Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    70

    san andreas geometry ?

    I picked up a 93? frame and was wondering what the specs are head angle etc.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Mig Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    69
    Banging your head won't get the answer!!

    I would say that the HA runs at about 69-70 degrees stock and the SA is around 72 or so. What happens next depends on the travel settings as well as what forks you put on it. The old girl is a lot steeper than the current gen of slack bikes, which I think explains her popularity in the hands of those that have experience riding short and fast bikes.
    ---
    Old skool is the new skool

    My dot net

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    70
    Thanks for the feed back do you how I can tell the year? I have been looking at photos I think its between a 96 -99.The serial number is scratched in and starts with 2--94

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: thekiltedskier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    151
    Stick some photos up and that'll help ID the year. Keep it short travel and fast if it's an older non VPS model!! 140/152mm i2i shock gives just under 4" travel. Interesting that Commencal and Orange are really pushing their 4" travel bikes just now for trail centre use. It's like suddenly people are realising we've been going longer and longer travel and it's more than is needed for aggro XC/all day mountain biking.

    Just shout if you need more info if it's an older one.
    Gus
    SCOTLAND! Where men are men and sheep are scared!

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Mig Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    69
    Quote Originally Posted by thekiltedskier
    It's like suddenly people are realising we've been going longer and longer travel and it's more than is needed for aggro XC/all day mountain biking.
    Yes and no. I am in the camp that says travel is physical size dependent. At 6'3" 5-6" works much better for me than 3-4 ever did.
    ---
    Old skool is the new skool

    My dot net

  6. #6
    Hmmmmm
    Reputation: Ericmopar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,629
    Quote Originally Posted by Mig Pilot
    Yes and no. I am in the camp that says travel is physical size dependent. At 6'3" 5-6" works much better for me than 3-4 ever did.
    I like 5 - 6" travel, because it's plusher in the initial part of the travel.
    That really helps with trail vibration on our super chunky terrain.
    It also gives me some "screw-up" room. You know, like when you dive into a drop too quickly and / or there is a big rock at the bottom.
    I freely admit though, that my bike isn't as nimble as one with shorter travel.
    It is however one of the nimblest 6" bikes I have ever ridden, even with the high BB.
    I'd like to try a 6.5" shock, just to see what the difference is.


    Eric.
    "I thought of that while riding my bike."
    Albert Einstein, on the theory of relativity.

    Peace and Long Rides...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •