Results 1 to 45 of 45
  1. #1
    Cleavage Of The Tetons
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,063

    New American Hiking Society logo....



    (thanks for the PS help, Dr. Sloth!)
    "We LOVE cows! They make trails for us.....

    And then we eat them."

  2. #2
    007
    007 is offline
    b a n n e d
    Reputation: 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,208
    Alcohol may lead nowhere, but it sure is the scenic route!

  3. #3
    Cleavage Of The Tetons
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,063
    Yup
    "We LOVE cows! They make trails for us.....

    And then we eat them."

  4. #4
    AZ
    AZ is offline
    banned
    Reputation: AZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    19,201
    Hiking is on the wane while MTBing continues to attract new participants, it is nothing but a matter of time before the inevitable happens. Remember to vote.

  5. #5
    MTB B'dos
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    22,195
    Sorry, don't see the issue here Seems like you're the kid who jealous of what another has and wants it too along with what you already have. Once they're not fighting to get MTBers kicked off of current trails they are allowed to use I fully understand them wanting to not have MTBs zipping by along current hiker only trails - I used to bird watch and photograph and having mountain bikes zipping along on such trails would be damn aggravating if you are a naturalist and hiker interested in watching nature.
    One day your life will flash before your eyes, will it be worth watching??

  6. #6
    Cleavage Of The Tetons
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,063
    Not remotely the case.
    Look where I live....the hikers/equestrians have literally MILLIONS of acres of wilderness as a private playground. It's time, politically and demographically, that they need to learn to share the remainder.
    "We LOVE cows! They make trails for us.....

    And then we eat them."

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Gasp4Air's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,990
    I agree with Lynx. I am both a hiker and a biker, and I've been buzzed enough times by thoughtless bikers that I fully see their point of view. As long as they come to the table with cooperative sharing in mind, I support them.
    Use it, use it, use it while you still have it.

  8. #8
    Cleavage Of The Tetons
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,063
    Quote Originally Posted by Gasp4Air View Post
    I agree with Lynx. I am both a hiker and a biker, and I've been buzzed enough times by thoughtless bikers that I fully see their point of view. As long as they come to the table with cooperative sharing in mind, I support them.
    They don't...look Into to it!
    They are 100% anti- access for bikes, anywhere, period.
    "We LOVE cows! They make trails for us.....

    And then we eat them."

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    They don't...look Into to it!
    They are 100% anti- access for bikes, anywhere, period.
    Why do I like sports that piss people off?

    Late 80's-early 90's skateboarding = hate
    Early 90's snowboarding = hate
    Mid 90's to present road biking = hate by many motorists
    Now mountain biking = hate.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: evdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,515
    Good thing the PCT = Perfect Cycling Trail. Despite not being designed for bikes it really is perfect for them in a lot of areas. And it is sustainable. So, seems to me, there goes their argument.

    Though I would add self-entitlement and selfishness to the logo along with hate.

    Seriously people, if you want solitude in a country with 330 million people I don't know how you can expect to find it on the trails. All you have to do if you want solitude is go 100ft off trail, and you won't see a soul.

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Gasp4Air's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,990
    Quote Originally Posted by evdog View Post
    Seriously people, if you want solitude in a country with 330 million people I don't know how you can expect to find it on the trails. All you have to do if you want solitude is go 100ft off trail, and you won't see a soul.
    I don't think it's about solitude - it's about not having to be worrying about a jackass on a bike coming behind you at speed and yelling at the last moment, then blasting past you. Around where I ride and hike, many bikers are safe and courteous to hikers; almost all are at least ok; and then there are the ones who ride like they own the trail, whipping through blind corners, barely slowing to pass a hiker at speed. After a few of those jerks, you're always looking over your shoulder.

    I don't mind if a few trails are set aside for hikers only, as long as there enough to go around for everyone. But that's the key - trail are resources for hikers, bikers and horses, and cooperation and sharing should be the rule. Maybe for a trail devoted to hikers, another could be bikes only, one way, so the racer boys can rip to their hearts content and not have pesky hikers in the way.
    Use it, use it, use it while you still have it.

  12. #12
    livin' the dream......
    Reputation: tjkm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,668
    Hiking is the lowest common denominator in the outdoor world. I am all for people getting out there and accessing public lands, that is their right. What I don't put up with is the occasional/seasonal user(s) hiking three wide and not yielding to anyone, solo hikers rocking tunes, oblivious to my bell, polite request to pass on the left, etc. Locally, there are some hike only trails, but no ride only trails.......I kill people with kindness while riding, I go out of my way to be 'responsible' and 'predictable' while on my bike. On the rare occasion that I hike, I expect that from riders too. Don't always get that, but most mtbr's get it, and are good.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: evdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Gasp4Air View Post
    I don't think it's about solitude
    Well mainly its about not wanting to share. But if hikers were honest folk (at least, for the hard cores) they would admit that they don't want to see ANYONE else on the trails period, other hikers included. Read the pct message boards, they go on at length how important it is to be "in the zone" and how they can be 1/2mi ahead or behind another hiker and never see the person.

    I wonder how they feel when it takes them 2 days then to go from 0.1mi behind to 0.1mi ahead and finally out of sight of that other a-hole hiker. Whereas a bike would be gone and out of sight in 5min. Just a thought.

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation: PerfectZero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,212
    I don't think this would be an issue if we were allowed to build more mtb specific trails. But its often the case that ::cough:: certain groups will go out of their way to oppose that from happening. Can you imagine the $hit storm that would develop from, say, the Sierra club if someone tried to create a bike equivalent to the PCT?

    So if you can't legally build your own trails, and you can expand to hiking only trails, what options are there?
    buzzes like a fridge

  15. #15
    CoolArrow
    Reputation: jhazard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,417
    Plenty of solitude and "zone opportunity" in the designated wilderness areas. Colorado alone has like 40 or so, totaling over 3 million acres. Its not like there's a shortage of hiker-only venues to get away from those pesky, buzzing bikers.
    Airborne Flight Crew

    Jerry Hazard – website

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation: evdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,515
    Quote Originally Posted by PerfectZero View Post
    I don't think this would be an issue if we were allowed to build more mtb specific trails. But its often the case that ::cough:: certain groups will go out of their way to oppose that from happening. Can you imagine the $hit storm that would develop from, say, the Sierra club if someone tried to create a bike equivalent to the PCT?

    So if you can't legally build your own trails, and you can expand to hiking only trails, what options are there?
    The hikers would love it if we could build our own bike specific PCT. Because they could then hike on it and then ***** that the bikers were running them off the trail. Make no mistake, it is a very small majority who are making noise to keep bikes off the PCT. Half the hikers who use the PCT dont even know that bikes are not allowed. of those who do know, only 50% even care. Of those who care, only a smaller % would ever say anything to you. Probably the same % that would give you stink eye for riding a bike on a multi use trail.

    Reality is we could never build a MTB specific PCT. There is too much wilderness and too much private property, it would cost too much, and the people who would make the decisions are not willing to stick their necks out to support it. They have been trying to resurrect the California Riding and Hiking Trail for decades, which would be our one hope. But that is mired down by a multitude of issues.

    What would make sense is to open the non-wilderness PCT to bikes. It would not cost a penny to do, and would actually save money as bikers could adopt sections to maintain. Plus, people would actually use the trail! Go figure....

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: skiahh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,610
    Quote Originally Posted by LyNx View Post
    Sorry, don't see the issue here Seems like you're the kid who jealous of what another has and wants it too along with what you already have. Once they're not fighting to get MTBers kicked off of current trails they are allowed to use I fully understand them wanting to not have MTBs zipping by along current hiker only trails - I used to bird watch and photograph and having mountain bikes zipping along on such trails would be damn aggravating if you are a naturalist and hiker interested in watching nature.
    Quote Originally Posted by Gasp4Air View Post
    I agree with Lynx. I am both a hiker and a biker, and I've been buzzed enough times by thoughtless bikers that I fully see their point of view. As long as they come to the table with cooperative sharing in mind, I support them.
    And this is why mountain biking struggles to make the slow progress we do. "They" have closed ranks and want to exclude MTBs. Our ranks have hikers amongst us who "see their point of view" and thus we can't and don't mount a strong campaign to share what belongs to ALL of the citizens of the US.

    As for coming to the table with cooperative sharing in mind? So far, I've not seen a hint of that from any hiker dominated organization.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    11
    I do a lot of hiking and mountain biking. I think the big problem is that many mountain bikers have poor trail manners. They don't yield to hikers like they're supposed to and often times you can't hear them coming until they're right on you. When I've lived in Alaska and Washington State I tied a small bell (like a jingle bell) to my handle bar. That way bears and hikers would know I was coming, it's been helpful. I'm in Korea now but I think I might do the same. Hiking is huge here. From experience, I know that almost getting run over on an otherwise peaceful hike can be quite off putting.

    Personally, I'd like to see a network of mountain bike only trails setup so we don't have to watch out for hikers and equestrians. Then we can just bomb downhill and zip through the forest unimpeded.

    Anyway, I don't think it's productive for either side to be hateful and vengeful about the issue of access and use. Let Congress keep that nonsense. I think there are valid concerns on both sides.
    Adventure Strong | Hiking, Mountain Biking, and Adventure Travel
    http://www.adventurestrong.com

  19. #19
    MTB B'dos
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    22,195
    Sorry to be a logical, honest, ethically thinking MTBer and being able to view from the other sides perspective, guess that makes me a "bad" person Curious who would have pushed for and help build this PCT system? I say do as suggested and build your own trails, that are bike specific. Instead of blowing that $20, $30, $40 on beer and pizza after the ride, throw it in a collection tin and get the rest of the MTBers to do the same, petition for someplace to build the trail and get other MTBers to do the same. When you get the permission, then round up all those MTBers and get them to come out and volunteer and build their bike only trail.

    Sorry if you all can't realise how annoying and a PITA we in general are, some people aren't out there just to get a speed/adrenalin buzz, they want to enjoy nature, taking their time to take it in, watch the wildlife and just chill and if you're narrow minded enough to think that's possible allowing bikes or horses on these trails, then you fall into the same narrow minded category as the hikers you're trying to pigeon hole as such.
    Quote Originally Posted by skiahh View Post
    And this is why mountain biking struggles to make the slow progress we do. "They" have closed ranks and want to exclude MTBs. Our ranks have hikers amongst us who "see their point of view" and thus we can't and don't mount a strong campaign to share what belongs to ALL of the citizens of the US.

    As for coming to the table with cooperative sharing in mind? So far, I've not seen a hint of that from any hiker dominated organization.
    One day your life will flash before your eyes, will it be worth watching??

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation: J.B. Weld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    8,152
    I prefer riding where motorcycles and jeeps aren't allowed, what the heck's wrong with hikers wanting trails without bikes?

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: SlowMTBer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by J.B. Weld View Post
    I prefer riding where motorcycles and jeeps aren't allowed, what the heck's wrong with hikers wanting trails without bikes?
    I agree with you, but also would like to see more MTB trails where hikers were not allowed. The problem as I perceive it is that Hikers do not like being told that any trail is off-limits to them, especially if it is built on public (government owned) land.

    I rode at a MTB Park yesterday for the first time, and realized just how nice it was having no hikers to avoid. I am a very courteous trail rider, but regardless of how nice you are, some hikers just act like you shouldn't be out there. Our local trails here are closed to Mountain Bikers on Saturdays, but yet the hikers have trails that bikers are not allowed on any other day of the week as well. I would be happy with some bike specific trails, or maybe a day when hikers aren't allowed.
    2011 Trek Rumblefish 1

  22. #22
    YRG
    YRG is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    345
    Totally agree with them (American Hiking). Signed their petition. Bikes are PITA for people on foot. More separate use trails are better for all user groups. Branding them as a hate group is a very angry act, ironically demonstrating hate. The way things get better for all is with cooperation and respect. I want hiking only trails. I want directional bike only trails. I wish bikers would ride with courtesy in our area. Unfortunately most of us don't. Look at history and see that bikes are the ones bringing down on other users experience. Our bikes are better, faster, and way more fun. A decent xc rider can out ride a dh rider of 15 years ago. We are the ones who are messing things up for others. Rideit, please take down the logo, it is narrow minded and counter productive.

  23. #23
    NOT Team Sanchez
    Reputation: wasea04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,972
    We, the mountain bikers, built many of the so called hiking trails in our area. Y'know what's a major PITA? Having a dozen or more hikers unwilling to move aside down or up the hill! Even better, there are multiple destination weight loss spas that use our bike trails as commercial hiking locations. I too hike, although hiking terrain that could be biked causes me intense pain and regret, however that doesn't limit my perception to being blind to the inequitable behavior of many hiking/naturalist groups. I agree with cooperation, but when one group refuses to cooperate with the other only a fool tries to continue to "get along." Don't even get me started on equestrians, they do more damage to a trail than a thousand hikers/bikers!
    I like bikes.

  24. #24
    CoolArrow
    Reputation: jhazard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,417
    "Do you realize what a PITA it is" can be played by both sides. What gives hikers "more right" than mtb'ers?

    What's narrow minded is to believe that hikers have some priority to use the trails that we do not. PITA or not, I have a right to be that PITA. Just because they are looking to chill in wildlife, are on foot, or can whistle Zippity Doo Dah, does give them priority of usage.

    I also have the right to be courteous, in fact, it's more a responsibility. And I am. There are users on both sides that are not, neither "side" has a lock-down on misbehavior. Its a bogus excuse.

    Also narrow minded is to ignore the fact that millions of acres of designated wilderness that riders are not allowed in. The rider-free utopia they seek already exists. For every existing trail they get to designate as "hiker only" - they should be working to provide a venue for the users they displace. OR build their own damn trails. Go build a "hiking park" and see how that flies for them...

    and Rideit, please leave the logo there - its quite productive in generating a dialogue. (they had their a$$es handed to them on their little facebook campaign).
    Airborne Flight Crew

    Jerry Hazard – website

  25. #25
    007
    007 is offline
    b a n n e d
    Reputation: 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,208
    The bottom line is that the hiking, cycling and equestrian communities need to learn to share the trails. If you can't manage to share a trail safely and responsibly - no matter how you travel on it - then get off the trails. Period.
    Alcohol may lead nowhere, but it sure is the scenic route!

  26. #26
    YRG
    YRG is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    345
    In multiple use, bikes yield to all (at least in theory). Telling hikers to go to wilderness is a akin to telling bikers to go ride a park. Same argument, different sides. Neither is useful or really worthwhile. Hikers don't want priority of use, just use. Everybody should be able to use a trail and not have to fear getting run over. We have hikers who jump off a trail because they are scared of getting taken out. Bikers are so used to this that they have ceased to yield the trail in our area.
    Which is why I see bikes as a pain. Trail users should not have to keep constantly vigilant to ensure they don't get hit by someone.

    Riding a trail with a lot of hikers is a big pain also. Start, stop, start, stop................ It isn't worth it. That's when I go somewhere else.

    If there are groups of walkers unwilling to let a rider pass when they are going the same direction, that would be impolite. Going different directions, the bikers should yield. Wasea not sure if you are bummed about one or both of these. I've never run into hikers who don't yield a trail when I come up behind them. I have run into lots of bikers who don't though.
    Anyway, maybe it's different where you guys are. Where we are, the bikers (us) are the *******s, and the hikers need some help getting their fair share of use.

  27. #27
    CoolArrow
    Reputation: jhazard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,417
    It's not "telling them to go the wilderness"... so much. But the place their looking for exists in that wilderness. There is no "bike wilderness". Bike parks - not the same thing, not even relatively speaking, besides the fact that there is exponentially more wilderness than there are bike parks.

    If you have local users who do not understand, and who do not operate with common courtesy - that's your local issue and it needs to be addressed. Do not apply that experience to all users across the board. It is not the reality where I ride. Why do "hikers need some help", when at the same time if a trail has too many hikers - YOU go somewhere else? Who's helping you? Why is the rider the one with less rights to an otherwise multi-use trail?

    A previous poster had it right - we need to learn to share a little better.
    Airborne Flight Crew

    Jerry Hazard – website

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation: skiahh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,610
    Quote Originally Posted by LyNx View Post
    Sorry to be a logical, honest, ethically thinking MTBer and being able to view from the other sides perspective, guess that makes me a "bad" person Curious who would have pushed for and help build this PCT system? I say do as suggested and build your own trails, that are bike specific. Instead of blowing that $20, $30, $40 on beer and pizza after the ride, throw it in a collection tin and get the rest of the MTBers to do the same, petition for someplace to build the trail and get other MTBers to do the same. When you get the permission, then round up all those MTBers and get them to come out and volunteer and build their bike only trail.

    Sorry if you all can't realise how annoying and a PITA we in general are, some people aren't out there just to get a speed/adrenalin buzz, they want to enjoy nature, taking their time to take it in, watch the wildlife and just chill and if you're narrow minded enough to think that's possible allowing bikes or horses on these trails, then you fall into the same narrow minded category as the hikers you're trying to pigeon hole as such.
    Wow, defensive much? I think I struck a nerve.

    Why are you on this forum again?

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    709

    Re: New American Hiking Society logo....

    "Secure their bikes at the trailhead and join us for a hike"
    Lol and come back to no bike

    Sent from my HTC EVO LTE

  30. #30
    MTB B'dos
    Reputation: LyNx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    22,195
    Because I LOVE MTBing, but unlike it seems a majority, I am logical and can see others perspective, not something that seems to be the norm in this world these days. If you can't look at yourself and see that a speeding MTB is an evasive vehicle for someone out wanting to enjoy nature, then I've no more to say.

    Quote Originally Posted by skiahh View Post
    Wow, defensive much? I think I struck a nerve.

    Why are you on this forum again?
    One day your life will flash before your eyes, will it be worth watching??

  31. #31
    fresh fish in stock...... SuperModerator
    Reputation: CHUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,621
    Quote Originally Posted by LyNx View Post
    Sorry to be a logical, honest, ethically thinking MTBer and being able to view from the other sides perspective, guess that makes me a "bad" person Curious who would have pushed for and help build this PCT system?I say do as suggested and build your own trails, that are bike specific. Instead of blowing that $20, $30, $40 on beer and pizza after the ride, throw it in a collection tin and get the rest of the MTBers to do the same, petition for someplace to build the trail and get other MTBers to do the same. When you get the permission, then round up all those MTBers and get them to come out and volunteer and build their bike only trail.

    Sorry if you all can't realise how annoying and a PITA we in general are, some people aren't out there just to get a speed/adrenalin buzz, they want to enjoy nature, taking their time to take it in, watch the wildlife and just chill and if you're narrow minded enough to think that's possible allowing bikes or horses on these trails, then you fall into the same narrow minded category as the hikers you're trying to pigeon hole as such.
    you have absolutely zero concept as to how stupid your statement above is.

    The whole 'build your own trail' comment is nothing more than an ignorant attempt to push a strawman argument...and so unrealistic it's to be treated as an insult.

    The fact is hikers have exclusive use of over 200,000 miles of trails in the U.S. on public land.

    Mountain bikers have less than 50 miles of trails in the U.S. for exclusive use on public land. It takes approx 2+ years, 3000+ volunteer hours and around $25,000 to build 2 miles of singletrack in California...for shared use

    And here you are *****ing about the PCT...a 2650 mile grossly underutilized premier singletrack that bikes were banned from in 1988 based on a rumored incident that did not happen on the PCT.

    In fact, 2 of the 3 original signers of the damn ban think it should be overturned.
    Click Here for Forum Rules

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Thyamine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    63
    I think everyone can understand the idea that a group of people would like to have their own trails and not be bothered by other groups using the trails in a different manner. The hard part is removing the emotion from the arguments, and knowing that often the most vocal are also the more radical/extreme.

    From the other side, if we had MTB trails that were single use, and then hikers petitioning to be on them, quite a few of us would be against it. And the gut reaction is often a 'hell no!', even if logically we can understand the reasoning. In this case, we have the up-hill battle of trying to gain access to trails that are traditionally not for us to use, and the problem that the one mountain biker who is a jackass when they ride outshines the 100 other mountain bikers who were perfectly polite.

    Hopefully just like snowboarding, this is a process that will take time, but will see more and more trails for us to use in conjunction with everyone else on the trails. We just have to be careful that the a-holes on both sides aren't the ones determining the conversation, and that the rest of us can figure something out that makes sense.
    2012 Specialized Carve Comp 29
    IMBA Member
    Team J3 :: http://www.ridej3.com

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Taranis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    221
    I'm all for agitating for more Bike only trials, but in the mean time on the trails that are multi use; we as bikers need to give right of way to hikers as per the rules - Even if the hiker has stepped off the trail for you, and in fact, especially when the hiker steps off the trail, we need to stop our bikes and let them by.

    Most hikers step aside for bikes even though it's the hikers right of way, not because they are being courteous, but because they don't know if your going to hit them or not.

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation: skiahh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,610
    Quote Originally Posted by LyNx View Post
    Because I LOVE MTBing, but unlike it seems a majority, I am logical and can see others perspective, not something that seems to be the norm in this world these days. If you can't look at yourself and see that a speeding MTB is an evasive vehicle for someone out wanting to enjoy nature, then I've no more to say.
    Huh? WTF does that mean? Are you trying to hide or evade from hikers now?

  35. #35
    Professional Crastinator
    Reputation: Fleas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,616
    For the sake of discussion, we have more than our share of anti-MTBers. When the latest shared trail opened it was touted as primarily a MTB trail (bold move on the part of the park) and thoughtfully laid out with many turns and narrow spaces to keep speeds in check. Bikes may travel in one direction. Hikers may travel in either direction (although if you're smart you hike towards the bikes). The lines of sight are pretty good, and a few of the turns allow you to look across to the next ridge to see who's ahead of you - or to look back to see who is coming. It is 10 miles of shared trail among hundreds of miles of hiking-only trails and almost 100 miles of equestrian trails. It is so unfairly disproportionate whether it is based on user group size, user group miles, trail utilization, users per mile, or any other comparative metric. It stinks.
    It will be forever before the number of MTB trail miles is in proportion with the MTB user group, or with other user groups' trails. I think everyone needs to accept that more MTB trails are needed to help disperse the traffic. It would not hurt to allow MTBers access to underutilized trails from other user groups.

    -F
    It's never easier - you just go faster.

  36. #36
    AZ
    AZ is offline
    banned
    Reputation: AZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    19,201
    He's just doin the usual, trolling.

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JoePAz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,683
    Quote Originally Posted by tjkm View Post
    .. solo hikers rocking tunes, oblivious to my bell, polite request to pass on the left, etc. ..
    I ran into this over the weekend. However I was descending on saw mtn biker climbing. So I stop and pull off to allow the climbing rider to ride on, but despite my verbal commands to ride through he stopped too. Then he pulled out his earphone... Ugg... Better to yield than to crash, but wear headphone is just such a pain. I know he never heard me tell him to "keep riding". And it was an older guy too. Late 40's or 50's.
    Joe
    '12 Santa Cruz Highball 29", '13 Santa Cruz Solo 27.5",Vassago Verhauen SS 29" XC, AM, blah blah blah.. I just ride.

  38. #38
    Bandit 29 FTW!!!
    Reputation: In-Yo-Grill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,157
    Quote Originally Posted by LyNx View Post
    Sorry to be a logical, honest, ethically thinking MTBer and being able to view from the other sides perspective, guess that makes me a "bad" person Curious who would have pushed for and help build this PCT system? I say do as suggested and build your own trails, that are bike specific. Instead of blowing that $20, $30, $40 on beer and pizza after the ride, throw it in a collection tin and get the rest of the MTBers to do the same, petition for someplace to build the trail and get other MTBers to do the same. When you get the permission, then round up all those MTBers and get them to come out and volunteer and build their bike only trail.

    Sorry if you all can't realise how annoying and a PITA we in general are, some people aren't out there just to get a speed/adrenalin buzz, they want to enjoy nature, taking their time to take it in, watch the wildlife and just chill and if you're narrow minded enough to think that's possible allowing bikes or horses on these trails, then you fall into the same narrow minded category as the hikers you're trying to pigeon hole as such.
    I just can't see this as a reality for Texas since 98% of the land is privately owned. I would be more than happy to help fund and put in the sweat equity to get trails built. I only know if two privately owners who open up their property to bikers. One charges $7.00 a day to ride and it's worth every penny and then some. I could see a mixture of trails within the same area. Some being for hikers and others specific to bikers. Then you would just have to watch for cross traffic where they intersect.

    I understand your point but there is a finite amount of land and funding. We have a series of paved trails around the city and it's great for walking and jogging. I don't care for the roadies who fly through because they don't want to ride the streets but oh well. All I can do is hope they will be courteous as they ride. Most are but some are real pricks.
    Let's make like a Bike and get the Huck outta here...

  39. #39
    Bandit 29 FTW!!!
    Reputation: In-Yo-Grill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,157
    Quote Originally Posted by JoePAz View Post
    I ran into this over the weekend. However I was descending on saw mtn biker climbing. So I stop and pull off to allow the climbing rider to ride on, but despite my verbal commands to ride through he stopped too. Then he pulled out his earphone... Ugg... Better to yield than to crash, but wear headphone is just such a pain. I know he never heard me tell him to "keep riding". And it was an older guy too. Late 40's or 50's.
    I find that really annoying too. Riders who don't know trail etiquette and wear headphones are an accident waiting to happen. I've gotten to where I shout out "ON YOUR LEFT" and hope that people don't think I'm pissed. Just trying to get their attention over the music.

    BTW, I'm in my 40's and know better.
    Let's make like a Bike and get the Huck outta here...

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Gasp4Air's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,990
    Quote Originally Posted by JoePAz View Post
    And it was an older guy too. Late 40's or 50's.
    Ouch. This would make someone in their 60s, what, a walking corpse?
    Use it, use it, use it while you still have it.

  41. #41
    mtbr member
    Reputation: JoePAz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,683
    Quote Originally Posted by Gasp4Air View Post
    Ouch. This would make someone in their 60s, what, a walking corpse?
    I say older because it was not some punk 20 year kid, but an older guy who I would expect to know better. Seemed like a strong rider too, but just out to lunch due to headphones. Might as well be deaf. To me riding and being able to hear clearly is so important. Lots of things you can hear about how the bike is working and what is around you. That would be debate for another topic, but to keep it on topic for this thread anyone with earbuds pressed in so tight they cannot hear anything around them is taking a risk at worst and annoying for those around them at best.
    Joe
    '12 Santa Cruz Highball 29", '13 Santa Cruz Solo 27.5",Vassago Verhauen SS 29" XC, AM, blah blah blah.. I just ride.

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Gasp4Air's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,990
    Quote Originally Posted by JoePAz View Post
    I say older because it was not some punk 20 year kid, but an older guy who I would expect to know better. Seemed like a strong rider too, but just out to lunch due to headphones. Might as well be deaf. To me riding and being able to hear clearly is so important. Lots of things you can hear about how the bike is working and what is around you. That would be debate for another topic, but to keep it on topic for this thread anyone with earbuds pressed in so tight they cannot hear anything around them is taking a risk at worst and annoying for those around them at best.
    I was just kidding. Actually, sometimes I do feel like a walking (or riding) corpse. And I agree with you about the earphones, esp where safety is concerned, but also from a personal and esthetic standpoint. The sounds of riding in the woods are something I'd miss.
    Use it, use it, use it while you still have it.

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tystevens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,826
    I get that maybe "some trails" out there should be hiker only. No argument out of me.

    What drives me crazy is that the hikers don't act like there are a few trails that should be set aside, and that the rest should be open to multiple uses/users. Rather, some hikers get ticked off that there are multiple users on easily accessible trails that are right next to city of a million people, rolling their eyes, lecturing bikers as they pass, loudly sighing as they have to step 1/2 step aside again for a bike to pass.

    If they want solitude, go where there can be solitude. But don't expect it on a trail right next to the city at 5:30 pm when everyone else wants to get their trail use in, too.
    '11 Specialized Enduro Expert for the trails
    '13 Felt Z4 for the road

  44. #44
    007
    007 is offline
    b a n n e d
    Reputation: 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,208
    Remember that the hiking groups have ALL of the designated Wilderness trails COMPLETELY to themselves. That's a VERY large percentage of the trails in the US where bikes simply cannot go (for now).
    Alcohol may lead nowhere, but it sure is the scenic route!

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    171
    I like the idea of having trail schedules. Loop A is open to MTBers on Tues, Thurs, Sat and Loop B is open to MTBers the other days. That way nobody is on the same trail at the same time and everyone can enjoy them. This doesn't require new trails being built ($$$) and when new trails are actually built hikers and bikers can BOTH invest in them.

    As much as the AHS facebook posts and the members comments infuriated me, we all need to see the big picture and work together. It will be better for both of our futures.

Similar Threads

  1. American Hiking Society doesn't want to share trails...
    By SkaredShtles in forum Colorado - Front Range
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-03-2013, 12:30 PM
  2. Where do I buy a Society Fury fork in the US?
    By AC/BC in forum Where are the Best Deals?
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-09-2013, 07:51 PM
  3. United Society for SingleSprocket's Rep (USSR)
    By Biggie in forum Eastern Canada
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 09-30-2011, 11:18 AM
  4. Average American perception of American Beer
    By Guerdonian in forum Beer Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 09-25-2011, 11:15 AM
  5. OT: Hiking (yes hiking) and Lodging Near Nevada City..
    By cohenfive in forum California - Norcal
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 06-26-2011, 10:09 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •