Page 21 of 25 FirstFirst ... 11 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 LastLast
Results 501 to 525 of 611

Thread: M9 Fro

  1. #501
    mtbr member
    Reputation: squiby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by squiby View Post
    Does anyone know the actual torque specs from Intense on the new lower pivots?

    I just threw the new link on my old SS1. Betterer system IMO. Used the Santa Cruz torque specs but I don't want to assume they are correct before I take it out for a little abuse.

    Edit: (to keep it on topic) I have another new link to throw on my M9 next.
    I may have spoke too soon.

    When I tested with my flex meter (grabbed the seat and wheel and pulled in opposite directions) it was WAY flexier than with the original link. Almost felt like it had play. I took the cone out and torqued the pivot bolt to about 90 In lb. That has the bike close to the flex I had with the original link.... maybe a little flexier....hard to tell with out a side by side comparison.

    Is that too much preload on the bearings? Or can i go more?

  2. #502
    mtbr member
    Reputation: squiby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by downplease View Post
    I've just put the new hardware and bearings in and it feels like the rear end moves side to side at least as much if not more than it did with the old hardware.
    So i'm curious to know how your M9 with the new bolts and bearings feels, does the rear end still move side to side as much as it did before? Also have you compared your updated M9 with one from the factory to see if they feel the same? Does a V10 have this much side to side movement? I really want to know if I put something in wrong or didn't torque it properly or if this movement is normal?
    downplease, did you remedy this issue? Im wondering if the torque specs from Santa Cruz are off for the Intense link or if it was something else.

  3. #503
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    417
    edit: just called Intense instead of beating around the bush and guessing
    60 in/lbs for the pivot axle and 125 in/lbs for the cone bolt

  4. #504
    mtbr member
    Reputation: squiby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by deadatbirth View Post
    edit: just called Intense instead of beating around the bush and guessing
    60 in/lbs for the pivot axle and 125 in/lbs for the cone bolt
    Ha, sniped! I just did the same thing.

    They also said you could apply a little more torque on the pivot axle that is preloading the bearing as long as it is not too notchy, and then check the torque once it beds in. Kinda like a headset. That is what I had already done to get the rear of the SS back to the original state of noodleness. I was hoping the new link would help it in the stiffness department but I don't notice any improvement, even with the shiny new stuff placebo effect. Oh well.

  5. #505
    mtbr member
    Reputation: eurospek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,340
    Quote Originally Posted by 8664 View Post
    One of the nicest looking DH rigs I've seen posted in a while.

  6. #506
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 8664's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,952
    thanks!!
    Saturday i change to my long expected fox 40 2012 white!!

    ride.

  7. #507
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    417
    got new bearings and link installed finally. pressing them in straight was a bit of a PITA but i figured something out in the end.
    of course after i put everything together, i find out that the new box link's shock mount is a hair bigger then the offset flip chip causing a bunch of play just as i fix one problem, another arises.
    my shock also must has puked up some oil from the last ride too. fvck me

    its hard to tell how much grease you need in the cavities so i just put a ton of Red Devil grease in there


    edit: Intense is sending new off-set flip chips to see if that will solve the problem....crossing my fingers


    heres some pics if anyone was interested

    i used a 5mm nut driver to knock the bearings out




    Last edited by deadatbirth; 12-21-2011 at 02:45 PM.

  8. #508
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jimarin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    394
    So is it just with the offset chips and fine with the 9 inch one? Mine is tight but I haven't tried the offset chip with it.

  9. #509
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by jimarin View Post
    So is it just with the offset chips and fine with the 9 inch one? Mine is tight but I haven't tried the offset chip with it.
    the centered flip chips are significantly worse.

  10. #510
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    114
    Make sure your shock reducers are pressed in firmly. It may also help if you file them down slightly (to make sure the bolt is clamping the chips tightly in the link!).

  11. #511
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    417
    theres nothing wrong with the reducers or bushings. you can see the flip chips moving around in the box link.
    the shock is off to QBP now anyway since the seal head is leaking

  12. #512
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 8664's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,952
    Done.
    Last edited by 8664; 12-25-2011 at 12:36 AM.

    ride.

  13. #513
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnozpikr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,684
    I'm considering picking up a 2012 M9 some time in the near future but would like to know what the changes from 2011-2012 are to the frame. I am assuming that the linkage update is standard now. Also I am assuming it is still available with either the DHX RC4 (Kashima?) or the CCDB. Am I correct? Anything else I should know about?
    2012 Intense M9
    2012 Pivot Mach 5.7 Carbon
    2008 Look 595
    2007 Custom Litespeed Sewanee

  14. #514
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 8664's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,952
    Quote Originally Posted by mtbnozpikr View Post
    I'm considering picking up a 2012 M9 some time in the near future but would like to know what the changes from 2011-2012 are to the frame. I am assuming that the linkage update is standard now. Also I am assuming it is still available with either the DHX RC4 (Kashima?) or the CCDB. Am I correct? Anything else I should know about?
    yes the link update is now standard.
    i prefer the rc4 over the ccdb. i dont like the the "low and higspeed"
    rebound system!!
    and go with the 2012 fox 40!!!
    cheers and let us see your beast...

    ride.

  15. #515
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 8664's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,952

    Box Link Change

    Tools you need, easy Job. i make it all up side done...
    need a 1/4 tube lube for refuel the bearings..
    and the flip chip for 9.5inch work perfect in the new box link..
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails M9 Fro-tools.jpg  

    M9 Fro-link2.jpg  

    Last edited by 8664; 12-26-2011 at 03:56 AM.

    ride.

  16. #516
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnozpikr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,684
    I have read that the MRP G2 is the only guide (outside of the SRAM guide which I don't know much about) that will fit the M9. I have an e13 LG1+ and would like to use it if possible. I have seen a few throughout the thread with LG1+ guides on but am wondering if there is anything I should know about installing them.
    2012 Intense M9
    2012 Pivot Mach 5.7 Carbon
    2008 Look 595
    2007 Custom Litespeed Sewanee

  17. #517
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    667
    Quote Originally Posted by mtbnozpikr View Post
    I have read that the MRP G2 is the only guide (outside of the SRAM guide which I don't know much about) that will fit the M9. I have an e13 LG1+ and would like to use it if possible. I have seen a few throughout the thread with LG1+ guides on but am wondering if there is anything I should know about installing them.
    I had an E13 LG1+ 32-36 on my M9, ith saint cranks, fitted ithout problems, perfect fit

  18. #518
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 8664's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,952
    lg1 with descendant crank nondrive 1 spacer drive side 2 spacers under the lg1 the fat spacer + the half from the fat spacer.

    ride.

  19. #519
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    232
    Using a SRS with e13 DH cranks and previously saint cranks, both fitted fine. Loads of pictures of M9s on pinkbike.com with all manner of guides if you want to check

    And for what it's worth Im not a massive fan of the CCDB either. Order without a shock and get a BOS Stoy. I have one on my SS1, it's witchcraft.

    Dan

  20. #520
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mtbnozpikr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,684
    Great, thanks for the help guys.
    2012 Intense M9
    2012 Pivot Mach 5.7 Carbon
    2008 Look 595
    2007 Custom Litespeed Sewanee

  21. #521
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 8664's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,952
    your welcome! a friend have it in works gold, killa to!!!

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=1&theater

    ride.

  22. #522
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    297
    Quote Originally Posted by deadatbirth View Post

    below.
    Last edited by Dwdrums00; 12-27-2011 at 11:47 AM.

  23. #523
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 8664's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,952
    for me they are wrong, left 1 right 2

    ride.

  24. #524
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    417
    zero issues with chain line with this setup on my small cassette. the SRS+ is spaced out with the thinner of the two spacers behind the back plate. on all my other DH bikes thats used RF cranks, ive used this setup....cant remember how my MRP were though.
    RF certainly doesnt make setting up chain line easy by putting a stupid amount of loctite on the shell

  25. #525
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 8664's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,952
    i use E13 Lg1 with truvativ, but never see left 2 spacers!
    sorry but instal, like it is before...

    ride.

Page 21 of 25 FirstFirst ... 11 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •