"It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth
Ok, sorry, I didn't look close enough to notice it actually says AMP on the rear dropout..so my Wal-Amp comments are off..disregard..looks like a B3 to me.
Geologist by trade...bicycle mechanic (former) by the grace of God!
Still not it, check out the gussets at the end of the toptube of the OP's. It is most definitely an AMP suspension design. But during this time frame there were several companies using that design.
29'ers should come with a warning label affixed to the toptube. WARNING: Objects may be further than they appear.
As I posted earlier, it has an Amp swingarm, but what the frame is, thats still up in th air.
Yeah that post was in reference to the the photo of the AMP. Your frame is definitely not an AMP but one of the several companies that used that suspension design. The mystery rolls on.
Edit: Unless your frame is an AMP and some gussets were custom welded on to it. Just a thought, because those AMP frames were very prone to cracking.
29'ers should come with a warning label affixed to the toptube. WARNING: Objects may be further than they appear.
Yeah definitely a cool looking vintage bike. But one of the worst suspension designs ever.
Oh man, I don't think so...the Horst Link is the basis for some of the designs still in use! The thing I remember about them is the flexiness of the rear end.
Geologist by trade...bicycle mechanic (former) by the grace of God!
sifting through google images, I can't find any verified 2000 models of this bike aside from the tiny mtbr thumbnail. A lot of other manufacturers who used this frame design (Mongoose, Litespeed) used square tubing in the rear triangle, presumably to reduce the flexiness. they also ran the rear derailleur cable down the seatstay.
Originally Posted by shawnt2012
...the other two morons are bellowing like wookies in a bush waiting for a response back
The bikepedia page for that bike shows a picture that looks very similar to me, though I'm not sure if the pic is actually of the B-3 Laguna Classic
I wouldn't hold Bikepedia as being a bike Bible as some think. I found 3 mistakes on a description of one bike I recently looked up. If they can make 3 mistakes on one bike I can just imagine how many mistakes there are amongst thousands of bikes.
29'ers should come with a warning label affixed to the toptube. WARNING: Objects may be further than they appear.