Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    5

    Crankset Weight Triple Conversion vs. Double

    Why does it seem that a triple crank, converted, is less weight than a similar double?

    Example: SRAM X0 Triple, no BB, = 705 grams. (= 625g converted)
    SRAM X0 Double, no BB, = 700 grams.

    Umm, you lose the big ring, so what's up?

    I'm thinking the smart solution is to buy a triple, and do a simple conversion. Looks 75g less rotating weight in the end, weighs 705 - big ring(80g?), and Q is all good(for me at least)? Yes, the weight matters to me, I'm a WW. ((Please don't just say the old blah, blah, weight is overrated argument, etc. (unless you're being facetious, that is awesome) I get it if you don't care, but I do. Cheers!))

    Why? Or am I totally misunderstanding something about crankset weights?

  2. #2
    Warrior's Society
    Reputation: mtnbikej's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    4,905
    Are you factoring in the same chainring sizes?

    Taking a triple 44/32/22 and just dropping the big ring is gonna be lighter than a double with 39/26.
    I crashed hard enough on my Tallboy to break my leg,
    The carbon is way more durable than most people.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    5
    Yes on the ring sizing.
    I'd buy a 44/32(or 34)/22, and convert to 34/22. Lots of massive inclines where I live.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Trail_Blazer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,934
    Sure, it works fine.

    Consider replacing the big gear with a bash guard if you prefer, or keep the big ring as a bash guard.
    Most MTN bikes could use a good bash guard.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 70sSanO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    436
    I'd post this in the Weight Weenies Forum if you want to get an opinion from people who obsess over these things.

    Not that obsessing over weight is a bad thing, but they can probably give you some really good advice making the conversion.

    John
    1995 Trek 970 - 80mm Atom Race
    1992 Serotta T-Max - 70mm Z3 Light
    1993 GT All Terra - 46mm Mag 21

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Trail_Blazer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1,934
    Something else to consider is that the advertised weight of parts don't always translate to real world weights.
    Often crankset weights are lacking full disclosure of what parts are included in the weight measurement also year to year the change and the internet specs are not always accurate.
    My XT and Saint cranks advertize a similar weight but in reality the gap is much more and it's noticeable with all the parts combined.

Similar Threads

  1. Converting an FSA triple Dynadrive Crankset to a double crankset
    By wheelinthai in forum Drivetrain - shifters, derailleurs, cranks
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 4 Weeks Ago, 06:20 AM
  2. Triple to Double conversion
    By jkymmel in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-24-2013, 12:20 AM
  3. Differences in strength between XT 780 triple crankset and the 785 double crankset??
    By zoro in forum Drivetrain - shifters, derailleurs, cranks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-15-2013, 03:11 AM
  4. Is the XTR double crankset, convertable to triple?
    By scant in forum Drivetrain - shifters, derailleurs, cranks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-03-2012, 12:22 PM
  5. SLX Crankset-Double or Triple?
    By angelo in forum Drivetrain - shifters, derailleurs, cranks
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-11-2011, 05:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •