Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Music & Bikes
    Reputation: fokof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    934

    IGH efficiency: a chart

    http://www.ihpva.org/HParchive/PDF/hp52-2001.pdf


    It states that they are around 2% less efficient than a traditional 27 speed drivetrain.

    A little inconvenience for lots of advantages.
    "There is a big difference between kneeling down and bending over" -FZ

  2. #2
    MHC
    MHC is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    73
    I'd be interested to see how they'd compare after 6 months use covered in mud & trail dust.
    ie in the real world.

  3. #3
    Music & Bikes
    Reputation: fokof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    934
    Yep!

    The friction of mud & dust on a tradidtional drivetrain must increase a lot compared to a SS setup (IGH)

    They probably didn't want to cleanup the mess in the lab after throwing mud all over the place
    Last edited by fokof; 08-28-2011 at 12:00 AM.
    "There is a big difference between kneeling down and bending over" -FZ

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: nateeprasan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    33
    I wish someone test them in extreme temperature (at least 0 Fahrenheit). It's a long and cold winter here in Midwest of the USA.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: tidelag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    45
    0 Fahrenheit? Isn't that a myth?

    I find it worser in dry and warm weather, but I ride less and lube the chain more regulary in the winter. One MAY say that the deraillerchain needs more lube in winter than the summer, even with less mileage!

    It's not a big of difference of chain friction on a fixie between winter and summer, I don't feel the difference, but it have less mileage between each lubrication.

    I ride a lot in -15C and -10C, and it's better than between -5 to +5C.
    Freezing point of water really sucks and makes my bicycle dirty and dries out the chain.
    When the chain is dry it's really easy to feel the sluggishness on a derallier system, while I never felt "the shock" on my fixie/IG. Try that if you can.

    I suspect that the efficency would be way less than 95% on dry derailler chains.
    I wonder if the 11T pulleys are the sinner?

    They could use two chain, letting one be used regulary and test it when it's dry/muddy/snowny, and compare it to the other reference chain. (Thanks for the link, I loved it)

    (sorry for my crappy english)

Similar Threads

  1. Cycling Efficiency
    By DirectRevolt in forum Endurance XC Racing
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-22-2011, 04:26 AM
  2. bike efficiency
    By buggyman in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 02-27-2007, 01:07 PM
  3. FS efficiency
    By richwolf in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-03-2006, 06:02 PM
  4. HH Efficiency
    By Exon in forum Titus
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-12-2005, 09:01 PM
  5. Bicycle efficiency
    By Greenfix in forum Singlespeed
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-04-2005, 08:27 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •