Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    230

    bar strength comparison - carbon vs high end aluminum

    It is time to replace my handlebars (5 year old aluminum). I am considering Ritchey WCS riser bar ($70, ~215 g) or Easton EC70 XC carbon ($140, 155 g). I am a pretty cautious XC rider - no jumps, no terrain parks - weigh 170 #, riding a full suspension bike.

    I am kind of interested in the carbon bar to see if I can tell any difference between carbon and aluminum, but don't want to constantly worry about my handlebar snapping during normal riding.

    Assuming both bars are installed and torqued properly, will one be more durable than the other?

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    617
    If you ride conservatively as you say; I don't think strength will be an issue. Either bar should just about outlast your bike.

    Full disclosure: I have yet to try a carbon bar, but would not hesitate to do so. I weigh 210 lbs pre-gear and ride pretty rough.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: smilinsteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    6,721
    The carbon bar almost certainly has higher tensile strength and better fatigue resistance. And it will feel better (not as harsh) and it is lighter.

    I have an LP composite bar that has lasted me through at least 11 or 12 seasons and a Richey WCS carbon bar on my other bike about 4 years old. I do not worry one bit about either one. If I was going to worry about a bar snapping, I would worry more about aluminum, especially ultra light aluminum.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,087
    I'm 225 or so, on a 5.5" 29er trailbike, and do drop ledges, occasionally crash, and am on 190g carbon bars that are speced for "all mountain" (Truvativ Noir) and they're just fine.

  5. #5
    addicted to chunk
    Reputation: Shark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    4,898
    Carbon bars are great (seatpost too), have easton monkey lites and won't be going back to al bars anytime soon. (ever)
    Riding.....

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,465
    Easton Haven on the AM and Answer pro on the XC both carbon and both get hammered. No flex and ride qualify is so much better than the AL they replaced.
    2014 S-Works Epic WC
    2014 Yeti ARC
    2014 S-Works Crux Disc

  7. #7
    T.W.O.
    Reputation: mimi1885's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,010
    Quote Originally Posted by smilinsteve View Post
    The carbon bar almost certainly has higher tensile strength and better fatigue resistance. And it will feel better (not as harsh) and it is lighter.

    I have an LP composite bar that has lasted me through at least 11 or 12 seasons and a Richey WCS carbon bar on my other bike about 4 years old. I do not worry one bit about either one. If I was going to worry about a bar snapping, I would worry more about aluminum, especially ultra light aluminum.
    ^^^^This

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •