Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010

    Do Ineed anything more than the Etrex H

    For my Geographical Information Science class project, I am hoping to take GPS routes and import them using GIS. I would like to also be able to take routes off of geoladders and import them to the GPS. I would like to have information on eachway point (location/elevation) and general route information (length/time/maybe max speed). Not sure I need maps on the GPS, since I will be importing the shapefiles from elsewhere and layering the waypoints. Is the most basic Etrex worthwhile? Is there anything that it is severely lacking. Not sure how much I want to spend, but certainly not more than $200 and I am not to concerned with being terribly accurate. Also buying used, is that an option or would you suggest only looking at new equiptment.


  2. #2
    since 4/10/2009
    Reputation: Harold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    The basic etrex is seriously lacking in memory capacity and in a proprietary data cable you'll have to buy extra.

    Do yourself a favor and at least get a Legend (HCx is the best one, but any model with an H will be good enough).

    When using MN DNR Garmin to load shapefiles onto your GPS, you will need to keep in mind a few things:
    1. the GPS has a track point limit. If the file has more points than the limit, you will lose data and you have no control of it at that point. You will have to simplify the file to fewer points in a line first.
    2. Garmin GPSes cannot handle polyline features well. You take one file that contains a network of intersecting lines and attempt to load it onto the GPS, and the GPS will break it up into many, many separate files that will be practically impossible to work with. To load that sort of feature, you have to turn it into a transparent .img file that can load as a map in Garmin Mapsource that can be transferred onto the GPS as a basemap. More steps, but involves free software. You can read tutorials on it at
    3. The Garmin GPS cannot interpret a polygon correctly. Even if all you want to do is load a single rectangle, the GPS will interpret it either as a line or a series of waypoints. You will not be able to assign any sort of area symbology to it by just loading a shapefile through MN DNR Garmin. You will have to use the method I mentioned in 2 in order to turn that polygon into a transparent .img file for use as a basemap.
    4. the easiest way for any Garmin GPS to handle any sort of GIS data would be to set it up as a Garmin Custom Map in a tiled .kmz that could be loaded onto the newer Garmins (Dakota, Oregon, Colorado, 62, 78). At that point, your only limit is the number of map tiles, but you can layer as many files as you like.

  3. #3
    GT Xizang
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    If you are certain never to use maps, any GPS model will do.
    Hower, on using topo maps a Hcx model is advisable.
    Much more memory capacity and a faster processor.

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts



VISIT US AT and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.