Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 101 to 150 of 347
  1. #101
    cowbell
    Reputation: Cotharyus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3,072
    I have to say, my Anthem just keeps feeling better. I've finally got the suspension tuned where I want it, now I just need to sort out the brakes. Does anyone else who has the Elixir 1's (I guess this is just X2 level in the US?) feel like the brakes are a little weak? Have you done anything about it? I'm thinking about a larger rotor up front.

  2. #102
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    16
    I have had my 2013 Anthem x 29er 2 for two weeks now. The Elixir 1's are horrid. The front squeels loudly and seems like I have no braking power. My other bike (Gary Fisher Hi FI delux) has Elixir 5's which are much better. I have just ordered shimano XT to replace the Elixir 1s and going with a 180mm rotor up front.

    Other than the brakes, I love this bike. Very fast and turns like a 26" bike.

  3. #103
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jkirkpatri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,526
    Quote Originally Posted by Cotharyus View Post
    I have to say, my Anthem just keeps feeling better. I've finally got the suspension tuned where I want it, now I just need to sort out the brakes. Does anyone else who has the Elixir 1's (I guess this is just X2 level in the US?) feel like the brakes are a little weak? Have you done anything about it? I'm thinking about a larger rotor up front.
    Yes, the brakes are weak. Going 203mm up front and swapping the OEM 180mm out back. Parts have arrived, should be able to get it done this weekend. I have a thread in the brake forum regarding this, so I'll be posting my results there once the new rotors have bedded in and I've got some riding time on the new setup.

    If the experiment fails, I'm going SLX or XT next spring.

  4. #104
    cowbell
    Reputation: Cotharyus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3,072
    Quote Originally Posted by jkirkpatri View Post
    Yes, the brakes are weak. Going 203mm up front and swapping the OEM 180mm out back. Parts have arrived, should be able to get it done this weekend. I have a thread in the brake forum regarding this, so I'll be posting my results there once the new rotors have bedded in and I've got some riding time on the new setup.

    If the experiment fails, I'm going SLX or XT next spring.
    I've been looking at a rotor swap as well, my concern is my bike came with a 170mm on the front, and I'm not certain that a 180 will be enough. I'm not sure the back needs more power, but the front certainly does. I'm looking forward to hearing how your swap works out.

  5. #105
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    16
    First thing I did was ditch the Deore brakes on my X3 for a set of SLX brakes, kept the 180/160mm discs... braking is perfect!

  6. #106
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    215

    Another happy Anthem Rider

    Picked mine up in Sydney about 3 weeks ago. Been making a few changes and now happy with it.

    Comes in a 11.2kg with the following spec:

    XT Cranks
    XT RD
    XT Shifters
    Easton Bars
    Stans Arches Wheels
    Formula The One Brakes and Rotors
    Rockshox Dropper Post
    Ergon Grips
    XTR Pedals
    Crossmark Rear Tire
    Ardent Front Tire

    Few pics for those interested.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 2013 Anthem X 29er anybody?-img_0982.jpg  

    2013 Anthem X 29er anybody?-img_0983.jpg  

    2013 Anthem X 29er anybody?-img_0987.jpg  

    2013 Anthem X 29er anybody?-img_0984.jpg  

    2013 Anthem X 29er anybody?-img_0980.jpg  


  7. #107
    Bellydraft
    Reputation: 0sparky0's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    47
    I just picked up my anthem x advanced 29er yesterday. With all the stock parts,including reflectors it was 26.0lbs on the Park digital scale at the shop. That's about what my xtc composite weighed out of the box (including crank bros candy 3 pedals in both cases.). I put my enve wheels on w sram rotors and an xx cassette and dropped a tad over 3lbs. My frame is an xs. I haven't ridden proper off road yet,but bounced around on it yesterday. Wow is the rear suspension nice to have! I love my xtc composite but this may be better on my booty,and not much slower. My xtc is at 21lbs w the enve wheels. Don't think I can get the anthem that low.
    This may hurt a little..

  8. #108
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    17
    Had my X 1 for two weeks now and ridden it every day! It is completely stock and so far apart from some brake noise, which was quickly sorted out, it is just fine. I have not tried to save any weight yet as I have a few pounds to drop off myself before I worry about changing bits.Have added a Garmin 800 and despite some reviews I read I am very happy with it. Seemed a very simple device not sure why folks were having so much trouble with it. How durable it is remains to be seen.

    Brakes are Elixr 5's and seem very powerful! Love the shocks you don't notice them woking until you look down. Compact gears seem fine, certainly not missed the granny ring and top end speed on the flat is really good. Climbs really well even with me on it!

  9. #109
    DFMBA.org
    Reputation: MTBeing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,700
    Quote Originally Posted by 40Lucky View Post
    22.75 Lbs as you see it.
    Racy and beautiful! Carbon wheels right?

  10. #110
    davidcarson48
    Guest
    Just ordered my 2013 Anthem X Advanced 29er 1. US specs. Should be here in a week or so.

    Does the bike come with the rim strips needed to convert the wheels to tubeless?

    Do the XT shifters have the i-Spec integrated mounts?

    Can anyone verify this post: For all those buying Anthem X's, remember to install a couple 1.2mm chainring spacers in the seatstay pivot bolts - the swingarm is welded too wide to match up with the linkages, so bearings will get damaged and rough if you don't realign things properly. Makes them run smoother for longer.

  11. #111
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    20
    It seems like you guys are enjoying your anthems. Anyone here have ride experience with SC tallboys before you bought an anthem? Ive got it narrowed down to the anthem 29 x 2 and tallboy AL(will be built up so that it compares to the anthem 2).

  12. #112
    mtbr member
    Reputation: KirtM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    478
    Quote Originally Posted by davidcarson48 View Post
    Just ordered my 2013 Anthem X Advanced 29er 1. US specs. Should be here in a week or so.
    .
    Now we know what you're doing with all that overtime. Come in yet?
    Jersey Off-Road Bicycle Association- Advocate, Educate and Conserve
    You Dig? WWW.JORBA.ORG

    WWW.MTBNJ.COM

  13. #113
    davidcarson48
    Guest
    Kirt!

    It's in. Gotta get it set up and whatnot, but I hope to be out on it in the next week or so.

  14. #114
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    14

    rim strips & Tubeless valve kit

    Just built up my son's athem x 1 this evening ... heading to camp eagle in the morning for a marathon race in south texas!!! Bike came with racing ralphs with tubes but in the box of goodies was the rimstrip & double sided tape along with valves

    Full XT kit with the exception of the chain which is a stylish KMC full chrome, relief cutouts, hollow pins etc. Stock wheels appear to be pretty nice with the smooth bearings & reported DT internals.

    I'm thrilled with my Anthem X



    Quote Originally Posted by davidcarson48 View Post
    Just ordered my 2013 Anthem X Advanced 29er 1. US specs. Should be here in a week or so.

    Does the bike come with the rim strips needed to convert the wheels to tubeless?

    Do the XT shifters have the i-Spec integrated mounts?

    Can anyone verify this post: For all those buying Anthem X's, remember to install a couple 1.2mm chainring spacers in the seatstay pivot bolts - the swingarm is welded too wide to match up with the linkages, so bearings will get damaged and rough if you don't realign things properly. Makes them run smoother for longer.

  15. #115
    Team Velveeta™
    Reputation: TomP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by jhbeeton View Post
    ...Full XT kit with the exception of the chain which is a stylish KMC full chrome, relief cutouts, hollow pins etc. Stock wheels appear to be pretty nice with the smooth bearings & reported DT internals...
    I'm a little confused, is the anthem x 29er 1 as shown on the Giant Website the 2013 anthem with the currently shipping spec? It's showing as an SLX bike with an XT rear derailleur. Did yours come out of the box with full XT?
    Tom Purvis - Salida, CO - http://teamvelveeta.tom-purvis.com

    "I like my wimmen like I like my beer--cold and bitter!"

  16. #116
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    381
    I've got the 1 here in Australia and it's SLX/XT

  17. #117
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    308
    Quote Originally Posted by TomP View Post
    I'm a little confused, is the anthem x 29er 1 as shown on the Giant Website the 2013 anthem with the currently shipping spec? It's showing as an SLX bike with an XT rear derailleur. Did yours come out of the box with full XT?
    I guess it is the carbon version... Anthem advanced 1

  18. #118
    Team Velveeta™
    Reputation: TomP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by plupp View Post
    I guess it is the carbon version... Anthem advanced 1
    Ah yes, there you go. I looked at the advanced to see but what came up was the advanced 0, and it had sram xx so I got confused. Didn't think to look at the advanced 1 and see what its spec was.

    Thread title doesn't mean that every post will be about that bike...
    Tom Purvis - Salida, CO - http://teamvelveeta.tom-purvis.com

    "I like my wimmen like I like my beer--cold and bitter!"

  19. #119
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    14

    full xt

    exactly per the spec sheet

    DRIVETRAIN
    Shifters Shimano Deore XT, 2x10 Speed
    Front Derailleur Shimano Deore XT
    Rear Derailleur Shimano Deore XT
    Brakes Shimano Deore XT, 160mm
    Brake Levers Shimano Deore XT
    Cassette Shimano HG81 11x36, 10-Speed
    Chain KMC X10SL
    Crankset Shimano Deore XT, 26/38
    Bottom Bracket Shimano, Press Fit

  20. #120
    Team Velveeta™
    Reputation: TomP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by jhbeeton View Post
    exactly per the spec sheet

    DRIVETRAIN
    Shifters Shimano Deore XT, 2x10 Speed
    Front Derailleur Shimano Deore XT
    Rear Derailleur Shimano Deore XT
    Brakes Shimano Deore XT, 160mm
    Brake Levers Shimano Deore XT
    Cassette Shimano HG81 11x36, 10-Speed
    Chain KMC X10SL
    Crankset Shimano Deore XT, 26/38
    Bottom Bracket Shimano, Press Fit
    Yes, but that's the Anthem X Advanced 29er 1

    That's where my confusion came in: the thread title is 2013 Anthem X 29er anybody?

    That bike, the aluminum one not the carbon fiber one, that's what I was looking for information about. I just assumed that this bike you're talking about was the aluminum one.

    See? So the one I'm looking at, the 2013 Anthem X 29er is an SLX bike with and XT rear derailleur. Exactly per the spec sheet.
    Tom Purvis - Salida, CO - http://teamvelveeta.tom-purvis.com

    "I like my wimmen like I like my beer--cold and bitter!"

  21. #121
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    14

    I stand corrected...

    Didn't see the forest for the trees... sorry boss, didn't mean anything by it.

    Yes, the Anthem X advanced 1 has got a bigger price tag and a slightly updated spec.

    On that note: I have a brand new XT rear derailler/ shifter/ brakeset that is for sale to make an x5-7 or Deore-SLX build a bunch nicer ... i had a preference for the SRAM gripshift and went that way.

    Quote Originally Posted by TomP View Post
    Yes, but that's the Anthem X Advanced 29er 1

    That's where my confusion came in: the thread title is 2013 Anthem X 29er anybody?

    That bike, the aluminum one not the carbon fiber one, that's what I was looking for information about. I just assumed that this bike you're talking about was the aluminum one.

    See? So the one I'm looking at, the 2013 Anthem X 29er is an SLX bike with and XT rear derailleur. Exactly per the spec sheet.

  22. #122
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    860
    Canada and USA don't get the beautiful blue X0 model? What the heck is up with that? We have the X1 and then the Advanced Zero. Uh...can you say hole in the line-up big enough to drive a tractor-trailer? The X1 is $2799 and then the Advanced Zero is $8399. I don't necessarily want the components and shocks of the aluminum zero model, but I'd like to have the option. Also, the blue colour is awesome. I don't like when companies change bike models per country. Mexico gets an aluminum X0 model with some grey and blue colour. Canada and the USA don't get the alum X0? Why would they do this? Annoying.

    For those who prefer rock shox, have you had a chance to try the new CTD Fox forks and shocks?
    Last edited by morkys; 12-04-2012 at 08:31 PM.

  23. #123
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    14

    Alternative

    I went with the athem x advanced 0 frameset ( black with blue) and built it up with an xo drivetrain & brakes, rotor xc2 crankset, fox fit 100 15mm fork, Easton ea90 wheelset and raceface 3/4 riser carbon bar. Fizik tundra saddle, crank bros foam grips and some Rubena tubeless tires makes for a cost competitive trail monster bike!!!

    Don't let the marketing guys get you down

  24. #124
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    860
    Quote Originally Posted by jhbeeton View Post
    I went with the athem x advanced 0 frameset ( black with blue) and built it up with an xo drivetrain & brakes, rotor xc2 crankset, fox fit 100 15mm fork, Easton ea90 wheelset and raceface 3/4 riser carbon bar. Fizik tundra saddle, crank bros foam grips and some Rubena tubeless tires makes for a cost competitive trail monster bike!!!

    Don't let the marketing guys get you down
    Yeah, I suppose I am over-reacting a bit. I am not normally one who is picky about colour. I guess it's bc blue is a fave colour of mine and the part spec is different too. I will look into the individual framesets and whether we can get them in different colours or perhaps even special order a 2013 aluminum X0 complete bicycle. Building up from the frame could be quite costly.

  25. #125
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    860
    #jhbeeton

    Where r u located and what was the cost of your build?
    (No edit post option in my cell phone browser)

  26. #126
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    860
    Was wondering about comparisons of the Anthem X 29'er vs similar Niner FS bikes. I noticed the Jet 9 has 3" of rear wheel travel and the RDO costs as much for the frame and fork as an entire Anthem X 29 complete bicycle. Curious if the handling of the Niner bikes is quicker, but even if it were, at what cost?

  27. #127
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PerthMTB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    598
    Hey guys, here's mine...



    Started life as an X3 with Deore components, but I upgraded to all XT - including 2x10 cranks, I-spec shifters, Shadow+ RD, brakes and UST wheelset.

    Have raced it a couple of times and it's fast!
    Last edited by PerthMTB; 12-09-2012 at 06:53 AM.

  28. #128
    mtbr member
    Reputation: ha-evolution's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    135
    Great looking bike mate!

  29. #129
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jkirkpatri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,526
    Quote Originally Posted by jkirkpatri View Post
    Yes, the brakes are weak. Going 203mm up front and swapping the OEM 180mm out back. Parts have arrived, should be able to get it done this weekend. I have a thread in the brake forum regarding this, so I'll be posting my results there once the new rotors have bedded in and I've got some riding time on the new setup.

    If the experiment fails, I'm going SLX or XT next spring.
    Just to follow up on my post, went with a 203mm front rotor and put the OEM 180mm on the back end. Same G3 rotor style up front as the one in the back. I now have sufficient braking power. The back is a bit too easy to lock up, so I might go back to the stock 160mm, but the 203mm front end has alleviated all of my braking issues.

  30. #130
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    860
    I may pick one of these up this year and the spring bike show is an awesome place for it, but...that means no decent test ride on trails before buying. I like a lot about the bike and feel it's a worth while gamble. I like quick and sharp handling though, as I sought out the 70 deg head angle 26" Brodie Mettle I have now and love it for it's quick handling. I just hope that the Giant Anthem X 29'er is quick enough handling for me, but I suppose I could always tweak it to suit. I like so many other things about it like light weight and great rear suspension etc.

  31. #131
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by morkys View Post
    Was wondering about comparisons of the Anthem X 29'er vs similar Niner FS bikes. I noticed the Jet 9 has 3" of rear wheel travel and the RDO costs as much for the frame and fork as an entire Anthem X 29 complete bicycle. Curious if the handling of the Niner bikes is quicker, but even if it were, at what cost?
    Check out these you tube clips: Giant Anthem X 29 vs 26 vs Niner-Part 1 - YouTube and Giant Anthem X 29 vs 26 vs Niner-Part 2 - YouTube which compare them.

  32. #132
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    860
    I just watched a Youtube video comparing the Giant Anthem X 29'er to a Niner Jet 9. I notice that the Anthem X 29 has specs listed for a longer chainstay than other comparable bikes, but the Anthem X 29 wheelbase specs out shorter than other bikes, size for size. I figure there is a balance there somewhere and the Giant seems to work for many people. I admit I like quicker handing bikes, so I should probably ride it and compare it to another 29 FS bike.
    Last edited by morkys; 12-14-2012 at 09:39 AM.

  33. #133
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PerthMTB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    598
    Morkys - I like my new Anthem 29er, and for fast and flowy courses, firetrails/railtrails, and all day epics its just perfect. But, I wouldn't describe it (or any other short travel 29er I've tried) as "quick handling". I have a 26" Trance I use for tight and technical courses with lots of jumps, which I still find superior (and more fun!) in those kind of situations.

    I can't say this is a fault in the design of the Anthem, I just don't think there's any such thing as a 'do-it-all' bike, and each is optimised for a certain type of riding, and not so good at others.

    So, for me the Anthem 29er excels as a light and fast XC race bike, but if you ride a lot where a very nimble bike is required, maybe you should hang onto your 26" Brodie as well. Its horses for courses IMHO, and always good to have a choice of steed to suit different riding conditions.

    As always, just my experience, others may differ...

  34. #134
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jeffzx12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    30
    2013 Anthem X 29er anybody?-imageuploadedbytapatalk1355112992.517491.jpg2013 Anthem X 29er anybody?-imageuploadedbytapatalk1355113009.497374.jpg
    Hi guys
    Here's my new toy. I've been riding a Xtc composite but the longer rides have been taking their toll so caved and went FS. I'm no spring chicken turning 50 next year but kept telling myself a hard tail wasn't that bad and I should harden up.
    First thing I did was make the tires tubeless with stans yellow tape and spoof. Sealed first time. Carbon wheels feel great.
    It took a few rides to get comfortable but after a couple of 5 hour rides I can say it great!

  35. #135
    Your Best Friend
    Reputation: Silentfoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,768
    Curious as to why the Stans tape and not the tape supplied with the bike? Also, why'd you change out the stem?
    I'm a mountain bike guide in South West Utah

  36. #136
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jeffzx12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    30
    Have always had no problem with the Stans tape so why change? Wheels didn't come tubeless so it was an easy change. Not a fan of the GIant stem and wanted it slightly longer also changed the seat and bars from my Xtc. I've been riding an XL hard tail but have gone down to an Large for the Anthem as I'm on the boarder of both sizes. Wanted to use this as an all rounder rather than just a XC bike and I can't be happier.

  37. #137
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    215
    Quote Originally Posted by morkys View Post
    Was wondering about comparisons of the Anthem X 29'er vs similar Niner FS bikes. I noticed the Jet 9 has 3" of rear wheel travel and the RDO costs as much for the frame and fork as an entire Anthem X 29 complete bicycle. Curious if the handling of the Niner bikes is quicker, but even if it were, at what cost?
    I own a Jet9 and an Anthem. Overall, they are very similar. I don't have much of a preference between the two. The rear of the Jet feels a little softer, meaning it's more comfortable sitting over small bumps than the Anthem.

    The RDO, for me, is the harshest of the three. It drives well, but lap times were similar to the other two. So far, I've had no interest in purchasing one based on a couple hours of seat time. What I really wanted was a carbon 3" jet, but niner saw fit (like giant) to pander to the "more travel is always better" crowd. With the way they're being cleared out currently I'm skeptical whether the aluminum jet will return another year.

  38. #138
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    860
    Quote Originally Posted by JeffS View Post
    I own a Jet9 and an Anthem. Overall, they are very similar. I don't have much of a preference between the two. The rear of the Jet feels a little softer, meaning it's more comfortable sitting over small bumps than the Anthem.

    The RDO, for me, is the harshest of the three. It drives well, but lap times were similar to the other two. So far, I've had no interest in purchasing one based on a couple hours of seat time. What I really wanted was a carbon 3" jet, but niner saw fit (like giant) to pander to the "more travel is always better" crowd. With the way they're being cleared out currently I'm skeptical whether the aluminum jet will return another year.
    Thanks for the feedback, however, the more I look into it, even the aluminum 3" travel jet seems more expensive vs comparable Anthem x 29'er. So Niner has no 4" rear travel aluminum bike?

  39. #139
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    860
    delete
    Last edited by morkys; 12-13-2012 at 04:40 PM. Reason: duplicate post in error

  40. #140
    more skier than biker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,081
    @jeffzx12 - nice bike. Could you tell us what the weight on that bad boy is? With pedals? Also any particular reason you aren't a fan of the stock Giant stem that came with it or was it just a length thing? (I have an Anthem X Advanced 0 on the way soon...and I love the chunky look of the Giant Contact SLR Overdrive composite stem...plus am hoping that it is way stiff).

  41. #141
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jeffzx12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    30
    Hi Tyrone

    With pedals 23.72 pounds or 10.74kg2013 Anthem X 29er anybody?-imageuploadedbytapatalk1355464313.372647.jpg

    it's a size large with tubeless RaRas and xtr pedals. I do prefer the Xtr spec shifters/brakes on my xtc and might transplant them at a later date.

    I changed the stem for a syntace that's just a bit longer as my other rides are all XL and I prefer being a bit stretched out. Not a great fan of the boxy giant stem and have no stiffness issues.
    So far loving the Anthem.

    Cheers Jeff

  42. #142
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jclyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    154
    Jeff-
    Can you share the year and model you have along with any changes to stock components? That is an excellent weight!

    Quote Originally Posted by jeffzx12 View Post
    Hi Tyrone

    With pedals 23.72 pounds or 10.74kgClick image for larger version. 

Name:	ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355464313.372647.jpg 
Views:	959 
Size:	135.9 KB 
ID:	744856

    it's a size large with tubeless RaRas and xtr pedals. I do prefer the Xtr spec shifters/brakes on my xtc and might transplant them at a later date.

    I changed the stem for a syntace that's just a bit longer as my other rides are all XL and I prefer being a bit stretched out. Not a great fan of the boxy giant stem and have no stiffness issues.
    So far loving the Anthem.

    Cheers Jeff
    2015 Giant Anthem 29er
    2012 Trek Superfly Carbon HT

  43. #143
    davidcarson48
    Guest
    Syntace makes an OD2 stem?

  44. #144
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    860
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffzx12 View Post
    Hi Tyrone

    With pedals 23.72 pounds or 10.74kgClick image for larger version. 

Name:	ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355464313.372647.jpg 
Views:	959 
Size:	135.9 KB 
ID:	744856

    it's a size large with tubeless RaRas and xtr pedals. I do prefer the Xtr spec shifters/brakes on my xtc and might transplant them at a later date.

    I changed the stem for a syntace that's just a bit longer as my other rides are all XL and I prefer being a bit stretched out. Not a great fan of the boxy giant stem and have no stiffness issues.
    So far loving the Anthem.

    Cheers Jeff
    Which version is that? Is that an Advanced Carbon or an aluminum zero or 1?

  45. #145
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    860
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffzx12 View Post
    Hi Tyrone

    With pedals 23.72 pounds or 10.74kgClick image for larger version. 

Name:	ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355464313.372647.jpg 
Views:	959 
Size:	135.9 KB 
ID:	744856

    it's a size large with tubeless RaRas and xtr pedals. I do prefer the Xtr spec shifters/brakes on my xtc and might transplant them at a later date.

    I changed the stem for a syntace that's just a bit longer as my other rides are all XL and I prefer being a bit stretched out. Not a great fan of the boxy giant stem and have no stiffness issues.
    So far loving the Anthem.

    Cheers Jeff
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffzx12 View Post
    Hi Tyrone

    With pedals 23.72 pounds or 10.74kgClick image for larger version. 

Name:	ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355464313.372647.jpg 
Views:	959 
Size:	135.9 KB 
ID:	744856

    it's a size large with tubeless RaRas and xtr pedals. I do prefer the Xtr spec shifters/brakes on my xtc and might transplant them at a later date.

    I changed the stem for a syntace that's just a bit longer as my other rides are all XL and I prefer being a bit stretched out. Not a great fan of the boxy giant stem and have no stiffness issues.
    So far loving the Anthem.

    Cheers Jeff
    Which version is that? Is that an Advanced Carbon or an aluminum zero or 1?

  46. #146
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    860
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffzx12 View Post
    Hi Tyrone

    With pedals 23.72 pounds or 10.74kgClick image for larger version. 

Name:	ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355464313.372647.jpg 
Views:	959 
Size:	135.9 KB 
ID:	744856

    it's a size large with tubeless RaRas and xtr pedals. I do prefer the Xtr spec shifters/brakes on my xtc and might transplant them at a later date.

    I changed the stem for a syntace that's just a bit longer as my other rides are all XL and I prefer being a bit stretched out. Not a great fan of the boxy giant stem and have no stiffness issues.
    So far loving the Anthem.

    Cheers Jeff
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffzx12 View Post
    Hi Tyrone

    With pedals 23.72 pounds or 10.74kgClick image for larger version. 

Name:	ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355464313.372647.jpg 
Views:	959 
Size:	135.9 KB 
ID:	744856

    it's a size large with tubeless RaRas and xtr pedals. I do prefer the Xtr spec shifters/brakes on my xtc and might transplant them at a later date.

    I changed the stem for a syntace that's just a bit longer as my other rides are all XL and I prefer being a bit stretched out. Not a great fan of the boxy giant stem and have no stiffness issues.
    So far loving the Anthem.

    Cheers Jeff
    Which version is that? Is that an Advanced Carbon or an aluminum zero or 1?

  47. #147
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jeffzx12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    30
    Hi guys
    It's a 2013 advance carbon in size large.
    Changes I've made are.......
    Carbon Wtb Valcon seat (for comfort)
    Syntace 105mm stem .yes they fit o/d
    Ec70 carbon flat bars and chunky Esi grips
    Xtr pedals
    Frame skins and frame wrap
    Converted wheels to tubeless.
    I was looking for a bit of comfort on the 4 plus hour rides. Loving it so far . I have read so many good reports on the Anthem.
    Cheers

  48. #148
    more skier than biker
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,081
    Just picked up my Anthem Advanced 0 a few days ago. Haven't ridden yet due to 4 days of straight rain here in NorCal.

    Converted the P-XCR 0 wheels to tubeless with the Ralph's and they both seated up first try but the rear has been steadily losing air every day. Need to work on that a bit....

    2013 Anthem X 29er anybody?-imageuploadedbytapatalk1356458618.727724.jpg

    2013 Anthem X 29er anybody?-imageuploadedbytapatalk1356458630.177350.jpg

  49. #149
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    3,489
    They're nice looking bikes aren't they.Accept the stem.

  50. #150
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jeffzx12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    30
    Looking good. The Ralph's leak though their sidewalls until sealed. I stuck them on their side on a bucket as per stans advice and they have been good since. I've been riding it regularly and man does the rear tire wear!

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •