Quote:
Originally Posted by Senor StrongBad
This would be a good entry level bike for anyone thinking about getting into Mountain biking. Although I would not get it if it were for someone over 180lbs. The fork stanchions are small, the handlebars and stem are weak and the brakes are poor. .
|
I agree with the good entry level comment but have to disagree a little on the rider more than 180 on it, and I say that without ever having ridden on one or even seen one in person. The reason that I would disagree is that its specked a bit better than the Zed 3.2 (26 inch wheels) and though I have worn some of the components on the 3.2 none of the things that you mention as weak points have failed on my bike. The 3.2 has the Suntour xct V2 fork and the stem looks identical to the one on the 3.29, can't see the bars on the 3.29 but if they are the same as on the 3.2 they are steel and not going anywhere. Braking on the 3.2 is done with Tektro IOX mechanical disc (similar enough to the 3.29 I think) and I have never had an issue with them, they stop good and never need adjustment of any kind, do they work like hydraulics? nope but they do stop reliably.
I generally ride rail trails (18-25 miles at a time) hopping off trail as often as I can find little hills or paths to do a little more than the rail trail, for the record I have never been below 300 pounds since buying the bike back in 2009 and have been as high as 360 pounds, I have at least 2000 miles on that bike in that time. of course, I have upgraded things along the way but none of the things that you mentioned as potential weak points for someone over 180 so I thought I would reply

and of course none of this may apply anyways as its a different bike all together but I think they are similar enough to make the comparison, the 3.29 actually has a couple places where components are better than on the stock 3.2.
with all of that said... I would love to see some pictures of your wifes bike

nothing on the net seems to be "real images" they are mostly stock images.