Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    No, that's not phonetic
    Reputation: tscheezy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003

    We the people ... Links to websites with some in-depth I-Bike coverage?

    I know a lot of people aren't back from Vegas yet, so more stuff will be forthcoming in future days, but I figure people have been combing the interwebs and finding some gems from I-Bike already. KRob's stuff will probably be the real goods, but until he gets done, what else is out there? It seems like most of the "corporate" sites (this one, pinkbike, sicklines, etc) so far have fallen asleep on the job and somehow the crowdsourcing aspect of mtbr has not come through.

    Let me define what I think good coverage is:
    • LARGE pictures- 1,000 pixels wide/tall is a good starting point but the option of 2,000 pix is great
    • MULTIPLE pictures of bikes- not just the yawner drive side catalog pic, but front, back, linkage, chain and seat stays, shock mounts, disc tabs, etc.
    • DETAIL pictures- odd angles, closeups, well lit and focused
    • Action shots of riding
    • Detailed verbiage of actual trail experience using the equipment in question including direct comparisons to other equipment- not just a reprint of the manufacturer's ad copy (barf!)

    What crappy coverage is:
    • SMALL pictures
    • Tiny bikes in the distance leaning up against rocks
    • Pictures of tents in the desert. Seriously, who cares?
    • Verbiage that does not compare bikes or parts to other bikes or parts to put them in context
    • Descriptions that are nothing more than direct reprints or paraphrases of the company's press release

    NSMB actually has some good stuff up.

    Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
    Last edited by tscheezy; 09-26-2009 at 12:30 PM.
    My video techniques can be found in this thread.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    thanks for the links dude. nice stuff. bit surprised by 661's 'new' prototype riding lid. Looks almost like a carbon copy of my 2008 Fox Flux lid. Seems a case of OEM part getting rebadged...

  3. #3
    FM is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: FM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Sicklines has about the best coverage I've seen so far.

    Check it out!

    Regardless of how much effort MTBR puts into coverage, the format sucks IMHO.
    Very little opportunity for interaction from viewers, not enough content, poor photos, and what gets covered is dependent on who goes (i.e. 29'ers & tires? yawn). I still enjoy MTBR but they are way off the back when it comes to iBike coverage IMHO. Just some simple formatting changes (i.e. show it all as regular posts in a forum, rather than blog style) would be a huge improvment.

  4. #4
    used to be uno-speedo....
    Reputation: dirtdrop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts



VISIT US AT and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.