Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 100 of 103

Thread: Ibis and 650B?

  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Yody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,175

    Ibis and 650B?

    So I hate to say it but its apparent that 26" is on its way out. In the next few years if you want the latest technology you will not be buying a 26" bike. I'm not a fan of the bigger wheels but this is the truth unfortunately.

    So saying that, has Ibis missed the 650B train this year? Or are they possibly taking cues from the SL-R and then the Ripley Releases and keeping tight mouth until the new bike is ready to ship if there is one? I know the HD is 650B convertible but thats not nearly the same as a 650 specific bike.

    I'm not looking forward to having to deal with the bigger wheel size but bikes like the new Santa Cruz Bronson have started to sway my feelings on it. That is a bad machine. I still love my HD and ever since owning it since late 2010 I have not had other bike envy, but I'm hoping Ibis gives me a reason to start saving my pennies for something new. And if you guys do, please make it 36MM stanchion compatible
    Last edited by Yody; 04-28-2013 at 09:58 AM.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,160
    The SC Bronson is a big deal--two guys from the shop I bought my SL-R from both went down to Santa Cruz and rode the Bronson around a couple of weekends back. One has a Mojo HD, the other an SC Nomad. They both ordered up new Bronsons.

    I re-watched the Ripley video interviewing Hans and Colin about the Ripley, and I think that the fact that they had originally spec'ed the Ripley as a 26" bike for small and medium and a 29" bike for large and extra-large might be a clue to a 650b version of it being fairly easy to accommodate. However, that probably won't make an enduro-style bike. A response to the Bronson would probably come from the Mojo HD side then. How much would it take to actually make the HD a real 650b bike? A slightly modified rear triangle (and one for the SL-R too?) for more clearance and dropping the BB a bit. The problem I see them having is that this option would slack out the HA a bit and Ibis seems resistant to doing that in general. I don't know how they could do that w/o redoing the mainframe to lower the head tube or by limiting the fork to 160mm.

    Hmmm.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Yody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,175
    I'm no expert but I'd assume they would need a whole new bike. People are already converting normal HD's. A specific 650b bike with new technologies would be where its at. I know the molds cost a lot of money, a lot of R+D, and they just released the Ripley finally. But Ibis seems like a successful business. I'm sure there is a way to justify the costs and make money after its all said n done. If the market truly is switching to 27.5" on everything and no longer updating anything 26" (which is what i've been told by more than one) a new HD is inevitable. Its just a matter of when and what

  4. #4
    MountainGoat aka OldGoat
    Reputation: pachaven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    813
    Good news Yody. I was driving thru the alley of my LBS and saw a Ibis mule being loaded into Brians van. It had 27's, a coil over and a duel crown. If that can be tested under Lopes and brought to the public soon, I will buy one!!! I miss my DW bikes and an all mountain 27 to use at Snow Summit would be killer.
    Vote with your feet.
    No bike is perfect!

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Yody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,175
    Dual crown??

  6. #6
    MountainGoat aka OldGoat
    Reputation: pachaven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    813
    Yeah sorry mi inglish es nu tu gud!
    Vote with your feet.
    No bike is perfect!

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    293
    New triangle and aheadset to gain back a degree or two and that would work well in my book

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Yody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,175
    No i meant the bike had a dual crown dh fork on it? Was it a dh bike? Wasnt tryin to correct ur spelling. Lol

  9. #9
    MountainGoat aka OldGoat
    Reputation: pachaven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    813
    I know Yody. We're good. Yes it looked ready for DH use. Again I only got a quick look and it was being loaded into a van. But the good news is that Ibis is testing a 27!!!!
    Vote with your feet.
    No bike is perfect!

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    135
    If 650b is really promising or maybe all marketing hyp. do you think all 26er bikers will just ditch their bikes and get a new one? I mean bikes are not like shoes that you can just change whenever you want unless money is not an issue for you... and besides is 1.5 difference big of a change?

  11. #11
    Mtb Guide
    Reputation: Maverick005's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,023
    Sorry to say it but thats the stupiest statement yet! i thought Ibiesians were more intelligent than this!

    Yes 29ers are selling more @ the LBS, big wheels for basically muppet riders, yes theyre are still good 29er riders, but majority of bike purchases whether you like it or not dont spend 10k on a bike, 3k is allot for at least 80% of the mtb market.

    27.5/650b is the next big thing and people esspecially in the US will buy them, honestly look at the trails most of those people ride! Not that they're aren't great trails in the US but majority might as well be riding roads.

    26er will become niche but not lost or outdated for a number of reasons.

    GEO is pretty dialled on 26ers, its taken years! 29ers and 27,5 have growing pains yet!

    Allot of manafactures have allot invested, forks shocks, frames wheels tires.

    26 will still dominate at minimum the 160-200mm arena!
    Maybe even 140-150mm theyre will be options.
    The wheels are stronger

    26ers generate speed over all terrain better by better riders.

    Theyre will be areas in racing where 26ers Enduro and DH esspecially will always have an advantage esspecially for riders that have good skill levels, racers what am I saying course they can ride hello.

    15mm axles dd not get rid of 9mm axles, carbon has not got rid of Alloy as Alloy did not get rid of Steel frames.

    Bike manafactures as I see it will become more and more Specialised esspecially big guys like Giant.

    Up to 120 / 130 - 29er
    130 /-150 - 27.5
    150 / 200 90% atleast will still be 26er

    Some like KHS will look to differeniate themselves in the market by going full 650b but this will be the exception not the norm the market is too small to lock into one wheel option.

    Basically big wheels help beginners, bigger riders, poor riders ride easier, the beginner rider is not developing skills fundamental in mtb for intermeadiate to advanced, some will but they are the few, I see it more and more every day people lacking fundamental skills like pumping a trail, good line choices, using ground features for grip or speed. I constantly here roll over speed especially here on forums that spells to me lack of skill to use terrain.

    This not just because of big wheels this phenonem started with dual suspenion but has accelerated with big wheels. Its a dumbing down syndrome so common in modern society and mtb is also consumed with it.

    I find these threads discussions just totally useless basically because people should just ride what they enjoy and stop dicking around because they have a self confindence issue about what wheel size they ride, mountain biking will be better for it and so would your riding!

    I remember when the same was said of the 2 stroke, it would die and be consigned to the history books, Honda, Yamaha, Kawa! Suzuki used to dominate this market, they went all in on the four strokes, KTM is the biggest dirt bike manufacturer in the world, why, they sell more 2 strokes than they do four strokes all because the big four Japanese manufactures ignored the key market, not just racers buy bikes. Funny now some like Yamaha while not developing them still sell brand new 2007 models and they still stand up suspension wise on those bikes on the 2stroke is still one of the best, KTM have reportedly got direction injection dialled but not to market yet, only 20 years behind outboard motors but hey!

    But 26ers are here to stay like it or not, and perish at your lack of vision if you give someone else that opportunity. Chromag 26ers in hardtails are some of the most desired bikes around just another example!

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    495
    Here's the rub about the 650B:

    At the amateur rider level they are going to be a very hard sell.
    Want a bike that is like your 26" but heavier?
    Want a bike that will improve your ability to descend thru chunk, but not as well as a 29" can?

    It seems that they are a great way to sell a bike. In the 150mm range.

    As for the Bronson, well Santa Cruz has a long history of making good bikes. Why would this one be any different?

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: doismellbacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,332
    Wow, Maverick, that's quite a manifesto.

    While I agree with you that a lot of people spend way too much time and money agonizing over equipment choices instead of just getting on their bike and building some skills, it's pretty ironic that you're laying that rant on Yody who is clearly not a wheel size fashionista, rather is getting dragged reluctantly into the big wheel era. And while I've never ridden with Yody, I'm willing to bet $100 based on all the discussions we've both joined in, pictures he's posted, and advice that I've heard him give, that he is NOT one of these hacks that needs to shut his computer off and go learn some basic skills.
    So, dual suspension is bad because it makes riding a given trail easier? Big wheels are bad because it makes harder terrain more accessible to beginners? So what innovation is acceptable? I've been around long enough to remember grey haired dudes in wool knickers bashing on index shifting because young riders wouldn't have to learn proper shifting technique. If I follow that argument to it's logical conclusion, then all innovation is bad. I guess the French guy that made the first bone shaker in the mid 1800's with wood & iron wagon wheels and no pedals or drivetrain had it right and we should all stop being a bunch of whiny pnssies wanting gears, and pedals, and pneumatic tires, and seats with padding.
    I ride 26 & 650b. I've ridden a bunch of nice 29ers but I don't own one. My friend at the LBS tells me 29ers are 90% of their mtb sales now. Many of our local trails are uninterrupted crumbling limestone cluster focks. (which I love, btw!) When you're grinding up a long steep section of that stuff, skill and fitness still make the biggest difference, but big wheels help too. And if big wheels help new riders get into what can be an intimidating and even dangerous sport, that's great as far as I'm concerned. I've known a lot of people over the years (my wife included) who were turned off to mtb before they every really got started, because the terrain was too difficult for the bikes of the day unless you were willing to make it practically a life calling (I was), and pay the blood-n-skin tax on a regular basis (I did). A beginners is a beginner, regardless of wheel size, and a beginner on a high dollar big wheel fullsusser will still learn those skills if he keeps riding enough... that's the key, just keep riding and you'll gain skill regardless.
    I grimace too sometimes when I see an obviously rookie rider on a big dollar bike, and I think "man, what a punk....doesn't know how easy he's got it." But then I follow my own advice ( and yours ) and just shut up and ride the awesome bike I already have...no hate. Trying to force the technology that was state of the art when you started riding on new riders today is a bogus proposition...that's not the way our world works.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Yody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,175
    Quote Originally Posted by doismellbacon View Post
    Wow, Maverick, that's quite a manifesto.

    While I agree with you that a lot of people spend way too much time and money agonizing over equipment choices instead of just getting on their bike and building some skills, it's pretty ironic that you're laying that rant on Yody who is clearly not a wheel size fashionista, rather is getting dragged reluctantly into the big wheel era. And while I've never ridden with Yody, I'm willing to bet $100 based on all the discussions we've both joined in, pictures he's posted, and advice that I've heard him give, that he is NOT one of these hacks that needs to shut his computer off and go learn some basic skills.
    So, dual suspension is bad because it makes riding a given trail easier? Big wheels are bad because it makes harder terrain more accessible to beginners? So what innovation is acceptable? I've been around long enough to remember grey haired dudes in wool knickers bashing on index shifting because young riders wouldn't have to learn proper shifting technique. If I follow that argument to it's logical conclusion, then all innovation is bad. I guess the French guy that made the first bone shaker in the mid 1800's with wood & iron wagon wheels and no pedals or drivetrain had it right and we should all stop being a bunch of whiny pnssies wanting gears, and pedals, and pneumatic tires, and seats with padding.
    I ride 26 & 650b. I've ridden a bunch of nice 29ers but I don't own one. My friend at the LBS tells me 29ers are 90% of their mtb sales now. Many of our local trails are uninterrupted crumbling limestone cluster focks. (which I love, btw!) When you're grinding up a long steep section of that stuff, skill and fitness still make the biggest difference, but big wheels help too. And if big wheels help new riders get into what can be an intimidating and even dangerous sport, that's great as far as I'm concerned. I've known a lot of people over the years (my wife included) who were turned off to mtb before they every really got started, because the terrain was too difficult for the bikes of the day unless you were willing to make it practically a life calling (I was), and pay the blood-n-skin tax on a regular basis (I did). A beginners is a beginner, regardless of wheel size, and a beginner on a high dollar big wheel fullsusser will still learn those skills if he keeps riding enough... that's the key, just keep riding and you'll gain skill regardless.
    I grimace too sometimes when I see an obviously rookie rider on a big dollar bike, and I think "man, what a punk....doesn't know how easy he's got it." But then I follow my own advice ( and yours ) and just shut up and ride the awesome bike I already have...no hate. Trying to force the technology that was state of the art when you started riding on new riders today is a bogus proposition...that's not the way our world works.

  15. #15
    screamer
    Reputation: budgie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,273
    Quote Originally Posted by Maverick005 View Post
    Sorry to say it but thats the stupiest statement yet! i thought Ibiesians were more intelligent than this!
    When calling others out for their stupidity, it's generally a good idea to avoid incoherent ramblings riddled with spelling & grammatical errors.

    I like 650B. I like 26". I like pumping terrain, but pumping terrain is hard, hard work. Big wheels make pumping less important to carry equivalent speed, leaving more gas in the tank, allowing for longer rides, and therefore more time riding. Win. Nothing to do with skill or experience whatsoever. These are different tools for different jobs.

    To respond to Yody's original post, I think 650B for Ibis is a no-brainer. As I've argued in other threads, the tweener wheel size really plays to the dw-link's strengths, and Ibis' version of it in particular. In addition, the HD could be timed well for an update, to incorporate everything Ibis must have learned with the SL-R and Ripley for layup, etc. With the 27.5 market in 2013-2014, the industry focus with tires, forks, and other manufacturers seems to be capable trail/AM bikes in the 150-160mm range. So both of those factors point to the HD being the obvious place to incorporate 27.5. Where the dilemma is -- and I don't envy Ibis this decision at all -- is whether to update the existing HD (new layup, tweaked rear triangle, which is so, so close already) or go with an entirely new platform, perhaps based on the 2xc design. Personally I'd be stoked on either, but given the HD's current status as industry-leader in terms of versatility, I'd go with the update. With one rear mold covering all frame sizes, you can address the entire 26 & 27.5" AM market. Offer it as an option, exactly the same idea as the 140/160 limbo chip choice. This would mean getting it to market much, much faster than a completely new frame, and presumably require far less investment. In either case, it'd give the Bronson a real run for its money. 140 or 160. 26 or 27.5. No compromises, no concessions, no drama, no manifesto, no obsolescence.
    Last edited by budgie; 04-29-2013 at 12:33 PM.
    On heavy rotation: White Lung: Deep Fantasy

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Yody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,175
    Ive been told fox is no longer going to put any new technology into any of their 26" forks....

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    248

    Ibis and 650B?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yody View Post
    Ive been told fox is no longer going to put any new technology into any of their 26" forks....
    I don't believe this for a second. First off, 26" is not dead and never will be. There are still a ton of 26" bikes sold and will continue to be sold. Second, a damper is a damper and doesn't matter what wheel size it is made for. If they make some new damper or super blingy diamond Kashima butter coating they will put it on every wheel size fork they make. And if I'm wrong...fox forks blow anyways and people may start realizing that there are better options.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: doismellbacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,332
    Quote Originally Posted by Yody View Post
    I guess my even-longer manifesto left nothing for you to say....

    Did I just jip myself out of witnessing another Yody tongue lashing? bummer

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    415
    Quote Originally Posted by Yody View Post
    Ive been told fox is no longer going to put any new technology into any of their 26" forks....
    I don't like it, but I believe it, WTB also said no new 26" tread patterns....only 27.5 and 29.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    495
    Quote Originally Posted by Yody View Post
    Ive been told fox is no longer going to put any new technology into any of their 26" forks....
    I have read this quote elsewhere.
    I asked for a source there and am still waiting.

    I won't believe this until I see Fox actually say this.

    Secondly, Fox is not impressing me right now.

    I saw there new FloAt X shock, you can not adjust the rebound without a tool.

    Their new CTD has been reviewed so harshly that they issued a new updated version on the compression damper less than a year after release.

    And they discontinued my favorite fork ever right before I bought my bike: Vanilla 36,160mm

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Yody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,175
    Quote Originally Posted by doismellbacon View Post
    I guess my even-longer manifesto left nothing for you to say....

    Did I just jip myself out of witnessing another Yody tongue lashing? bummer
    LOL! I dunno I didn't quite understand that dudes long winded rant to be honest. Sounded kinda angry with no direction, really didn't push any buttons. And thanks for the comments, appreciate it! I'm always learning new things and always trying to pass along knowledge to others.

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Yody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,175
    Quote Originally Posted by saidrick View Post
    I have read this quote elsewhere.
    I asked for a source there and am still waiting.

    I won't believe this until I see Fox actually say this.

    Secondly, Fox is not impressing me right now.

    I saw there new FloAt X shock, you can not adjust the rebound without a tool.

    Their new CTD has been reviewed so harshly that they issued a new updated version on the compression damper less than a year after release.

    And they discontinued my favorite fork ever right before I bought my bike: Vanilla 36,160mm
    Just hearsay, someone who I trust told me that, but who knows if its true. Wouldn't be surprised.

    I like Fox products, so what if FloatX needs a tool, The DBair does and I don't see people bashing that. I mean tooless is way better but I'm not going to overlook a good shock just based on that. I like Rockshox as well, both make good stuff.

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation: doismellbacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,332
    Back on topic.....yes, I think we'll see something 650b from Ibis this year, and the HD is the likely guess.

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Yody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,175
    Hmm nobody from Ibis Chiming in. That must mean something, but what it means? Who knows, lol

  25. #25
    OriginalDonk
    Reputation: OriginalDonk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    446
    I imagine Hans might be looking to preserve a bit of sanity at the office. If they even allude to a 650B frame I can only imagine how his inbox would look. I really wonder how many Ripley emails those guys received in the past two years alone. A lot of people were calling for the "Apple" product development model where it's announced when it's ready so I don't expect anything soon.

    My best guess would be any news would be released at just before dealer camp in July. I expect the Tranny 29 to be the next model announced (a few threads have pointed out a mystery T9 model on Ibis boxes). With Fox and Rockshox jumping on board with 650B last year I'm wondering if it might be a year early in the Ibis development cycle. Should be interesting to see what shakes out.

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation: getbusyliving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    417
    Look, there already is an Ibis 27.5er: Sea Otter Quick Test: 27.5ers from Focus, Santa Cruz and Ibis Conversion | Mountain Bike Review | Page 3

    Funny that the reviewer likes the Ibis better than the purpose-built 27.5ers.

    Everyone seems to love or hate the new wheel sizes. I personally like more choices than fewer, but it sure does complicate decision-making.

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    9,922
    I'm riding a SC Nomad with the biggest tires I can fit into the frame/fork. I'm not in a rush to dump my bike, but it's 5yrs old so in the next couple years I'll get a new bike and it's going to be 650B.

    Having ridden various sizes of 26er tires and owning a couple 29ers I'm sold on bigger wheels for our local rocky/rooty terrain. I think 650B will be a great compromise between handling, roll over and wheelbase.

    I'm hoping Ibis, SC and Knolly come out with 160mm travel FS 650B bikes by then so I have a few options to pick from.

    I don't see any reason to dump a 26er you love, but at the same time if you are in the market for a new bike and plan to keep your bike a while I'd hesitate to buy a 26er until the 650B options shake out and you can see what's what.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    12
    Build the 650b Ibis, I will buy it. I promise.

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mazspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Yody View Post
    Ive been told fox is no longer going to put any new technology into any of their 26" forks....
    Hey Yody, i texted my girl"friend" at Fox and she said that's not at all true as far as she knows. its a big company and what the big wigs say won't trickle down to her area that fast. She said all their technology comes from the 26 and trickles down, but they are putting out some 27.5 out first in some production models. But she said that didnt mean anything as far as what sizes are being favorited. The 26 is by far their best seller especially in the lower grade models.
    Last edited by mazspeed; 05-02-2013 at 02:33 AM.

  30. #30
    Unpredictable
    Reputation: Ridnparadise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,105
    When calling others out for their stupidity, it's generally a good idea to avoid incoherent ramblings riddled with spelling & grammatical errors.

    I like 650B. I like 26". I like pumping terrain, but pumping terrain is hard, hard work. Big wheels make pumping less important to carry equivalent speed, leaving more gas in the tank, allowing for longer rides, and therefore more time riding.


    Sorry to be picky, but are you suggesting the only limit to our riding experience is our lack of ability to keep riding and 26 wheels contribute to that? And a bigger wheel will extend our riding time and joy, rather than making us run out of trail faster, becoming disappointed and disheartened by the local riding experience? All due to the enhanced magnificence of having a larger......rim?

    In fact, are you suggesting that MTB has been limited by the failure to produce bigger wheels and that Ibis is contributing to this failure to provide satisfaction and enjoyment to it's customers and that Ibis does not love us?

  31. #31
    screamer
    Reputation: budgie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,273
    Wow. Not at all what i was saying; not even close. (????) I'm just responding to mav's post above where he/she seems to suggest that experienced riders ride 26" (b/c of the ability to pump), and 27.5 & 29 are designed for newbs (b/c of their ability to smooth out difficult terrain). I was just pointing out that there are other reasons to choose larger wheel sizes -- like on long & technical rides where pumping for hours on end is just impractical for mere mortals -- that have nothing to do with skill or experience. As I said, these are different tools for different jobs, not universal truths of one size being inherently superior.

    I have two wheelsets for my HD, one 26", one 27.5". For rides longer than 2 hours, I almost always go with the 27.5". Nice to have the option.

    Something about the new MTBR format makes it hard to see who is responding to what context. Read Mav's post above & I think you'll get where I'm coming from.
    Last edited by budgie; 05-02-2013 at 07:02 AM.
    On heavy rotation: White Lung: Deep Fantasy

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jon123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    876
    FWIW, here's where I'm heading.
    For better or worse, I think it's pretty clear 650B is the future for 140-160mm trail bikes, which I ride.
    I'd be very happy riding 26 inch wheels for the rest of my days, but ultimately I think they will fade away, and we'll be left with 650B and 29.
    I'm currently on a Yeti ASR 5C and want to get a new frame.
    I've looked at the HD, Nomad C, SB 66C, and Mach 5.7C.
    To be honest, the HD would be my first choice anyway, but the ability to convert it to a 650B (and a pretty decent one from what I've read) makes it the slam-dunk winner.
    So in the next few weeks I'll be picking up an HD frame and swapping over my components.
    Then, in a year or two, or whenever, when the 650B revolution is well underway and I want to convert my bike, I only need a new fork and wheelset.

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: doismellbacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,332
    Quote Originally Posted by jon123 View Post
    Then, in a year or two, or whenever, when the 650B revolution is well underway and I want to convert my bike, I only need a new fork and wheelset.
    Sounds like a plan....but a year or two? more like a month or two, or week or two. But hey, it's easy for me to spend your money, right? haha

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    740
    Quote Originally Posted by jon123 View Post
    Then, in a year or two, or whenever, when the 650B revolution is well underway and I want to convert my bike, I only need a new fork and wheelset.
    I would highly recommend the X-Fusion Vengeance for your HD build - awesome fork and you'd be future-proofing yourself because it can take meaty 650b tires no problem. I've lowered mine to 150mm travel (actual measured is 155) and it matches well with my shimmed Vector Air shock for a very balanced ride. HA is 67, BB ~14" with 2.35 Nevegals front & back. Love this thing.
    ride, eat, sleep, repeat

  35. #35
    Too Much Fun
    Reputation: benja55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,232

    Good job! Nice setup, please post pics!

    Quote Originally Posted by tdotrider View Post
    I've lowered mine to 150mm travel (actual measured is 155) and it matches well with my shimmed Vector Air shock for a very balanced ride. HA is 67, BB ~14" with 2.35 Nevegals front & back.
    That sounds like a pretty dialed setup. Can you please post pics of the Nevegal tire clearance at the stays? That's my biggest concern about going 650b on my HD. If I lived in a really dry climate I wouldn't care as much, but in OR we ride in muck some of the year.

    I'm still in the early, early HD 650b planning phase like jon123, though I'm in no rush right now as my HD is riding better then any bike I've ever owned. Whenever I think about making major updates I remind myself that I'm a jackass for thinking about messing with what's essentially a Perfect Bike.

    "Need" vs "Want". First world problems.
    - -benja- -

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    740
    Quote Originally Posted by benja55 View Post
    Can you please post pics of the Nevegal tire clearance at the stays?
    Here you go - ideally I'd like a bit more clearance but 2.35 Nevs are enough rear tire for me and I don't ride much in mud. For the sake of comparison I put my spare 26" wheelset back into the bike for a trail ride last week (same loop I rode the previous week with 650b). The only advantages I could feel with the smaller wheels was that it was a bit easier to accelerate on steep punchy climbs, and it was a little easier to throw the bike around - JUST a little. Going back to 650b, I can feel better traction, increased stability at speed, better rollover of small chop and that they carry momentum better. For me, the 650b setup offers a better all-around ride. If I came from a BMX or DH background I might prefer the slightly more flickable feel of the bike with 26" wheels but for my riding (aggressive XC with some AM days, lots of tight rocky/rooty trails) i'm sticking with the tweener wheels.Ibis and 650B?-hd_650b_1.jpgIbis and 650B?-hd_650b_2.jpg
    ride, eat, sleep, repeat

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jon123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    876
    Quote Originally Posted by tdotrider View Post
    Here you go - ideally I'd like a bit more clearance but 2.35 Nevs are enough rear tire for me and I don't ride much in mud. ATTACH=CONFIG]795559[/ATTACH]Click image for larger version. 

Name:	hd_650b_2.jpg 
Views:	844 
Size:	103.4 KB 
ID:	795560
    Any idea how that would compare to the Schwalbe Hans Dampf 27.5?

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Yody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,175
    Quote Originally Posted by mazspeed View Post
    Hey Yody, i texted my girl"friend" at Fox and she said that's not at all true as far as she knows. its a big company and what the big wigs say won't trickle down to her area that fast. She said all their technology comes from the 26 and trickles down, but they are putting out some 27.5 out first in some production models. But she said that didnt mean anything as far as what sizes are being favorited. The 26 is by far their best seller especially in the lower grade models.
    Interesting. Time will tell I suppose

  39. #39
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    740
    Quote Originally Posted by jon123 View Post
    Any idea how that would compare to the Schwalbe Hans Dampf 27.5?
    The Hans Dampf is substantially bigger than the Nevegal, I read a review of the 2.35 Nobby Nics in 27.5 form and the reviewer BARELY fit the tire into the rear triangle of a Mojo HD...
    ride, eat, sleep, repeat

  40. #40
    Unpredictable
    Reputation: Ridnparadise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,105
    The post was tongue in cheek - a joke. To me the concept of pumping all day means tires with tubes, not riding a 26er.

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    132
    We have some 2.4 Vee rubber tyres here that won't fit=touching the frame when installed, leaving the HD not the greatest sled for converting, especially if you want to run big tyres.

    Ibis would do great with a dedicated 650 either HD or rear, or replaceable dropouts on their HD rear ends
    Defcon Cycles - Brisbane Australia

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Geeze6700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    103
    Last evening my friend and I took out a carbon Bronson XT build demo for the evening. The bike had the stock SC Fox 34 CTD fork and float CTD shock "velocity tune". I brought along my 2012 HD 160 with a 2.35 Hans Dampf up front and a 2.25 Nobby Nic in back, stock ibis float CTD shock and 34 CTD fork. We set up same sag, tire pressure and approximate rebound. One difference, the Bronson had alu WTB wheels and the HD has carbon Havens. I have never ridden a big wheeled bike before. We were both surprised how different the two bikes were. After riding and reriding the same rocky trail we came to the same conclusions:
    -The HD climbed steep hills easily and felt lively, the Bronson felt slow and sluggish with definite bob.
    -On choppy downhill the Bronson felt plush compared to the HD.
    -Up or down, the HD allowed us to fine tune our line, while the Bronson was less responsive, but it didnt seem to matter - you just role through it.
    -Bronson- less need to pay attention on fast flowing downhill narrow single track.
    -HD much more lively on twisty downhill.
    I can definitely see why a less experienced rider would gravitate to bigger wheels. When pushing my limits on a given section of technical terrain, the Bronson felt "safer".

    In conclusion, when riding my usual trails where I know the features, I would pick my HD hands down. New ride on technical terrain, I would lean to the Bronson.

    So one conclusion and one question for you guys:
    - Bigger wheels on Bronson mellows the technical terrain. This can be good or bad.
    - Why is the ride on the Bronson so much more plush? It seems this is more of a suspension/tune issue as well as wheel difference. What are the differences between the "Velocity tune" and the "Boost tune"? I would like to get a little of that plushness!
    Last edited by Geeze6700; 05-03-2013 at 10:30 PM.

  43. #43
    Well Biked
    Reputation: scepticshock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,692
    I tend to agree with the OP, and thought the same after seeing the new slew of 650b bikes coming out. After 3 years, most things in the bike world get a major update. I would be surprised, if we don't see a dedicated 650b option for the HD next year. Having not invested in an expensive pair of carbon wheels, I don't feel too bad experimenting with a new wheel size. Having the option to swap out the rear triangle, would be a nice transition move.

    Thanks for posting the Bronson comparison Geeze6700.

  44. #44
    Too Much Fun
    Reputation: benja55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,232

    Ibis and 650B?

    Quote Originally Posted by Geeze6700 View Post
    - Why is the ride on the Bronson so much more plush? It seems this is more of a suspension/tune issue as well as wheel difference. What are the differences between the "Velocity tune" and the "Boost tune"? I would like to get a little of that plushness!
    It's amazing how much the tune of a shock can change the way a bike rides.

    I LOVED my HD 160 but found the original tune on the stock RP23 was a bit dead, not quite as plush as I wanted but not really that lively either, but it was OK. Getting it PUSH'ed turned the bike from one that I loved to what has to stand as my all-time favorite bike.

    I do think its easier to get the more plush feel with generic tunes on VPP rear suss. I rode a Nomad for years and it was stupid plush without my touching a damn thing.
    - -benja- -

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    9,922
    Quote Originally Posted by benja55 View Post
    I do think its easier to get the more plush feel with generic tunes on VPP rear suss. I rode a Nomad for years and it was stupid plush without my touching a damn thing.
    +1 - I actually got a custom tune from Avalanche for my Nomad to firm up the mid-stroke of my rear shock for better climbing.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Salespunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,976
    Quote Originally Posted by Geeze6700 View Post
    Last evening my friend and I took out a carbon Bronson XT build demo for the evening. The bike had the stock SC Fox 34 CTD fork and float CTD shock "velocity tune". I brought along my 2012 HD 160 with a 2.35 Hans Dampf up front and a 2.25 Nobby Nic in back, stock ibis float CTD shock and 34 CTD fork. We set up same sag, tire pressure and approximate rebound. One difference, the Bronson had alu WTB wheels and the HD has carbon Havens. I have never ridden a big wheeled bike before. We were both surprised how different the two bikes were. After riding and reriding the same rocky trail we came to the same conclusions:
    -The HD climbed steep hills easily and felt lively, the Bronson felt slow and sluggish with definite bob.
    -On choppy downhill the Bronson felt plush compared to the HD.
    -Up or down, the HD allowed us to fine tune our line, while the Bronson was less responsive, but it didnt seem to matter - you just role through it.
    -Bronson- less need to pay attention on fast flowing downhill narrow single track.
    -HD much more lively on twisty downhill.
    I can definitely see why a less experienced rider would gravitate to bigger wheels. When pushing my limits on a given section of technical terrain, the Bronson felt "safer".

    In conclusion, when riding my usual trails where I know the features, I would pick my HD hands down. New ride on technical terrain, I would lean to the Bronson.

    So one conclusion and one question for you guys:
    - Bigger wheels on Bronson mellows the technical terrain. This can be good or bad.
    - Why is the ride on the Bronson so much more plush? It seems this is more of a suspension/tune issue as well as wheel difference. What are the differences between the "Velocity tune" and the "Boost tune"? I would like to get a little of that plushness!
    The Bronson is more plush out of the box, but a Push tune will blow your mind. The new Fox piggyback is a similar setup to the RS Monarch Plus (dual circuit damping and three position compression setup) and I sure that Push will have a tune for that very soon. When I changed from the RP23 to the Monarch Plus it was like I bought a new bike.

  47. #47
    All bike, all the time
    Reputation: BikeIntelligencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,072
    I don't see why the bike industry can't offer all 3. That said, 650b is lost on me. I'm 6-1 and the difference between 26 and 650b is why bother? Whereas 29 does feel like a different bike, for different applications. Most of the 650b riders I've talked to are in the 5-8 to 5-10 range and love their bikes. And what they say is they tried 29 and it just felt too big. So there's the key...
    All bike, all the time

  48. #48
    All bike, all the time
    Reputation: BikeIntelligencer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,072
    As for the Bronson, well Santa Cruz has a long history of making good bikes. Why would this one be any different?
    I agree with everything you say if you delete the words "long" and "good."

    Maybe it's just me but VPP just doesn't feel right and SC cockpit doesn't fit. To each his own, I'll stick with Ibis and Pivot...
    All bike, all the time

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mazspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,058
    Quote Originally Posted by BikeIntelligencer View Post
    I agree with everything you say if you delete the words "long" and "good."

    Maybe it's just me but VPP just doesn't feel right and SC cockpit doesn't fit. To each his own, I'll stick with Ibis and Pivot...
    Santa Cruz does make good bikes. This is not in debate. What is, is the vpp design. It does some things well, and does some things poorly. The DW is a better design. It does everything very well and can be tuned even further. If you want your HD to be plush, you can, if you like it more direct you can do that too something you can't do as well on vpp. I have not ridden the Bronson as of yet, so I cannot give my 2 cents, but from what I understand is that it rides like a vpp bike which i dislike immensely. To people that like it, the bike looks really nice and should do just fine. Personally i wont give up my HD.

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    495
    Quote Originally Posted by BikeIntelligencer View Post
    I agree with everything you say if you delete the words "long" and "good."

    Maybe it's just me but VPP just doesn't feel right and SC cockpit doesn't fit. To each his own, I'll stick with Ibis and Pivot...
    So first things first: I ride an HD that I chose over the Nomad Carbon.

    However I have demo'd a couple of their Bikes and they performed really well.
    The reason I did not buy them is because they never really seemed to flow with the way I ride. They did everything well, but never felt quite right.

    They are still a good company making good bikes. From the Blur , to the Nomad, to the TallBoy, they have a clear history of making quality bikes.

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,169
    Ideally I wanted an HD but not without a dedicated 650B rear triangle to fit all available "B" tires. I considered a Bronson and also the Intense carbine 275 but something about the VPP suspension kinematics of those 2 bikes I just don't like. I ended up buying a new Banshee Spitfire V2 frame instead. It's VPP is very different in action from the SC or Intense and much more similar to a DW Link or Maestro and like the HD can use either 26" or 650B wheels (but everything fits). I think Banshee really nailed it here. Still, I really hope Ibis makes a retro-fit rear triangle for the HD as well as a completely new 650 bike. I also hope they keep that ability to run it either 140 or 160 for that extra bit of versatility......and it happens SOON not 2 or 3 years from now.

    Santa Cruz Bronson suspension charts Google Translate

    Banshee Rune, Mojo HD, Giant Reign suspension charts Google Translate
    2013 Banshee Spitfire V2 650b

  52. #52
    OriginalDonk
    Reputation: OriginalDonk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    446
    I follow a few people on Twitter to see if they drop any hints about products in the pipeline. Dave Weagle was alluding to a few new models for a while across DW brands. Lopes posted a few Ripley photos before the official launch. He just posted a tweet referring to 650B below and here:

    "Brian Lopes ‏@BrianLopes 10h

    Can't remember the last time I saw some of these. Most if u probably have no clue what they R. & they r going in 650b pic.twitter.com/kpgXyUhMDm"

    My best guess is that they're well into product testing but won't hit go until they're really pleased with what they have. Sounds like Hans is never satisfied, something I would seek out in a mechanical engineer designing what I ride.

    Maybe somebody in Orange County will see Lopes on something soon and estimate a few things like travel or comment on a linkage.

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Geeze6700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    103
    Found this pic on Lopes twitter gallary. Check out the apparent tire height between the HD and the ripley:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Ibis and 650B?-bjzepokciaae3ps.jpg  


  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Yody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,175
    Doesnt' look like a 650 fork or tire

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,169
    X-Fusion Vengeance fork which is 650B certified. Not much room in that arch and it kinds does look 650Bish to me.

    He's got a Bikeco.com sticker on it. Aren't those guys into doing all kinds of 650B conversions including the Mojo HD and Pivot Mach 5.7
    2013 Banshee Spitfire V2 650b

  56. #56
    Commit or eat sh!t
    Reputation: Cable0guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,384
    Quote Originally Posted by Yody View Post
    So I hate to say it but its apparent that 26" is on its way out. In the next few years if you want the latest technology you will not be buying a 26" bike.

    ....

    Ive been told fox is no longer going to put any new technology into any of their 26" forks....


    Late to this party, but talk about trolling...

  57. #57
    Well Biked
    Reputation: scepticshock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,692
    So, is Lopes loving 29 inch tires now? The impression I got from reading his mountain biking skills book was that he was not big fan.
    Thats interesting that he would choose the Ripley, over the HD for the Sea Otter DH.

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mazspeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Geeze6700 View Post
    Found this pic on Lopes twitter gallary. Check out the apparent tire height between the HD and the ripley:
    Lopes has said that the HD rides better with the 26 inch wheels.

  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jazzanova's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,783

    Re: Ibis and 650B?

    That is a 1UP USA bike rack, the racks are not at the same level. The outer rack with HD is further from the ground than the one with the Ripley.

    Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

  60. #60
    Too Much Fun
    Reputation: benja55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,232

    It wasn't Oswald...

    Quote Originally Posted by jazzanova View Post
    That is a 1UP USA bike rack, the racks are not at the same level. The outer rack with HD is further from the ground than the one with the Ripley.
    DOOOOD. Why are you messing with a good conspiracy theory!
    - -benja- -

  61. #61
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    449
    Nope thats a 26 wheel, I have the exact same fork with a 650B I have much less room than that fork and wheel combo

  62. #62
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by jazzanova View Post
    That is a 1UP USA bike rack, the racks are not at the same level. The outer rack with HD is further from the ground than the one with the Ripley.

    Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
    Ding ding ding!

  63. #63
    The MTB Lab
    Reputation: pastajet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,429
    Quote Originally Posted by stu44 View Post
    We have some 2.4 Vee rubber tyres here that won't fit=touching the frame when installed, leaving the HD not the greatest sled for converting, especially if you want to run big tyres.

    Ibis would do great with a dedicated 650 either HD or rear, or replaceable dropouts on their HD rear ends
    The Vee Rubber Trail Takers fit, but don't leave much room. First time you get in mud or snow they might remove some paint in the yoke.

    Which Vee Rubber tire are you referring to?

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    132
    Quote Originally Posted by pastajet View Post
    The Vee Rubber Trail Takers fit, but don't leave much room. First time you get in mud or snow they might remove some paint in the yoke.

    Which Vee Rubber tire are you referring to?
    The Flows , I'll get some pics when the bike comes back from demo with em on.
    Defcon Cycles - Brisbane Australia

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    216
    Quote Originally Posted by Cable0guy View Post
    Late to this party, but talk about trolling...
    Has any wheel size ever died? I'm all for options, but I certainly don't want to see 26er options fade.

    My HD 26er rips in Colorado. I can climb the Rockies with 160mm of travel without my front end feeling too tall (barely), and still have 160mm of travel to land drops and jumps on the way down at 210 lbs. And I've never wanted bigger wheels while navigating the tight, steep switchbacks.

    650b at 160mm with the same angles would make the front end taller, unless I'm missing something. I am not a pro, nor do I care what the pros are doing on which wheels. I'm sure many folks better at this game than me can push a bike up 5000 vertical feet with a tall front end. I just don't want to. I climb to huck, and need all the help I can get on the way up. To further drive my point home, I run a 180-150 travel adjust Totem. I wouldn't even want to run 150mm travel on 650b wheels on a bike designed around 150mm travel (Bronson I think).

    I'd rather not see the market dictated solely by Texans or the "rocky rooty" flatlander crowd. I have a 29er hard tail. It's great. I used to live in Austin. It's great. Just please don't make my 26er HD obsolete. Out of style? Fine. Just don't make it obsolete.

    I'm actually in the market for 650b other than a lack of money and garage space. It has its place, just not in the HD at 160mm travel. In my opinion.

    Here's how I see it for my ability and trails, I'm 6'0" tall...

    29er.. hardtail only, no more than 100mm travel

    650b.. 100-140mm, full suspension or hard tail.

    26er.. 120-200mm travel, full suspension.

    Everything expressed here is, like, my opinion, man. So try not to take it as anything other than, like, my opinion, man. Just throwing in my vote to save the 26er... and expand the 650b market at the same time. Even though my OPINION is that 650b is hitting the wrong market (140-160mm) at the moment.

    So there's my vote, in case the Ibis gods are listening. Not trying to tell people what to ride on their trails for their ability. I just want to save my Mojo HD 150-180mm 26er in case I ever need a new one, or even just new wheels. For now, I'll just hope this one lasts forever. I've never been on a bike that keeps me from lusting over bikes that aren't mine a year later. With the HD, I'm on it. Trend away, just please let me ride my 26er HD in peace for years to come.

  66. #66
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,895
    I am not quite sure why some people have a problem with admitting that 650b wheels might be a great fit for 150-160mm bikes. I am wishing for a dedicated 650b rear triangle for my HD but i am not keeping my hopes up high.

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Bones2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    323

    Ibis and 650B?

    Quote Originally Posted by Geeze6700 View Post
    Found this pic on Lopes twitter gallary. Check out the apparent tire height between the HD and the ripley:
    Talking about showing up to the trail in style, two ibis and a Porshe.

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bpnic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,390

    Re: Ibis and 650B?

    Quote Originally Posted by StiHacka View Post
    I am not quite sure why some people have a problem with admitting that 650b wheels might be a great fit for 150-160mm bikes. I am wishing for a dedicated 650b rear triangle for my HD but i am not keeping my hopes up high.
    I'm running a shimmed 650b HD @160 with a 150mm RS up front and its bomber. Flow ex rims and nevegal 2.35 with no rubbing in the rear.
    Love it. And I've always been a 26er @ heart.
    I'd hit it, but I bruise like a peach.

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    740
    Quote Originally Posted by bpnic View Post
    I'm running a shimmed 650b HD @160 with a 150mm RS up front and its bomber. Flow ex rims and nevegal 2.35 with no rubbing in the rear.
    Love it. And I've always been a 26er @ heart.
    Hey bpnic, have you tried running the bike in 26" form with big tires like Hans Dampfs? I converted my HD to 650b shortly after buying it and have been running Nev 2.35's front and back as well, but I recently tossed my 26" wheelset back on and find that with the smaller wheels the bike is noticeably punchier and motors up steep climbs better. I have a set of 26x2.35 Hans Dampfs on order and will be doing a back-to-back comparison between the 650b Nevegal set up and the 26" Hans Dampfs. I ride a lot of rocky and rooty trails and suspect that the smaller wheels and meatier tires will serve me a bit better than the 650b setup but I'm interested to compare the two.

    Has anyone else tried a Mojo HD setup with both 26"+meaty rubber and 650b?
    ride, eat, sleep, repeat

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation: bpnic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,390
    Quote Originally Posted by tdotrider View Post
    Hey bpnic, have you tried running the bike in 26" form with big tires like Hans Dampfs? I converted my HD to 650b shortly after buying it and have been running Nev 2.35's front and back as well, but I recently tossed my 26" wheelset back on and find that with the smaller wheels the bike is noticeably punchier and motors up steep climbs better. I have a set of 26x2.35 Hans Dampfs on order and will be doing a back-to-back comparison between the 650b Nevegal set up and the 26" Hans Dampfs. I ride a lot of rocky and rooty trails and suspect that the smaller wheels and meatier tires will serve me a bit better than the 650b setup but I'm interested to compare the two.

    Has anyone else tried a Mojo HD setup with both 26"+meaty rubber and 650b?

    I've run, in the past, Conti MK 2.4'S with a 26" setup, but prefer the Nevegal 2.35" (650b) set up. I feel it actually rolls faster without giving up too much in the areas of acceleration, jumps, drops, or maneuverability.
    I'm really digging it so far here in Ny.

    Note: I've been on 26" wheels for 15 years or so and stand about 5'10" tall (Medium HD)
    I'd hit it, but I bruise like a peach.

  71. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    134
    I sure hope we see the relase of the Mojo 650b (150mm) bike from IBIS as I love my Mojo I bought in 2008 and I need a new bike by the end of the year. I hate to say it, but I might be the proud new owner of a SC Bronson if I don't hear anything. I think the 150mm travel 650b Mojo would be a perfect bike to fill the gap. Ibis ??
    I have my fingers crossed as I love the DWLink.

  72. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    12
    same here. I just had my 4th year of ownership anniversary. And I am ready for a 650b.

    Quote Originally Posted by dcpowpow View Post
    I sure hope we see the relase of the Mojo 650b (150mm) bike from IBIS as I love my Mojo I bought in 2008 and I need a new bike by the end of the year. I hate to say it, but I might be the proud new owner of a SC Bronson if I don't hear anything. I think the 150mm travel 650b Mojo would be a perfect bike to fill the gap. Ibis ??
    I have my fingers crossed as I love the DWLink.

  73. #73
    banned
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,895
    Quote Originally Posted by bpnic View Post
    I'm running a shimmed 650b HD @160 with a 150mm RS up front and its bomber. Flow ex rims and nevegal 2.35 with no rubbing in the rear.
    Love it. And I've always been a 26er @ heart.
    Yep, these conversions are pretty sweet. I like mine a lot, too. I run it with a Hans Dampf 2.25 with snakeskin protection and trailstar compound in the rear, a really nice tire for the HD.

  74. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,110
    Why the heck are you looking for a 150mm 650b HD? Why don't you just make one? The tech is there.. I would NEVER in my life trade my bike even as a 26er for a SC bronson.. crazy, just crazy.. just having the HD be compatible for 650b (so you can't run a full out DH tire.. big deal) speaks to how awesome and how much MORE awesome the HD is than alot of the other crap on the market!
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  75. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,110
    Also, I have a Bikeco custom tuned roco tst air, an bikeco has told me that with that shock they will custom tune it to 153mm for 650b and tune it specifically to the HD's suspension to run a 650b rear. Then, if that stupid RS PIKE ever comes out.. that will turn the HD into a 153mm rear and a 160mm front 650b singletrack slayer! That's my plan anyway... or, bikeco says they do custom fox 34's as well... tempting, but I hate fox suspension
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    134
    I don't really want the HD and the HD has a pretty high bottom bracket with 27.5" wheels on it. It is not bad, but really, how about a desinged for 650b frame that is between the HD and the SLR.. 150mm travel.. Sounds better to me and yup, that is what the Bronson is. So, no I am not running right out to buy one yet, but the answer to 650b is not just "change the wheels".

  77. #77
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    495
    Quote Originally Posted by dcpowpow View Post
    I don't really want the HD and the HD has a pretty high bottom bracket with 27.5" wheels on it. It is not bad, but really, how about a desinged for 650b frame that is between the HD and the SLR.. 150mm travel.. Sounds better to me and yup, that is what the Bronson is. So, no I am not running right out to buy one yet, but the answer to 650b is not just "change the wheels".
    I would be very cautious in buying a carbon Santa Cruz bike in the near future. They are currently having issues with the rear axle de-bonding on multiple models.

    As for the Bronson, read the I-mtb review of the Bronson. They rode it back to back with a nomad. So far this is the first review that will actually admit that 650B has handling trade-offs.
    Last edited by saidrick; 05-15-2013 at 12:21 PM. Reason: Wrong word choice.

  78. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    134
    I can't find that review, but found this one...
    Santa Cruz Bronson Review | Mountain Bike Review

  79. #79
    mtbr member
    Reputation: doismellbacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,332
    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    Why the heck are you looking for a 150mm 650b HD? Why don't you just make one? The tech is there..
    Yeah, I agree. I guess if you're riding flow trails and want a 13.0" unsagged bb height, a converted HD won't get you there. But why the hell would you want 650b and that much travel anyway if that's what you're riding.

  80. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    134
    The trails I ride have steep rocky climbs to rocky technical downhills with drops up to 3 feet or so. I am older (49), so not riding too crazy, but I need a bike to perform in a huge range as I need to climb what i come down most of the time. I like technical terrain though and certainly do not want my bike to suffer when I start to push it.
    My Mojo currently has a 27.5" front wheel and TALAS 150mm forks.
    All else is stock size. It is awesome, so I would like basically the same bike, but 150mm shock in the frame and a 27.5" wheel in the back. I know I can cram opne in my frame, but that is a bit tight and I have to reduce my travel in the rear shock a tad..
    I hope you see where I am at...

  81. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,110
    Quote Originally Posted by dcpowpow View Post
    The trails I ride have steep rocky climbs to rocky technical downhills with drops up to 3 feet or so. I am older (49), so not riding too crazy, but I need a bike to perform in a huge range as I need to climb what i come down most of the time. I like technical terrain though and certainly do not want my bike to suffer when I start to push it.
    My Mojo currently has a 27.5" front wheel and TALAS 150mm forks.
    All else is stock size. It is awesome, so I would like basically the same bike, but 150mm shock in the frame and a 27.5" wheel in the back. I know I can cram opne in my frame, but that is a bit tight and I have to reduce my travel in the rear shock a tad..
    I hope you see where I am at...
    I see your point about BB height. But, if your not blasting berms at high speed an tryin to get low, wouldn't a slightly higher bottom bracket be better in chunky situations, and rock gardens? Stock HD unsagged BB height is 13.8 Unsagged bronson 13.6. Depending on which tires they spec with that you could be talking 10mm +/- just by changing tires.. Then there's the rocky mountain altitude 650b which doesn't list a bb height on the website, but I know for a fact with nobby nics it's right around 14". I ride in New england, a slightly higher BB isnt' always a bad thing tryin to roll over certain sections..

    For me, personally speaking.. I think i will be taking my 170mm lyrik and swapping it for a 160 pike (dropping almost a pound!) switching over to 650b front an rear, having bikeco tune my TST air for 650 rear an run it. so it has a slightly higher bottom bracket.. eh, not a big deal. I can't see it changing the Geo that much, as right now I'm at 65.5 HA, with 170 front an 160 rear..

    I suppose if I were in the market for a brand new bike I might consider something else, but after being on my HD for a year an half I can't imagine buying anything but what I have...
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  82. #82
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    495
    Quote Originally Posted by dcpowpow View Post
    I can't find that review, but found this one...
    Santa Cruz Bronson Review | Mountain Bike Review
    Www.i-mtb.com/Santa-Cruz-Bronson-27-5

    If you google. " I-mtb.com Santa Cruz Bronson" it should pop up.

  83. #83
    screamer
    Reputation: budgie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,273
    Personally I don't find the BB height to be a problem on my converted HD (running @140mm). One of the great attributes of DW link is being able to run whatever sag you want without adversely affecting pedaling characteristics. So for me, the 30-35% sag puts the BB nice and low, without getting all wallow-y. I have yet to find another suspension platform that allows the same level of freedom for sag and therefore ride geometry. Given that I was getting a lot of pedal strikes @140mm with 26" wheels anyway, the 27.5" setup was a welcome change for rocky terrain, particularly climbing.

    Sorry to drone on, but my basic point is that geo charts don't tell the whole story about the implications of 27.5 HD conversions on BB height.
    On heavy rotation: White Lung: Deep Fantasy

  84. #84
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    134
    I assume this has been discussed in other threads, but from what I hear, a HD 140mm converts to 27.5" with no mods ?

  85. #85
    screamer
    Reputation: budgie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,273
    Yes, that's correct.
    On heavy rotation: White Lung: Deep Fantasy

  86. #86
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    740
    Quote Originally Posted by dcpowpow View Post
    I assume this has been discussed in other threads, but from what I hear, a HD 140mm converts to 27.5" with no mods ?
    also, although not officially sanctioned by Ibis, you can run a 7.875x2.25 shock with the 140mm limbo chips for ~150mm travel and 650b wheels. I believe this would result in a lower BB than a shimmed 8.5x2.5 with 160mm chips.
    ride, eat, sleep, repeat

  87. #87
    mtbr member
    Reputation: manchvegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,110
    good point on the sag.. didn't even think of that. I routinely run 30% sag an it's perfect.. the more I read, the more I'm convinced of doing 650b on my HD. Now if continental would just get on board an produce some tires that'd be great.. (I've been running MKII's for so long I don't wanna switch)
    Full time rider part time racer...

    See my adventures here..

    https://www.instagram.com/projectnortheast/

  88. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation: doismellbacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,332
    Quote Originally Posted by dcpowpow View Post
    The trails I ride have steep rocky climbs to rocky technical downhills with drops up to 3 feet or so. I am older (49), so not riding too crazy, but I need a bike to perform in a huge range as I need to climb what i come down most of the time. I like technical terrain though and certainly do not want my bike to suffer when I start to push it.
    My Mojo currently has a 27.5" front wheel and TALAS 150mm forks.
    All else is stock size. It is awesome, so I would like basically the same bike, but 150mm shock in the frame and a 27.5" wheel in the back. I know I can cram opne in my frame, but that is a bit tight and I have to reduce my travel in the rear shock a tad..
    I hope you see where I am at...
    Hey powpow, I can see exactly where you're at.... we ride the same kind of trails, and our bikes sound really similar too. Mine's an SL w/ 150 Revelation, 650b front /26 rear at the moment since my 650b rear wheel is "in the shop". Heck, we're even around the same age...you've just got 3 years on me, Gramps
    It's a great setup... and I like it with 650b rear but admit that it's a compromise with the limited clearance. However that's not so much the case with the HD. You could build one today with 650b f&r, 140-150mm rear travel, 150 front travel, and end up with a bb height somewhere around 13.8"....generally considered ideal for a 150mm bike meant to tame rough trails. If the lower bb height is a priority stay with 140mm rear travel and put an offset shock bushing on it. That's what I do with my SL when the 650b rear is on there to keep the bb height at 13.6-7, vs 13.9 with the standard shock mount. You still couldn't use the biggest of the big tires, but I think most of those are overkill for the rear.
    Anyway, not trying to lecture you.... obviously a purpose-built Mojo 27.5 would be awesome, but "ideal" is subjective and spans a pretty wide range. The HD, with a thoughtful 650b setup, looks ideal to me for rough steep technical trails, and would definitely be my preference over a Bronson.... I'll take DW Link w/ no super fat rear tires over VPP any day.

  89. #89
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    134
    Thanks for all the info on the Mojo HD mods. I did not realize it was so easy to convert to 27.5 and I agree with the DWLink. I love it. A Mojo HD could be in my future as the versatility of making it the bike I want appears to be available.

  90. #90
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    574
    budgie - What is your measured unsagged BB height? On paper I would expect it to be about 350mm / 13.8" but want to make sure I'm not wrong in my 650B conversion math.

    Quote Originally Posted by budgie View Post
    Personally I don't find the BB height to be a problem on my converted HD (running @140mm). One of the great attributes of DW link is being able to run whatever sag you want without adversely affecting pedaling characteristics. So for me, the 30-35% sag puts the BB nice and low, without getting all wallow-y. I have yet to find another suspension platform that allows the same level of freedom for sag and therefore ride geometry. Given that I was getting a lot of pedal strikes @140mm with 26" wheels anyway, the 27.5" setup was a welcome change for rocky terrain, particularly climbing.

    Sorry to drone on, but my basic point is that geo charts don't tell the whole story about the implications of 27.5 HD conversions on BB height.
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
    - Arthur C. Clarke

  91. #91
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    574
    I'm looking at doing the same conversion from a Lyrik 170 to a Pike 27.5 fork and looking at both a Pike 150 with a -0.5 Angleset and a Pike 160. Curious on people's experiences on 650B HD handling with a 150 and a 160 fork?

    I personally worried about adding to the BB height to do the conversion and don't want to raise mine higher than it is today. Any one with first hand experience on running offset bushings on a 8.5x2.5 shock to lower the BB? Other than the need to shim - any down sides vs running a 7.875x2.25?

    -Shane

    Quote Originally Posted by manchvegas View Post
    I see your point about BB height. But, if your not blasting berms at high speed an tryin to get low, wouldn't a slightly higher bottom bracket be better in chunky situations, and rock gardens? Stock HD unsagged BB height is 13.8 Unsagged bronson 13.6. Depending on which tires they spec with that you could be talking 10mm +/- just by changing tires.. Then there's the rocky mountain altitude 650b which doesn't list a bb height on the website, but I know for a fact with nobby nics it's right around 14". I ride in New england, a slightly higher BB isnt' always a bad thing tryin to roll over certain sections..

    For me, personally speaking.. I think i will be taking my 170mm lyrik and swapping it for a 160 pike (dropping almost a pound!) switching over to 650b front an rear, having bikeco tune my TST air for 650 rear an run it. so it has a slightly higher bottom bracket.. eh, not a big deal. I can't see it changing the Geo that much, as right now I'm at 65.5 HA, with 170 front an 160 rear..

    I suppose if I were in the market for a brand new bike I might consider something else, but after being on my HD for a year an half I can't imagine buying anything but what I have...
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
    - Arthur C. Clarke

  92. #92
    screamer
    Reputation: budgie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,273
    Yep, 13.75 with neo moto 2.3's, 150mm revelation (529mm a-c).
    On heavy rotation: White Lung: Deep Fantasy

  93. #93
    mtbr member
    Reputation: doismellbacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,332
    Yep, if it weren't for kid's tuition I'd be ordering a new Pike 150 to go on a HD @ 140mm with offset shock bushings.

  94. #94
    Mtb Guide
    Reputation: Maverick005's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,023
    This is what 650b brings ya on real trails

    Nico practice first rd EWS, will be interesting to see what the hardest round of the EWS throughs up, results re riders and machine, never has an event replicated more what we ride everyday, let the blood fall where it may and see which wheel is left standing

    Go team Ibis!

  95. #95
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Accident Prone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    87
    ...

  96. #96
    Mtb Guide
    Reputation: Maverick005's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,023
    Quote Originally Posted by Accident Prone View Post
    See Lopes is riding a Ripley at EWS, WTF!! Why would he not be on his HD?? an XC 29er, seriously!?? He obviously doesn't want to win. He is riding the most least capable bike out of every single rider entered in the series.

    Maybe Ibis have told him he has to ride it?
    I know, I had him on my Dirt Fantasy team, because I couldnt afford Manuel Ducci and Fabien B and Anne Carro, so I chose Lopesy as an Ibis rider in place of MD.

    This course will not suit the bigger wheels imo, I wish he was on the HD. I might have to trade his arse for someone else of a similar value who can also garner me points lol.

    BTW you can join my Private league to compete if you wish!

    RotoVegas Enduro Bush Pilots
    League PIN: 21232

    Dirt Fantasy League, Gentleman!


  97. #97
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Accident Prone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    87
    Can you have your team in 2 private leagues? I am already in one. haha I have similar riders to you. I ditched Barel for ACC as she will be easy points. I went Lopes, Ducci, Lupato, Graves (didnt have much money left) and ACC. I might drop Lopes now that I see he is riding an XC bike at an enduro race.

  98. #98
    Mtb Guide
    Reputation: Maverick005's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,023
    Quote Originally Posted by Accident Prone View Post
    Can you have your team in 2 private leagues? I am already in one. haha I have similar riders to you. I ditched Barel for ACC as she will be easy points. I went Lopes, Ducci, Lupato, Graves (didnt have much money left) and ACC. I might drop Lopes now that I see he is riding an XC bike at an enduro race.
    Yep you can join as many private leagues as you want, only the team Captain can join your team, just hit the enter new league add pin as you will be competing with that team as well!


    Nice team btw!

    Yeah I traded Brian Lopes, sorry Lopesy, love the Ripley not the tool for this job imo, good luck.

    I did get Ducci, I just added 2 50k riders for some points, choose an Italian for local advantage and Sammy B for being a Kiwi

    Originally I had JLo but he's not competing here WTF Trek!

    AC will tear it up in the womens bet shes on the HD std

  99. #99
    mtbr member
    Reputation: red bank rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    135
    Quote Originally Posted by tdotrider View Post
    also, although not officially sanctioned by Ibis, you can run a 7.875x2.25 shock with the 140mm limbo chips for ~150mm travel and 650b wheels. I believe this would result in a lower BB than a shimmed 8.5x2.5 with 160mm chips.
    Hi. I'm interested in this....you're essentially fitting a shock with slightly longer stroke into the same spot as the OEM 7.875X2.0 with 140 limbo chips. How does this lower the unsagged bb? Wouldn't that just give you more travel at end of stroke? If anything, bb for the hd160 is more than hd140 due to the extra.travel from shock and fork as th measurement is done at unsagged 0mm of travel.
    Just trying to understand.

  100. #100
    mtbr member
    Reputation: doismellbacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,332

    Ibis and 650B?

    Quote Originally Posted by red bank rider View Post
    Hi. I'm interested in this....you're essentially fitting a shock with slightly longer stroke into the same spot as the OEM 7.875X2.0 with 140 limbo chips. How does this lower the unsagged bb? Wouldn't that just give you more travel at end of stroke? If anything, bb for the hd160 is more than hd140 due to the extra.travel from shock and fork as th measurement is done at unsagged 0mm of travel.
    Just trying to understand.
    You're right, 7.875X2.25 with 140 limbo chips gives you the same unssgged bb height as the stock 7.875X2.0 with 140 limbo chips, but 150ish travel. The question is whether that bb height is higher or lower than the stock 160 limbo chips and 8.5 shock reduced to produce the same 150ish travel, BUT mounted with an offset bushing to lower the bb. Two different ways to achieve similar results. I suspect the 140 chip w/ longer stroke shock has a slightly lower bb, but I'm guessing..... somebody who's actually compared both will have to answer that one.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Ibis Mojo SL-R 650b
    By ibis4me in forum 27.5
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-24-2013, 01:27 AM
  2. Niner WFO vs Ibis Mojo HD (650B Conversion). HELP!!!
    By racinghk in forum Bike and Frame discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-06-2013, 05:46 AM
  3. Ibis 650B?
    By lml427 in forum 27.5
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-25-2012, 04:47 PM
  4. Ibis mojoHD 650b conversion questions
    By slideways666 in forum 27.5
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-24-2012, 05:04 PM
  5. Ibis tranny fit 650b
    By scottybinwv in forum 27.5
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-11-2011, 05:10 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •