Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 174
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mr intense's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    578

    2009 Uzzi vp sneek peek

    Sneek peek at 2009 Uzzi vp , changes still to be made as this is the 2nd proto but getting close. Travele adjust (like Tracer vp ) 6.75" or 7.25" 2nd gen VPP w/ new bearing zirk system, Iscg 05 integrated bb, 1.5 head tube . more specs to come.Leverage ratio in the 2.5 / 1 range , coil or air .
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    146
    Wow, very nice, sign me up please the color looks more like a candy apple red, silver base with red clearcoat.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: nybike1971's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,780
    Wow! It looks great, the red works is such an amazing paint job.

    Any guess about production frame weight?

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: twouareks's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,181
    Gorgeous! I've been waiting for you to post this up too!! Thanks!!

  5. #5
    Knolliac
    Reputation: EastBay_Slim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    404
    WOW!

    Any more info on this Mr. Intense? Fork travel range? Shock length? Frame weight?

  6. #6
    wretch
    Reputation: Truckee Trash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,652
    I'm in.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    34
    intense awesomeness. so after ordering my SS i'll need to get my hands on this uzzi and the tracer. i'll be broke dudes ...

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    35
    Nice, but replaceble dropouts should be a better choice for this frame...just my thought. It looks like 135 mm rear end, isnt' it? Maybe we'll see at Eurobike ?? :-)

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    63
    Ahhhh.... now that looks more like a replacement for the current 6.6. Like it a lot.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    433
    One of those with a fox 40 set to 7 inch will do me....
    Meh

  11. #11
    the refurbished one
    Reputation: hball's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    553
    the shock fit looks horrible. does not look like you can mount every shock you want to.
    Sokrates is dead, Galilei is dead, Newton is dead, Einstein is dead, Pantani is dead and i am feeling sick too.

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,757
    sweet.

    i trust that you'll make sure that someone using a Totem with a 1.5 steerer/headset, and tires that are large enough for loose conditions, will still have a bottom bracket height below 14 inches. as Intense knows, that was a common complaint w/ the previous uzzi vpx. not all of us want to run a zero stack reducer headset. skinny steerer tube, and smallish tires just to keep the BB reasonably low.

  13. #13
    Founder: Dirty3hirties
    Reputation: ddraewwg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,958
    Quote Originally Posted by hball
    the shock fit looks horrible. does not look like you can mount every shock you want to.

    True, but that looks to be a small....and it's just a proto. Other sizes would allow more options even in this model.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    252
    Quote Originally Posted by ddraewwg
    True, but that looks to be a small....and it's just a proto. Other sizes would allow more options even in this model.
    Looks more like a medium to me.

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mr intense's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    578
    This is another test proto set up with a Travis 180 single 1.5 & remember as I said these are still protos and there are changes in process to address shock fitament, rate etc.
    The weld on drop out is set @ 135 but uses a chip that will allow standard, 12mm or Maxle configuration & it is a lighter setup as you can see we are trying both.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: skatetokil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    387
    Quote Originally Posted by Fadl
    Looks more like a medium to me.
    So here's a question for all you industry types: do manufacturers just design and proto a medium and then scale up and down for small and large? I've always felt like medium bikes rode better even though I should be on a large at 6'3. Might just be a preference for small bikes, but it seems like lots of rigs just look out of proportion in other sizes. I imagine that just adding or removing some tube here or there would totally change the weight balance and feel of the bike.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    148
    lots of maggs here now....

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mr intense's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    578
    that is pretty much the way I do it , start @ the medium size for several reasons, it will fit more people for test riding & I always scale up and down from there as the medium is always what I consider ideal numbers ( wheelbase , height ,etc.) I have always ridden a medium size frame even though most people would put me on a large cause I like the fell of this relationship the best.

  19. #19
    Front Range, Colorado
    Reputation: DIRTJUNKIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    7,635
    Quote Originally Posted by mr intense
    that is pretty much the way I do it , start @ the medium size for several reasons, it will fit more people for test riding & I always scale up and down from there as the medium is always what I consider ideal numbers ( wheelbase , height ,etc.) I have always ridden a medium size frame even though most people would put me on a large cause I like the fell of this relationship the best.
    So if you ride a medium how tall are you? I have always rode a large at 6' 0" but I have never tried a medium so I can't compare.
    29'ers should come with a warning label affixed to the toptube.
    WARNING: Objects may be further than they appear.

  20. #20
    Stray Bullet
    Reputation: Nagaredama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,252
    Please tell me the new VPX will be available in XL.

  21. #21
    Stray Bullet
    Reputation: Nagaredama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,252
    Any more geo numbers?

    HA?
    BBH?

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: sanjosedre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    601
    I like it but with my SS I find it hard to justify a new frame for .75" increase in travel.

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    55
    just brilliant!
    the dropout thing sounds like a great way to make as many people as possible happy.

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,350
    Tracer = 5.5 to 6.0 travel
    Uzzi = 6.75 to 7.25 travel

    Bye Bye 6.6

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,530
    Quote Originally Posted by frorider
    as Intense knows, that was a common complaint w/ the previous uzzi vpx.
    Other dropouts would solve that problem EASY, but I am still waiting....

    The new Uzzi LOOKS good!
    Although from experience I am fearing that the monocoque is not as crashworthy as the tube'd frame on the old one. And again this low-low-low link on the new VPP......

Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Hot Deals

Contests

Latest Mountain Bike Articles

Videos

MTBR on Facebook