Results 1 to 84 of 84

Thread: Helius AM

  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303

    Helius AM

    Hey guy's haven;t been around on the forum for awile. I just ordered a AM to see what it is all about. This bike is between the CC and the FR. The AM is going to have adjustable travel. The travel setting is going to be (120 4.9 )(135 5.3 )(145 5.7 5.8 )(167 6.6 )which i think are great travel setting. This bike is giong to be a everything bike. I alway's felt that if the cc had a little more it would be the bike of all bikes. That what i hope the AM is going to be. We have been talking with nicolai alot to try to get more bikes here and hopefully it will work. I do have to say the FR is the best bike i have ever been . It is so stable climbing and decending and dropping. But like everything in life you get older and need a little less and that what the AM was geared towards . I will post pictures of the bike when it comes in and a review of the bike. cheers.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Karve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,439
    Awesome.. what spec and options / color have you gone for?

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    Just going to keep it simple black anodized.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,654
    ncig, I see that some AM builds are coming out as heavy as an FR. My older 05 FR weighs 32lb with CCDB. The way I see it, an AM build should come out 30lb or less, otherwise why bother? Like to know your spec.?

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    I am hoping that it comes in less then 30 pounds here is the build.

    MED frame
    XTR CRANKS
    ROCKSHOCK PIKE FORK
    CCDB TI SPRING
    I9 ENDURO WHEELS
    XO SHIFTERS
    X9 RDER
    THOMPSON X4 STEM

  6. #6
    local trails rider
    Reputation: perttime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    12,228
    The older FR frame was lighter than the beefed up '08 ... so Nicolai needed something to close the gap between CC and the current FR. The result (AM) looks good.

  7. #7
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    Is this one going to hit the classifieds as well, after months of riding, of course being advertised as new like your last one?

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    As alway's you don't have your fact right! Do me a favor if you don't have anything worth saying don't say it.

  9. #9
    banned
    Reputation: Jerk_Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    16,466
    We all saw the ad and commented on the used Nicolai you sold to someone as new.

    Anyhow, good luck.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    First off are you talking about the white Knolly we sold for CF? Because we have yet to sell any Nicolai on the mtbr. If CF CC sells that would be the first.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: thepimpmessiah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    539
    Quote Originally Posted by ncig
    I am hoping that it comes in less then 30 pounds here is the build.

    MED frame
    XTR CRANKS
    ROCKSHOCK PIKE FORK
    CCDB TI SPRING
    I9 ENDURO WHEELS
    XO SHIFTERS
    X9 RDER
    THOMPSON X4 STEM
    I would look at different forks, the Pike damping system is not very sophisticated. It can be set for small stuff or big stuff... not both, and even when set for big stuff they can be easily overwhelmed and end up blowing through the travel and going clunk-clunk-clunk as they bounce between bottom out and top out. Feels and sounds horrible on the trail

    Very light though... but if all your worried about is the weight of the thing why not take the internals out out of your forks? That way you can post pictures and boast about the weight of the bike on internet forums without worrying about how it rides

    *pinch of salt*

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    635
    I was wondering about the choosen fork myself, on the other hand a proper AM/Enduro air fork with 160mm (Fox Talas, Lyrik 2-Step) is almost twice the price of a Pike air in retail. At least that's how it is here in Germany. Magura's Wotan would come in bit cheaper though.

    Anyway, I'm looking very much forward seeing that build !!!

  13. #13
    local trails rider
    Reputation: perttime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    12,228
    Which rear travel setting do you plan to use?
    Does that affect BB height and/or frame angles?

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    I will be set up at the 145mm travel. This bike will be set up as a true AM bike. I am considering the lyrik. not sure yet

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,654
    Hi ncig, have you considered the DT Swiss 150 with bolt-through. My dealer says that his customers love them; and they are very light! Does anybody have reports on them?

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    No but i will look into it sounds good. Thanks ryates

  17. #17
    steep fast and loose :)
    Reputation: The_Lecht_Rocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,270
    DT Swiss - a'la PACE.
    I used to run the PACE equivalent RC41 Fighter on a Cove Hustler. Great fork, sh1tr reliability, and I'll be surprised if DT have amended the reliability as it's based on the PACE internals / modular design. although, i have no evidence on which to base this opinion.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    Thanks for the heads up on the fork it is also very expensive.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    256
    Same here on DT / Pace - ran an RC40 on numerous bikes - back to the factory 3 times!!
    Also had problems with Wotans which have now gone back to Magura -apparently this is more widespread than reported.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,654
    I have to say I like the Wotans and they have performed really well on my FR. Because I neglected to clean under the seals, they did get gummed-up after 10 months. I sent them back to Magura UK and they serviced them and updated them with the latest damping and applied the new look decals, and did not charge a penny. How's that for service? When I got them back, they needed running in over about 6 rides. They also told me how to lower the legs in order to get out the seals to clean. This needs to be done periodically depending on how much riding/weather conditions you do.

  21. #21
    ಠ_ಠ
    Reputation: dulyebr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,192
    Quote Originally Posted by ncig
    I will be set up at the 145mm travel. This bike will be set up as a true AM bike. I am considering the lyrik. not sure yet
    I have a Lyrik SoloAir set to 140mm using spacers. It was only ~100g heavier than my PIKE air u-turn.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    Do you like it

  23. #23
    ಠ_ಠ
    Reputation: dulyebr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,192
    Quote Originally Posted by ncig
    Do you like it
    Yea, it's sweet. Pike was sweet as well. They're definitely not the same though. The Lyrik ramps up more, and does feel a bit more solid.

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    256
    Glad you had a better experience than me. Mine went back to Magura UK after ~5hrs riding as the travel adjust stopped working. Same happened again about 10hrs later, a week before a 2 week trip to Scotland and the Lakes. Got them back just in time to find (a) they'd forgotten to reattatch the compression adjust knob, and (b) they didn't hold any air (you could hear it hissing out). After a significant amount of pressure, the rep did try and sort me out with a brand new pair, but I decided against it and bought a pair of Lyric Coils, which I prefer anyway.

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    Thanks guys for the info i am also thinking of the marz 55 ata but i am hearing good and bad.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,654
    heihei, sorry to hear about your problems with the Wotan. Seems to be a hit or miss situation with most makes of fork. Heard good and bad about nearly all of them. Manufacturers generally need to improve their quality control standards, especially considering the prices asked. The only suspension product I have heard no complaints about is the CCDB shock. Talking about different forks, has anybody considered White Industries?

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    635
    To complete the confusion , I'm throwing the 2009 Fox 32 Talas with 150mm in.

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    I am considering it to the 15qr is the sticking point. I should have so many problems.

  29. #29
    "Its All Good"
    Reputation: Whafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    10,697
    Going to be an interesting bike the AM, will be interesting to see how the majority are spec'd.... The Lyric or Fox 36 Talas comes to mind... I have the Talas on my FR and have yet to really beat on it, and I do try and give it a hard time....

    I would think that Nicolai will spec their own AM's with a Lyric Air fork I would think..... I have had a good run out of a Pike 454... The term AM is a differing one now it seems...

    But I agree with an earlier comment, it needs to be below 30 lbs in my book to be a light AM ride... My FR is 32lbs and strong as an Ox thus far.....

    WIll for sure watch this with great interest...
    The_Lecht_Rocks: whafe - cheeers - may i offer an official apology for the wagon wheeler "dis-belief"

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    Whafe this bike will be under 30 pounds if it kills me. What will make it under 30 is going to be fork selection! That seems to be the million dollar question. I am leaning toward 3 forks.


    1 Is the Pike 454 it is the lightest and has 20ml travel only goes to 150 so that the down point to that fork.


    2 The Lyric Air fork is what i want in travel but is heavier if it weigh like 4.8 it would be a no brainer but where in the 5pound range which is heavier then my float so that the down size to that.



    3 Last is the Marzz 55ATA which is the weigh i want and the travel i am looking for . The problem is all the bad reports that i have heard about the fork not working right which makes me nervous.

    The conversation i have had with Nicolai is this bike is meant for me old guy that wants a great bike but doesn't need a FR size bike. What scares me the most is how much i love my FR it is truly one of my favorite bikes of all time. But as what they told me at Nicolai it will be as good as the FR just lighter and not meant for a lot of dropping and abuse like that. That is why i want this bike to be under 30 pounds and front end not to sit so high. especially that my FR is 31 pounds. Will keep you up dated should see frame in about weeks .

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Karve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,439
    If weight is a concern What bout a 36 float @ 4.69lbs 2.12kg?

    However fork performance is not an area that id ever compromise on for a few pounds, so my choice at 160 would have to be the Fox 36 Talas. @ 5.08lbs 2.3kg? Consistently reviewed as stiff and with every adjustment you will need. I wish they did a god dam 180mm veriosn - im thinking a fox 38 series, as I would be all over it like a rash.

    The difference in weight is minimal!

    http://www.foxracingshox.com/fox_bicycle/bike_index.htm

    The Marz forks really dook like the real deal on the spec.. however beware the weights have been know to be a bit off.. ie not include oil or steerer tubes.. Also the quality of the lower castings seems to be in doubt. Marz are aware of this but until I hear 6 months of trouble free comments on the boards I wont be touching them. For the full lowdown including the excellent responses from Marzocchi on the subject take a look here

    Marzocchi "Oh how the mighty "M" has fallen"
    Marzocchi "Oh how the mighty "M" has fallen"

    In summary Marz admit to a few problems and have been chasing their tails all year to sort it out. I suspect that the 09 forks could well be excellent. Its no different to the problems Rock Shox had with the 07 2 steps and seals.. which have all but gone for 08.

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,654
    ncig, I think Karves suggestion of the 36 Floats could be good. I believe they are smoother than the Talas version? You can have them set to any travel at time of purchase. Also, Magura are bringing out a new twin arch 20mm bolt-through at around 4lbs. Might be worth checking out.

    With regard to light enduro wheel sets have you considered DT EX1750 or Stans (see Freeborns web site)?

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    Guy's I have a float 36 right know. I love fork but i want adjustable travel to match frame. I didn't know about the Magura new fork will check that out. I will run the I9 enduro will be light and durable. I really want to see if i can get bike in the 28 pound range . You guy's have been great with all of your suggestions keep them coming i need all the help i can get!

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    635
    The new Magura fork will be called "Thor" and has 100-140mm travel (adjustable with lever from handlebar), including features like the "Albert Select System", Maxle360 or Magura own thru-axle (= MAGURA 60less), which is 60gr lighter, than the Maxle and 32mm stanchions. Weight is w/o the levers for travel and damping-system and w/o Maxle360 (+150gr) Magura60less (+90gr) 1785gr. Axle2crown length is 520mm.


  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,654
    Hi Testmaen, thanks for the Magura info. Looks interesting. I might consider it for my new CC build? Have there been any test reports in Gemany yet?

  36. #36
    "Its All Good"
    Reputation: Whafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    10,697
    I have no doubt the Helius AM is going to the shizzle in bikes.....

    Very fine line between bikes it seems....

    Possible build weights:

    Helius CC -- 25 - 27 lbs
    Helius AM -- 28 - 30 lbs
    Helius FR -- 31 - 34 lbs
    Helius ST -- 33 - 37 lbs

    Some real close cross overs...... The AM will be a hit for sure I think....
    The_Lecht_Rocks: whafe - cheeers - may i offer an official apology for the wagon wheeler "dis-belief"

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    635
    No, unfortunately not. The "Thor" is a brand-new fork in their line-up for 2009, so they have yet to be deliverd. There has been a Magura press-camp recently, where they showed all their new gear for 09, including a new Martha and a new rear-shock, so I guess those parts will work their way through the mag's the next few weeks/months for tests etc.

    A few pictures can be seen here: http://www.mtb-news.de/forum/showthread.php?t=346115

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    17
    I heard that Ti Spring is no longer available in CCDB travel under 240mm, is that true?

  39. #39
    "Its All Good"
    Reputation: Whafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    10,697
    Quote Originally Posted by HostilityLin
    I heard that Ti Spring is no longer available in CCDB travel under 240mm, is that true?
    Am not sure on that, you could be right. In my opinion though with the fact many companies relatively speaking make Ti springs, am sure there will be models available for CCDB shocks with less than 240mm travel...

    Anymore insight as to where you heard this...
    The_Lecht_Rocks: whafe - cheeers - may i offer an official apology for the wagon wheeler "dis-belief"

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by Whafe
    Am not sure on that, you could be right. In my opinion though with the fact many companies relatively speaking make Ti springs, am sure there will be models available for CCDB shocks with less than 240mm travel...

    Anymore insight as to where you heard this...
    I wanna buy a Helius AM,
    so I ask my dealer some questions, this is one of it.

    They said that Ti springs for travel under 240mm are hard to adjust preload,
    and for weight saving, Steel and Titanium spring under 240mm weights almost the same.

    But that only means you can't get *original* Ti spring,
    doesn't mean you can't load a Ti spring on your CCDB.

  41. #41
    steep fast and loose :)
    Reputation: The_Lecht_Rocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,270
    Cane Creek use a different int. dia / ext. dia than other shock manufacturers for their springs.

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,407
    getting you're AM under 30lb with a coil will be a challange. I just received mine and weighed it on a digital bike scale. It's a medium frame with CCDB and maxle rear. it's 4070g or 8.97lb.

    Can't remember what the FR was but I'm sure it was a good 2lb heavier if I remember right(large frame).

    Suits me fine as i was aiming for @ 32lb anyway. My FR was more like 35lb

    have to say the new HT gusset and the TT>ST plates are very well finished. looks much classier than the FR. the 2 plates now have an internal weld as well as an external one. Not quite so sure about the bolted cable guides but sure they'll be fine.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Karve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,439
    Quote Originally Posted by dipper

    Can't remember what the FR was but I'm sure it was a good 2lb heavier if I remember right(large frame).

    Suits me fine as i was aiming for @ 32lb anyway. My FR was more like 35lb
    .

    my Small/ Med was 4145g including shock.. no paint which trims a couple hundred g's plus smaller size.. I imagine 4400 inc shock for a large is about right

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Karve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,439
    Quote Originally Posted by dipper
    I just received mine
    pics pics pics!

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    635
    Quote Originally Posted by Karve
    pics pics pics!
    YEAH YEAH YEAH !!!

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    635
    UNCOOL, 2hrs since posting ... and no additional pics submitted ... what should I now dream about ???

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    Guys i solved my fork problem going to lower the travel on a 36 float rc2 which will solve the problem.Dipper i should be able to get it under 30. Not using the maxle rearend and not painted will go a long way. I am wondering about the cable routing is it better then the fr?

  48. #48
    "Its All Good"
    Reputation: Whafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    10,697
    dipper - Not good form, you weighed the frame, yet didnt take pictures...

    I think a new thread should be started with pictures and close ups of the changes you mention in the head gusset etc...
    Attached Images Attached Images
    The_Lecht_Rocks: whafe - cheeers - may i offer an official apology for the wagon wheeler "dis-belief"

  49. #49
    steep fast and loose :)
    Reputation: The_Lecht_Rocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,270
    dipper's pictures coming soon ! when i get them hosted ;-0

  50. #50
    "Its All Good"
    Reputation: Whafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    10,697
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Lecht_Rocks
    dipper's pictures coming soon ! when i get them hosted ;-0
    So is Christmas............................
    Attached Images Attached Images
    The_Lecht_Rocks: whafe - cheeers - may i offer an official apology for the wagon wheeler "dis-belief"

  51. #51
    steep fast and loose :)
    Reputation: The_Lecht_Rocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,270
    are you ready for them then ?

  52. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Karve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,439
    Quote Originally Posted by Whafe
    So is Christmas............................
    Har har!

  53. #53
    steep fast and loose :)
    Reputation: The_Lecht_Rocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,270
    coutesy of GRAVITY SPORTS, here's their latest demo machine in it's infant state




    www.gravity-sports.co.uk

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    635
    I really hope, that it grows mighty strong and fast!!!

    And that out-grows its infancy and rushes through childhood and puberty real fast!

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    635
    @The_Lecht_Rocks
    Do you (or anybody else) know the exact geometry of the AM?

    The N-website doesn't help out, because the AM isn't listed yet.

    Nicolai said, that the geometry is the same or equal to the Helius FR, but to me it seems, that the stand-over-height is lowered compared to a FR the same size.

  56. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    648
    hmmm thats nice, one of those and an ion and your sorted, lol.........

  57. #57
    "Its All Good"
    Reputation: Whafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    10,697
    Well well, have to say, that shot sort of takes me breath away to be honest.... Looks stunning....

    When the big Nicolai builds a frame pretty much like that as a 5 inch travel FS 29er, I will be in the land of bliss....
    The_Lecht_Rocks: whafe - cheeers - may i offer an official apology for the wagon wheeler "dis-belief"

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CRAZY FRED's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,676

    Wtf?

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Lecht_Rocks
    coutesy of GRAVITY SPORTS, here's their latest demo machine in it's infant state




    www.gravity-sports.co.uk
    Where was this bad boy a year ago?That is one sweet arse looking Nicolai..Dare I say better looking than the FR?..CF..

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation: thepimpmessiah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    539
    Back to the forks - have you thought about Manitou?

    Minutes
    Wwightt. lbs. 3.4 (100), 3.6 (120), 3.8 (140) / Wt. Grams 1542 (100), 1633 (120), 1723 (140)
    Travel: 100mm, 120mm, or 140mm

    Nixon
    Weight: Wt. lbs. 4.2 (145), 4.4 (160) / Wt. Grams 1905 (145), 1995 (160)
    Travel: 145mm or 160mm

    Details taken from

    http://www.manitoumtb.com

    I know there are people out there who hate Manitou forks, but I've always found them to be as good as any other... but the colours could be an issue if you want everything to match

  60. #60
    steep fast and loose :)
    Reputation: The_Lecht_Rocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,270
    I think the gusset is a work of art.
    also looks like the 12mm bolt through rear axle is standard and QR is not available.

  61. #61
    "Its All Good"
    Reputation: Whafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    10,697
    Now that is what I like to hear, a fellow mtb freak like me that sees a frame as art..... Now we cooking with gas, yeah ha....
    The_Lecht_Rocks: whafe - cheeers - may i offer an official apology for the wagon wheeler "dis-belief"

  62. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Lecht_Rocks
    I think the gusset is a work of art.
    also looks like the 12mm bolt through rear axle is standard and QR is not available.
    Yes,
    according to Nicolai.uk, 12mm rear axle is standard for 09 AM and FR.
    QR is optional choice.
    And that makes me heart breaking because Chris King isn't available in 135x12mm.

  63. #63
    "Its All Good"
    Reputation: Whafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    10,697
    Quote Originally Posted by HostilityLin
    Yes,
    according to Nicolai.uk, 12mm rear axle is standard for 09 AM and FR.
    QR is optional choice.
    And that makes me heart breaking because Chris King isn't available in 135x12mm.
    Go as I did and always have with FR and DH bikes. Go Hadley rear hub..... Have had a fantastic run with Hadley....

    Have CK hubs on one bike and have great runs also, but a shame they as yet do not have 135 x 12mm hubs...

    Or go I9, great wheels also.... Had a great run with them on one of my main rides....
    The_Lecht_Rocks: whafe - cheeers - may i offer an official apology for the wagon wheeler "dis-belief"

  64. #64
    steep fast and loose :)
    Reputation: The_Lecht_Rocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,270
    whafe - as an engineer i appreciate the artistry in an industrial manner rather than an aesthetic one, although aesthetically, it works for me too.
    Lin - Are you telling us QR is still available as I need this adaptability.

    Thanks

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    17
    Dropout options for Helius FR and AM

    However, I don't think it can be adaptable because as you can see in the picture below,
    the dropout for 12mm axle is different from QR dropout.
    (picture from "dipper" in another topic)

  66. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    Guy's i didn't hear the 12mm axle was standard. The bike we ordered is coming with quick release. Dipper you might not be right about the top hole on am that should be top travel for air or coil. That what Nicolai told me. That goes for the FR.

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    17
    Here's my build,
    Frame:Helius AM (Medium)
    Fork:Magura Wotan
    Shock:CCDB
    Headset:Reset 118LP-S
    Brakes:Magura Louise BAT
    Cranks:Shimano SLX
    Shifters:SRAM X.O.
    Front / Rear Derailleur:SLX/X.9.
    Pedals:Specialized Lo Pro Mag 2
    Stem:Thomson
    Handlebar:EASTON EA70
    Seatpost:Thomson
    Saddle:fi:zi'k Gobi
    Cassette:SRAM PG-990
    Chain:Shimano XTR
    Wheelset: Haven't decided yet, it could be either I-9 or DT

  68. #68
    steep fast and loose :)
    Reputation: The_Lecht_Rocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,270
    lin - where are you and wher've you ordered from ?

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Lecht_Rocks
    lin - where are you and wher've you ordered from ?
    Taiwan,
    I ordered it from Taiwan's agent.

    ETA: about couple of months

    (apologize for my poor English grammar wrongs)

  70. #70
    steep fast and loose :)
    Reputation: The_Lecht_Rocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,270
    no apologies necessary

  71. #71
    "Its All Good"
    Reputation: Whafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    10,697
    Sweet build....

    TLR - Hear you from the engineering viewpoint.... For me, functional art cannot be beaten. Some dont like the industrial look at all, but for me it is AWESOME
    The_Lecht_Rocks: whafe - cheeers - may i offer an official apology for the wagon wheeler "dis-belief"

  72. #72
    trail fairy
    Reputation: trailadvent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    9,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Whafe

    Have CK hubs on one bike and have great runs also, but a shame they as yet do not have 135 x 12mm hubs...

    .
    They do now! King 135 x 12mm

    Just riding a muddy trail. . ..

    MAXXIS 4C!
    Helmet for your neck

    Leatt FAQs


  73. #73
    "Its All Good"
    Reputation: Whafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    10,697
    Quote Originally Posted by trailadvent
    They do now! King 135 x 12mm

    My mistake, good for CK....
    The_Lecht_Rocks: whafe - cheeers - may i offer an official apology for the wagon wheeler "dis-belief"

  74. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,407
    ncig - "Dipper you might not be right about the top hole on am that should be top travel for air or coil. That what Nicolai told me. That goes for the FR."

    I suspect you may have your wires crossed. The info I have came from Nicolai UK. The top hole on both bikes allows maximum travel with 50mm stroke shocks. If you use a 57mm stroke shock in the top hole the wheel will hit the seat tube.

  75. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,654
    Hi Whafe, thanks for mentioning about I-9 wheels. Something new to me, so I checked them out on the web. Had some very good reviews I see. I don't think they are distributed in the UK? Anybody know about this and the costs?

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    Dipper i got my info right from vincent at Nicolai he was the one that gave me the specs when we ordered the bike. That is true for the FR . They also told me that the travel settings are 120 135 145 167.

  77. #77
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,407
    with what shock though? a 50 or 75mm stroke? travel will be different for both. Mine was supplied with a 200X57 coil and Nicolai had blanked the top hole. Nicolai UK connfirmed with Germany that the top hole was for use with a 50mm stroke shock and should not be used for a 57 as the tyre will hit the seat tube.

    My FR was exactly the same. 2 holes, both giving 167mm travel with a 57mm stroke in the bottom hole and 50 in the top.

  78. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    303
    dipper just let me say i am not trying to prove you wrong! that is not my objective. as a dealer i have got wrong info before. Vincent is the sales manager for Nicolai. It is very posible he gave me wrong info in which i will be very upset! As i said before they told me all of the travel setting and said nothing about coil or air. When i filled out the order form they where charging me extra for 12mm rear axle and i read it suppose to be standard. So i guess we have a lot of different info. I am planning on calling them on monday and get the true fax on the am so we are all on the same page.

  79. #79
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,407
    same here. I'm a dealer as well and am frequently wrong Or maybe it's just that the customer is always right!

    personally i don't really see the difference between coil and air from a 'will it, won't it work' point of view. It's the stroke thats the issue. if the top hole is designed for a 50mm stroke shock then fitting a 57mm will obviously increase the travel(by 21mm on a 3:1 ratio frame). Hence blanking the top hole off when specced with a 57mm stroke shock. these frames already run pretty close to the seat tube with the tyre at max travel. I wanted a top routed front mech but the reason they won't do it is due to clearance issues with the high mounted cable stop required for top routing.

    By the way, I also ordered a QR rear because I thought it cost more for the 12mm. Actually I don't think I specified QR. I just didn't ask for 12mm, assuming that QR was the standard. The 12mm rear arrived and at no extra cost I'm more than happy.

  80. #80
    trail fairy
    Reputation: trailadvent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    9,554
    Quote Originally Posted by dipper
    same here. I'm a dealer as well and am frequently wrong Or maybe it's just that the customer is always right!

    personally i don't really see the difference between coil and air from a 'will it, won't it work' point of view. It's the stroke thats the issue. if the top hole is designed for a 50mm stroke shock then fitting a 57mm will obviously increase the travel(by 21mm on a 3:1 ratio frame). Hence blanking the top hole off when specced with a 57mm stroke shock. these frames already run pretty close to the seat tube with the tyre at max travel. I wanted a top routed front mech but the reason they won't do it is due to clearance issues with the high mounted cable stop required for top routing.

    By the way, I also ordered a QR rear because I thought it cost more for the 12mm. Actually I don't think I specified QR. I just didn't ask for 12mm, assuming that QR was the standard. The 12mm rear arrived and at no extra cost I'm more than happy.

    Um only reason I could see is if the designer wanted a more progressive stroke vs a linear stroke from the intended shock, but I can't see any reason with Nicolai why it would matter, its a pretty straight fwd configuration!

    I agree re the top mounted FD, its one of the few [if minor,] but it still buzzes me seeing bikes in this day with under downtube, cs cable routing, I'm being general here not poking @ Nicolai other brands come to mind!

    I still don't see why its a clearance issue, can't the stop be mount ont he side, my frames have a side mounted stop for clearance I presume for tire buzz , bit lossed on that one, maybe the tire is allot close to the seat down tube than mine I guess, still there' only a seat stay to negociate no rockers, still its one of the nicest frames Ive seen from them so far. possibly that color works for me too! Not that I'll ever own one but will be nice to see the thread again when ones built up!

    Enjoy
    Just riding a muddy trail. . ..

    MAXXIS 4C!
    Helmet for your neck

    Leatt FAQs


  81. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by trailadvent
    They do now! King 135 x 12mm

    They are still prototype anyway,
    will it come out with an "upgrade" parts?

  82. #82
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Karve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,439
    Quote Originally Posted by dipper
    t's the stroke thats the issue. if the top hole is designed for a 50mm stroke shock then fitting a 57mm will obviously increase the travel(by 21mm on a 3:1 ratio frame). Hence blanking the top hole off when specced with a 57mm stroke shock. these frames already run pretty close to the seat tube with the tyre at max travel. I wanted a top routed front mech but the reason they won't do it is due to clearance issues with the high mounted cable stop required for top routing.
    God Id be in heaven if i could squeeze another 20m out of the FR if required.. just like the old nomad trick!

  83. #83
    "Its All Good"
    Reputation: Whafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    10,697
    Quote Originally Posted by ryates
    Hi Whafe, thanks for mentioning about I-9 wheels. Something new to me, so I checked them out on the web. Had some very good reviews I see. I don't think they are distributed in the UK? Anybody know about this and the costs?
    Sorry to derail the thread... Not sure of the distributor in the UK, am sure there will be one... I think they run around 8 hundy USD, so into Sterling not sure...

    But I would not hesitate having another set for sure.... For me, King, Hadley and I9 have all done me real proud......
    The_Lecht_Rocks: whafe - cheeers - may i offer an official apology for the wagon wheeler "dis-belief"

  84. #84
    trail fairy
    Reputation: trailadvent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    9,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Whafe
    . For me, King, Hadley and I9 have all done me real proud......
    Yeah Hadley and King for me 2 I9s too much coin for me I could go 2 wheelsets for that, and I can maintain CK,Hadleys myself no probs, lovely wheels though!

    If I got another CK set though it would be with the stainless cassette body, the alloys do burr
    Just riding a muddy trail. . ..

    MAXXIS 4C!
    Helmet for your neck

    Leatt FAQs


Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •