Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 100 of 118
  1. #1
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    905

    The TRUE tire size thread

    ohh no, here we go again, not another tire thread

    I'd really like all the info in one place, so lets see what we can gather here

    Post your actual inside bead to bead measurements with tires lying flat so help us out filling in missing data where we can

    here's what I've gathered from other threads and this one, if I'm missing any tires and you have the info, post it up

    all collected data is in black, if measurements came in together I kept them on the same line

    I added averages and estimates so we can see the predictions and the actuals

    Rim sizes added as well, no I don't care if there's a 44 and a 102 or whatever, this is enough

    Weights added, these are averages or published weights, tires fluctuate by up to 100g, usually 50 one way or the other from the numbers in the chart

    tire sizes.pdf
    Last edited by TitanofChaos; 03-19-2015 at 05:59 AM.
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    74
    [QUOTE=TitanofChaos;10933399]ohh no, here we go again, not another tire thread

    Post your actual inside bead to bead measurements with tires lying flat so help us out filling in missing data where we can

    Could you provide a picture demonstrating how this should look so we can be consistent?

  3. #3
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by genefruit View Post
    Could you provide a picture demonstrating how this should look so we can be consistent?
    The TRUE tire size thread-bead.png

    you want this measurement, bead edge to bead edge but from the inside, tire tread flat on the table
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  4. #4
    gone walk about
    Reputation: nvphatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    9,472
    But sir what if we lack the techno for such things?

  5. #5
    Anchorage, AK
    Reputation: Lars_D's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,181
    ...by the way you can get a pretty decent approximation of mounted casing width by simply adding rim width to the casing's flat width and dividing by 3.14. I tested it with a few of the tires on the above table and it came reasonably closed to the measured widths that I have seen for those tires when mounted.
    --Peace

  6. #6
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by Lars_D View Post
    ...by the way you can get a pretty decent approximation of mounted casing width by simply adding rim width to the casing's flat width and dividing by 3.14. I tested it with a few of the tires on the above table and it came reasonably closed to the measured widths that I have seen for those tires when mounted.
    Thanks for the tip, this plus surly's tire spec sheet looks like it got really close for all of their tires, I added them above
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,680
    I'm no mathematician, but does this system take into account any variances in sidewall height? Or is sidewall height standardized among all fat tires?

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: thickfog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,271
    I'm not sure how useful this is. My bfl rubbed the inside of my 907 fork. My snowshoe is nowhere even close. Both at 12 psi on a 90 mm uma.

    And you have an identical bead to bead width on both tires.
    So what "true size" do you hope to get from this?
    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
    CRAMBA Chairman

  9. #9
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by thickfog View Post
    I'm not sure how useful this is. My bfl rubbed the inside of my 907 fork. My snowshoe is nowhere even close. Both at 12 psi on a 90 mm uma.

    And you have an identical bead to bead width on both tires.
    So what "true size" do you hope to get from this?
    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
    depends where you get the info, I posted what I think is better info from surly's site
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation: thickfog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,271

    Re: The TRUE tire size thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post
    depends where you get the info, I posted what I think is better info from surly's site
    I got my own tire width info with my own actual experience. I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish. Is this to determine what an actual mounted width would be? Or approx?

    I'll measure my bfl, larry and snowshoe in a bit to contribute.

    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
    CRAMBA Chairman

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: thickfog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,271
    238 Big Fat Larry lightweight casing.

    233 Snowshoe 4.7

    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
    CRAMBA Chairman

  12. #12
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by thickfog View Post
    I got my own tire width info with my own actual experience. I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish. Is this to determine what an actual mounted width would be? Or approx?

    I'll measure my bfl, larry and snowshoe in a bit to contribute.

    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
    I'm only attempting to estimate mounted sizes for the 3 surly rim sizes and somewhat demystify the tire size confusion, manufacturer tire sizes obviously don't mean much as they all measure their tires on different rims at different PSI, some are broken in or stretched and some brand new

    I understand that there will be variations in every tire produced, we see 20-50 gram weight changes in a stack of the same tire so I don't assume anything here is 100% accurate

    I'm just a geek about numbers and data
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: thickfog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,271
    Ok. I added mine. Hope that helps.

    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
    CRAMBA Chairman

  14. #14
    gone walk about
    Reputation: nvphatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    9,472
    Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post
    I'm only attempting to estimate mounted sizes for the 3 surly rim sizes and somewhat demystify the tire size confusion, manufacturer tire sizes obviously don't mean much as they all measure their tires on different rims at different PSI, some are broken in or stretched and some brand new

    I understand that there will be variations in every tire produced, we see 20-50 gram weight changes in a stack of the same tire so I don't assume anything here is 100% accurate

    I'm just a geek about numbers and data
    I appreciate your efforts and others will too.

  15. #15
    Location: SouthPole of MN
    Reputation: duggus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,712
    Bud & Lou are actually labeled as 4.8... not sure where the 4.7 came from.
    ...Be careful what you're looking at because it might be looking back...

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,593
    OP, thanks for taking the time to compile this. It was interesting to study the numbers and compare the differences between the smallest rim and tire combo vs. the largest. 30mm or just over an inch difference from one extreme to the other sure puts things in perspective. As a side note, the range in size between like-sized car tire is also significant. We just replaced one set of 225/45/17's with another set of 225/45/17's from a different manufacturer, and the new ones are noticeably larger, so I doubt the small-potatoes fat bike industry will ever be consistent.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: gcappy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,641
    Edit:
    Morning brain fart.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    982
    Nice Idea, thanks. Maybe add a couple of more columns. Uma 70mm and 90mm.

    Steven
    Lucky neighbor of Maryland's Patapsco Valley State Park, 39.23,-76.76 Flickr

  19. #19
    drev-il, not Dr. Evil!
    Reputation: Drevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,853
    Quote Originally Posted by shoo View Post
    Nice Idea, thanks. Maybe add a couple of more columns. Uma 70mm and 90mm.

    Steven
    It'd also be cool to add us little guys that run 47mm-50mm (Schlick Northpaw, Surly Rabbit Hole 26", etc.)
    "Keep your burgers lean and your tires fat." -h.d. | ssoft | flickr

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation: wetpaint's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    313
    Just measured my Snowshoe on a 80mm RD. 96mm wide at the case, 85mm at tread blocks

  21. #21
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by duggus View Post
    Bud & Lou are actually labeled as 4.8... not sure where the 4.7 came from.
    this http://surlybikes.com//uploads/downl...Geometries.pdf
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    72
    Vee8 (new, unmounted): 230mm

  23. #23
    Fat & Single
    Reputation: ozzybmx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,078
    Any chance of putting another column on there with the tyre weights ? I keep looking for it.

    cheers
    Evil Following
    Trek 9.9 Superfly SL
    Indy Fab Deluxe 29
    FM190 Fatty
    Pivot Vault CX
    Cervelo R3 Disc

  24. #24
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by ozzybmx View Post
    Any chance of putting another column on there with the tyre weights ? I keep looking for it.

    cheers
    Done
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  25. #25
    Fat & Single
    Reputation: ozzybmx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,078
    Cheers... now when I go "hmmm nice width" the weight weenie part of my brain looks at the new column and dismisses it as too heavy.

    I wonder what my bald buds tip the scales at.
    Evil Following
    Trek 9.9 Superfly SL
    Indy Fab Deluxe 29
    FM190 Fatty
    Pivot Vault CX
    Cervelo R3 Disc

  26. #26
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    905
    measured some missions last night
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  27. #27
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    905
    More measuring, added a sterling bead length and BFL bead length and size on uma 70
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    242
    This review of the 45nrth Dillinger 5 has a bead to bead measurement of 245 mm.

    45NRTH Dillinger 5 – Six Week Test Ride | FAT-BIKE.COM

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iamkeith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    772
    Quote Originally Posted by 2LO4U2C View Post
    This review of the 45nrth Dillinger 5 ....

    45NRTH Dillinger 5 – Six Week Test Ride | FAT-BIKE.COM
    Classic: "we tested it for 6 weeks, but never as a rear tire. I'm sure it has good traction and will be good in the snow, though."

    I've been anxiously awaiting some info on this tire, but this is pretty funny. I'm glad to at least hear some production-version width measurements though, and that's really the most important part, so thanks for posting this.
    We still hang bike thieves in Wyoming [Pedal House]

  30. #30
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    905
    lots of new stuff added, PDF file attached, the image keeps getting downsized by the forum software
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,212
    My 2 Vee Bulldozers weighed in at 1339g and 1380g, and measure 109mm knob to knob on 80mm Sun Mulefut rims, tubeless, at 15psi. 104.5mm at casing.
    Jason
    Disclaimer: www.paramountsports.net

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post
    lots of new stuff added, PDF file attached, the image keeps getting downsized by the forum software
    This is GREAT work. Thanks for all the effort on this!!! I like the addition of the PDF too, the tables in the forums were impossible to read.

    One note, the Ground Control Fat tire is actually 1450g, not 1350g. I heard that 1350 somewhere too, but the special-ed website says 1450 and the one I got the other day was 1468.

  33. #33
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by JAGI410 View Post
    My 2 Vee Bulldozers weighed in at 1339g and 1380g, and measure 109mm knob to knob on 80mm Sun Mulefut rims, tubeless, at 15psi. 104.5mm at casing.
    Quote Originally Posted by jasongerken View Post
    This is GREAT work. Thanks for all the effort on this!!! I like the addition of the PDF too, the tables in the forums were impossible to read.

    One note, the Ground Control Fat tire is actually 1450g, not 1350g. I heard that 1350 somewhere too, but the special-ed website says 1450 and the one I got the other day was 1468.
    Done and Done
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,555
    Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post
    Awesome!

    Can you add placeholders for Knard 4.8, or whatever they are calling it. Panaracer Fat-B-Nimble, and the various versions of the Schwalbe Jumbo Jim? Schwalbe has specs listed on their site.

  35. #35
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    7,860
    I weighed 4 Ground Controls and got anywhere from 1420g to 1486g

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    665
    Quote Originally Posted by bme107 View Post
    Awesome!

    Can you add placeholders for Knard 4.8, or whatever they are calling it. Panaracer Fat-B-Nimble, and the various versions of the Schwalbe Jumbo Jim? Schwalbe has specs listed on their site.
    Curios what the reality size of the 4.8 Jumbo Jim is. Looks really jumbo.

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    525
    Weighed a 60 TPI Fat B Nimble and got 1350. :-)

    My Snowshow (4.5 120TPI) was 1250 as well. I had the widths written down on my 47mm rims but I lost my paper and now the rims are in the shop getting laced up.

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    24
    Some info for Specialized Ground Control 4.6". Bought two tyres. Measured bead to bead as per instructions and took four measurements for each tyre at approx 90 degree intervals. Also weighed them.

    Tyre 02145219:
    243; 244; 243; 245 -> average 244mm
    Weight = 1430g

    Tyre 03145131:
    240; 238; 239; 239 -> average 239mm
    Weight = 1440g

    Will post widths on 90mm rims as soon as the wheelbuilder finishes building up the wheelset.

    Thanks for the info provided in your PDF. I think it is really helpful.

  39. #39
    wjh
    wjh is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    152
    I am trying to determine if a dillinger 5 with studs will clear a 170 spaced 9zero7. Nates on margelites clear with room to spare and according to the chart they are both 99 mm wide. Can anyone verify that these 2 tires are in fact the same width? I measure my nate at 98 but a 4 and a 5" tire are the same size? Seems odd

  40. #40
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    26,012
    Quote Originally Posted by wjh View Post
    I am trying to determine if a dillinger 5 with studs will clear a 170 spaced 9zero7. Nates on margelites clear with room to spare and according to the chart they are both 99 mm wide. Can anyone verify that these 2 tires are in fact the same width? I measure my nate at 98 but a 4 and a 5" tire are the same size? Seems odd
    About 4 and 3/8" on my LB 90mm rims from tread to tread. Couldn't believe the traction in deep snow today I run them on a 170mm bike. Some guys with skinnier rear ends are switching to 65mm rims just to be able to run them, although I'm not sure that'd be a huge benefit, but idk.
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  41. #41
    wjh
    wjh is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayem View Post
    About 4 and 3/8" on my LB 90mm rims from tread to tread. Couldn't believe the traction in deep snow today I run them on a 170mm bike. Some guys with skinnier rear ends are switching to 65mm rims just to be able to run them, although I'm not sure that'd be a huge benefit, but idk.
    What bike is it? I know some bikes (salsa) are wider than a 907

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation: blowery's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    249
    Framed 26 x 4.0

    I don't have a way to weigh them.

    Bead to bead flat: 228mm
    80mm rim: 98mm

    Here is what some reviews showed for specs:
    Weight – 1328g and 1330g
    The spread out test measuring bead to bead flattened out – 225mm

  43. #43
    mtbr member
    Reputation: DubzOxford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    108
    OP. Thanks for doing this!
    Fat and Single

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    21
    Vee8 on 80mm rim: 97mm measured. Oh, and please add the Panaracer Fat B Nimble tires.

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post


    Attachment 925861

    I'm trying to wrap my head around the attachment TitanofChaos posted. I have Nates on 80mm rims which supposedly measure in at 98mm. I'd like to go wider/higher volume but read that Ground Controls's and D5's can't fit a pugsley. However they come in at 97 and 99 respectively on 65mm rims. How accurate is the chart? Has anyone tried a 5'' tire on a 65mm in a pugsley? This is a great thread by the way.

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    636
    can we get a thread that describes how the tires actually work too? I've been reading reviews for weeks now and my head is spinning. I need to buy tires in the next day or two for a race this weekend. Sucks that I have to spend almost as much as I paid for the bike to have it not suck big donkey.

  47. #47
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by ntm1973 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post


    Attachment 925861

    I'm trying to wrap my head around the attachment TitanofChaos posted. I have Nates on 80mm rims which supposedly measure in at 98mm. I'd like to go wider/higher volume but read that Ground Controls's and D5's can't fit a pugsley. However they come in at 97 and 99 respectively on 65mm rims. How accurate is the chart? Has anyone tried a 5'' tire on a 65mm in a pugsley? This is a great thread by the way.
    There's a lot more to tire fit than just width, overall diameter and chain clearance play a big part

    lots of updates, thanks for all the info folks!
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    124
    I take interest in this post.

    On rolling darryl my 27tpi nates measured 3-15/16" wide. Freshly mounted 120 tpi D4 studded only measured 3-11/16" wide. Not to happy about that. Maybe there is some stretching over time? Will update.

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,555
    Anybody have cross-references to provide Titan about the Bontrager Hodag? Seems to have escaped this list.

  50. #50
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    636
    Just got my Vee Bulldozer 26x4.7 120TPI

    1330g/1360g
    248mm/250mm

    They will be going on 100mm rims soon.

    edit:

    115mm at the casing and 111.5 at the side knobs on 100mm rims with tubes at 15psi.
    Last edited by slowride454; 01-30-2015 at 12:47 AM.

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    636
    Vee Rubber Mission Command 26x4.0 72TPI tubeless ready (stock tires on Mongoose Vinson) These have about 160 miles on them.

    1410g/1440g
    236mm/238mm

    they measured right at 4" on 100mm rims

  52. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    516
    Halo Nanuk 26x4.0 60tpi. Freshly mounted with 1/4 mile on 'em.

    210mm bead to bead.

    Measure exactly 3.5" wide at 10# on 65 mm Marge Lites. Tread-to tread, outer edge.

    Don't own a digital scale, other than my bathroom scale which is semi-accurate to 0.1 lbs. One tire felt a wee bit heavier than the other.

    I accomplished my goal of reducing the rotational mas of my wheels. By weighing myself, and then picking up my bike and weighing myself and the bike, both before I removed my Larrys, and doing the same after mounting these new Nanuks and substituting an ultralite Surly tube for the original (80 gram weight savings on the one tube), the same scale read 2.5 lbs less. That's with an error + or - 0.1 lb.
    At that level of accuracy, I suppose that I lost a approx 1.25 lbs per wheel.

    Almost forgot to mention that Nanuk is 3/8" (approx 10mm) smaller in diameter than Larry. A set of these will lower one's bottom bracket 3/16" compared to a set of the Larrys.
    Last edited by PlutonicPlague; 02-07-2015 at 12:49 PM.

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation: AllMountin''s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,002

    The TRUE tire size thread



    These ties don't love laying completely flat due to wire bead and tall profile, but I get a shade over 10 1/2" bead to bead, or 267mm. They may be closer to 270mm.

    Chaoyang 4.9

    267mm bead to bead
    111.5mm casing
    101mm lug to lug
    ~1550 grams (not my measurement)

    Edited to adjust carcass width to 114 millimeters, when set up tubeless, at 15 psi.

    All measurements taken on 80mm rims.
    Last edited by AllMountin'; 02-15-2015 at 06:02 AM.

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    224
    Why is this not a sticky? This should be sticky. Big props to TitanofChaos for putting that table together, how about something along the lines of a Googledoc that people could add their own info to? Just a thought

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    24
    Tyres were mounted tubeless on 90mm rims a week ago, so I'm guessing they've had enough time to stretch out. 7psi. Widths on 90mm rims added below in bold.

    Quote Originally Posted by 2bliss View Post
    Some info for Specialized Ground Control 4.6". Bought two tyres. Measured bead to bead as per instructions and took four measurements for each tyre at approx 90 degree intervals. Also weighed them.

    Tyre 02145219:
    243; 244; 243; 245 -> average 244mm
    Weight = 1430g
    Width (sidewall-to-sidewall) on 90mm rim: 109mm
    Width (across side knobs) on 90mm rim: 112mm


    Tyre 03145131:
    240; 238; 239; 239 -> average 239mm
    Weight = 1440g
    Width (sidewall-to-sidewall) on 90mm rim: 108mm
    Width (across side knobs) on 90mm rim: 111mm

  56. #56
    Tear it all out! SuperModerator
    Reputation: CraigH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    7,755
    Quote Originally Posted by Willum View Post
    Why is this not a sticky? This should be sticky.
    I added a link to this thread to the Fatbike Info thread already stuck to the top of the board as I was searching for it after seeing a few people mention this thread.

  57. #57
    Tear it all out! SuperModerator
    Reputation: CraigH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    7,755
    Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post
    There's a lot more to tire fit than just width, overall diameter and chain clearance play a big part

    lots of updates, thanks for all the info folks!
    Where is the latest version posted?

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation: AllMountin''s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,002
    Don't think the chaotic Titan is updating the list anymore. Perhaps one of you IT geeks could transfer the info into a public document?

  59. #59
    Lord Thunderbottom
    Reputation: TitanofChaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by AllMountin' View Post
    Don't think the chaotic Titan is updating the list anymore. Perhaps one of you IT geeks could transfer the info into a public document?
    sorry, added 2 measurements for tires we already have data on and added 2 tires no one is talking about
    Today I will do what others won't, so tomorrow I can do what others can't

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation: AllMountin''s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,002
    Muchas gracias.

    Also, I've got a fat b 4.0 that measures 85mm on a 47mm rim.

  61. #61
    Tear it all out! SuperModerator
    Reputation: CraigH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    7,755
    Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post
    sorry, added 2 measurements for tires we already have data on and added 2 tires no one is talking about
    Where is the latest version of the document?

  62. #62
    is buachail foighneach me
    Reputation: sean salach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    6,602
    Quote Originally Posted by CraigH View Post
    Where is the latest version of the document?
    He has been replacing the pdf in the first post every time the list get's edited.

  63. #63
    Tear it all out! SuperModerator
    Reputation: CraigH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    7,755
    Quote Originally Posted by sean salach View Post
    He has been replacing the pdf in the first post every time the list get's edited.
    Thanks! I hadn't noticed the edit.

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation: akacoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    663
    i wonder where i can buy the chaoyang 4.9 tire
    16 Trek Farley 5 W/2XL snowshoe
    07 Kona Stab
    14 Specialized Fatboy
    04 Giant Simple
    04 SC V10

    My Parts for sale link

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    151
    Thanks for all the great info…how about a column for tire circumference ?

  66. #66
    Tear it all out! SuperModerator
    Reputation: CraigH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    7,755
    Quote Originally Posted by akacoke View Post
    i wonder where i can buy the chaoyang 4.9 tire
    I tried to contact the fat bike company that installs them on their complete bikes to see if they sold them separate but they never responded.

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    636
    Quote Originally Posted by CraigH View Post
    I tried to contact the fat bike company that installs them on their complete bikes to see if they sold them separate but they never responded.
    I asked at Wheel & Sprocket about them too. I suggested they sell them through their ebay store.

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    22
    It appears you can order them from the u.k. eBay site. Shipping sticks you pretty good but it's still not bad for what you get.

  69. #69
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    58
    Schwalbe Jumbo Jim 4.8", liteskin version.
    1350 grams
    111 mm width on an 80mm wide rim (Sun Mulefut) running tubeless at 15 PSI.

    Some weights from my postage scale:
    Vee Bulldozer 4.6" folding: 1350g
    Vee Snowshoe XL 4.8" folding: 1450 and 1460g
    Surly Big Fat Larry 4.7" 120 tpi: 1190g

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    140
    LBS has a Farley 5 in stock. Stopped by last night to measure the Barbegazi 4.7's on 80mm Mulfuts.

    I measured:
    761mm diameter at max pressure
    116mm outside edge of tread at max pressure
    117mm sidewall width at max pressure
    113mm outside edge of tread at 10psi

    Sorry I couldn't get the flat casing or tread width. The shop and I were unprepared for the pain of pulling the tires off the rims. That should be a bullet-proof tubeless setup, for sure! People are gonna have to CUT those tires off those rims!

  71. #71
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    20
    Schwalbe Jumbo Jim Evo foldable Liteskin 120 TPI 4.8 on 82 mm rims with 4.0 innertubes.

    - 260 mm bead to bead
    - 111 mm outside thread to thread

  72. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    99
    Dunderbeist
    1498grams
    248mm bead to bead

    Flowbeist
    1320 grams
    250mm bead to bead

  73. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation: tundratrader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    565
    I am not seeing the data. I am on my phone with tapatalk.

  74. #74
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,555
    Quote Originally Posted by tundratrader View Post
    I am not seeing the data. I am on my phone with tapatalk.
    it's a link to a PDF in the first post of the thread.

  75. #75
    mtbr member
    Reputation: tundratrader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    565
    I see a icon with mountain with sgwigly line horizontal.

  76. #76
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    20
    Chaoyang 26x4.9 60 TPI folding

    bead to bead 272 mm
    mounted on 82 mm rim at 15 PSI
    knob to knob 106 mm

    somehow the rear Jumbo Jim looks bigger because of the side knobs.

    Anyone knows how much bigger both tires are gonna get if i put them tubeless?

  77. #77
    mtbr member
    Reputation: AllMountin''s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,002
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabriel F. Popescu View Post
    Chaoyang 26x4.9 60 TPI folding

    bead to bead 272 mm
    mounted on 82 mm rim at 15 PSI
    knob to knob 106 mm

    somehow the rear Jumbo Jim looks bigger because of the side knobs.

    Anyone knows how much bigger both tires are gonna get if i put them tubeless?
    Not sure on the growth, but I found the same thing. Sitting next to Spesh Ground Control, the GC looked bigger, even though the numbers don't back that up.

  78. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation: rain100's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    35
    I measured the 27.5" Hodag 3.8, and the bead to bead was 215mm. I measured 1260 g.

  79. #79
    beer thief
    Reputation: radair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,564
    Bump to keep this near the top

  80. #80
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Misterg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    177
    Bontrager Barbegazi 26 x 4.7 120tpi Team Issue folding (stock on 2016 Farley 5)

    Weight 1.346 kg / 1.356 kg (front & rear) = 1.35kg / 3lbs average

    I couldn't get the carcass to lay completely flat, but the bead to bead measurement with it as flat as it would go is 260mm / 10.25" (would be more if it would lay flat).

    On the stock 80mm Mulefut rims it measures ~115mm / 4.5" across the knobs at ~~10 PSI.

  81. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by Misterg View Post
    Bontrager Barbegazi 26 x 4.7 120tpi Team Issue folding (stock on 2016 Farley 5)

    Weight 1.346 kg / 1.356 kg (front & rear) = 1.35kg / 3lbs average

    I couldn't get the carcass to lay completely flat, but the bead to bead measurement with it as flat as it would go is 260mm / 10.25" (would be more if it would lay flat).

    On the stock 80mm Mulefut rims it measures ~115mm / 4.5" across the knobs at ~~10 PSI.
    I'll remeasure mine before I mount it tomorrow, but Barbegazi 120 TPI folding as well, 1360g. 255mm bead to bead. Will be mounting on Marge Lites, hoping to fit rear of 170mm 907.

  82. #82
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    400
    Forgot to measure the bead to bead width, but I just mounted up a snowshoe xl. At 10psi, new (no time to stretch out), 80mm rims (Mulfut), tubeless, it measures 111 mm to lugs, 109 carcass.

    Update. After stretching for a week or so, it measures 111 at the carcass. Had to trim knobs for it to fit in my frame, so I don't know exactly the knob width, but I would guess about 113.

    Typed on my phone. Pardon the autocorrect.
    Last edited by fotooutdoors; 11-20-2015 at 05:56 AM.

  83. #83
    Squ-eti
    Reputation: mccartney7499's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    234
    Snowshoe XL's

    1474 g, 1530 g

    117 mm knob to knob on 90 mm rims
    114 mm at the carcass

    standard 4.0/4.9 tubes 623 g
    specialized 24x2.4-3.0 presta tubes 283 g

    rolls fairly smooth @ 9 psi with my 200 lb self aboard
    sounds like it's ripping apart the fabric of the earth @ 7 psi
    (I'm talking velcro like/kung fu grip)
    starts to feel "floaty" like you're riding
    a marshmallow or a cloud at below 6 psi

    not surprisingly self steer also begins to show up around 7 psi
    when the traction goes through the roof

    The wire bead, 72 tpi Vee H-Billies (4.25) these replaced
    were both 1445 grams.
    Last edited by mccartney7499; 11-20-2015 at 08:22 AM.
    "Trails? Where we're going we don't need, trails!"


  84. #84
    sluice box
    Reputation: Co-opski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    793
    45nrth Dillinger 5 studded 1528g & 1605g
    Schwalbe Jumbo Jim 4.0 light skin 1109g & 1090g
    ptarmigan hardcore

  85. #85
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    506
    I got 1180g and 1137g for my JJ 4.0 Liteskins.
    So much for the 999g ones that were floating about when they first became available


    Fat Biker

  86. #86
    mtbr member
    Reputation: kaleidopete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    239
    My sad story... I put a Dillinger 5 studded on the rear of my 2014 Farley with am 80mm wheel last year and it just fit. Three studs "ticked" the derailleur, but I didn't care, I ran it anyway. Fast forward to this year, I bought a Dillinger 5 unstudded to run on the rear. Guess what! I can't even squeeze it in there, even with 5 psi it's too big and too fat! Hard to believe there is that much discrepancy it the same tire and brand. So reading spec's and tire sizes doesn't always work as I found out. Makes me wonder if I bought 5 tires and tried them all until I found one that fit. ps, I even unmounted and rotated and remounted the tire several times because I really wanted it to work, but no dice.

  87. #87
    mtbr member
    Reputation: xjoex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    249
    I have two new Maxxis Minion FBF and FBR tires. They claim 4.8" but they measure
    FBF 4.18" on a 81mm DT Swiss BR 710
    FBR 4.31" on a 81mm DT Swiss BR 710

    Honestly a bit of a disappointment.




    -Joe
    Last edited by xjoex; 12-05-2015 at 08:35 PM.

  88. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Jseis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    159
    Quote Originally Posted by TitanofChaos View Post
    ohh no, here we go again, not another tire thread

    I'd really like all the info in one place, so lets see what we can gather here

    Post your actual inside bead to bead measurements with tires lying flat so help us out filling in missing data where we can

    here's what I've gathered from other threads and this one, if I'm missing any tires and you have the info, post it up

    all collected data is in black, if measurements came in together I kept them on the same line

    I added averages and estimates so we can see the predictions and the actuals

    Rim sizes added as well, no I don't care if there's a 44 and a 102 or whatever, this is enough

    Weights added, these are averages or published weights, tires fluctuate by up to 100g, usually 50 one way or the other from the numbers in the chart

    tire sizes.pdf
    Hey thanks for doing this, it is VERY helpful.

    One thing that likely messes with fit is aspect ratio: tire depth/sidewall height. A lower aspect fat tire is likely going to fit a [marginal] frame where a higher aspect ratio fat tire is going to hit the stays. Wouldn't take more than a centimeter to screw things up and it appears that air pressure figures prominently here. Higher pressure stacks sidewall height.

  89. #89
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    37
    Incredibly useful thread, given the price of these tires. Thanks to the OP.

  90. #90
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by xjoex View Post
    I have two new Maxxis Minion FBF and FBR tires. They claim 4.8" but they measure
    FBF 4.18" on a 81mm DT Swiss BR 710
    FBR 4.31" on a 81mm DT Swiss BR 710

    Honestly a bit of a disappointment.




    -Joe
    weight is 1600gramm per tire?
    Then i certainly stick with my 4.6 45nrth ..

  91. #91
    Doesntplaywellwithmorons!
    Reputation: DeeEight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    10,764
    I will be taking delivery of a 2016 KHS Four Seasons 1000 in a matter of hours, I will measure the ChaoYang made KHS 120TPI Foldable 26 x 4.9s as mounted on 100mm rims the bike comes with, but if the bead-to-bead number a few messages back is correct, they should be monsters.

    Ok so they're a tall casing tire, bead to bead flat is 260mm but the tread is only 113mm flat and as what is essentially the same tire design as Panaracer's Fat B Nimble (which also never actually lives up to its claimed width) this didn't surprise me too much. At 5.7psi on 100mm rim the casing measured out to 115mm width but the tread was only about 103mm. Light weight and very supple casing though, 1306 grams for the front one on the bike and 1335g for the rear one. If you're after a large air volume with a fast rolling footprint this is a good tire to run.


    The TRUE tire size thread-bigdaddy1.jpgThe TRUE tire size thread-bigdaddy2.jpg
    Last edited by DeeEight; 12-24-2015 at 10:15 PM.
    I don't post to generate business for myself or make like I'm better than sliced bread

  92. #92
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    96
    Anyone got measurements of the Maxxis Colossus yet?

  93. #93
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    67
    Quote Originally Posted by slabber View Post
    I'll remeasure mine before I mount it tomorrow, but Barbegazi 120 TPI folding as well, 1360g. 255mm bead to bead. Will be mounting on Marge Lites, hoping to fit rear of 170mm 907.
    So how is it ? Width ?

  94. #94
    LCW
    LCW is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: LCW's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,987
    Flowbeist/Dunderbeist 26x4.6

    Didn't measure bead to bead (saw this thread after they were already mounted), but happended to weigh them before installing:

    Flowbeist: 1380g
    Dunderbeist: 1440g

    And in comparison, Surly Nate 26x4.0 27tpi pair weighed:
    -1720 & 1760g

    ... so pretty good savings!!!


    Rough measurement of them installed, after about 1/2 dozen rides (6-8 psi), they are appox 4.2" (107mm) at the knobs, 4 (101mm) at the casing. Far cry from the "4.6" they are supposed to be. This is on My Other Brother Darryl rims. Running them tubeless.

    EVIL Following

    Surly Wednesday

  95. #95
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeEight View Post
    I will be taking delivery of a 2016 KHS Four Seasons 1000 in a matter of hours, I will measure the ChaoYang made KHS 120TPI Foldable 26 x 4.9s as mounted on 100mm rims the bike comes with, but if the bead-to-bead number a few messages back is correct, they should be monsters.

    Ok so they're a tall casing tire, bead to bead flat is 260mm but the tread is only 113mm flat and as what is essentially the same tire design as Panaracer's Fat B Nimble (which also never actually lives up to its claimed width) this didn't surprise me too much. At 5.7psi on 100mm rim the casing measured out to 115mm width but the tread was only about 103mm. Light weight and very supple casing though, 1306 grams for the front one on the bike and 1335g for the rear one. If you're after a large air volume with a fast rolling footprint this is a good tire to run.


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	bigdaddy1.jpg 
Views:	635 
Size:	97.3 KB 
ID:	1037727Click image for larger version. 

Name:	bigdaddy2.jpg 
Views:	516 
Size:	81.9 KB 
ID:	1037728
    Hello Dee8, ive been on the fence about buying a 2016 1000 khs, may we know your impressions please? Ive been riding a 2015 and been quite happy with it. But its smaller frame cant accomodate the bigger tires unfortunately. Thanks.
    Last edited by Charliegreen; 01-18-2016 at 09:12 AM. Reason: Forgot details

  96. #96
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by Jukahia View Post
    So how is it ? Width ?
    Sorry, didn't see this question earlier, not visiting site that regularly these days...

    Mounted tubeless on Marge Lites - casing measured out just over 104mm, knob width 109.5mm.

    Pretty happy with the tire overall, but going to try Flowbeist now for more positive cornering traction as the Barbegazi knobs aren't super tall but it does roll relatively well as a result.

  97. #97
    Old, Slow and now FAT! :)
    Reputation: TheNormsk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,467

    The TRUE tire size thread

    Quote Originally Posted by LCW View Post
    Flowbeist/Dunderbeist 26x4.6

    Didn't measure bead to bead (saw this thread after they were already mounted), but happended to weigh them before installing:

    Flowbeist: 1380g
    Dunderbeist: 1440g
    That's a low weight for your tired. Is that accurate?

    I weighed mine on kitchen scales and mine came to:

    Flowbeist 1446g
    Dunderbeist 1479g

  98. #98
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    33
    Just browsing this thread to help inform my next tyre purchase and saw the Maxxis Minion FBF size quoted. I have an FBF on the same rim (81mm) and it measures 4.46" @ 10psi. Quite a difference - that is the outside knob measurement.

  99. #99
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    373
    I did not take them off the rim, but the Kenda 4.5" Gumwalls measured 4.49" wide on a 101mm rim:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails The TRUE tire size thread-223.jpg  


  100. #100
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by GiantTurd View Post
    Anyone measure a JJ 4.8 on a 65mm rim?
    Someone from the Jumbo Jim thread said 110mm on 65. Not sure how accurate that is.

    http://forums.mtbr.com/fat-bikes/jumbo-jim-928088-post12483975.html

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Maxxis Minions DHR II 2.3 true to size?
    By Whip Chop! in forum Wheels and Tires
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 11-24-2015, 07:05 PM
  2. 19.5/49.5cm? What is the true size for me?
    By wfp in forum Bike and Frame discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-16-2013, 02:37 PM
  3. Kenda slant 6 true to size
    By Learux in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-22-2013, 08:08 PM
  4. How do the sizes on XXX shoe run? True to size? Or not quite?
    By squareback in forum Apparel and Protection
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-13-2013, 10:45 AM
  5. 45NRTH Wölvhammer--they fit true to size.
    By lawfarm in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-21-2012, 05:01 AM

Members who have read this thread: 271

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •