Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    325

    Ideal front chainring size for 1x10/XX1 on the Ripley?

    Hans-

    I will be running a 1x10 initially and possibly XX1 in the future, was wondering what would be the "optimal" size for the front chainring? 32t? 33t? How would a 27t/28t perform?

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    629
    I beleive ibis listed the ideal chain ring range on their write up.

    If the gearing is too tall for you then riding with the smaller ring is what you have to do. I'm sure the bike will still perform quite well.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    629
    "The advancements in 29er fork technology allowed Ibis to design a bike in every size, which when ridden in the 34 chain-ring, has almost 100 percent anti-squat, reasonable standover height, and the same trail numbers as the bike maker’s venerable Ibis SL-R."

  4. #4
    More Torque
    Reputation: Diesel~'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,555
    Have you run the numbers relative to your current setup, fitness, and riding locations to determine how low of a gear you need?

    -D

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    325
    Currently running a 28T, but have ran a 32T as well without much issue. I think I heard in one of the promo videos that it is optimized around a 33, so I might go back to the 32 and try that out.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by Colin+M View Post
    Currently running a 28T, but have ran a 32T as well without much issue. I think I heard in one of the promo videos that it is optimized around a 33, so I might go back to the 32 and try that out.
    A 32 or 34 will be optimal.
    The suspension works astonishingly well with that set up.
    H
    Hans
    Ibis Cycles, Inc.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    325
    Quote Originally Posted by hanssc View Post
    A 32 or 34 will be optimal.
    The suspension works astonishingly well with that set up.
    H
    Perfect! Thank you sir, can't wait to try it out.

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Jrsandiego's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    18
    Hans... I am curious about what is the effect of running a smaller single chainring versus the 32 or 34 tooth... I currently run a 1x10 set-up on my SL-R...using a 27 tooth chainring... I prefer to pedal up a hill than hike it and don't have the strength or stamina to push the bigger rings... Does the smaller chainring overcome the anti-squat effect??
    Thanks

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    286
    I think the smaller chainrings will add more antisquat but loosing a feww tooth down to 30 or 28 really shouldn't make too much difference.

  10. #10
    MSH
    MSH is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    672
    One question I have is if the narrow Q factor (156) SRAM XX1 cranks I picked up for my Ripley build will work? I can easily swap them out with my LBS I bought my XX1 gruppo from if not

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by MSH View Post
    One question I have is if the narrow Q factor (156) SRAM XX1 cranks I picked up for my Ripley build will work? I can easily swap them out with my LBS I bought my XX1 gruppo from if not
    156 will fit just fine.
    H
    Hans
    Ibis Cycles, Inc.

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by Jrsandiego View Post
    Hans... I am curious about what is the effect of running a smaller single chainring versus the 32 or 34 tooth... I currently run a 1x10 set-up on my SL-R...using a 27 tooth chainring... I prefer to pedal up a hill than hike it and don't have the strength or stamina to push the bigger rings... Does the smaller chainring overcome the anti-squat effect??
    Thanks
    The smaller chainring will give you more anti squat. The 27 will ride fine and should feel pretty good, though you might spin out the 11 at times. I rode a bunch of terrain in the 24t on the 34 24 double the other day so I could comment on this and I can say that it rides well.

    H
    Hans
    Ibis Cycles, Inc.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Jrsandiego's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    18
    Thanks!!

  14. #14
    MSH
    MSH is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    672
    Quote Originally Posted by hanssc View Post
    156 will fit just fine.
    H
    Perfect. Thanks again Hans!!

Similar Threads

  1. 1x10 what chainring up front????
    By mjduct in forum 29er Components
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 02-10-2013, 04:57 PM
  2. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-11-2012, 12:29 PM
  3. Direct mount front derailleur and chainring size
    By nounours in forum Cannondale
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-10-2012, 06:11 PM
  4. 1x10 front chainring sizing and functionality questions!
    By simpy16 in forum 29er Components
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-29-2012, 09:18 PM
  5. chainring size on a 1x10
    By drivengsxr1000 in forum Drivetrain - shifters, derailleurs, cranks
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-20-2011, 02:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Hot Deals

Contests

Latest Mountain Bike Articles

Videos

MTBR on Facebook