This is my first post on this forum so don't beat me up to much
I am on very limited budget but want to get a mt. bike. I have been searching craigslist and these are the two deals in my area that I have come up with. Not sure which is the better way to go.
Instincts tell me newer is better but I am new to buying mt. bikes so not sure if that holds true.
2000 Big Sur - This bike is in excellent condition and the owner purchased it new in 2000. Everything on this bike is stock. Asking price is $150. Not sure whether this is over priced or not.
2006 Wahoo - This bike is also in excellent condition. It is the model with v-brakes (not disc). The owner purchased this new in 2006 and hasn't ridden it since 2008/9. This bike doesn't even have a scratch on it and has been ridden only on road / in town. It has cane creek bar ends, pump, rear saddle bag (small), cat eye speedometer, and upgraded cranks. I can get this one for $225.
What do you think? Are either of them worth the money or should I keep looking?
Thanks in advance!
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: Big Sur vs Wahoo