Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: starsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    252

    Fox F120 on a 5.5?

    Underforked?

  2. #2
    "Why I oughta..."
    Reputation: boboso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    207
    Quote Originally Posted by starsky
    Underforked?
    To me... Yes. I was running a Talas 130r and found myself heading over the bars requiring much lean back at Mammoth. Went to a Manitou Nixon 145 which worked out much better but the fork was not for me. Went back to Fox with a 140 Talas RLC and am very happy now.
    "Welcome to All Things Scottish, if it's not Scottish, it's craaaapp!! Can I help ye?" - Stuart Rankin

  3. #3
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    897
    Go with the Fload 140. 120 is simply too little.


    Ole

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •