rip down.

    Descending....................RIP owns with the Pike!!!!
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    97
    Thank you muzzanic and five5 for your feedback.

    Five5, actually my question wasn’t ‘all about the money money money’ (5 kids I hear a variety of songs... ha sorry for that) I'm really asking about the old 80/20 type rule. Let me explain.

    So you put $4k into a 3-star 2014 Rip 9 Alloy. On a scale of 1-100, maybe the bike ranks 90. Next you put $6300 into a 3-star 2014 Rip RDO, that gets you what, 92? It's not until you put a 1k fork and 1.5k worth of wheels and $300 dropper on the thing that it hits the 98 type mark (because nothing is perfect). So you have a point of diminishing returns. 2x the money for a 5%-8% improvement... I mean I am over 40 and simply getting a diet would probably net me a larger improvement and save me on the food bill.

    Muzzanic, I think you summed it up very well. Basically, there is less ride difference in the Alloy and Carbon than there is in almost any component upgrade. If purchasing the carbon means a lesser drivetrain, fork, wheels, then it simply won't ride as nice. Is that about right?

    With a big family, the thought of spending 4k on a bike is very crazy, but yet here I am. I simply can't justify spending more than this amount. I'd like to take a trip to Moab next year with some friends, so it's unlikely I'll have any serious money to put into the bike next year. At this point, I'm really looking buying / building a bike, staying under 4k with taxes and riding it for the next 2 years with very minimal changes (maybe a dropper post).

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation: five5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    461

    New Rip 9 Alloy vs Rip 9 RDO

    Totally, agree! I think we're all saying the same thing.

    80/20, you'll get everything you need from the alloy, plus some extra room to upgrade the alloy.

    That's the direction I'm going for sure.


  15. #15
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,397
    [QUOTE=Highlander944;10609898]

    Muzzanic, I think you summed it up very well. Basically, there is less ride difference in the Alloy and Carbon than there is in almost any component upgrade. If purchasing the carbon means a lesser drivetrain, fork, wheels, then it simply won't ride as nice. Is that about right?

    Yes that is what I'm saying, build a Alloy Rip9 & put the Pike on it if you can & build the rest of it the best you can.
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    864
    Quote Originally Posted by scvkurt03 View Post
    Now I have to put some alloy in this thread.
    Now you need to get some new pics of that thing.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kragu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,428

    New Rip 9 Alloy vs Rip 9 RDO

    I do. I'm sick of it! Got a Pike on it now, too.

  18. #18
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,397
    Well what's your thoughts over the Fox 34.


    Quote Originally Posted by scvkurt03 View Post
    I do. I'm sick of it! Got a Pike on it now, too.
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kragu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,428

    New Rip 9 Alloy vs Rip 9 RDO

    Quote Originally Posted by muzzanic View Post
    Well what's your thoughts over the Fox 34.
    I really only have one ride on it, but the Pike is both plush and supportive. The 2014 Fox is much improved over the 2013, but stiction issues remain, and the Pike is superior. It's not close, either.

  20. #20
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,397
    Yes that is my thoughts to & others that have ridden my bike are looking to buy a Pike as well.


    Quote Originally Posted by scvkurt03 View Post
    I really only have one ride on it, but the Pike is both plush and supportive. The 2014 Fox is much improved over the 2013, but stiction issues remain, and the Pike is superior. It's not close, either.
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kragu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,428

    New Rip 9 Alloy vs Rip 9 RDO

    Set several PRs on one of my first local rides on the new RIP today. Paired with the Pike and a good wheel set, this is likely all the bike I'll ever need, unless I move to the PNW. Here rufus, just for you:

  22. #22
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,397
    Your bike is a nice build, I'm trying at the moment to talk a couple of my friends into builds just like yours.



    QUOTE=scvkurt03;10613273]Set several PRs on one of my first local rides on the new RIP today. Paired with the Pike and a good wheel set, this is likely all the bike I'll ever need, unless I move to the PNW. Here rufus, just for you:[/QUOTE]
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: blackhammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    118
    I had the opportunity a few weeks ago to ride the RIP alloy and the RDO back to back at Fort Custer, MI. Both bikes were set up with the same spec, same size, and I rode them on the same trail. I came back impressed with the RDO but even more impressed with the alloy. Why? The only real difference I noticed between the two was that I could toss the RDO into a corner with almost no effort, while the alloy required a little more body english. I guess that's the stiffness in the RDO frame showing its presence.

    Both bikes allowed me to get a little stupid. The RDO saved my bacon on a drop in which I should have endo'd. I made climbs on the alloy in the big ring that I usually have to drop down into my granny to negotiate (I'm a big guy.) I took my hardtail EMD out on the same trail later that day and got harshly reminded how good both RIPs were. I was really impressed with the alloy because I didn't feel like it gave up $1000 worth of performance to the RDO. I don't think that's a knock on the RDO, it's more a compliment to how good the new alloy version is. Some of that was probably due to them having the exact same setup, but it's what I felt. I decided that weekend that, given my budget, the RIP9 alloy was logically probably going to be my next bike.

    So what did I do two weeks ago? I bought the RIP9 RDO. I know, I know. Now, I still stand by my statement that I believe the alloy to be almost as good. I never thought I was going to be able to justify that extra cash but I got a great deal on an RDO frame and fork, and the spouse surprisingly agreed. Unfortunately, I'm still dealing with an issue from that purchase but I'm waiting on an email response from Niner before I discuss the resolution of the issue.

    I think I would have been perfectly happy with the RIP alloy but in the end I was seduced by the black carbon. I think anyone who's sensible should go with the alloy version, I think I just got tired of being sensible.
    "Serpentine Shelly. Serpentine!"

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    97
    Some great feedback. One LBS I contacted seems to have a very reasonable offer. They will trade out the standard 3 star fork (ROCK SHOX REVELATION RCT3 ) for the Pike (the RockShox Pike RCT3 29 Solo Air) plus $205. Seems like this would be a very good blend of high end bike and value (if there's such a thing for bicycle)....

  25. #25
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,397
    That sounds like a great deal


    Quote Originally Posted by Highlander944 View Post
    Some great feedback. One LBS I contacted seems to have a very reasonable offer. They will trade out the standard 3 star fork (ROCK SHOX REVELATION RCT3 ) for the Pike (the RockShox Pike RCT3 29 Solo Air) plus $205. Seems like this would be a very good blend of high end bike and value (if there's such a thing for bicycle)....
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kragu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,428

    New Rip 9 Alloy vs Rip 9 RDO

    The Pike is simply marvelous. It has such an "easy" feel to it. Tracks so well at high speed through the rough, but gives you no inkling as to how active it really is. It's smooth over everything, supple over small bumps. Just an amazing piece of engineering. My only complaint has to do with how badly it outperforms my Monarch.

  27. #27
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,397
    Yes the fox on the RDO feels like a good match to the Pike.

    Quote Originally Posted by scvkurt03 View Post
    The Pike is simply marvelous. It has such an "easy" feel to it. Tracks so well at high speed through the rough, but gives you no inkling as to how active it really is. It's smooth over everything, supple over small bumps. Just an amazing piece of engineering. My only complaint has to do with how badly it outperforms my Monarch.
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  28. #28
    Phatt Tire Luva'
    Reputation: Qanuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    160
    So - here's my question for the bunch...

    I've got in the arsenal currently:

    V1 EMD - 100mm travel
    V1 SIR 9 - Carbon fork, SS setup
    V2 Jet 9 RDO - 120mm 34 Fox + dropper (this thing is built much more trail than XC, and I intend to keep it that way).
    ROS 9 (once released) - to be built with Pike 140mm + dropper.

    I feel that there are those places we ride - were a bit more trail oriented full squish would be warranted.

    That new WFO is awfully appealing, but I do wonder if the Geo. is going to be soooo different for me that it might feel awkward all the time. I DO NOT ride full gravity/DH lines at all. If any of you are from Oregon, or familiar with Sandy Ridge - I'm thinking something more along those lines. This bike would be something that I would bring on a week long expedition to Moab (although the Jet does quite well - there were a few places it was underserved).

    Opinions for adding something that is full-squish and longer travel - and heavily towards trail bike standards? Will the RIP with a Pike 140 be too similar to the Jet 9? When I look at the frame Geo. between the RIP & Jet - they don't seem to be dissimilar enough to warrant having both. I can't imagine that 69.5º vs. 70.5º head angle is "that" different - as well as a small bump in travel ( 100 to 125 - rear & 120 to 140 - front) would make that much of a difference.

    Opinions please...
    Ciao,

    -A-


    “Beer, if drank in moderation, softens the temper, cheers the spirit and promotes health”

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kragu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,428

    New Rip 9 Alloy vs Rip 9 RDO

    RIP w/ Pike 150. Slam your stem and it climbs well, doesn't feel too tall, absolutely rails downhill, and will feel quite different from your JET - with 51mm offset, it slackens to 68.2.

    I'm really interested in the WFO, too, but I'm worried about how it climbs.

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation: five5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    461

    New Rip 9 Alloy vs Rip 9 RDO

    It WILL be different for sure. I ride the J9RDO, and R9RDO together quite often.. They feel completely different. I'm planning on adding an alloy R9 to my line-up this winter. Not even sure if I'll keep the J9RDO. They can cover same trails in my opinion, but the R9 group is just more fun to me.

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kragu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,428

    New Rip 9 Alloy vs Rip 9 RDO

    Just curious, why would you want an alloy RIP if you have the RDO?

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: five5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    461
    Quote Originally Posted by scvkurt03 View Post
    Just curious, why would you want an alloy RIP if you have the RDO?
    Me? Ah, yeah, I'll clarify... I have the JETRDO.. my boss who I ride with a ton has the RIPRDO, so I get to ride it a lot. Which is super nice, but honestly.. for what I do, I could replace the JETRDO with the Alloy RIP pretty easily. I'm not out to win races, I'm out to have fun. For me, the RIP is just more fun. Carbon, or Alloy. I just want one for my own.

    I'll see if I end up keeping the J9RDO.. who knows, it may get cannibalized this winter.

  33. #33
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,397
    Well here is my take on it & I like the look of the new WFO & may get 1.

    I tell people that if you have to ask if the WFO would suit you, Then it wouldn't.

    I see WFO people as people that look at the bike & say things like about time they built this, Shame it didn't have more travel of I wish I could get a longer fork.

    I think a true WFO rider is in no doubt that they want the big travel bike.

    I would be more inclined to lighten the Jet9 up more & make it faster & then go all out on the Rip9.

    You will then have a Rip9 that is heaps of fun & still a fast & easy bike to ride.

    IMO Niner also have a great chance to build another bike, Not with the Rip9 RDO because it would cost quite a lot. But I see that they could keep the New Rip9 Alloy & also offer a Rip9 Alloy with Slacker HA & down tube like the WFO so you can run a Double Barrel shock & keep the Rear Triangle Rockers & other tubes the same.

    Just my thoughts because the Rip9 is a great bike & pedals well, But some people have a little different Idea of what a quiver killer is.

    After all there is 2 Jet9 carbon bikes on offer.

    But all that aside the current New Rip9 with a pike would be more than most people would need.


    Quote Originally Posted by Qanuk View Post
    So - here's my question for the bunch...

    I've got in the arsenal currently:

    V1 EMD - 100mm travel
    V1 SIR 9 - Carbon fork, SS setup
    V2 Jet 9 RDO - 120mm 34 Fox + dropper (this thing is built much more trail than XC, and I intend to keep it that way).
    ROS 9 (once released) - to be built with Pike 140mm + dropper.

    I feel that there are those places we ride - were a bit more trail oriented full squish would be warranted.

    That new WFO is awfully appealing, but I do wonder if the Geo. Soooo different for me that it might feel awkward all the time. I DO NOT ride full gravity/DH lines at all. If any of you are from Oregon, or familiar with Sandy Ridge - I'm thinking something more along those lines. This bike would be something that I would bring on a week long expedition to Moab (although the Jet does quite well - there were a few places it was underserved).

    Opinions for adding something that is full-squish and longer travel - and heavily towards trail bike standards? Will the RIP with a Pike 140 be too similar to the Jet 9? When I look at the frame Geo. between the RIP & Jet - they don't seem to be dissimilar enough to warrant having both. I can't imagine that 69.5º vs. 70.5º head angle is "that" different - as well as a small bump in travel ( 100 to 125 - rear & 120 to 140 - front) would make that much of a difference.

    Opinions please...
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    248
    I thought I'd weigh in with my $0.02 worth. First a disclaimer - I'm the New Zealand Niner Distributor, I keep Muzz equipped with the good stuff. I've ridden pretty much every FS bike Niner has made and until recently my main ride was a Wfo9. I briefly transitioned to a 2012 Rip9 while I waited for the new Rip9 and have been on new Green Rip9 for the last few weeks. It's an awesome bike, considerably better than the older Rip in just about every respect. I've been pleasantly surprised by the Monarch shock, it's great. To be quite honest I was tempted by the Rip9 RDO and if I wanted one I could of had one but in reality I'm really waiting for the new Wfo9 and I had this sneaking suspicion that the new alloy Rip9 might come pretty damn close to the Rip9 RDO. I was right, to a degree.

    I recently had the good fortune of riding with Muzz and the opportunity to ride his Rip9 RDO back to back with my alloy Rip9. Bike setup was similar, 140 Pikes on both bikes, XX1 on Muzz's bike, 1 x 10 XTR on mine, I9 Torch Carbons on the RDO, I9/LB Carbon rear wheel and a Torch Trail alloy front wheel on mine, 780mm bars on both bikes. Probably the biggest difference was in the front tire as I was running a 2.5 Minion DHF whereas Muzz had Nobby Nic. My bike was great, Muzz's bike was better. I was quite surprised to discover that there was a noticeable difference just about everywhere. The RDO climbed better, I felt like I could ride with the group with ease (I'm not a strong climber) and I felt could ride faster if required. Going down the difference was probably less pronounced but there's no doubt the exceptional stiffness of the RDO just makes it that much more precise and control-able when things get fast and loose. I thought I was an alloy bike guy, turns out I might be a carbon bike guy. The weight difference is nice but it's the stiffness that really impressed me. I agree with others, the alloy bike is superb and I wouldn't give up my Pike or a nice stiff set of wheels for the sake of the upgrade to the RDO, but the fact is the RDO is a better bike and if it wasn't for the imminent arrival of the new Wfo9, I'd probably get one. Is it worth the extra $$$? That's a highly subjective and very much a matter of personal choice, but I would say that the performance gap is bigger than I personally had imagined it would be.

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation: five5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    461

    New Rip 9 Alloy vs Rip 9 RDO

    Quote Originally Posted by WayDownSouth View Post
    I thought I'd weigh in with my $0.02 worth. First a disclaimer - I'm the New Zealand Niner Distributor, I keep Muzz equipped with the good stuff. I've ridden pretty much every FS bike Niner has made and until recently my main ride was a Wfo9. I briefly transitioned to a 2012 Rip9 while I waited for the new Rip9 and have been on new Green Rip9 for the last few weeks. It's an awesome bike, considerably better than the older Rip in just about every respect. I've been pleasantly surprised by the Monarch shock, it's great. To be quite honest I was tempted by the Rip9 RDO and if I wanted one I could of had one but in reality I'm really waiting for the new Wfo9 and I had this sneaking suspicion that the new alloy Rip9 might come pretty damn close to the Rip9 RDO. I was right, to a degree.

    I recently had the good fortune of riding with Muzz and the opportunity to ride his Rip9 RDO back to back with my alloy Rip9. Bike setup was similar, 140 Pikes on both bikes, XX1 on Muzz's bike, 1 x 10 XTR on mine, I9 Torch Carbons on the RDO, I9/LB Carbon rear wheel and a Torch Trail alloy front wheel on mine, 780mm bars on both bikes. Probably the biggest difference was in the front tire as I was running a 2.5 Minion DHF whereas Muzz had Nobby Nic. My bike was great, Muzz's bike was better. I was quite surprised to discover that there was a noticeable difference just about everywhere. The RDO climbed better, I felt like I could ride with the group with ease (I'm not a strong climber) and I felt could ride faster if required. Going down the difference was probably less pronounced but there's no doubt the exceptional stiffness of the RDO just makes it that much more precise and control-able when things get fast and loose. I thought I was an alloy bike guy, turns out I might be a carbon bike guy. The weight difference is nice but it's the stiffness that really impressed me. I agree with others, the alloy bike is superb and I wouldn't give up my Pike or a nice stiff set of wheels for the sake of the upgrade to the RDO, but the fact is the RDO is a better bike and if it wasn't for the imminent arrival of the new Wfo9, I'd probably get one. Is it worth the extra $$$? That's a highly subjective and very much a matter of personal choice, but I would say that the performance gap is bigger than I personally had imagined it would be.
    Pics of Greenie!!!

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    248
    Quote Originally Posted by five5 View Post
    Pics of Greenie!!!
    Sure!

    New Rip 9 Alloy vs Rip 9 RDO-img_3840.jpeg

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    97
    Thank you WayDownSouth... I think. Since I have already ordered the alloy Rip, I guess the key here will be to never ride the RDO. Since the alloy w/ the Pike is a great ride I will simply set my mind to love and enjoy it.

    One side note, I do work in a machine shop so I'm around metal often. I'm absolutely amazed how thin the tubing for the alloy Rip feels. I feel as though I can almost crush the tube in my hand (I'd swear I can feel it flex).

    Second side note. Can I just say these toys are WAY too expensive! There is no way in heck that the manufacturing price delta from entry level to XX or XTR justify these prices.

  38. #38
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,397
    Quote Originally Posted by Highlander944 View Post
    Thank you WayDownSouth... I think. Since I have already ordered the alloy Rip, I guess the key here will be to never ride the RDO. Since the alloy w/ the Pike is a great ride I will simply set my mind to love and enjoy it.
    This in no way plays down just how good the new Rip9 Alloy is, But more to just how good the Rip9 RDO is.

    I liked the old alloy Rip9, But the New Rip9 alloy is quite a big step up from the older model.

    Having owned 4 Rip9's now the big thing I tell people that buy them, Don't build it for how you think you ride now, Build it how you would if you were 20% better rider.

    Because these bikes will get you there fast, They make you really test your limits.
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  39. #39
    NMBP
    Reputation: gfs69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,145
    How do you like the rear shock on the new RIP compared to the old one with the Fox shocks? I have read that some think it is not as plush, others think it's ok. If I get a RIP, I want PLUSH!!

  40. #40
    Loser
    Reputation: Jisch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,499
    I moved from a 2010 RIP9 to a RIP9 alloy, I'm still messing around with the rear shock, but in general I do not feel its a plush as the Fox on the 2010.

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Qfactor03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    773

    I am interested in the answer to this one as well.

    I have a 2014 RIP9 alloy coming as a warranty replacement for a 2012 RIP9. The fox worked well enough, but I'm really interested in knowing what to expect when comparing the Fox and the RS Monarch. If it works so well, why didn't it get spec'd for the RDO as well?

    Quote Originally Posted by gfs69 View Post
    How do you like the rear shock on the new RIP compared to the old one with the Fox shocks? I have read that some think it is not as plush, others think it's ok. If I get a RIP, I want PLUSH!!

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    248
    Decisions Decisions. I still love my 12 Jet9Rdo and just can't decide if I go one bike with the Rip9Rdo or keep two and get a WFO. My problem is at my height I have to have a dropper fork

  43. #43
    Back of the pack fat guy
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,958
    What's the BB height on the new RIP (and RDO) with a 140mm Pike? How about with a 150mm Pike? I like my '12 RIP, but with 140mm up front, I measure the BB height at over 14".

  44. #44
    NMBP
    Reputation: gfs69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,145
    Quote Originally Posted by Jisch View Post
    I moved from a 2010 RIP9 to a RIP9 alloy, I'm still messing around with the rear shock, but in general I do not feel its a plush as the Fox on the 2010.
    Thanks. Do you know if a trip to PUSH could solve that, or if it is just the nature of the Monarch shocks? I have no experience with them at all. I have had several RP23's/CTD's and have liked them all. I would think that Niner would spec a nice cushy shock for this thing, but maybe you have to get the RDO for that.

  45. #45
    ksk
    ksk is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    6

    FOX Talas on the RIP9 RDO

    Great reviews on the bikes and forks. I ordered a RIP9RDO with the 2014 Fox Talas 110/140, XX1, XTR, Brakes, KS Lev dropper, AC all mtn wheels, until AC wide lightnings come in. However still like to climb too, so question...I only rode a RIP9 Alloy 2x10 with RS Revelation 130 and liked it but wanted a little more slack geometry with 140 up front, so not sure what to expect on the RDO with the Talas with extra .5 lbs and on climbs? Should I change up for the standard rally blue RS Rev, RS Pike or try out Talas and hope the weight increase on manuals and climbs wont be too noticeable? I like the 110mm setting for long climbs but kind of wanted to set it and forget it. I didn't ride the RDO9 but pulled the trigger anyway. Any input is great as a fork change later may cost more.

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    97
    I purchased the new Rip Alloy and upgraded to the Pike, 140mm 46mm offset (no white lettering on the stanchion btw). Did my first rides this weekend. I'm about 185 w/ my pack. I set the Pike at 85psi for the first 10 miles, then down to 80psi for the next 8. The bike felt great, the Pike was very nice but the Monarch was more plush than the Pike. If I'm remember right, I set the Monarch for 20%ish sag. It was very soft on the small stuff.

    I've been riding a HT 29er for the past 3 years so my reference is stiff. To me, I would not want the ride any more plush. Early on in the first ride, I lost momentum, thinking 'I'll drive around this stuff like on my HT'.... well the suspension would load then when I lost forward movement, it would unload, forcing me to dap. After two daps, I stopped slowing down, I just "pedal damn it"... wouldn't you know it, the bike just went. From there I cleared everything at Sals except two more daps in the bolder field (didn’t want to kill the new bike).

    So... I don't know how the RP23 would feel, but the Monarch on Trial with 20% sag was extremely soft on small bumps and medium rock gardens. The rear w/ a Monarch at 20%ish sag on trial mode was softer than the 140mm Pike @ 80psi. I can't imagine anything feeling softer.

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    97
    I have been riding a HT 29er from Motobecane w/ a 100mm Reba fork. I test road a Giant Trance X 29er w/ a Fox Float 120mm fork. The Giant front end was light on climbs. I really had to focus to keep it down. I just built the 2013/2014 RIP 9 Alloy with a 140mm Pike. While I still had to shift my weight forward, I had much less issue keeping the front wheel on the trail than the Trance.

  48. #48
    ksk
    ksk is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Highlander944 View Post
    I have been riding a HT 29er from Motobecane w/ a 100mm Reba fork. I test road a Giant Trance X 29er w/ a Fox Float 120mm fork. The Giant front end was light on climbs. I really had to focus to keep it down. I just built the 2013/2014 RIP 9 Alloy with a 140mm Pike. While I still had to shift my weight forward, I had much less issue keeping the front wheel on the trail than the Trance.
    Good to know Highlander944. I just traded my 2013 Giant Trance x29 w/ Fox 120mm up front, for the RIP9RDO with the Talas, so I should fell pretty good on short climbs in 140mm if I don't switch to 110mm setting. Was concerned about the weight over Revelation 130 and Pike 140, but will just have to ride later this week on delivery and see...

  49. #49
    Carbon & Ti rule
    Reputation: muzzanic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,397
    Quote Originally Posted by ksk View Post
    Great reviews on the bikes and forks. I ordered a RIP9RDO with the 2014 Fox Talas 110/140, XX1, XTR, Brakes, KS Lev dropper, AC all mtn wheels, until AC wide lightnings come in. However still like to climb too, so question...I only rode a RIP9 Alloy 2x10 with RS Revelation 130 and liked it but wanted a little more slack geometry with 140 up front, so not sure what to expect on the RDO with the Talas with extra .5 lbs and on climbs? Should I change up for the standard rally blue RS Rev, RS Pike or try out Talas and hope the weight increase on manuals and climbs wont be too noticeable? I like the 110mm setting for long climbs but kind of wanted to set it and forget it. I didn't ride the RDO9 but pulled the trigger anyway. Any input is great as a fork change later may cost more.
    If you can swap out to the Pike, Do it.

    The Pike suits the Rip9 RDO so well.

    The travel adjust forks just don't seem to work as well as the single travel.

    Most that have ridden the Fox 34 & Pike say that the pike is better, Even as much as saying it is a game changer.

    I climb some very steep stuff on my Rip9 RDO & don't feel I wish I was running a travel adjust fork.

    I also had a 140mm Revelation RCT3 fork on my bike when I built it & it was nice but the Pike just soaks up everything & is just so stiff & smooth.
    Raising money, my friend broke his neck Mtbing, Please Share link. http://givealittle.co.nz/cause/elliottkeys/donations

  50. #50
    ksk
    ksk is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by muzzanic View Post
    If you can swap out to the Pike, Do it.

    The Pike suits the Rip9 RDO so well.

    The travel adjust forks just don't seem to work as well as the single travel.

    Most that have ridden the Fox 34 & Pike say that the pike is better, Even as much as saying it is a game changer.

    I climb some very steep stuff on my Rip9 RDO & don't feel I wish I was running a travel adjust fork.

    I also had a 140mm Revelation RCT3 fork on my bike when I built it & it was nice but the Pike just soaks up everything & is just so stiff & smooth.

    Thanks for the input muzzanic, and have also heard a lot of great reports on the Pike 140, however I couldn't swap the fork now w/o a long wait and hassle so will ride with the 2014 Talas for now. Although many web reports are praising the new 2014 Talas over the 2013, so let's hope it translates on the trail. FOX Hits Back For 2014 - Pinkbike

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Upgraded alloy RIP 9 alloy to RIP 9 RDO - awesome!
    By albertdc in forum Niner Bikes
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07-19-2013, 10:45 PM
  2. Jet9 alloy or Rip9 alloy
    By Lost Biker StL in forum Niner Bikes
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 07-19-2013, 09:20 PM
  3. Alloy Freehub/alloy cassette carrier
    By c_trail_biker in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-11-2013, 05:38 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-27-2012, 08:04 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-04-2011, 09:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •