Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 100 of 207
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,420

    Ripley compatible forks

    Although the Ripley will ride OK with a shorter rake fork, the best handling is achieved with a 51 mm offset (rake) fork.

    The 51 mm offset is available from Fox (optional on 32s with 120 mm travel, it is stock on the 34 140 mm)
    Fox aftermarket part numbers for the 34 140:
    US aftermarket
    910-01-415 2013, 34-K, FLOAT 29in F-S, 140, CTD-Adj, FIT, Wht, Gold Logo, 15QR, 1.5 T, Disc, 51mm Rake, DE

    International aftermarket
    910-90-402 2013, 34-K, FLOAT 29in F-S, 140, CTD-Adj, FIT, Wht, Gold Logo, 15QR, 1.5 T, Disc, 51mm Rake, DI

    There is currently no aftermarket part number for the 32 120 mm. Fox is working on it and this list will get updated when / if we get new information.

    Also available from X-Fusion, arriving this week (March 25th 2013):
    Trace Taper 120mm 15mm White
    Trace Taper 120mm 15mm Black
    Trace Taper 140mm 15mm White
    Trace Taper 140mm 15mm Black

    Rock Shox makes 46 and 51 mm offset in 29r 120 and 140 travel forks, but the 51 is not generally stocked by shops and distributors. This one will be hard to find for a while.

    Cheers!

    Hans
    Last edited by hanssc; 03-25-2013 at 01:34 PM. Reason: More info added

  2. #2
    It's the axle
    Reputation: Gregg K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,654
    Have you guys discussed, or have any opinions on, using the Lefty with the Ripley?
    Note to self: 85% of FTP for 20 min.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,420
    I am not up to speed on the specs...
    H

  4. #4
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    This was the biggest screw up on my part since I decided to get all my parts prior to the Ripley specs being released. Guess my standard offset RS fork I already purchased goes up on EBay shortly.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,420
    Quote Originally Posted by MSH View Post
    This was the biggest screw up on my part since I decided to get all my parts prior to the Ripley specs being released. Guess my standard offset RS fork I already purchased goes up on EBay shortly.
    Check the rake 1st, might be OK.
    H

  6. #6
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by hanssc View Post
    Check the rake 1st, might be OK.
    H
    RS 29 forks std offset is 46mm. I normally wouldn't worry about it that much but want to spec mine with the fork offset you guys designed/intended it for. Wasn't Evan Plews running (and maybe still running) the Manitou Tower on his which I believe are 48mm offset?

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,420
    Understood. 51 mm would be better.
    H

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    279
    Hmm, this has got me thinking. I have a 32 Talas 120 on backorder with my LBS right now and wondering if I should call them to change it to a 51mm.

    I'm not a bike geo expert, not even close, but I plugged the numbers into a Trail Calculator for my SLR(not sure if I'm right), Fox 32 Talas 140 - 44mm offset, 67.5 HA with Angleset; and trail came out to ~93. I really liked the way the bike rode and corner. So if I use a standard Fox 32 Talas 120mm with 46mm offset, trail would be ~86.
    Not sure if my calculations are right or wrong, but not being able to demo the bike before, I have to go on something I know. I know it's designed at 80 trail, and I know it's really up to me and how I like it, but it's just got me thinking. Hmm

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Portti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    223
    Hans:

    Thanks for this fork/offset info.

    I already had ordered a Rock Shox Revelation RCT3 Solo Air 29" 2013 fork for the upcoming Ripley and it seems like it doesn't have the preferred 51 mm offset.

    I have few questions.

    1. What kind of effect does the shorter 46 mm offset on the Revelation have on Ripley's handling? As far as I understand the shorter offset increases the trail measurement (how much)? How does this affect handling?

    2. Is there a version of Revelation 29" with 51 mm offset available to end-users? I haven't seen Rock Shox even mention the offset in relation to Revelation let alone offering different offset-versions of the fork.
    Last edited by Portti; 03-20-2013 at 02:58 AM. Reason: Clarification of misunderstanding related to trail increase question
    Pertti
    Lahti, Finland
    MC Kramppi

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    279
    You can go here to calculate trail. Bicycle Trail Calculator | yojimg.net

    It looks like using a 46mm offset fork will give you more trail as it brings the contact patch further from the steering axis.

    If you read Ibis Ripley story, they decided to go with 70 degree HA to help with descending and then offset the trail with a 51mm fork to give a more snappy response. They want the numbers be in line with the SL and SLR.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: simenf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    594
    Cannot find any direct info on the RS and X-Fusion online.
    Could you please post the respective part numbers for reference?

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    279
    Hans,

    I think I remember reading in a prior post that you said you have the Fox Forks available. What's the availability on the Fox 32.

  13. #13
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by simenf View Post
    Cannot find any direct info on the RS and X-Fusion online.
    Could you please post the respective part numbers for reference?
    I put up my standard offset RS SID up for sale yesterday. I ordered the 51mm offset version yesterday as well. Mfg# 00.4018.238.003. I pulled that part # from the Universal Cycles website and ordered through my dealer Scroll down here....
    Universal Cycles -- Rock Shox SID RCT3 Solo Air 29er Fork 2013

    If I recall from the other threads correctly you are looking at the Revelations as a possible option? Problem is (which you alluded to) finding the 51mm offset part #'s for any other forks (either X-Fusion or RS) other than the RS SID 120mm is a major challenge. I searched on Universal Cycle's site and a few others and nothing

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,420
    Fox 32 and 34 are In stock!
    H

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    279
    Quote Originally Posted by hanssc View Post
    Fox 32 and 34 are In stock!
    H
    Thanks Hans! Called my LBS to switch.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: FastDDS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    47
    I spoke with Rock Shox this week and they don't have a SID RCT3 120mm with the 51mm offset. You can get a 100mm with 51mm offset though. Apparently there are some OEM 120mm 51mm's out there, but I had no luck. Cambria Bikes lists them on the website, but when I called they said they don't have them (?).

  17. #17
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by FastDDS View Post
    I spoke with Rock Shox this week and they don't have a SID RCT3 120mm with the 51mm offset. You can get a 100mm with 51mm offset though. Apparently there are some OEM 120mm 51mm's out there, but I had no luck. Cambria Bikes lists them on the website, but when I called they said they don't have them (?).
    I must have got one of the few that were left then. I ordered yesterday through bikerbob that a lot of folks here on mtbr have used.

    Edit- I should clarify that I did double check with Bob today that he did indeed order the 120mm version and he confirmed the 120 version is what he ordered. Guess we'll see once it officially comes in

    BTW - If you go to Universal Cycles website they do show as having the 120mm w/ 51mm offset available in their New Mexico warehouse (4 qty available as of this evening) available to order
    Last edited by MSH; 03-20-2013 at 07:33 PM. Reason: additional info

  18. #18
    Hello
    Reputation: charlesinoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    324
    Thanks too.

    Quote Originally Posted by MSH View Post
    I put up my standard offset RS SID up for sale yesterday. I ordered the 51mm offset version yesterday as well. Mfg# 00.4018.238.003. I pulled that part # from the Universal Cycles website and ordered through my dealer Scroll down here....
    Universal Cycles -- Rock Shox SID RCT3 Solo Air 29er Fork 2013

    If I recall from the other threads correctly you are looking at the Revelations as a possible option? Problem is (which you alluded to) finding the 51mm offset part #'s for any other forks (either X-Fusion or RS) other than the RS SID 120mm is a major challenge. I searched on Universal Cycle's site and a few others and nothing

    sent from my rotary phone

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CactusJackSlade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,467
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg K View Post
    Have you guys discussed, or have any opinions on, using the Lefty with the Ripley?
    Without proper alignment tools, just a couple straight edges, I see the Lefty being 45 or 46mm offset...

    I have one on my Tallboy now and will at least try it when I get a Ripley.

    I'm set up for a demo ride at the end of the month...
    Largest NorCal XC Race Series
    http://www.bicyclingevents.com
    http://www.UavTechReview.com
    Best in the West!

  20. #20
    It's the axle
    Reputation: Gregg K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,654
    Quote Originally Posted by CactusJackSlade View Post
    Without proper alignment tools, just a couple straight edges, I see the Lefty being 45 or 46mm offset...

    I have one on my Tallboy now and will at least try it when I get a Ripley.

    I'm set up for a demo ride at the end of the month...
    I've seen several posts that say the Lefty offset is 45mm. But the newer 29er fork might be different since those were older posts.

    Trail is affected by headtube angle and offset.

    From a thread by what appears to be a qualified poster-
    Increased offset = decreased trail = faster handling despite longer wheelbase.
    Decreased offset = increased trail = slower handling despite shorter wheelbase.

    It appears to be a fairly complicated variable in the bike handling geometry, with quite a bit more than just what I copied and pasted from the thread. High speed versus slow speed handling. Now I'm a bit disappointed since the Lefty might very well be less than desirable with the Ripley.
    Note to self: 85% of FTP for 20 min.

  21. #21
    It's the axle
    Reputation: Gregg K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,654
    Regarding the Lefty, this article says the 2012 29er has 53mm of offset. So...who knows.

    Eurobike 2012: Special Report- Cannondale Trigger 29/Lefty Max
    Note to self: 85% of FTP for 20 min.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Brisco Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    277
    Hans....Is it possible for someone at Ibis to find out at what the offset is for the most common forks recommended for the Ripley? Or better yet, get us the exact model numbers for the forks that have 51mm of offset. I simply don't believe that the average shop worker is going to know this and will order the wrong fork for the bike. Ibis should have more pull with companies like Fox, Rockshox, etc. to obtain this information. The last thing I want is to spend 6/7/8 grand for a bike and have it handle just "OK".

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Portti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    223
    Quote Originally Posted by mcgong View Post
    You can go here to calculate trail. Bicycle Trail Calculator | yojimg.net...
    Using this calculator I get 96 mm trail for RS Revelation 140 mm fork on Ripley with 46 mm offset using the following parametres:

    - Head angle 68.5 mm
    - Fork offset 46 mm
    - Bead-seat diameter 622 mm (700C)
    - Tire width 53 mm

    Changing the fork offset to 51 mm gives 90 mm trail which corresponds with the figure which Ibis gives on their website.
    Pertti
    Lahti, Finland
    MC Kramppi

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    279
    Quote Originally Posted by Portti View Post
    Using this calculator I get 96 mm trail for RS Revelation 140 mm fork on Ripley with 46 mm offset using the following parametres:

    - Head angle 68.5 mm
    - Fork offset 46 mm
    - Bead-seat diameter 622 mm (700C)
    - Tire width 53 mm

    Changing the fork offset to 51 mm gives 90 mm trail which corresponds with the figure which Ibis gives on their website.

    Yep that sounds right. I ordered a 51mm Offset Fox Float from Ibis to get the 80 trail. I'm going to ride it as Ibis intended and if need be, have an Angleset from my SLR to dial in the trail more. I usually like my bikes in the 90 range so we'll see.

  25. #25
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by MSH View Post
    I must have got one of the few that were left then. I ordered yesterday through bikerbob that a lot of folks here on mtbr have used.

    Edit- I should clarify that I did double check with Bob today that he did indeed order the 120mm version and he confirmed the 120 version is what he ordered. Guess we'll see once it officially comes in

    BTW - If you go to Universal Cycles website they do show as having the 120mm w/ 51mm offset available in their New Mexico warehouse (4 qty available as of this evening) available to order
    Bad news for me and any others that ordered (or I should say "thought" they ordered) the 120mm 51mm offset SID RCT3 fork. I called Universal Cycles just now to ask about the inconsistent information on RS Mfg# 00.4018.238.003 (some sites were showing this part# as a 100mm fork and some show it as 120mm). Universal is one site that listed that fork on their website as the 120mm version. I conveyed to the Universal Rep the inconsistencies in info. He put me on hold and called RS directly and they did confirm that that sku is the 100mm version. They are updating the info on their website to reflect that it is a 100mm fork
    I guess it's back to the drawing board for me

  26. #26
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    So I called RockShox directly on this and the Tech I spoke with was super helpful. As far as a 120mm SID RCT3 there is NO 120mm version available at this time (So FastDDS a couple of posts up was 100% spot on)

    The only option (other than finding a "takeoff" that has already been converted) is to buy the 100mm/51mm offset version and then convert the entire SoloAir spring assembly to the 120mm version. For those interested the Tech provided me with the Part # to order ---> 11.4018.010.046 BTI | Rock Shox SoloAir spring assembly, 2013 Reba/SID B (29") 120mm

    Looks like price is around $85 if you do a search on that part # on Google, but all retailers (including BTI) don't have it in stock yet

    I didn't ask the RS tech about the Revelations, etc in the 51mm offset flavor but I'm assuming it's going to be the same story

    Bottom line....with RockShox, at this point in time, it looks like you either have to perform some unnatural acts if you want the 51mm offset version of the SID 120mm forks. EDIT - looks like Brisco Dog confirmed with RS a couple of posts down that Revelations can be ordered in 51mm offset
    Last edited by MSH; 03-21-2013 at 01:35 PM. Reason: updated info

  27. #27
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    Sorry for the info inundation all but I hope this helps those of you who are looking for alternatives to the Fox forks....
    Emailed X-Fusion for their options on 51mm offset 29 forks. Here's the response...

    Yes we have a 51mm offset 29er fork called the Trace. Unfortunately the fork will not become available until early May.

    Please check back with us then.

    Cheers,


    John Valera
    X-Fusion-Shox USA
    USA Sales/Service Manager

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Brisco Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    277
    I also called Rock Shox this morning. They confirmed that the Sid's have an offset of 46mm, but that Revelations can be order for either 46mm or 51mm.

  29. #29
    I'm more of a dog person
    Reputation: unclekittykiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    864
    Now it's May????? At this rate we may not see this mysterious Trace until 2014. I may have to consider a different fork with all these delays

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,369
    Quote Originally Posted by unclekittykiller View Post
    Now it's May????? At this rate we may not see this mysterious Trace until 2014. I may have to consider a different fork with all these delays
    I wanted a Ripley with a Trace on it since the moment they were announced. I've had two different bikes since then, and been very happy on my Tallboy LTc with a Fox 34 for six months now. I'm hoping my next bike purchase will be an Ibis, either for me or my wife, hopefully with an X-Fusion fork. I'm all set on 29er FS trailbikes, though.

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    103
    Hi,
    So what are the stock forks available w/ 51mm offset in 120 mm & 140 mm ?
    I saw a SID RCT3 100 w/ 51 offset here : ROCK SHOX Federgabel 29" SID RCT3 2013 100 mm QR15 tapered 51 Offset
    On the description, they write that it's possible to switch @80 or 120mm w/ internal spacer, is it right ?

  32. #32
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by kite85 View Post
    ....On the description, they write that it's possible to switch @80 or 120mm w/ internal spacer, is it right ?
    That is incorrect according to the RS Tech I spoke with. It is no longer a simple internal spacer swap for 2013 forks. You need to replace the whole air spring assembly.

  33. #33
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by hanssc View Post
    ........EDIT 3/21/2013: Sorry to send you guys off on a wild goose chase! We are getting info from the other manufacturers on this, but the Taiwan show is happening currently and it might take a couple of days to get the info. Thanks for all the follow up posts and info. More soon.

    Cheers!

    Hans
    Great news. Thanks Hans!!

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,420
    Bump

  35. #35
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    125
    It's a shame that there doesn't seem to be a dual position fork in the market with a 140mm/120mm position option. It looks like they're all 140mm/110mm. It would be the perfect option.. 120mm for when racing a marathon; 140mm when doing some trail/AM riding

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,369
    Quote Originally Posted by Jubas View Post
    It's a shame that there doesn't seem to be a dual position fork in the market with a 140mm/120mm position option. It looks like they're all 140mm/110mm. It would be the perfect option.. 120mm for when racing a marathon; 140mm when doing some trail/AM riding
    It's already not worth the extra seals and weight for the 30mm change. It would be even less so for 20mm. It's my opinion, but you'd be crazy to put a travel adjust fork on this bike.

  37. #37
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by MSH View Post
    So I called RockShox directly on this and the Tech I spoke with was super helpful. As far as a 120mm SID RCT3 there is NO 120mm version available at this time (So FastDDS a couple of posts up was 100% spot on)

    The only option (other than finding a "takeoff" that has already been converted) is to buy the 100mm/51mm offset version and then convert the entire SoloAir spring assembly to the 120mm version. For those interested the Tech provided me with the Part # to order ---> 11.4018.010.046 BTI | Rock Shox SoloAir spring assembly, 2013 Reba/SID B (29") 120mm....
    More updated info for anyone interested in converting a RS SID 100mm G2 fork to 120mm.....
    I spoke to another tech at RS today to inquire as to when the 120mm air spring assemblies would be in stock as none of the distributors have them in stock right now. I was advised a 4/15 availability date, but this tech told me that to go from 100mm to 120mm I would also need to change the lowers to the 120mm version and change some bushings. This completely changes my plans yet again as the price to do this conversion is beyond reasonable from a cost perspective (not to mention hassle factor).
    This was also confirmed by someone else in another thread when they inquired about changing a 2013 RS fork from 100 to 120 with RS directly... 2013 Reba RL 29 and Reba RLT 29 100mm Travel adjustable to 120mm?

    Basically I'm down to choosing between going with the 46mm offset version of the RS or just get the Fox G2 fork directly from Ibis with my frame
    Last edited by MSH; 03-26-2013 at 01:25 PM.

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,135
    Quote Originally Posted by hanssc View Post
    I am not up to speed on the specs...
    H
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg K View Post
    Regarding the Lefty, this article says the 2012 29er has 53mm of offset. So...who knows.

    Eurobike 2012: Special Report- Cannondale Trigger 29/Lefty Max
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg K View Post
    I've seen several posts that say the Lefty offset is 45mm. But the newer 29er fork might be different since those were older posts.

    Trail is affected by headtube angle and offset.

    From a thread by what appears to be a qualified poster-
    Increased offset = decreased trail = faster handling despite longer wheelbase.
    Decreased offset = increased trail = slower handling despite shorter wheelbase.

    It appears to be a fairly complicated variable in the bike handling geometry, with quite a bit more than just what I copied and pasted from the thread. High speed versus slow speed handling. Now I'm a bit disappointed since the Lefty might very well be less than desirable with the Ripley.
    Quote Originally Posted by CactusJackSlade View Post
    Without proper alignment tools, just a couple straight edges, I see the Lefty being 45 or 46mm offset...

    I have one on my Tallboy now and will at least try it when I get a Ripley.

    I'm set up for a demo ride at the end of the month...
    Hans, it appears that the Lefty Supermax 29 from C'dale has a 61mm offset/rake with 130mm of travel. It might be a bit too snappy with the reduced trail, but if the A-C height is probably a bit taller than the Fox 120mm fork, it could even out in stability vs. nimbleness. Since its torsional stiffness is probably a bit better than the Fox forks, at least until you get to a 36mm stanchion, it may provide for a suitable ride, even with a reduced trail. If in fact it is reduced! I'll have to measure a Supermax 29er Lefty when my LBS gets one in.

    Here is a video from Bike Mag on a Trigger 29er teaser where I saw the spec for the offset/rake as 61mm for the Supermax:
    Cannondale Trigger 29er: Preview - YouTube

  39. #39
    It's the axle
    Reputation: Gregg K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,654
    I didn't want to chime in before the Ibis team had their say, but I have a thought on trail that might be worth mentioning. Key word- thought. Not experience with riding on an actual bike.

    The bigger the offset (less trail), the more the rear wheel is active in steering. If you exaggerate offset to the extreme, the head tube becomes like a hinge. And the frame behind the head tube swings as well as the forks. If that is the case, and I can't see why it wouldn't be, then more offset (less trail) is great for slower speeds.- Tight turning for switchbacks.

    So I believe that depending on what your favored riding is, trail can be a friend or an enemy.

    The conclusion I am coming to is-
    Less trail is good for switchbacks and tight singletrack at slower speeds.
    More trail is good for downhill and faster speeds.

    ****Oops. Edited to make sense. The post directly below is right. Now both of our posts agree.

    The point I was trying to make is that if offset were 5 feet, when you turned the bars, the whole bike frame would also hinge, making the rear wheel also play a role in steering.
    Last edited by Gregg K; 03-27-2013 at 12:36 PM.
    Note to self: 85% of FTP for 20 min.

  40. #40
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg K View Post
    .......
    The conclusion I am coming to is-
    More trail is good for switchbacks and tight singletrack at slower speeds.
    Less trail is good for downhill and faster speeds.
    I thought the opposite was true. More trail makes the bike more stable at speed but less maneuverable.
    If you look at the bottom of the Story tab on Ibis website you will see the shorter travel bikes have less trail (SL, SLR, and Ripley with 80mm) and the larger travel Mojo HD 160 has 100mm trail.

    Calfee's summary on trail and impact on handling...
    http://www.calfeedesign.com/tech-pap...bike-handling/

    "....Trail is best thought of as the tire patch “trailing” behind the steering axis. Fork offset for road bikes usually ranges from 40 to 55 mm, generating trail figures from 50 to 63 mm. 57mm of trail is considered by many to be an ideal combination of stability and agility. More trail is nice at high speeds (motorcycles usually have 80 mm of trail) but can feel sluggish at slower speeds."

  41. #41
    It's the axle
    Reputation: Gregg K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,654
    Oh, I'm sorry. I knew it was wrong, but my brain wasn't working.

    I was thinking offset, but writing trail.

    I've edited it to make sense.
    Note to self: 85% of FTP for 20 min.

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,021
    Makes sense.

  43. #43
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg K View Post
    Oh, I'm sorry. I knew it was wrong, but my brain wasn't working.

    I was thinking offset, but writing trail.

    I've edited it to make sense.
    No worries Gregg! To be honest until the whole discussion came up with the Ripley and the 51mm offset forks I never gave trail figures much thought. It's been a good education/learning experience.

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by hillharman View Post
    It's already not worth the extra seals and weight for the 30mm change. It would be even less so for 20mm. It's my opinion, but you'd be crazy to put a travel adjust fork on this bike.
    Really? I'm not so sure - I can see myself quickly dropping the bike down to 120mm for a long training ride or marathon race on a saturday, and then popping it up to a 140mm to say, race an Enduro on the sunday

    I can't see myself racing 140mm in a marathon, and 120mm in an Enduro? Maybe.. 130mm is the obvious solution here, but for a weight penalty of 100g (?) i'd probably go with a dual position to be honest..

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,369
    Quote Originally Posted by Jubas View Post
    Really? I'm not so sure - I can see myself quickly dropping the bike down to 120mm for a long training ride or marathon race on a saturday, and then popping it up to a 140mm to say, race an Enduro on the sunday

    I can't see myself racing 140mm in a marathon, and 120mm in an Enduro? Maybe.. 130mm is the obvious solution here, but for a weight penalty of 100g (?) i'd probably go with a dual position to be honest..
    I don't know why the length of the ride would matter. I could see (maybe) wanting to change the damping. The conventional wisdom is that the longer fork might negatively affect your climbing, but on a well designed bike of this type, I don't think that's the case. The amount of travel doesn't inherently make something less efficient. It's the effect of the travel on the geometry. It seems like the Ripley geo is probably dialed in as is, whether you are running at 120 or 140. If travel adjust forks performed the same as their nonadjustable counterparts, I'd say sure, why not? But if you do much research on them most people will tell you that they suffer from higher stiction and different performance in the high and low travel settings, in addition to the extra weight and mechanical complexity.

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by hillharman View Post
    I don't know why the length of the ride would matter. I could see (maybe) wanting to change the damping. The conventional wisdom is that the longer fork might negatively affect your climbing, but on a well designed bike of this type, I don't think that's the case. The amount of travel doesn't inherently make something less efficient. It's the effect of the travel on the geometry. It seems like the Ripley geo is probably dialed in as is, whether you are running at 120 or 140. If travel adjust forks performed the same as their nonadjustable counterparts, I'd say sure, why not? But if you do much research on them most people will tell you that they suffer from higher stiction and different performance in the high and low travel settings, in addition to the extra weight and mechanical complexity.
    Yep - good points.. the change would be definitely to affect geometry and climbing ability. As you say, it depends heavily on the bike, so i'll wait to hear more reviews. I just think that climbing a ~8km hill like I have on one of my training routes is going to be a hell of a lot easier in the 120mm setting/geometry than the 140mm setting/geometry.

    Similarly, descending rough technical terrain is going to be easier at 140mm vs 120mm (travel and geometry)

  47. #47
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    18
    And the Manitou Tower Pro 120mm with 48mm offset? Good option?

    I have one (100mm) on my rigid and I love how it feels, more than Fox.

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Colin+M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,948
    I think Evan Plews was/is running that fork on his Ripley. Kinda splits the difference between the Fox and RS offset.

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    145
    Does anyone have any insight on the offset/rake numbers for the soon-to-be available Pike?

    Riding RockShox's New 2014 Pike - First Look - Pinkbike

  50. #50
    I'm more of a dog person
    Reputation: unclekittykiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    864
    Quote Originally Posted by mtnwater View Post
    Does anyone have any insight on the offset/rake numbers for the soon-to-be available Pike?

    Riding RockShox's New 2014 Pike - First Look - Pinkbike
    If it comes with a 51mm offset, it will find a home on my Ripley. I was pretty adamant about waiting for the Trace, but this new Pike has totally caught my eye. I'll be pretty dissapointed in RS if they only offer it in a standard offset.

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    207
    For those wanting a Rockshox SID 120mm option for their Ripley, we found a solution.

    RockShox SID 120mm 51mm Offset Conversion | Defconcycles

    (p.s. I posted the same info in another Ripley thread)

  52. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,110
    any more info on compatible forks? Does anyone know about the PIKE yet? Are all the 2012 and up fox 34 forks 51mm? Or do we need to be careful when looking?
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,420
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    any more info on compatible forks? Does anyone know about the PIKE yet? Are all the 2012 and up fox 34 forks 51mm? Or do we need to be careful when looking?
    We have a sample of the Pike coming to check out and will report back when we know. It's highly regarded and is available in 51 offset.

    Yes, all the Fox 34 29" forks are 51 offset, you don't have to worry about getting a short rake version if it's a 34.

    H

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,110
    Thanks Hans.. now if only us loyal ibis owners could get a discount on a new ripley frame I'd be all set! Haha.. I had a chance to demo the ripley saturday, an fell in love an think it would be the perfect combination to have along side my HD.. Just trying to figure out a build, buy a fox 34 for now and build up an ride.. or wait till the pike comes out. Think I might have to just suffer with the fox for a while till the pike has seen some action an you report back on how it handles on the ripley...
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    573
    Fantastic. Thanks Hans. Inquiring minds want to know - Pike vs 2014 F34 on the Ripley

    Quote Originally Posted by hanssc View Post
    We have a sample of the Pike coming to check out and will report back when we know. It's highly regarded and is available in 51 offset.

    Yes, all the Fox 34 29" forks are 51 offset, you don't have to worry about getting a short rake version if it's a 34.

    H
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
    - Arthur C. Clarke

  56. #56
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,110
    Is there a noticable difference in performance between the 2012,2013, and 2014 fox 34 forks? Can get ok deals on 2013's..
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,369
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    Is there a noticable difference in performance between the 2012,2013, and 2014 fox 34 forks? Can get ok deals on 2013's..
    Yes. Avoid the 2013s.

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,110
    what are the differences? I'm not a fox fan at all anyway.. so I may save some money an buy a left over 2013 an just have bikeco do a tune on it. I have a hard time justifying spending money just because a guy on the internet said it's better.. haha, no offense. Just looking for some more input..
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,369
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    what are the differences? I'm not a fox fan at all anyway.. so I may save some money an buy a left over 2013 an just have bikeco do a tune on it. I have a hard time justifying spending money just because a guy on the internet said it's better.. haha, no offense. Just looking for some more input..
    I feel the same way. I have a 2013 Fox 34, which is the first generation of CTD. The compression damping is just off. They have already announced that they will be changing the tune on the forks for 2014 to address these issues.

    Personally, I'd get a Pike if you want to go 140mm. The Revelation RCT3 is also a good fork.

    There's a pervasive sense on the internet that Fox forks are "the best" and it's just not true. They are fine, but they have hits and misses. In general, I've found Rock Shox to be more consistent and also easier to service.

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ancient rascal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,013

    I'm done forking around

    Ripley compatible forks-0530131614.jpg Is this a 120 on epo or a 140 as others have said. kashima cort fox for the ripper in pic. The 120's normally have 4.75 inches of exposed travel ? I have never owned a real shock so bear with me. Rigid rider with a new toy! Thanks !
    Still searching for my red headed hairdresser Tiffany. "Economic Mother Nature" ... Knocks at door! -AR

  61. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ancient rascal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,013
    Quote Originally Posted by ancient rascal View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	0530131614.jpg 
Views:	524 
Size:	48.4 KB 
ID:	804239 Is this a 120 on epo or a 140 as others have said. kashima cort fox for the ripper in pic. The 120's normally have 4.75 inches of exposed travel ? I have never owned a real shock so bear with me. Rigid rider with a new toy! Thanks !
    Quick ... somebuddy go measure the travel in their 120 fox on their Ripper ? C'mon men help out old AR ?
    Still searching for my red headed hairdresser Tiffany. "Economic Mother Nature" ... Knocks at door! -AR

  62. #62
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by ancient rascal View Post
    Quick ... somebuddy go measure the travel in their 120 fox on their Ripper ? C'mon men help out old AR ?
    I would do it for you in 2 secs if I didn't go the "FrankenSID" route on mine. Sorry!

  63. #63
    Mtb Guide
    Reputation: Maverick005's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,023
    ID go Pike or Rev for too reasons, forget that Fox is changing the ctd for 2014, what they wont do is make it easy to tune.

    If you still don't like it and to me thats a big if, Fox say this every year about more aggressive tuning and 2013 I got caught on the 34 because I loved my 2012 40 it took some convincing to get me onto that and only after riding a National team owners bike.

    If it was easy to change the tune it wouldn't have bothered me, but even my LBS a speciality Fox service center and mostly sell ride Fox themselves have been struggling with the newer ctd stuff.

    1:Tune-ability
    2:Serviceability

    Imo far more important than having fancy gold Kashima coating

    Rockshox have made the Pike super easy to tune a linear feel or for riders like me a more progressive feel and also made it easy to self service or at-least at worse easy for an LBs to do without having to relearn the basics.

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mazspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Maverick005 View Post
    ID go Pike or Rev for too reasons, forget that Fox is changing the ctd for 2014, what they wont do is make it easy to tune.

    If you still don't like it and to me thats a big if, Fox say this every year about more aggressive tuning and 2013 I got caught on the 34 because I loved my 2012 40 it took some convincing to get me onto that and only after riding a National team owners bike.

    If it was easy to change the tune it wouldn't have bothered me, but even my LBS a speciality Fox service center and mostly sell ride Fox themselves have been struggling with the newer ctd stuff.

    1:Tune-ability
    2:Serviceability

    Imo far more important than having fancy gold Kashima coating

    Rockshox have made the Pike super easy to tune a linear feel or for riders like me a more progressive feel and also made it easy to self service or at-least at worse easy for an LBs to do without having to relearn the basics.
    I was told by the Fox rep that if you have 2013 CTD the new 2014 ctd cartridge will fit right in and will be available for sale. At least that's what I was told at Sea Otter. I can check with my friend at Fox on timelines.

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Colin+M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,948
    Quote Originally Posted by ancient rascal View Post
    Quick ... somebuddy go measure the travel in their 120 fox on their Ripper ? C'mon men help out old AR ?
    My 2013 Float 34 measures close to 6.5 inches. So I think that is a 120 fork.

  66. #66
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,369
    Quote Originally Posted by mazspeed View Post
    I was told by the Fox rep that if you have 2013 CTD the new 2014 ctd cartridge will fit right in and will be available for sale. At least that's what I was told at Sea Otter. I can check with my friend at Fox on timelines.
    Please do. Would love to swap mine out.

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    573
    Mazspeed - If you reach out to Fox I'd be interested in what they say but isn't there two things potentially changing in the 2014s - 1) a shorter neg spring on the air assembly (was lengthened to get the new curves), 2) differently valved CTD cartridge? I had assumed at a minimum there was a new air assembly with different length neg air spring to get the new 2014 curves, can't see how it changes otherwise, in addition to any new CTD LSC valving they do. Thoughts?

    Quote Originally Posted by mazspeed View Post
    I was told by the Fox rep that if you have 2013 CTD the new 2014 ctd cartridge will fit right in and will be available for sale. At least that's what I was told at Sea Otter. I can check with my friend at Fox on timelines.
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
    - Arthur C. Clarke

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mazspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,058
    Quote Originally Posted by seleniak View Post
    Mazspeed - If you reach out to Fox I'd be interested in what they say but isn't there two things potentially changing in the 2014s - 1) a shorter neg spring on the air assembly (was lengthened to get the new curves), 2) differently valved CTD cartridge? I had assumed at a minimum there was a new air assembly with different length neg air spring to get the new 2014 curves, can't see how it changes otherwise, in addition to any new CTD LSC valving they do. Thoughts?
    Ok, will reach out to my friend, but to be clear, it's a friend, not Fox. I have no special connections there other than a friend or 2. Also this friend works in quality control, so I don't think tech info will be known. But I spoke to one of the quys who worked on the 2014 shocks at Sea Otter on that Friday and went over the Bronson and looked at the CTD stuff and had a long chat. Very nice guys, could not tell me pricing or available info, but told me that the 14 stuff is really a lot different, and it seemed to be. He was the engineer on the project and he know what he was talking about, so he did tell me that the cartridges are interchangeable from the 13 and that they would be for sale separately.

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    573
    Cool. The one guy I know who has ridden the 2014s thought they rode a lot different and better. Can't imagine why you couldn't retro a 2013 though, as I have heard there were no "structural" changes per se to the forks, just think you may need to swap that whole side of the fork - both air assembly and CTD damper to get the new fork feel.

    -Shane

    Quote Originally Posted by mazspeed View Post
    Ok, will reach out to my friend, but to be clear, it's a friend, not Fox. I have no special connections there other than a friend or 2. Also this friend works in quality control, so I don't think tech info will be known. But I spoke to one of the quys who worked on the 2014 shocks at Sea Otter on that Friday and went over the Bronson and looked at the CTD stuff and had a long chat. Very nice guys, could not tell me pricing or available info, but told me that the 14 stuff is really a lot different, and it seemed to be. He was the engineer on the project and he know what he was talking about, so he did tell me that the cartridges are interchangeable from the 13 and that they would be for sale separately.
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
    - Arthur C. Clarke

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ancient rascal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4,013
    Quote Originally Posted by Colin+M View Post
    My 2013 Float 34 measures close to 6.5 inches. So I think that is a 120 fork.
    Thanks for that Colin+M and thanks to the rest of you guys also! Funny how many folks were sold on it being a 140 and now it looks to be and was specked as a 120 on the parts and billing list. It sure works well for me on my trails!
    Still searching for my red headed hairdresser Tiffany. "Economic Mother Nature" ... Knocks at door! -AR

  71. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mazspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,058
    Ok, i was told that the 14 forks are out now or will be in the next few days but had no idea when the cartridges would be out for sale. That's not her area.

  72. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation: simenf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    594
    From the Pinkbike review (Mountain bike news, photos, videos and events - Pinkbike

    "...FOX will be producing a special 120/140 Talas version (the standard Talas setup is 110/140) of their revised 2014 CTD offerings. This upcoming 120/140 Talas fork, which Ibis' Scot Nicol says will be available this coming June, makes a lot of sense on the bike, and we would almost certainly lean that way if we were to purchase Ripley for ourselves."

    When and how much??

  73. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    125
    I read the Fox fork announcements on Pinkbike as including an ability to add a spacer chip to reduce the amount of travel reduction when using the TALAS system.. i.e. you can change it to 140/120mm with a chip yourself..

  74. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation: simenf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    594
    The Talas news put that for back into contention for me!

  75. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mazspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,058
    Year 2012-2013 CTD cartridges can be retrofitted for the 14 model on sale (supposedly) this month or early next I am now told. I only asked about the 160 which is what I got but I assume, but don't know for sure, but it should apply to the entire line. Yes it does ride much nicer, way more plush and linear feeling. My ride was only 2 min long but could tell a big difference from my 12 model. Just seemed more active.

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,110
    I would love a 120/140 travel adjust fork, but the talas has one thing going against it... it's a fox! Hated my talas 160...
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  77. #77
    It's the axle
    Reputation: Gregg K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,654
    I'm working (and paying a big price) for every 100 grams I can take off. I don't want to throw it all away on a fork.

    Does anyone know what the lightest fork with the 51mm offset is that we can use?

    Since I am going to use the 51mm offset, this is the one thing holding up my Ripley build.
    Note to self: 85% of FTP for 20 min.

  78. #78
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg K View Post
    I'm working (and paying a big price) for every 100 grams I can take off. I don't want to throw it all away on a fork.

    Does anyone know what the lightest fork with the 51mm offset is that we can use?

    Since I am going to use the 51mm offset, this is the one thing holding up my Ripley build.
    The RS SID RCT3 but you have to go through unnatural acts to make it work since RS isnt offering a 120mm 51 offset on the aftermarket. Alixta and I both went the route of buying a 100mm 51 offset fork and the 120mm standard RS offset (46mm) fork and then swapping uppers from one to the other. You have to put up extra $ on the front end but you can sell off the 100mm with the 46 offset uppers to make it slightly more palatable. Alixtas shop did a write up which he posted on page 3 of this thread if you are interested.

    Edit- should add that On One is having a sale on RS forks right now you can pick up the RCT3 120 for $515.

  79. #79
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    207
    Yep what MSH said, I've got the lightest 51mm offset fork available, and a spare 100mm fork as well, all I need is an XL frame.

  80. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    9
    Hi.
    Anyone knows if the new 2014 RS Pike (Pike RCT3 | SRAM) will give the correct geometry for the Rip? I felt in love with this fork (wishing to find a black-black combination).

  81. #81
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by tassburr View Post
    Hi.
    Anyone knows if the new 2014 RS Pike (Pike RCT3 | SRAM) will give the correct geometry for the Rip? I felt in love with this fork (wishing to find a black-black combination).
    Yes, the 140mm 51mm offset version. From my understanding RS will offer both standard RS offset (46mm) and the 51mm offset. Jenson's website would be consistent with that. Hit the "Choose Option" dropdown on options you will see the 51mm offset forks available for pre-order...

    Rockshox Pike RCT3 29" Suspension Fork > Components > Forks | Jenson USA Online Bike Shop

  82. #82
    It's the axle
    Reputation: Gregg K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,654
    Quote Originally Posted by MSH View Post
    The RS SID RCT3 but you have to go through unnatural acts to make it work since RS isnt offering a 120mm 51 offset on the aftermarket. Alixta and I both went the route of buying a 100mm 51 offset fork and the 120mm standard RS offset (46mm) fork and then swapping uppers from one to the other. You have to put up extra $ on the front end but you can sell off the 100mm with the 46 offset uppers to make it slightly more palatable. Alixtas shop did a write up which he posted on page 3 of this thread if you are interested.

    Edit- should add that On One is having a sale on RS forks right now you can pick up the RCT3 120 for $515.
    Yes but, yes but... Maybe I missed it. I didn't see any mention of weight in Alixta's article. That was the motivating factor behind posting my relatively silly question regarding what we all know about our limited fork choices.

    Having said that, thank you very much for the reply. I should have realized you guys weren't doing that swap for fun.

    Phew, I'm rereading this thread again. It's a fairly scattered bunch of information. And hard to collect.
    Note to self: 85% of FTP for 20 min.

  83. #83
    MSH
    MSH is online now
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    782
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg K View Post
    ....I didn't see any mention of weight in Alixta's article....
    I weighed both the 100mm and 120mm RCT3's on my gram scale and one was 1655g and the other was 1654g. Both weighed with uncut steerer and no starnut. The CSU stanchion length is exactly the same whether its a 100mm or 120mm hence the almost identical weights

  84. #84
    It's the axle
    Reputation: Gregg K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,654
    Thanks!

    Also, I've been wondering how the bike handles with 46mm offset forks. In lieu of hearing from anyone who has ridden it with that offset, I ran numbers through the trig formula. What I found is that in order to achieve 80mm of trail with a 46mm offset, the head angle would have to be 71 degrees. That actually sounds significant to me.

    The reason is, it's a POUND difference between some of these forks, and for example the SID XX world cup.

    So it's Shylock versus switchbacks.


    Update- OK, I just got an email from Scot, and his recommendation is that personally weight isn't as big an issue as keeping the trail at 80mm.
    Note to self: 85% of FTP for 20 min.

  85. #85
    Whatever
    Reputation: MINImtnbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    562
    I can't seem to find any feedback on the Ripley with a standard offset (not 51mm) fork. I have an HD now, and trail ride with a 180 fork. I'm interested in the Ripley as a faster bike, with 140 but want to slow down the handling a bit. Any feedback?
    just ride

  86. #86
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,654
    Anybody fitted/considering fitting the new RS Pike.? Comes in 51 x 140 or 150.

  87. #87
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,110
    read the rest of the thread loamranger... everyone's thought of it, but it's not exactly out yet... Any reports yet Hans?
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  88. #88
    I'm more of a dog person
    Reputation: unclekittykiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    864
    I have one on the way along with a Monarch shock. Should be here sometime in the next couple weeks I'm told. I'll report back when it's all in my hands.

  89. #89
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,654
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    read the rest of the thread loamranger... everyone's thought of it, but it's not exactly out yet... Any reports yet Hans?
    They are out there.....in stock in the UK.....and fitted to a Niner Rip9 RDO in NZ.

  90. #90
    mtbr member
    Reputation: simenf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    594
    Hans,

    What is the availability on the Fox 34 Talas 140/120?

  91. #91
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by MINImtnbiker View Post
    I can't seem to find any feedback on the Ripley with a standard offset (not 51mm) fork. I have an HD now, and trail ride with a 180 fork. I'm interested in the Ripley as a faster bike, with 140 but want to slow down the handling a bit. Any feedback?
    I'm currently using a Reba RLT Ti 140mm with a 46mm offset. I have not tried a 51mm offset to compare it with, but it is definitely not a slow turning bike with the 46.

    I ride pretty tight twisty single track and it feels almost exactly the same(turn in speed) as my 26" Trance X with a 140 Revelation.

    The Reba has a shorter AC than the Fox 34, and I think that changes the head angle closer to 69.

    I was going to put a Pike 51mm on when they become more readily available, but now I'm not so sure if it's worth the extra cash.

  92. #92
    Whatever
    Reputation: MINImtnbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    562
    Quote Originally Posted by ccinpa View Post
    I'm currently using a Reba RLT Ti 140mm with a 46mm offset. I have not tried a 51mm offset to compare it with, but it is definitely not a slow turning bike with the 46.

    I ride pretty tight twisty single track and it feels almost exactly the same(turn in speed) as my 26" Trance X with a 140 Revelation.

    The Reba has a shorter AC than the Fox 34, and I think that changes the head angle closer to 69.

    I was going to put a Pike 51mm on when they become more readily available, but now I'm not so sure if it's worth the extra cash.
    Thanks. I am looking at ordering a Pike 140mm with standard 46mm offset. I want to slow it down and slack it out a bit. I liked the 120mm Fox on the Ripley demo bike, but it steered way too quick for me going down technical stuff.
    just ride

  93. #93
    It's the axle
    Reputation: Gregg K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,654
    Quote Originally Posted by ccinpa View Post
    I'm currently using a Reba RLT Ti 140mm with a 46mm offset. I have not tried a 51mm offset to compare it with, but it is definitely not a slow turning bike with the 46.

    I ride pretty tight twisty single track and it feels almost exactly the same(turn in speed) as my 26" Trance X with a 140 Revelation.

    The Reba has a shorter AC than the Fox 34, and I think that changes the head angle closer to 69.

    I was going to put a Pike 51mm on when they become more readily available, but now I'm not so sure if it's worth the extra cash.
    Does any of your trail riding have switchbacks that are almost too tight to turn? That's about the only reason I'm holding out for a 51mm fork.
    Note to self: 85% of FTP for 20 min.

  94. #94
    Whatever
    Reputation: MINImtnbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    562
    Most of my rides have tight switchbacks, but I'll take more stability on rocky descents over switchbacks. My current is a Mojo HD with 180 fork, and I just learn to manage the switchbacks. I want something faster but not nervous.
    just ride

  95. #95
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by MINImtnbiker View Post
    Thanks. I am looking at ordering a Pike 140mm with standard 46mm offset. I want to slow it down and slack it out a bit. I liked the 120mm Fox on the Ripley demo bike, but it steered way too quick for me going down technical stuff.
    For technical descents you may be better served with the 51mm offset as it will push the front wheel out further, increasing the front center vs the 46mm.

  96. #96
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg K View Post
    Does any of your trail riding have switchbacks that are almost too tight to turn? That's about the only reason I'm holding out for a 51mm fork.
    I do ride some very tight switchback, but If you don't already own a fork, I would suggest the 51 as there are no drawbacks to going that way.

    I just happened to already own a 140mm fork w/ 46mm offset and didn't want to wait for he pike to become available.

    I was worried it would be sluggish, but that hasn't been the case. In fact it handles so well I'm having trouble justifying the cost of a new Pike now.

  97. #97
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    202
    I just took delivery of a PIKE 51 x 140mm 29 fork and don't need my Black FOX 34 CTD 51 x 140 fork, only ridden about 250 miles on fork. Excelent shape if anyone wants one send me a PM and I will send info and pics.

    I love the FOX 34 CTD but want to try out the Pike and I can't afford 2 forks right now.

  98. #98
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,110
    Hans.. what do you guys think of the x-fusion trace on the ripley? Had an interesting conversation last night with Bikeco.. reviews were pretty stellar from them on that vs a stock fox or even the pike on the ripley...
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  99. #99
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Salespunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,804
    Quote Originally Posted by chpfly View Post
    I just took delivery of a PIKE 51 x 140mm 29 fork and don't need my Black FOX 34 CTD 51 x 140 fork, only ridden about 250 miles on fork. Excelent shape if anyone wants one send me a PM and I will send info and pics.

    I love the FOX 34 CTD but want to try out the Pike and I can't afford 2 forks right now.
    Let us know how the 34 compares to the Pike... After you sell the 34 of course;-)

  100. #100
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    306
    I'm ordering a Pike as well. The wholesaler sells a few different 51mm offset versions. There is a 150mm Dual Position, 150mm RCT3, and a 140mm RCT3. The 140's sold out quick and there are only 4 150 RCT3s left. I believe, like all other rockshox forks, they will ship with the spacers to reduce travel. Not sure why they offer a 140 and 150 if that's true though.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Ripley - believe it or not, it's here!
    By doismellbacon in forum Ibis
    Replies: 125
    Last Post: 04-17-2013, 06:19 AM
  2. 2008 Nomad 1.5 head Not compatible with newer Fox Forks
    By vigla2002 in forum All Mountain
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-07-2012, 11:12 AM
  3. 650b compatible 26" forks
    By speederson in forum 27.5
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-05-2012, 08:53 PM
  4. A list of 29er compatible 27,5ers- forks, frames
    By Davidcopperfield in forum 29er Bikes
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-30-2012, 09:54 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-20-2011, 07:33 AM

Members who have read this thread: 9

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •