Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: MI-29er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009

    Garmin 205 or 305

    After looking at all the different types of bike computers, Ive narrowed it down to a Garmin. I've noticed alot of guys/gals use the Garmin Edge 305 over the Edge 205. Is there a reason why the Edge 305 is preferred over the 205. 205 is cheaper but the 305 has the heart rate monitor, cadence, and the elavation. Or is it just a preferrence and the cadence and monitor are more for a training aid? Any opinion would be great.
    1983 Ross Custom Deluxe Mtb
    2014 Giant Anthem Advanced 1 27.5
    2015 Giant TCX SLR 2


  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: pop_martian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Seems like you answered your own question. The 305 can connect to a heart rate monitor and a cadence/speed sensor. If that doesn't interest you, then get the 205. They are otherwise the same.
    "Donuts. Is there anything they can't do?"

  3. #3
    PCC is offline
    mtbr member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    The Edge 305 has a barometric altimeter, which is a good and a bad thing. The barometric altimeter is faster at attaining an elevation reading and doesn't rely on being able to connect to a fourth satellite. The problem is that, as the barometric pressure rises throughout the day the reading drifts. I've done out and back rides where my starting elevation is lower than my ending elevation by 20+ feet even though my starting point is the same as my ending point.

    The 205 uses the GPS to calculate the elevation, which is, ultimately, more accurate than using a barometric altimeter, and it doesn't drift depending on the weather. The problem is that it requires that the GPS attains a signal from at least four satellites in the sky before it can calculate your elevation. Not only that but it can take some time for it to settle on your actual elevation. The very first GPS unit I ever played with did this. I recall turning it on and setting it down and waiting for the elevation to settle. It took about 20 minutes to settle into the correct range then it drifted up and down for the next 20 minutes, never settling on a number, but I was able to surmise that I was at about 420 feet above sea level. This was an early Garmin hand-held unit so it probably has a slower processor than today's GPS units. Maybe I'll try turning the barometric altimeter off on my Edge 305 and see how it performs.
    Last edited by PCC; 06-30-2009 at 11:31 AM.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: cale399's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    how do I navigate the map on the 205??? I can zoom in and out but what about going up down left right after zooming????and how do I get the screen shot where I see the crosssection of the elevation w/the dot(rider) on it...I cant find anything in the manual

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    My understanding is that gps is not very good for determining elevations to the point where "total ascent" figures reported at the end of a ride are worthless. You will get much better accuracy w/ the altimeter, warts and all.

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts



VISIT US AT and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.