Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: drmayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    147

    Rumblefish vs. superfly100 al, hifi

    I have a 2010 rumble fish one. I also have a sette Razzo hard tail that I've used to race XC. Was thinking about ditching both for a superfly 100 al. I was thinking if I lowered my fork on the fish to 100mm I'd basically have the superfly geometry. I know the rear shock is different. Frame geometry wise, are there any other differences between the fish and the superfly 100 al?

    The reason for my inquiry is that I get beat up with the hard tail and want to race a FS bike.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    157
    I had a 2010 rumblefish one and when I started racing I sold it and bought a 2010 superfly 100 and have been very apply with the sf100. The suspension on the sf100 is not as plush, the ride angle is a little lower, the weight is 23 lbs. It is the only bike I have so I do ride it all the time and really enjoy it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •