Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 401 to 500 of 570
  1. #401
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by NiteBiker View Post
    Hey Francois,

    The Light & Motion Urban 500 looks really good. ... I don't see the trail beamshot for this light. Did you forget to upload it?
    Also I didn't see a trail shot for the Jet A51?
    thanks!

  2. #402
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    75
    The Magic Shine MJ-808 was included in last years shoot out. However, hasn't its LED been upgraded since..the new version being the 808-XM-L? If so, is the new version going to be in the shootout? It's probably one of the more common lights out there. Also curious to see how much improved it is over the old version.

    thanks

    Rix

  3. #403
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mattthemuppet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,342
    one comment about the Exposure light reviews; if two or more products are so similar that you can copy and paste text from one to the other, just put them in the same review. I appreciate that this is free content and all, but opening up a new review only to see that most of it is the same as one I've already read is a bit disappointing.

    I also feel that the reviews feel a little flat, more like a manufacturer's spec sheet with a few extra bits of info (Lux, lumens, beamshots) to pad it out. Much as if I were to review a set of brakes on a demo bike I rode around the block. It's useful information, no doubt, I just don't feel as it they're much of a review. I guess that's a function of having to go through so many models though.

    Perhaps when you've found your 5 or 6 favourites, use them (or have friends use them) for a couple of months and then do in depth reviews. How easy they are to live with, useable run times, what power levels work best, what their beam pattern is really like (I've taken enough beam shots to know that what you see in a static image doesn't necessarily translate to how it works on the trail), stuff like that. That would be really useful information, akin to the review boards but from someone who handles enough different lights to make meaningful comparisons.

  4. #404
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by pethelman View Post
    Personally I think it's going to depend on what you're looking for in a headlamp.

    In terms of producing a good thrower, the 20mm triple spot optics coupled with the XP-G are sort of in that middle ground territory.

    If the "thermal protection circuit" is doing its job on this one, I have a feeling it will be quite busy cutting back, unless you're really moving.
    Hi Pethelman,

    great to see some discussion about our new PMini on this forum. I've chopped a fair bit out the quote above to shorten but will answer many of the points you raise.

    This light is designed to be lightweight on the helmet, with good controls so that a long ride can be squeezed from a small battery by easy use of high and low beam as required. For riders that are tired, cranky, or just on the rivet, lightweight in the helmet area is always appreciated.

    When we were doing pre-market test of the beam, we found that many were happy with the narrow frosted optic that gave a nice smooth beam. But some helmet mount users wanted narrower. We gave them the narrowest offering from Carclo, which is the narrowest on the market that would fit the form we wanted. Those wanting narrow were happy and this is the one we use in production now. If you shine on a wall, the beam is not so nice and round but is a diamond shape. This does not do any harm on the trail. Will soon see what Francis says about the measured lumen output.

    Yes, all the power electronics, remote receiver etc are integrated within the battery. There is absolutely no way all this could be fitted inside that tiny head unit. Also putting in the battery allows use of more generous power components in there for better reliability and efficiency. The only thing inside the alloy head unit is the LEDs, and a temp sensor.
    On the bench top, the thermal protection circuit will cut back quickly and settles at about 4W within about a minute or so. But when riding along, a speed of about 15kph (10mph) gives enough cooling to hold full power. Most people wont need high beam at speeds less than 30-40kph. At this speed, the LEDs are cool enough to give good lighting efficacy.

    This product is indeed the result of years of development and testing, but it's not where most people think. The thermals, power circuitry, battery management etc is all important obviously but there are real challenges in the wireless remote too. The wireless remote is the cornerstone of the product really. A head unit that size is too small to have a switch on it. There are plenty of brands out there with the switch on the battery but when helmet mounted, it is hard to get good runtime out of just one beam setting. That's where the remote helps so much. I don't really know why there aren't more remote controlled systems out there. Other than to say that wireless is great if it works well but absolutely terrible if it is not reliable. Also for handlebar real estate, it's got to be small. It certainly isn't easy making a small wireless that is reliable across wide temperature differences (handlebars are cold, bike lights are warm). To make it small and reliable we needed to design from scratch including our own custom protocol for encoding. No off-the-shelf RF modules in this one!

    Please do get back with any more comments or queries. I don't visit the forum everyday but will be back to this thread again before the end.

    Cheers,
    David

  5. #405
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    398
    Quote Originally Posted by NiteBiker View Post
    Hey Francois,

    The Light & Motion Urban 500 looks really good. How would you characterize the beam? Is it more of a spot? How is the throw? I don't see the trail beamshot for this light. Did you forget to upload it?

    Thanks.
    Sorry to chime in, but Francois seems to have taken a day off :-)
    I have the Urban 300, and I can say the following about the beam:
    - it is bright. It is trailworthy in itself, and that's a real compliment from me (as I usually ride a Lupine Betty / Exposure Diablo combo on the trails...)
    - the beam is defined by a boom reflector: small bright spot, then a larger halo around it. Pretty similar to the (original) Magicshines, probably equal to one of the lower settings on the P7 lights. For the 500, it will match the Magicshine brightness.
    - sadly, it also means that for commuting, the beam is not so good (as the Philips for example), because it will blind oncoming drivers if pointed parallel to the ground. I would say this is more of an MTB light than a commuter light

    I have found one weakness, that I cannot understand: the light doesn't turn on while on the charger (USB). Which means that there is no way to use an external battery pack like the Exposures, all you have is the built-in charge of about 2 hours (probably less with the 500).

    Other than that, the quality is great, USB charging, built-in LiIon (no need to mess with AAs), no cables, mount is alright (rubber strap - still having a bit of a difficulty unmounting it), can be pointed left-right easily, maybe even too easily.

    It is quite an achievement IMHO that today you can buy a light in the $100-$150 category that is not China-made and is as bright as the L&M Urban, and as user friendly. Overall I'm very happy with it.

    PS: after reading the comments on the shootout page, I must add that I do not find the side visibility lights distracting at all, not even on the trail.
    Last edited by radirpok; 10-25-2011 at 12:11 AM.

  6. #406
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    14
    I have the Philips light on my road bike's handle bar - a fantastic light for general road biking, but on high speed descents on twisties, I feel the need to supplement with a helmet light to look at the corners. This supplemental light should have a tight spot with decent throw. Currently I am using a Sigma PowerLED EVO 900 on the lid. It works well but that is a bit heavy and cumbersome due to the external battery pack. I'd like a small, light, self-contained powerful spot light and it seems that the Urban 500 sounds perfect. And it is lighter and cheaper than the Lupike Piko. Runtime is not an issue because I need it for short durations on the descents. There is hardly any traffic to blind on these descents and if I do encounter oncoming traffic, I just turn my head to the right to avoid blinding them.

    Your feedback is very valuable. I will order the Urban 500 shortly!

    BTW 1, the Philips beam is absolutely fantastic for high speed road riding. The beam so uniform with a good width and long throw. I felt so relaxed and confident on my first high speed night road descent yesterday with the Philips (and the Sigma on the lid for the corners).

    BTW 2, the Philips has the same issue. The light turns off as soon as you connect a USB charger, so it is not possible to use an external pack.

    Quote Originally Posted by radirpok View Post
    Sorry to chime in, but Francois seems to have taken a day off :-)
    I have the Urban 300, and I can say the following about the beam:
    - it is bright. It is trailworthy in itself, and that's a real compliment from me (as I usually ride a Lupine Betty / Exposure Diablo combo on the trails...)
    - the beam is defined by a boom reflector: small bright spot, then a larger halo around it. Pretty similar to the (original) Magicshines, probably equal to one of the lower settings on the P7 lights. For the 500, it will match the Magicshine brightness.
    - sadly, it also means that for commuting, the beam is not so good (as the Philips for example), because it will blind oncoming drivers if pointed parallel to the ground. I would say this is more of an MTB light than a commuter light

    I have found one weakness, that I cannot understand: the light doesn't turn on while on the charger (USB). Which means that there is no way to use an external battery pack like the Exposures, all you have is the built-in charge of about 2 hours (probably less with the 500).

    Other than that, the quality is great, USB charging, built-in LiIon (no need to mess with AAs), no cables, mount is alright (rubber strap - still having a bit of a difficulty unmounting it), can be pointed left-right easily, maybe even too easily.

    It is quite an achievement IMHO that today you can buy a light in the $100-$150 category that is not China-made and is as bright as the L&M Urban, and as user friendly. Overall I'm very happy with it.

  7. #407
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    398
    Quote Originally Posted by NiteBiker View Post
    I'd like a small, light, self-contained powerful spot light and it seems that the Urban 500 sounds perfect. And it is lighter and cheaper than the Lupike Piko. Runtime is not an issue because I need it for short durations on the descents. There is hardly any traffic to blind on these descents and if I do encounter oncoming traffic, I just turn my head to the right to avoid blinding them.
    Just FYI, the Urban comes with a helmet mount in the box - nice addition. But even if it did not, you could use any of the rubber/ring-type lights' mount (Lupine, Magicshine...). It is a little bit heavier than the Exposure flash lights (Joystick and Diablo), but still very much acceptable and not noticeably heavy.

    I have to add though that the Piko is brighter, has probably more throw, and a better beam pattern (large spot and no halo), but as you said, it is also more expensive and I'm sure you'll be happy with the L&M too.

  8. #408
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MRMOLE's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,343
    I just picked up an urban 500 for my brother yesterday for his birthday and took it out for a short ride last night. For compairson it's brighter than my old 808 MS but not a bright as my 808E and has a slightly broader beam than either. The one problem I noticed is that is does get hot and kick down to the lowest setting. The temp. was still above 80 when I was out and it took about 3.5 miles before it hapened (at a stop light). I ran it @ the med. setting (more appropriate commuter setting since it doubles the run time to 3 hrs.) for another 6 miles and it ran fine.

  9. #409
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by @dam View Post
    rccardude: You'd have to adjust that for the mass of the housing. A heavier housing will take longer to heat up.

    A cool casing could just indicate there is plenty of surface area carrying the heat away.
    The lights should have a fairly similar surface area and heatsink mass in a given category. It wouldn't be 100% negligible, but it would give you an idea. Obviously if you're using a Chevy 350 engine block as the heatsink for a 200 lumen light, you're never going to see much temperature increase. On the other hand, if all the casings are fairly close in mass (Volume of heatsink material), then one staying cold and one getting hot is a pretty good sign that the cold one is either dissipating heat really well or not actually getting heat transferred to it from the inside.

    Also, a cool casing could indicate good heat dissipation if there's good convective flow over the heat sink area. But if you're in a stagnant air, all you'll get is natural convection which is proportional to temperature difference. You should still be able to feel how rapidly the casing is increasing in temperature immediately after it's turned on. It will eventually reach steady-state equilibrium at a certain temperature and flow rate, but not right away.

    You should still be able to get a good idea of the internal heat transfer rate based on how quickly the casing starts to increase in temperature.

    -Eric

  10. #410
    fc
    fc is offline
    stoked Administrator
    Reputation: fc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1996
    Posts
    27,299
    Quote Originally Posted by radirpok View Post
    Sorry to chime in, but Francois seems to have taken a day off :-)....
    Correct. I was at Infineon Raceway yesterday testing Toyotas, then Annadel testing bikes then Russian River Brewing in Santa Rosa sampling beers. It was a day for the ages.

    Radipork's comments are absolutely spot on about the Urban 500. It is a a big beam like the Niterider 600 with a big center a nice halo.

    The fundamental problem with Urban 500 is heat. It just doesn't have enough heatsinking for its level of brightness. On medium, it's fine but high mode is only reliable in cold nights or fast descents.

    fc

  11. #411
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by rixsurfer View Post
    The Magic Shine MJ-808 was included in last years shoot out. However, hasn't its LED been upgraded since..the new version being the 808-XM-L? If so, is the new version going to be in the shootout? It's probably one of the more common lights out there. Also curious to see how much improved it is over the old version.

    thanks

    Rix
    It has to be on the shootout the 808E XML.

  12. #412
    mtbr member
    Reputation: pethelman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    302
    Quote Originally Posted by dbastians View Post
    When we were doing pre-market test of the beam, we found that many were happy with the narrow frosted optic that gave a nice smooth beam. But some helmet mount users wanted narrower. We gave them the narrowest offering from Carclo, which is the narrowest on the market that would fit the form we wanted. Those wanting narrow were happy and this is the one we use in production now. If you shine on a wall, the beam is not so nice and round but is a diamond shape. This does not do any harm on the trail. Will soon see what Francis says about the measured lumen output.
    David
    Maybe from a few inches away, you can see the triangular arrangement of the optics, but generally from any distance, even a few feet, my experience is that the triple-optic Carclo SPOT lens produces a very round spot. The big difference comes when you compare the XP-E and XP-G. Because of the increased surface area of the XP-G die, the spot lens throws a slightly wider and shorter distance beam compared to the same spot lens with the XP-E. Unfortunately, in the spot-lens-only arrangement, there is also a dark ring immediately surrounding the spot, although not a major detractor. Now if we can just get Carclo to frost one of those 10mm optics, that'd be a killer combo. Did you mention if the light can still be controlled if the remote happens to go missing?

    First image is the XP-E triple with the Spot lens
    Second image is XP-G triple with the Spot lens
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 2012 Mtbr Lights Shootout.-xpe_triple_carclo_spot.jpg  

    2012 Mtbr Lights Shootout.-xpg_triple_carclo_spot.jpg  


  13. #413
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GTR2ebike's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,872
    Francois how long until you release a video featuring the new Lupine Betty? I think all the high end lights have videos posted on MTBR's youtube, except the Betty.

  14. #414
    fc
    fc is offline
    stoked Administrator
    Reputation: fc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1996
    Posts
    27,299
    first production Lezynes in the world!!!!

    fc
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  15. #415
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by pethelman View Post
    Maybe from a few inches away, you can see the triangular arrangement of the optics, but generally from any distance, even a few feet, my experience is that the triple-optic Carclo SPOT lens produces a very round spot.
    Hi Pethelman,

    well the die in XPG (XPE to a slightly lesser extent) is always going to be a big square thing relative to the tiny lens in the 20mm triple optic and the narrowest versions are always going to project a square. A common method to blend these squares is to offset the orientation of each die 120deg on the PCB layout. Then you may get something approximating a round spot. You can also mess with the die position relative to the centre of the lens.
    In our case, we have "embraced the square" and have each die exactly in the centre of the lens and not offset the rotations. Our beam output is definitely square. This is the case with both XPE and XPG. We use the XPG for this model because on the higher power levels, it is more effective. Anyway, we get this diamond shaped beam which looks a bit silly on a wall, but seems more intense on the trail. We tired some other brands of 20mm triple that did produce more roundness, but the intensity was less.
    Now we've done it this way because this light is going to see two popular uses: Helmet mounted for MTB and bar mounted on carbon road bikes. Both users mostly prefer a beam with a good bit of intensity. I still wouldn't call this diamond beam from the carclo triple a really tight spot, but we get feedback from very fast/elite roadies and MTBers that it is good.

    The photo below sort of shows the diamond but I must say that with the eye, the effect is stronger, I think this little point-and-shoot camera can't show the edges of the diamond as well.

    Regards the switch and remote. The battery has a switch on it so you can still use it if you lose the remote. Francis posted a photo a few days back; the green thing on the battery decal is embossed and marks the switch position.

    Cheers,
    David.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 2012 Mtbr Lights Shootout.-p9250299.jpg  


  16. #416
    mtbr member
    Reputation: pethelman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    302
    Quote Originally Posted by dbastians View Post
    In our case, we have "embraced the square" and have each die exactly in the centre of the lens and not offset the rotations.

    Regards the switch and remote. The battery has a switch on it so you can still use it if you lose the remote. Francis posted a photo a few days back; the green thing on the battery decal is embossed and marks the switch position.
    Very cool. Thanks for clearing that up David. I assume you're doing your own PCB design and re-flow work? I can definitely appreciate the work you've put in to create this little light.
    Last edited by pethelman; 10-25-2011 at 09:27 PM.

  17. #417
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by pethelman View Post
    Very cool. Thanks for clearing that up David. I assume you're doing you own PCB design and re-flow work? I can definitely appreciate the work you've put in to create this little light.
    Hey thanks for the interest and questions.
    We do all our own electronic design with the hardware and firmware, prototypes, testing, repairs, etc all done in house. We use a industrial designer for the metalwork and plastics design. PCB assembly and the plastic/rubber work is done by other companies here in Adelaide, South Australia. We don't make anything in China any more.
    Cheers,
    David

  18. #418
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by francois View Post
    first production Lezynes in the world!!!!

    fc
    Excellent! Exactly what I've been waiting for after a long and informative conversation with Mike at Lezyne. The folks there are simply wonderful.

  19. #419
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    58
    The link at the top of the page to the shoot out isn't working. It gives a 'page not found' error.

  20. #420
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,461
    Francios, two of the new lights you have measured, the Xera at 71lux, and a very good showing with the TridenX at 81lux. These are incredible results for both lights and was wondering when you may have the video's up?? Clearly CygoLite is under rating their lumen claims on their TridenX by quite a bit as it has the same lux measurment as the older 1200 lumen TrailLed Darkstar,and several other newer lights with higher lumen claims.

  21. #421
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by indebt View Post
    Francios, two of the new lights you have measured, the Xera at 71lux, and a very good showing with the TridenX at 81lux. These are incredible results for both lights and was wondering when you may have the video's up?? Clearly CygoLite is under rating their lumen claims on their TridenX by quite a bit as it has the same lux measurment as the older 1200 lumen TrailLed Darkstar,and several other newer lights with higher lumen claims.
    I wish I could find where the Xera result was posted. I'm finding it quite difficult to track the latest in the light shootout. I don't see the latest lux numbers on the beam meter results page: Bike Lights Shootout Light Meter Measurements | Mountain Bike Review nor on the main page, which seems to read like a blog (latest articles on top): Lights Shootout | Mountain Bike Review

    Also there are beam shots that seem missing, again maybe they're not posted on the beam shot page (Jet, L&M Urban 500, others?).

    I know we're tracking a moving target here and it's not all polished, but some folks are finding the info and I'd like to be among them

    Thanks Francois!

  22. #422
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,461
    icycle, click on Mtbr lights Shootout at the top of the page. It will say, page not found,scroll down and look on the right side of the page until you see 2012 Light Shootout,click on it, scroll down the page until you see, ( NEXT PAGE) click on that. You will find the lights mentioned down the page along with a couple others from Full Beam etc. Hope that helps.Cheers!!!

  23. #423
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by indebt View Post
    icycle, click on Mtbr lights Shootout at the top of the page. It will say, page not found,scroll down and look on the right side of the page until you see 2012 Light Shootout,click on it, scroll down the page until you see, ( NEXT PAGE) click on that. You will find the lights mentioned down the page along with a couple others from Full Beam etc. Hope that helps.Cheers!!!
    Thanks, found it. Direct link here: 2012 Bike Lights Shootout | Mountain Bike Review | Page 2

  24. #424
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    12
    Francois - Thank you for all you do! And thanks to everyone that has given Francois good positive feedback.

    One question and one comment.

    Question - Why no Ay-Ups? I apologize if you've already answered this question - I couldn't find it in any of the post.

    Comment - This particular thread has rekindled my hope for society. It's nice to see a thread being used to build something in a positive manner as oppose to almost every other thread out there.

  25. #425
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    145
    Possible correction? On this page you have the Cygolite Expilion 350
    listed as:

    2012 Bike Lights Shootout | Mountain Bike Review | Page 2
    Price: $250.00
    Claimed Lumens: 480
    Measured output: 31 Mtbr Lux
    Installed Weight: 161.5 grams
    Run Time: n/a hour

    This looks like it might be a mixup of some sort, as I believe the claimed lumens are 350 and the MSRP is around $100.

    Edit: The price, claimed lumens, and weight look like they might be for the Cygo‑Lite MityCross 480.
    Last edited by BowHopper; 10-27-2011 at 09:12 PM.

  26. #426
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    6
    hmmm

  27. #427
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    107
    In considering whether the easy to execute Lux measurement that François conducts are a good predictor of actual Lumen output as measured in an integrating sphere... I made a simple scatter plot of Lux vs. Lumens for the lights that have both values published to date.

    The relationship is highly correlated within a certain percent error... and it turns out that Lux times 9.7 is a good predictor of Lumens.

    To make the math easier, even Lux times 10 is a fairly good predictor (generally less than 10% error).


  28. #428
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    44
    Quote Originally Posted by abacojeff View Post
    In considering whether the easy to execute Lux measurement that François conducts are a good predictor of actual Lumen output as measured in an integrating sphere... I made a simple scatter plot of Lux vs. Lumens for the lights that have both values published to date.

    The relationship is highly correlated within a certain percent error... and it turns out that Lux times 9.7 is a good predictor of Lumens.

    To make the math easier, even Lux times 10 is a fairly good predictor (generally less than 10% error).

    Are the lights listed the only ones you did the analysis on? If so I'd like to see if the multiplication factor holds for a larger set. I think that the relation you found has to do with the sphere. If the measuring sphere was larger by a factor of ten, I wouldn't be surprised if there was a smaller correlation by just about the same factor.
    If anyone has or knows of a 15.5" blue 2009 Gary Fisher Mamba for sale, please let me know.

  29. #429
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    107
    Quote Originally Posted by PiranhaFisher View Post
    Are the lights listed the only ones you did the analysis on? If so I'd like to see if the multiplication factor holds for a larger set. I think that the relation you found has to do with the sphere. If the measuring sphere was larger by a factor of ten, I wouldn't be surprised if there was a smaller correlation by just about the same factor.
    Francois hasn't published all the Lumen measurements from his trip to the integrating sphere at Lezyne yet... when he does publish more data - we will be able to see how well the estimate holds up for other lights.

    I wouldn't be surprised if higher powered lights have a different profile and there is also the possibility of reflector type, flood vs spot, affecting the results...

    However, for a rough 'rule of thumb' it would be great if the ratio between Francois' Lux readings continue to correlate reasonably well to Lumens.

    This will allow estimation for lights from previous years that aren't being tested in the integrating sphere this year, old designs, etc... and estimation from certain models of lights from this year that didn't fit in the integrating sphere.

  30. #430
    mtbr member
    Reputation: pethelman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    302
    Quote Originally Posted by abacojeff View Post
    Francois hasn't published all the Lumen measurements from his trip to the integrating sphere at Lezyne yet... when he does publish more data - we will be able to see how well the estimate holds up for other lights.

    I wouldn't be surprised if higher powered lights have a different profile and there is also the possibility of reflector type, flood vs spot, affecting the results...

    However, for a rough 'rule of thumb' it would be great if the ratio between Francois' Lux readings continue to correlate reasonably well to Lumens.

    This will allow estimation for lights from previous years that aren't being tested in the integrating sphere this year, old designs, etc... and estimation from certain models of lights from this year that didn't fit in the integrating sphere.
    Do keep in mind that he mentioned the non-ideal conditions behind the lights that could not be fully inserted into the 2" diameter of the sphere. This alone will completely skew the data from any kind of correlation with the lux test.

  31. #431
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    14
    FC - I just wanted to thank you for helping me narrow down my choice of lights. I'm sure it takes a lot of your time to put these reviews together.

  32. #432
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,461
    Hey Francois, just noticed on the lux measurement tables you have the info on the TridenX as having 1600 lumens and 101 lux. I believe it was supposed to 750 lumens and 81 lux. Cheers!!! Looks like it is mixed up with the 350 as well.

  33. #433
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    23

    commuter Flashlight review comparisons.

    As a commuter looking for a under $200 flashlight bike light I just wanted to point out some observations from the reviews and other information I have found.

    NOTE: I do not own any of these lights, but am looking to purchase one of them.

    The contenders:

    Light and Motion Urban 500:

    Pros:
    1) MTBR says best commuting light
    2) Only light with side lighting
    3) Looks like the best beam patterns for MY commuting.
    4) One of the leading companies producing bike lights.

    Cons:
    1) Poor thermal regulation, the thing gets really hot. (So says Francois)
    2) Poor customer reviews
    Amazon.com: ColoradoSBDR's review of Light and Motion Urban 500 Commuter Headlamp
    3) Not many user reviews yet.
    4) Does not use standard battery. Can not bring spare battery with me for a ride.


    Niterider Minewt 600 cordless

    Pros
    1) Doesnt get as hot as Urban 500
    2) Beam spread comparable to Urban 500
    3) One of the leading companies producing bike lights.
    4) Plenty of user reviews, most very positive.

    Cons
    1) Read a couple user reviews that say USB cover doesn't stay on very well. This is the same chassis as previous model which also had the same problem.
    2) Bulkier than the other lights in this category
    3) A little heavy for a helmet mount
    4) Battery not user replaceable / cant bring spare battery with me for ride.
    5) no side lighting


    Lezyne Super drive 450

    Pros
    1) Cheapest out of all the lights
    2) User replaceable battery.
    3) Non proprietary battery.
    4) Beam pattern seems comparable to Urban 500 and Niterider minewt 600
    5) All aluminium construction (better heat sink?)


    Cons
    1) No user reviews thus far (well one user review)
    2) Company new to lighting business
    3) Doesnt come with helmet mount
    4) No side lighting




    Serfas True 500

    Pro:
    1) Cheaper than the Urban 500 and Niterider Minewt 600
    2) Replaceable battery

    Con:
    1) no side lighting
    2) Not as bright as the Urban 500 and Niterider Minewt 600


    Cygolite expillion 400

    Con: did not give to MTBR to do a review about.


    I'm interested to see if people agree with my observations from the reviews.

  34. #434
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,169
    Quote Originally Posted by blueyin View Post

    Niterider Minewt 600 cordless

    Pros
    1) Doesnt get as hot as Urban 500
    2) Beam spread comparable to Urban 500
    3) One of the leading companies producing bike lights.
    4) Plenty of user reviews, most very positive.

    Cons
    1) Read a couple user reviews that say USB cover doesn't stay on very well. This is the same chassis as previous model which also had the same problem.
    2) Bulkier than the other lights in this category
    3) A little heavy for a helmet mount
    4) Battery not user replaceable / cant bring spare battery with me for ride. *deal breaker IMO*5)
    no side lighting
    6) according to reviews clamp doesn't hold well for off road use

    Lezyne Super drive 450

    Pros
    1) Cheapest out of all the lights
    2) User replaceable battery.
    3) Non proprietary battery.
    4) Beam pattern seems comparable to Urban 500 and Niterider minewt 600
    5) All aluminium construction (better heat sink?)


    Cons
    1) No user reviews thus far (well one user review)
    2) Company new to lighting business
    3) Doesnt come with helmet mount...they are working on one4) No side lighting




    Serfas True 500

    Pro:
    1) Cheaper than the Urban 500 and Niterider Minewt 600
    2) Replaceable battery *see con list*

    Con:
    1) no side lighting
    2) Not as bright as the Urban 500 and Niterider Minewt 600
    3) Proprietary Serfas battery...Deal breaker for me
    Cygolite expillion 400

    Con: did not give to MTBR to do a review about.


    I'm interested to see if people agree with my observations from the reviews.
    Nice list...now go get the Lyzene for $79 today @ Cambria Bike. Use the code SCARY20 to get that price
    2013 Banshee Spitfire V2 650b

  35. #435
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    398
    Why not get the L&M Urban 300 which does not have heat issues, is still plenty bright, and costs $20 less than the 500? It is true though that there is no external battery pack connectivity.

    I had no issues with it so far but of course sh*t happens (check out the Niterider thread for some nice experiences), but if the customer service is good this is nothing to worry about...

  36. #436
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    14
    I recently acquired the L&M Urban 500. Yes, it does get hot on the highest setting and the protection circuitry kicks it down to a lower setting. I suspect this happens only if the ambient temperature is more than 70 degrees and you are moving slow. I had it on a ride yesterday morning in 50 degree weather. It ran for 10 minutes longer than advertised on high and stayed cool throughout, even during a slow climb. It comes with a nice helmet mount - adjustable both up/down and left/right.

    I am glad I got the Urban 500 instead of the Urban 300. It costs only a little more. You can always run it at medium (250 lumens) to avoid heat issues at get a longer run time of 3 hours and still have the high mode (500 lumens) available to you on fast descents.

    [QUOTE=blueyin;8586998]As a commuter looking for a under $200 flashlight bike light I just wanted to point out some observations from the reviews and other information I have found.

    NOTE: I do not own any of these lights, but am looking to purchase one of them.

  37. #437
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,169
    Quote Originally Posted by blueyin View Post
    As a commuter looking for a under $200 flashlight bike light I just wanted to point out some observations from the reviews and other information I have found.

    NOTE: I do not own any of these lights, but am looking to purchase one of them.
    Not trying to derail this thread but I want to add another light to your list and it's a torch. The ZebraLight SC600. Awesome light with easily = the light power of those mentioned already, beautiful build quality and very solid. Takes 1 standard 18650 battery and the thing is only 4.2" in length and 87.2 grams w/o battery. This is a beautuiful light with stunning power and I will compare it to the new Lyzene when that shows up. You would need to mount it with a TwoFish Lockblock or something similar.

    SC600 Cree XM-L 750Lm Flashlight 18650
    2013 Banshee Spitfire V2 650b

  38. #438
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    14

    Reviews

    Hi Francois, there are no new light reviews since the Cateye Nanoshot on 10/23. Are you planning to put up some soon. I am suffering from withdrawal

  39. #439
    fc
    fc is offline
    stoked Administrator
    Reputation: fc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1996
    Posts
    27,299
    Heyyyyy, I just got back from a mini-vacation in Bend, Oregon. It was the best riding ever. Here's one of the days of riding:
    Mtbr with Cogwild Tours in Bend, Oregon - YouTube

    Anyway, I'm back to publishing the rest of the reviews and the wrap-ups.

    fc

  40. #440
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    347
    LOL at 4:50 and Daddy chasing his kid. thanks for sharing
    12' Sir9 Rigid
    11' Jabber Rigid
    10 SJ SS rigid
    10' Swork SS 29er
    10' Tallboy
    08' RM Vertex SS

  41. #441
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,461
    I 2nd the LOL on dad chasing his son !!!!!! Nice Endo Francois, hope all's well. Looking forward to the rest of your reviews. Cheers!!!

  42. #442
    RTM
    RTM is offline
    #1 Latex Salesman
    Reputation: RTM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,845
    Quote Originally Posted by Bet99ty00 View Post
    I think you have done good job breaking it down in the past. I like the idea of "commuter" and "high end" for sure.
    Battery life on max is always what I'm looking for.

    What light is photo 3? Pretty much makes it daylight out.

    I'll be waiting to see the shootout.
    Check out the link at the top of the forum page. Francios is not done yet, but lots of good stuff already posted.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  43. #443
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cat-man-do's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    5,360
    Quote Originally Posted by skidad View Post
    Not trying to derail this thread but I want to add another light to your list and it's a torch. The ZebraLight SC600. Awesome light with easily = the light power of those mentioned already, beautiful build quality and very solid. Takes 1 standard 18650 battery and the thing is only 4.2" in length and 87.2 grams w/o battery. This is a beautuiful light with stunning power and I will compare it to the new Lyzene when that shows up. You would need to mount it with a TwoFish Lockblock or something similar.

    SC600 Cree XM-L 750Lm Flashlight 18650
    Yes, a nice torch it is and at $95 it better be...but seriously, there are any number of nice torches out there that don't cost a third of what you are suggesting.

    What I don't understand is "Why" the people who designed these so called "commuter lights", didn't make them more "user serviceable" as far as batteries go. Doing so would have probably doubled their sales. The Niterider cordless model would be sweet if it used standard 18650's and was designed for easy switch out. Because of my preference I tend to like the Lyzene models the most. If I wanted a commuter style light and didn't want to settle with a standard torch I would get one of those which "Do" use standard 18650's. Need more run time (?)...just bring more cells.

  44. #444
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Cat-man-do View Post
    Yes, a nice torch it is and at $95 it better be...but seriously, there are any number of nice torches out there that don't cost a third of what you are suggesting.

    What I don't understand is "Why" the people who designed these so called "commuter lights", didn't make them more "user serviceable" as far as batteries go. Doing so would have probably doubled their sales. The Niterider cordless model would be sweet if it used standard 18650's and was designed for easy switch out. Because of my preference I tend to like the Lyzene models the most. If I wanted a commuter style light and didn't want to settle with a standard torch I would get one of those which "Do" use standard 18650's. Need more run time (?)...just bring more cells.
    Cat Man....I know you know this but for others there are a number of things about the ZebraLight that make it such a good torch vs cheapo torches. Power, size, efficiency of battery use and build quality. Is it worth $95? Each person will have to decide that for themselves. I have the new Lyzene Power Drive and it's very nice with good output and a pretty tight beam with it's smooth reflector. The ZL SC600 is better as is the Spark SL6-800 which I also have (yeah, I'm a bit out of control). Both of these have orange peel reflectors which are 3mm and 6mm larger in diameter respectively than the new Lyzene which is approx. 18mm.

    Here is a quick summary from CPF on the SC600
    The SC600 packs a lot of punch – more than any other 1x18650 I’ve tested to date, including both the Thrunite Scorpion V2 and Spark SL6. It also has the most efficient and well-regulated circuit I’ve seen in this class. Oh, and have I mentioned it’s incredibly tiny too?

    Here is a link to the extensive test of the SC600 on CPF
    Zebralight SC600 (1x18650, XM-L) Review: RUNTIME, BEAMSHOTS, comparisons & more!
    2013 Banshee Spitfire V2 650b

  45. #445
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cat-man-do's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    5,360
    Quote Originally Posted by skidad View Post
    ...Here is a link to the extensive test of the SC600 on CPF
    Zebralight SC600 (1x18650, XM-L) Review: RUNTIME, BEAMSHOTS, comparisons & more!
    I gave this a quick look-see over on CPF. It never ceases to amaze me how much detail they go into over on CPF.
    In a nut shell, a very good review. As far as torches go the SC600 looks to be the equivalent to what the Lupine lights are to other bike lights. It does look like a very nice torch. I have no doubt it would make a fine bar lamp. I'd go into the details but not on this thread. I'll just say that if I was considering a Niterider cordless 600L the SC600 might be the better way to go since I already have a bar torch mount ( about $3 ).

  46. #446
    Old-newbie
    Reputation: g3rG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    379
    Quote Originally Posted by skidad View Post
    Not trying to derail this thread but I want to add another light to your list and it's a torch. The ZebraLight SC600. Awesome light with easily = the light power of those mentioned already, beautiful build quality and very solid. Takes 1 standard 18650 battery and the thing is only 4.2" in length and 87.2 grams w/o battery. This is a beautuiful light with stunning power and I will compare it to the new Lyzene when that shows up. You would need to mount it with a TwoFish Lockblock or something similar.

    SC600 Cree XM-L 750Lm Flashlight 18650
    This is a fantastic little light. I did most of my summer night rides with one on my helmet. The beam pattern is perfect for a helmet light. Too narrow for a bar light. Two zip ties holds it securely to the helmet. I ran it at 350lm most of the time, but a double click on the button kicked it to 750 for times that I needed it.


    gerG
    Last edited by fc; 11-15-2011 at 01:40 PM.
    ...uphill uphill uphill DOWNHILL! uphill uphill uphill uphill DOWNHILL! uphill ...

  47. #447
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,088
    Quote Originally Posted by Cat-man-do View Post
    I gave this a quick look-see over on CPF. It never ceases to amaze me how much detail they go into over on CPF.
    In a nut shell, a very good review. As far as torches go the SC600 looks to be the equivalent to what the Lupine lights are to other bike lights. It does look like a very nice torch. I have no doubt it would make a fine bar lamp. I'd go into the details but not on this thread. I'll just say that if I was considering a Niterider cordless 600L the SC600 might be the better way to go since I already have a bar torch mount ( about $3 ).
    In your experience what DX torch would put numbers equal to this light in flood and power? Most of the DX lights seem to be throwers with a super tight hot spot. TIA.

  48. #448
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    64
    Quote Originally Posted by GSJ1973 View Post
    In your experience what DX torch would put numbers equal to this light in flood and power? Most of the DX lights seem to be throwers with a super tight hot spot. TIA.
    I commute on road and MUP. No trails.

    The best cheap torch for the bars that most people favor is the KD C8 (product # S009844). As for helmet, there are several that people seem to find acceptable. The Uniquefire 2100, Yezl Z1 and Ultrafire 504b, all with XM-L. I really like the C8 on the bar, but the XM-L on the helmet does not out throw the one on the bar. I've ordered an S-Mini from Shiningbeam hoping that it will have more throw than the XM-L so that I can see a bit further down the road for patches in the road that might indicate something to avoid.

  49. #449
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cat-man-do's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    5,360
    Quote Originally Posted by GSJ1973 View Post
    In your experience what DX torch would put numbers equal to this light in flood and power? Most of the DX lights seem to be throwers with a super tight hot spot. TIA.
    Not really the thread to be answering this question but I'll try to be brief. I don't have an SC600 so I really can only speculate. The CPF review mentions the SC600 as having a good degree of flood/spill. The reflector on the SC600 looks like it might be a little wider than a standard P-60 reflector. Since I don't have one no way to know for sure. I will say though that a standard XM-L drop-in ( P-60 ) ( with OP reflector ) has a nice all-around beam pattern.

    Concerning total output, in the CPF review the "opening poster " was unable to give a current draw on the highest settings. That would of told me something about the over all output and gave me something to compare to. Without that I cannot comment on output other than to say that it's likely in the 2000-2500ma range. If true there are some drop-ins sold running in that area sold by other companies. Not sure if D/X has one in that range though. My K/D XM-L 5-mode drop-in draws 2500ma on high with a fresh cell and is damn bright for a T6 bin. The SC600 are likely using the best U-bin XM-L emitters. From what the OP said the current batch are all "cool white" with no green or purple tint. If true they probably are very nice. All of this is speculation on my part though.

    In the next few weeks I will be getting in a new order of XM-L stuff from Manafont that might give an interesting comparison to the SC600. I'll comment more about that ( on the D/X torch thread ) when the order comes in.
    Last edited by Cat-man-do; 11-08-2011 at 12:52 AM.

  50. #450
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    107
    Decided to post an updated LUX vs LUMENS chart for the lights with measurements posted to date.

    To anticipate some potential comments... I know Lux and Lumens are different types of measurements of light output (light density vs total output)... however, based on the way Francois does the Lux measurements (i.e. using an indirect measure of Lux in an enclosed room via reflected light) - he is using his room as a rough integrating sphere (or integrating cube complete with table, couch and TV if you will)...

    So if you don't agree with the approach, fine. But so far the data shows a reasonable (as defined by me) relationship between Francois measured Lux readings vs. Lezyne measured integrating sphere Lumen readings.

    So far the relationship is Lux x 9.5 = Lumens ± 15%.

    Considering I'm not able to visually detect a 15% difference in light output, as I said, close enough for me!

    2012 MTBR Light Test Lux vs Lumens 3
    Last edited by abacojeff; 11-09-2011 at 05:26 PM. Reason: updated chart to include term "MTBR Lux"

  51. #451
    fc
    fc is offline
    stoked Administrator
    Reputation: fc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1996
    Posts
    27,299
    Quote Originally Posted by abacojeff View Post
    Decided to post an updated LUX vs LUMENS chart for the lights with measurements posted to date.
    ....
    Nice. Send me your email and I'll send you my master spreadsheet.

    That was my observation too. It validated my lux readings.

    Can you call it Mtbr Measured Lux? That way, it's clear that these numbers are just for our setting.

    francis

  52. #452
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    107
    Quote Originally Posted by francois View Post
    Nice. Send me your email and I'll send you my master spreadsheet.

    That was my observation too. It validated my lux readings.

    Can you call it Mtbr Measured Lux? That way, it's clear that these numbers are just for our setting.

    francis
    Updated to "MTBR Measured Lux" per your request...

    e:mail send via PM...

  53. #453
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,158
    How about if Francois publishes that chart as part of the shoot out?

    J.

  54. #454
    fc
    fc is offline
    stoked Administrator
    Reputation: fc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1996
    Posts
    27,299
    Lezyne Super Drive – 2012 Mtbr Lights Shootout | Mountain Bike Review

    My first Lezyine is done. It's the good one too.

    fc

  55. #455
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    171
    You've done an excellent job, in your 2012 shootout Francois !!! Was wondering if you've had a chance to do an in-depth review of the Gemini Xera ???

  56. #456
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    61
    Is the Bike Ray IV going to be reveiwed?
    "Ride it Like You Stole it"!

  57. #457
    mtbr member
    Reputation: gticlay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    6,637
    Man, I'm soooooo tired of waiting for the results. I mean, it's daylight savings time already and we have to buy our lights about 2 weeks ago.
    "It looks flexy"

  58. #458
    RTM
    RTM is offline
    #1 Latex Salesman
    Reputation: RTM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,845
    I was thinking, perhaps for next year Francios could set a higher bar for acceptance into the reviews. It's nice to see all options covered but it may be too much for one man to handle.

  59. #459
    All fat, all the time.
    Reputation: Shark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    7,173
    Maybe I missed it, but has anyone done a spreadsheet/chart/graph that shows measured MTBR LUX vs $$?

    Just wondering, as it gives people a good place to start regarding best "bang for buck"...then add on quality etc after that, but it would be a helpful starting point.

  60. #460
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,158
    Quote Originally Posted by RTM View Post
    I was thinking, perhaps for next year Francios could set a higher bar for acceptance into the reviews. It's nice to see all options covered but it may be too much for one man to handle.
    ^^this.

    I'd set a bar at nothing less than 500 lumens. By next year that's going to be pretty much the entry ante.

    J.

  61. #461
    fc
    fc is offline
    stoked Administrator
    Reputation: fc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1996
    Posts
    27,299

  62. #462
    mtbr member
    Reputation: gticlay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    6,637
    Was that you who neg rep'd me for complaining? sorry, eh!
    "It looks flexy"

  63. #463
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TwoHeadsBrewing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
    ^^this.

    I'd set a bar at nothing less than 500 lumens. By next year that's going to be pretty much the entry ante.

    J.
    I think it would be great to have separate "Light Shootouts". Do one for Commuter Lights(<400lm), one for Budget Lights (<$50), and one for Singletrack Lights. Then just refresh those shootouts once a year in August/September as the companies come out with new products and the days get shorter. But all that aside, this is hands down the best light roundup out there. Nice work Francois!
    "Got everything you need?"

  64. #464
    fc
    fc is offline
    stoked Administrator
    Reputation: fc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1996
    Posts
    27,299
    Quote Originally Posted by gticlay View Post
    Was that you who neg rep'd me for complaining? sorry, eh!
    Oh heck no. If there was no negatives, it would be tough to improve!

    fc

  65. #465
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    48
    At the end of the shootout do you a summary of the results? Would be really nice to have that overall perspective after testing has been complete.

    Thanks for this great light resource!

  66. #466
    mtbr member
    Reputation: gticlay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    6,637
    Quote Originally Posted by francois View Post
    Oh heck no. If there was no negatives, it would be tough to improve!

    fc
    I guess it's some lame d-bag. Was nice to meet you again at Interbike
    "It looks flexy"

  67. #467
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    6
    Very nice!

  68. #468
    mtbr member
    Reputation: pethelman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    302

    Video content

    Ok, is it just me, or did all the MTBR video content just get yanked off of YouTube?
    Maybe something is in the works? Who knows.

  69. #469
    fc
    fc is offline
    stoked Administrator
    Reputation: fc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1996
    Posts
    27,299
    Quote Originally Posted by pethelman View Post
    Ok, is it just me, or did all the MTBR video content just get yanked off of YouTube?
    Maybe something is in the works? Who knows.
    Yup, one of our key accounts got deleted . We're trying to get it back.

    fc

  70. #470
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,461
    Hi Francois, still down, do have an ETA on when the U-Tube account will be restored??

  71. #471
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    185
    Any info on the Magic Shine MJ-880?

  72. #472
    mtbr member
    Reputation: gticlay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    6,637
    I am particularly interested in seeing how the Gemini Xera compares to the Strykr offerings. Also the new 750 lumen TridenX. That beam pattern is amazing in the old TridenX and with 750 lumen pumping out of that thing, I expect there to be some language like "wow, it works more like a 1200 lumen light"
    "It looks flexy"

  73. #473
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    45
    Love the reports, keep them coming. I am hoping for some tail lights soon, specifically the DS-500, would love to see that bad boy in action, especially since the new ones are on back-order. Looking for some love from behind .... er ... umm .. that didn't come out right, but so us some tail ... lights.

    - Roger

  74. #474
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    7
    Francois,

    In the 2012 Shootout review for the Exposure Diablo, I think you have an error. This year's light for 2012 is NOT twice as bright as last year's light. 59 lux for 2012 (mk.3) and 63 lux for 2010 (mk.2) (IIRC). Last year's 2011 model (mk.2) is significantly brighter than the one for 2010 (which came in about 37 Lux I believe).

    Thanks for all the great work that you have been doing!

  75. #475
    fc
    fc is offline
    stoked Administrator
    Reputation: fc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1996
    Posts
    27,299
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Huston View Post
    Love the reports, keep them coming. I am hoping for some tail lights soon, specifically the DS-500, would love to see that bad boy in action, especially since the new ones are on back-order. Looking for some love from behind .... er ... umm .. that didn't come out right, but so us some tail ... lights.

    - Roger
    Yess! I'm riding the DS-500 now. It's a work of art!!

    fc

  76. #476
    fc
    fc is offline
    stoked Administrator
    Reputation: fc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1996
    Posts
    27,299
    Quote Originally Posted by gocycling View Post
    Francois,

    In the 2012 Shootout review for the Exposure Diablo, I think you have an error. This year's light for 2012 is NOT twice as bright as last year's light. 59 lux for 2012 (mk.3) and 63 lux for 2010 (mk.2) (IIRC). Last year's 2011 model (mk.2) is significantly brighter than the one for 2010 (which came in about 37 Lux I believe).

    Thanks for all the great work that you have been doing!
    Thank you much bro!

    fc

  77. #477
    Your killing my Strava
    Reputation: vinnyl26's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    628
    Videos no longer work
    We will never know our full potential unless we push ourselves to find it.

  78. #478
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1
    ...you´re videos were great and it´s a big loss for us here, that your youtube account is still not working...

    Regards from Germany!

    SR--71

  79. #479
    Is not amused
    Reputation: Hutch3637's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    3,205
    Thank you for the reviews francois! The niterider mini 600 was working great until I improved. Now it's time so save for brighter lights.
    Yip yip yip nope nope nope

  80. #480
    ww.glowormlites.co.nz
    Reputation: Gloworm Manufacture's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    363
    Hello Francois,

    This is Vag from Gloworm Manufacturing.

    We are producing a new light system and we would love to get reviewed by you. We know it is pretty late for the Lights Shootout but we are looking forward for some feedback and a review.

    More details of our light system will be posted on the forum soon.

    On behalf of the Gloworm Manufacturing team,
    Vag
    Gloworm Website

    '...it's more fun with the lites on!'

  81. #481
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    626
    Hey Francois, when will the videos and the rest of the reviews be available for the rest of the lights? Also, are you going to review the new Jet Lites x-51?

  82. #482
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    7

    Lost Scott Genius LT before Night Ride

    I was all loaded up with my new MagicShine for a perfect Night Ride and my bike fell off the rack. I don't know what I did wrong, I've racked it 100 times...Somewhere around San Tomas Expressway in Campbell...I was on my way to ride in Los Gatos... So Bummed...
    408-314-6636 if you know anything

  83. #483
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    626
    Sorry to hear about that, what kind of rack is it and where is it attached? I ask because I use a Thule trunk rack

  84. #484
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Cat-man-do's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    5,360
    This isn't going to help you now but might help others. When using trunk or roof racks it might be a good idea use some kind of fail-safe. I would think a simple hook-bungee cord system ( $6 ) might do the trick. It could keep you from losing your next bike. I no longer use a roof rack but when I did I know I got home at least once and realized that I forgot to lock the fork mount tray. Crap happens.

  85. #485
    fc
    fc is offline
    stoked Administrator
    Reputation: fc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1996
    Posts
    27,299
    The lights are rolling again. I'll get the rest of the reviews out this week.

    fc

  86. #486
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    45
    Hello,

    Is it me? I can't find any new light reviews for a month. Francois, you OK?

    - Roger

  87. #487
    Is not amused
    Reputation: Hutch3637's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    3,205
    Wouldn't mind the Serfas True 1500 but don't really have the money. So my question to all of you. Does anyone have any experience with the Serfas True 1000? It seems to be the same case but with 1000 lumens. Can anyone confirm the real actual lumens and lux with run times for the 1000? It say's online at jenson that it will run up to 3.5 hours on high at peak output. So for 100$ less is it worth it?
    Yip yip yip nope nope nope

  88. #488
    mtbr member
    Reputation: gticlay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    6,637
    Quote Originally Posted by Hutch3637 View Post
    Wouldn't mind the Serfas True 1500 but don't really have the money. So my question to all of you. Does anyone have any experience with the Serfas True 1000? It seems to be the same case but with 1000 lumens. Can anyone confirm the real actual lumens and lux with run times for the 1000? It say's online at jenson that it will run up to 3.5 hours on high at peak output. So for 100$ less is it worth it?
    Search around. I saw Serfas 1500 on sale for waaaaaay less than retail somewhere... maybe jensonusa or wheelworld. Maybe it was on fleabay. All under $300.

    But if you have a dumpy light (any light), Baja will give you a substantial discount and their stuff is tough.

    Also, there's 15% off $300 right now at bikebling so $255 for something $300.
    "It looks flexy"

  89. #489
    Is not amused
    Reputation: Hutch3637's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    3,205
    ^^^ Thanks for the advice.
    Yip yip yip nope nope nope

  90. #490
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mattthemuppet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,342
    a friend who works at a bike shop recently bought a Serfas 1000. It's a nice light, similar in brightness to my DIY helmet light (most likely ~800 true lumens) but very spotty/torch/flashlight beam. Throws great, but I couldn't deal with the beam pattern although some might like it on the helmet.

  91. #491
    mtbr member
    Reputation: TwoHeadsBrewing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,879
    A riding buddy has the Serfas 1000 and it's the same size as the 1500, but lower output. It looks to be a great light, but honestly I think it's a bit overpriced compared to the current offerings. Definitely a well made light, but it's fairly large and doesn't put out a ton of light. For the weight and size penalty, I'd want to have a LOT of light.

    If you're on a budget the Gemini Xera is really hard to beat. Another riding buddy has the Xera and it is nice and bright with a good balance between spot and flood. Great for either the helmet or the bars, and it's TINY, and lightweight. He runs the whole deal on the helmet, battery and light, which is pretty awesome. It sucks to have to fool with cables when you need to rummage in your backpack or change a tube during a ride. For the same price you can get the Magicshine MJ-872, which puts out a ton of light. I'm running one on my bars, and the flood is awesome. No throw, so it's not a good "only light" to run, but it's great when paired with a spot beam on the helmet.
    "Got everything you need?"

  92. #492
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    129
    Quote Originally Posted by francois View Post
    The lights are rolling again. I'll get the rest of the reviews out this week.

    fc
    When will we see more reviews?

  93. #493
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    107
    Time to update the Lux vs. Lumen chart again. The previous version included 15 lights... the new chart almost doubles this to 28. The latest 13 lights are in bold.

    When Francis publishes additional reviews that includes the Lux and Lumen data, I'll update the chart again.

    Just to recap...
    1. Lux and Lumens are different measurements of light output and normally shouldn't be directly compared to each other.

    2. However, based on how Francis conducts his Lux readings (i.e. indirect via ceiling bounce), he is turning his room into a 'quasi' integrating sphere...

    3. This has allowed correlation between the 'quick and easy' Lux measurements that Francis routinely conducts with the precise Lumen readings that were measured in Lezyne's integrating sphere.

    4. Since a reasonable (as defined by me) correlation can be calculated - we can estimate the lumen output of older lights that Francis has previously measured Lux for... or we can estimate lumen output for current lights (2012 Shootout) that came too late to go to the Lezyne integrating sphere - or the shape of the lighthead precluded taking integrating sphere measurements.

    5. The correlation for Lux vs Lumens IS ONLY APPLICABLE TO LUX MEASUREMENTS AS CONDUCTED BY FRANCIS since his setup is unique for size/shape of room, contents of the room, color and reflectance of paint, position of Lux meter to lightheads, etc.

    6. The AVERAGE multiplication factor so far is: MTBR LUX x 9.5 = estimated LUMENS

    This is typically accurate to within ~15% of actual measured lumens.


    A 'lazy' calculation is: MTBR LUX x 10 = estimated LUMENS

    This is typically accurate to within ~20% of actual measured lumens.



    7. 28 down... approximately 25 more to go.

    MTBR Lux vs Lumens 010412
    Last edited by abacojeff; 01-04-2012 at 07:04 PM.

  94. #494
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    45
    Well, we haven't heard from francois for well over a month. I guess this review is dead. A shame because there were some pretty good lights left to be reviewed. Maybe the task was just too big of an undertaking, I can understand that.

    RIP francois,

    - Roger

  95. #495
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Huston View Post
    Well, we haven't heard from francois for well over a month. I guess this review is dead. A shame because there were some pretty good lights left to be reviewed. Maybe the task was just too big of an undertaking, I can understand that.

    RIP francois,

    - Roger
    I have been logging in eagerly awaiting new reviews as well. I understand Francois is a father, a programmer, a husband, etc... so I'm not going come down on him. Hopefully he knows his work is appriciated and we are all hoping for more.

  96. #496
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    45
    Yes, I understand that people are busy. However a busy man would say, I am overloaded right now, it will be a month before I can get back to it. Something else is going on here because the last word from francios is that the rest of the reviews were going to be posted "this week" and that was back in November. Then nothing. So my fear is that something happened to francois and no one from mtbr has said one word at to what may be going on.

    - Roger

  97. #497
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    232
    It will soon be out on the big screen "what happened to Francis". Seriously guys, is that all you have to worry about. I'm betting the man has other obligations. LOL

  98. #498
    mtbr member
    Reputation: gticlay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    6,637
    Quote Originally Posted by RBrady View Post
    It will soon be out on the big screen "what happened to Francis". Seriously guys, is that all you have to worry about. I'm betting the man has other obligations. LOL
    Color me suprised. I thought mtbr was his job. Really.
    "It looks flexy"

  99. #499
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    232
    Quote Originally Posted by gticlay View Post
    Color me suprised. I thought mtbr was his job. Really.
    Pretty sure he works a day job and well as having a family gticlay. Don't let it get you down. Push away from the keyboard and ride your bike. It's good for you.

  100. #500
    All fat, all the time.
    Reputation: Shark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    7,173
    Just pick a light, buy it, and ride!

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Lights shootout 2011
    By fc in forum California - Norcal
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 12-08-2010, 11:55 AM
  2. Lights shootout 2010 edition thread on Lights and Night Riding
    By odtexas in forum Lights DIY - Do It Yourself
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-20-2009, 05:17 AM
  3. Mtbr Lights Shootout Update
    By fc in forum Lights and Night Riding
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 02-22-2009, 07:26 PM
  4. Lights shootout comments
    By fc in forum Lights DIY - Do It Yourself
    Replies: 277
    Last Post: 12-08-2008, 07:39 AM
  5. mtbr Shine-Off lights shootout is here.
    By fc in forum Lights DIY - Do It Yourself
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 01-26-2004, 09:02 PM

Members who have read this thread: 1

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •