Page 5 of 13 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 250 of 609
  1. #201
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    16
    Been riding mine hard for the last week. Put together a little video of the bike being built and ridden.


  2. #202
    mtbr member
    Reputation: thecanoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,153

    Rocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike

    Great video. Is that New England? Maybe New Hampshire?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Santa Cruz Tallboy
    Moonlander

  3. #203
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    85
    great video!

  4. #204
    Muskoka
    Reputation: BlackCanoeDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    3,304
    Yep...nice video, nice bike
    https://get.google.com/albumarchive/...127?source=pwa

    RSD Bikes "The Mayor"
    Rocky Mountain Sherpa Overland

  5. #205
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    16
    Rossland, BC.

  6. #206
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    85
    I have one on order, wanting to replace my moonlander with something a bit more aggressive but so far reviews don't sound to favourable?? Might have to cancel and get on the fatboy waiting list. Keep the reviews coming guys.

  7. #207
    mtbr member
    Reputation: thecanoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,153

    Rocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike

    I did a short ride on one and loved the Bluto but found the ride in the rear very harsh compared to my Moonlander.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Santa Cruz Tallboy
    Moonlander

  8. #208
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Stopbreakindown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    735
    Quote Originally Posted by VBoothe View Post
    Been riding mine hard for the last week. Put together a little video of the bike being built and ridden.

    Nice work, enjoyed the video very much, thanks!

  9. #209
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Windigo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    447
    Quote Originally Posted by thecanoe View Post
    I did a short ride on one and loved the Bluto but found the ride in the rear very harsh compared to my Moonlander.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    I felt the same thing in the rear. I test rode a different brand right after, that I thought I would hate and to my surprise that bike felt great.

  10. #210
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    85
    thanks for the comparison report! I actually broke the rear end on my moonie, that's why I am looking for a more aggressive type riding build, a bit scared of breaking the warranted frame once i get it back. Would have loved to try one before buying, from some of the posts it sounds like handling is questionable for some?? also wondering if the blutto is intended for cold winter riding or more for summer XC type riding??

    Quote Originally Posted by thecanoe View Post
    I did a short ride on one and loved the Bluto but found the ride in the rear very harsh compared to my Moonlander.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  11. #211
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    85
    And what brand was that?

    Quote Originally Posted by Windigo View Post
    I felt the same thing in the rear. I test rode a different brand right after, that I thought I would hate and to my surprise that bike felt great.

  12. #212
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Michaud View Post
    thanks for the comparison report! I actually broke the rear end on my moonie, that's why I am looking for a more aggressive type riding build, a bit scared of breaking the warranted frame once i get it back. Would have loved to try one before buying, from some of the posts it sounds like handling is questionable for some?? also wondering if the blutto is intended for cold winter riding or more for summer XC type riding??
    The blizzard has aggressive geometry. It is one of thd reasons I bought it. Just because a few of you don't like aggressive frames doesn't make the blizzard a **** bike, it's personal preference. By the way the fatboy has aggressive geometry also. In my opinion the blizzard beats the fatboy in features and weight. They had to stick a 135mm carbon fork and, smaller tires just to hit the same weight as the blizzard with 4.7 tires and an aluminum fork. Check the specs! I think the fatboy is a nice bike but, the blizzard is superior, in my opinion. Purchase what you like however, bashing thr blizzard for it's aggressive frame is lame!

  13. #213
    mtbr member
    Reputation: thecanoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,153

    Rocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike

    I rode and ICT right after the Blizzard. Even fully rigid it felt better.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Santa Cruz Tallboy
    Moonlander

  14. #214
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Aceldama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    321
    I also rode the Blizzard and the ICT back to back and posted my impressions here:Surly ICT thread - Page 5- Mtbr.com

    They're both nice bikes and they're the same price. It's a hard decision.

    -I give the ICT the edge on tires but I actually prefer the Mulefut rims to the clown shoe for ease of tubeless setup

    -on the street the rigid ICT felt less darty. The comparison is kinda pointless because I can't test ride the bikes on the trail where the Bluto matters.

    -the Blizzard feels snappier.

    Unfortunately my LBS doesn't have the deore Blizzard. I think that model is an excellent value and I'd like to check one out in person.

  15. #215
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Windigo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    447
    Quote Originally Posted by Michaud View Post
    And what brand was that?
    fatboy.

  16. #216
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    145
    I've done three rides on the Blizzard, 50 mi, 27 mi, and 11 mi (the last 11 on the most technical terrain around where I live). I've done well over 2k mtb miles this season and my main bike (SC TBLT) was in the shop for ~ 2 months. I am liking the Blizzard a lot so far. It corners really well, grips very tightly, and is very comfortable on the downhills and in the air. Coming from my 69.5 HA on my TBLT, it is taking some adjustment to ascend short steep hills and get up and over steep rock obstacles. I am considering an angleset to get it closer to the geo on the TBLT, but will give it a few more rides before doing so. The angleset would decrease the wheelbase a little too which probably wouldn't hurt. The tires are pretty solid so far, excelling in cornering traction and faring pretty well on slow climbs. Overall coming from a Carbon sub 28 lb mtb frame I can def feel the weight on the longer rides, but I will be putting on some Nextie's and going tubeless soon, which should also improve the climbing. The bluto smooths things out up front and allows for more aggressive riding for sure.

  17. #217
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    8
    I love the Pacific Northwest Native motif.

  18. #218
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    12
    Road one today and it's a top contender. I have to say I really like the front suspension.

  19. #219
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by Windigo View Post
    fatboy.
    I also demo'd the fatboy before buying the blizzard. 60+ miles on dirt. The blizzard rides and feels more like a mountain bike. Self steer is much worse on the Fatboy (could be the tires). The Fatboy does climb better though. Both great bikes though can't go wrong either way.

  20. #220
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    12
    Michaud,

    I test rode quide a few bikes and the Blizzard was at the top of the list.Right now

    1. Blizzard
    2. Fat Boy
    3. ICT

    are my maybes

  21. #221
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    85
    Thanks, for your assessment! Did you get a chance to try them out in snow or mostly dirt?

    Very hard to make a choice without having the chance to demo them, your comments are much appreciated

    Quote Originally Posted by opdev View Post
    Michaud,

    I test rode quide a few bikes and the Blizzard was at the top of the list.Right now

    1. Blizzard
    2. Fat Boy
    3. ICT

    are my maybes

  22. #222
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    508
    Here are a few geometry numbers that are interesting to see for the different bikes. All numbers were taken from bike company websites and for the Large frame of each model.

    Bike Head Tube Angle Seat Tube Angle Chain Stay Standover Effective Top tube
    Blizzard 68.5 73 455 740 610
    Fatboy 70.5 73 455 820 625
    Mukluk II 68.5 73 447-464 786.3 625
    ICT 68 72.5 450 807.8 630
    “Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of riding a \mountain or fat/ bike.” ~ John F. Kennedy

  23. #223
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    62

    Blizzard First impression

    Hi Folks,

    Here's some impressions from my first Blizzard XT ride last night: In fact, my first fat-bike ride as well... just bought it.

    I have to ride roads to get to the trails and boy did that feel weird! I see what the commenters are talking about now. The gyroscopic effect of those huge rotating masses is very noticable. At first I was fighting the handlebars to turn, but by the end of the ride home I had figured out that I have to exaggerate the lean into a turn to initiate it more smoothly. No split-second course corrections on this bike, at least not on paved surfaces. Off-road it was a lot more comfortable and seemed much more nimble. It was a bit icy last night and I was on leaves a lot but no skidding out anywhere. Perhaps the slippery surface let me turn the tire easier, which makes me think that on pavement it might not be the gyroscopic effect as much as the contact patch being so large and so sticky that it fights twisting forces. Kind of like trying to turn a rubber dinner plate lying on asphalt.

    Gearing is low indeed. I was easily able to max out the speed and coasted a lot on the way to the trails, but after a while I just accepted the maximum speed and rode at the bike's pace. It's still a workout, as my heart rate attested to, but just not the speed we've become so used to. A different kind of riding, which is why I bought this to start with, I guess. I found a few sharp uphill trails and damn does that puppy climb. I was glad I was running SPDs because I needed that smooth pedal stroke to keep the rear tire from spinning out on the leaves. I never did use the lowest gear, but one could probably climb a tree stump with it. It will come in handy in deeper snow no doubt. Gotta say I like the Bluto. Only 100mm travel but with the tires it sure makes it plush up front.

    I rode the bike as set up by the shop because I was so eager to get out and play with it, but I'll need to tweak the cockpit quite a bit. Those stubby SLX brake levers need to be a lot closer to be usable with lobster-mitt gloves on and the angle of the handlebars is such that they droop down right now. I'll also install a pair of Ergon Grips and stub-ends for better hand warmth and control in the cold as well. I'm going to make Sugru plugs for the open cable-routing holes to keep water out, but I like the cable routing and the clean downtube. The top-tube studs were very handy for routing my lights cable from the water bottle battery on the seat tube. Beautiful finish and graphics on this bike too.

    The thing is heav-y. With lights, close to 35 lbs. Reminds me of the first CCM "mountain bikes" from the late '80s. Those big-ass steel framed bombers we'd taco wheelsets on a few times a year before we could afford a decent bike with a front shock. Kinda shows how spoiled we've become with our lightweight FS rides now, tackling terrain like a comfy couch. This bike does take me back to a simpler time, which is kinda ironic considering it's state of the art...

    Cheers,

    CC

  24. #224
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Aceldama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    321
    Quote Originally Posted by curiously-coherent View Post
    Hi Folks,

    Here's some impressions from my first Blizzard XT ride last night: In fact, my first fat-bike ride as well... just bought it.

    I have to ride roads to get to the trails and boy did that feel weird! I see what the commenters are talking about now. The gyroscopic effect of those huge rotating masses is very noticable. At first I was fighting the handlebars to turn, but by the end of the ride home I had figured out that I have to exaggerate the lean into a turn to initiate it more smoothly. No split-second course corrections on this bike, at least not on paved surfaces. Off-road it was a lot more comfortable and seemed much more nimble. It was a bit icy last night and I was on leaves a lot but no skidding out anywhere. Perhaps the slippery surface let me turn the tire easier, which makes me think that on pavement it might not be the gyroscopic effect as much as the contact patch being so large and so sticky that it fights twisting forces. Kind of like trying to turn a rubber dinner plate lying on asphalt.

    Gearing is low indeed. I was easily able to max out the speed and coasted a lot on the way to the trails, but after a while I just accepted the maximum speed and rode at the bike's pace. It's still a workout, as my heart rate attested to, but just not the speed we've become so used to. A different kind of riding, which is why I bought this to start with, I guess. I found a few sharp uphill trails and damn does that puppy climb. I was glad I was running SPDs because I needed that smooth pedal stroke to keep the rear tire from spinning out on the leaves. I never did use the lowest gear, but one could probably climb a tree stump with it. It will come in handy in deeper snow no doubt. Gotta say I like the Bluto. Only 100mm travel but with the tires it sure makes it plush up front.

    I rode the bike as set up by the shop because I was so eager to get out and play with it, but I'll need to tweak the cockpit quite a bit. Those stubby SLX brake levers need to be a lot closer to be usable with lobster-mitt gloves on and the angle of the handlebars is such that they droop down right now. I'll also install a pair of Ergon Grips and stub-ends for better hand warmth and control in the cold as well. I'm going to make Sugru plugs for the open cable-routing holes to keep water out, but I like the cable routing and the clean downtube. The top-tube studs were very handy for routing my lights cable from the water bottle battery on the seat tube. Beautiful finish and graphics on this bike too.

    The thing is heav-y. With lights, close to 35 lbs. Reminds me of the first CCM "mountain bikes" from the late '80s. Those big-ass steel framed bombers we'd taco wheelsets on a few times a year before we could afford a decent bike with a front shock. Kinda shows how spoiled we've become with our lightweight FS rides now, tackling terrain like a comfy couch. This bike does take me back to a simpler time, which is kinda ironic considering it's state of the art...

    Cheers,

    CC
    Thanks for your review of the ride. It's nice to read off-road ride reports. Unfortunately I'm only able to test-ride on the street which doesn't leave a great impression.

  25. #225
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    85
    Thanks, great comparison, from what I see, the blizzard has a slacker head angle than the fatboy hence less twitchy, I like that! Shorter top tube probably improves handling as well over the spech.


    Quote Originally Posted by urmb View Post
    Here are a few geometry numbers that are interesting to see for the different bikes. All numbers were taken from bike company websites and for the Large frame of each model.

    Bike Head Tube Angle Seat Tube Angle Chain Stay Standover Effective Top tube
    Blizzard 68.5 73 455 740 610
    Fatboy 70.5 73 455 820 625
    Mukluk II 68.5 73 447-464 786.3 625
    ICT 68 72.5 450 807.8 630

  26. #226
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    508
    Quote Originally Posted by curiously-coherent View Post
    Hi Folks,
    I'm going to make Sugru plugs for the open cable-routing holes to keep water out, but I like the cable routing and the clean downtube.

    CC
    I did not know what Sugru was, so I looked it up. Looks like great stuff. Any experience with its durability? Thanks for posting.

    urmb
    “Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of riding a \mountain or fat/ bike.” ~ John F. Kennedy

  27. #227
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by urmb View Post
    Here are a few geometry numbers that are interesting to see for the different bikes. All numbers were taken from bike company websites and for the Large frame of each model.

    Bike Head Tube Angle Seat Tube Angle Chain Stay Standover Effective Top tube
    Blizzard 68.5 73 455 740 610
    Fatboy 70.5 73 455 820 625
    Mukluk II 68.5 73 447-464 786.3 625
    ICT 68 72.5 450 807.8 630
    Science. Excellent pile of numbers. We need more of this kind of info-jiggin. Please feel free to initiate all-knowing-master-fat geo archive sequence...terminating at full spectrum of current offerings + 1...loading...

  28. #228
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5
    I'm glad to hear the mostly positive views on this bike. I've got a large Deore coming this Wednesday, according to the retailer the first in the UK. Review to follow as soon as I can get a ride in on it. No snow yet so it'll be about the bogtrotting aspects of it.

  29. #229
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by jonshonda View Post
    That guy is wearing shorts and tennis shoes riding in da snow!!

    I am now turned off.
    In Colorado this is the norm.. If conditions are right, which they are a few times a year, you can even catch girls in bikinis snowboarding.

    Often where I camp if early or late in the season at 10,500’ elevation it usually feels like it’s 75 degrees out, real temp around 50. Once the sun goes down.. you’re putting on pants, heavy jacket, gloves and still freezing your ass off..


    Anywho, cool looking bike! I like it a lot!

  30. #230
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    106
    I haven't ridden a blizzard yet, but based off the numbers, I typically prefer a shorter chainsay, shorter seat tube, and longer top tube. I wouldn't even mind a 67* head tube. That being said, I'm the exception, not the norm. PLUS, the numbers on a page only tell part of the story. Actually riding it is a totally different animal.

  31. #231
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    764
    In my case, it was far from what I was wishing for. Falling in love with numbers is not a good thing. No Rocky for me.

  32. #232
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    3
    Finally got a chance to ride my blizzard and I am very happy with it so far. It's my first fat bike so it's taking a while for me to get the tire pressures to just the right setting for some of the rockier trails. Debating about getting a carbon fiber seat post to smooth out the ride and a lighter wheel set. Anyone have any suggestions as far as potential upgrades?

    Rocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike-img_0157.jpgRocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike-img_0158.jpgRocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike-img_0160.jpgRocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike-img_0161.jpg

  33. #233
    Muskoka
    Reputation: BlackCanoeDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    3,304
    ^^ SweeT!! I'm really liking the Blizzard! try 8-10 psi tire pressure. I think they ship at ~ 15 psi. Suspension seat post like Thudbuster are popular on fatbikes, maybe worth a try.
    https://get.google.com/albumarchive/...127?source=pwa

    RSD Bikes "The Mayor"
    Rocky Mountain Sherpa Overland

  34. #234
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    291
    I like this bike a lot.. I’m going to try and locate one to test ride and hopefully buy.

    ..guess with that said I will be keeping my SUV. I really have the itch to hit some back woods trails and my Dolomite isn’t fitting the bill in terms of safety haha

  35. #235
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Windigo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    447
    Quote Originally Posted by kart_racer3 View Post
    Finally got a chance to ride my blizzard and I am very happy with it so far. It's my first fat bike so it's taking a while for me to get the tire pressures to just the right setting for some of the rockier trails. Debating about getting a carbon fiber seat post to smooth out the ride and a lighter wheel set. Anyone have any suggestions as far as potential upgrades?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0157.jpg 
Views:	979 
Size:	275.7 KB 
ID:	939464Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0158.jpg 
Views:	2288 
Size:	329.8 KB 
ID:	939465Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0160.jpg 
Views:	755 
Size:	263.5 KB 
ID:	939466Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0161.jpg 
Views:	837 
Size:	278.3 KB 
ID:	939467
    A carbon seat post won't help with the harsh rear. Not sure the reason for the harsh rear on this bike but noticed that as well. My Mukluk feels like it has a suspension back their. Could it be the tires?

  36. #236
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Windigo View Post
    A carbon seat post won't help with the harsh rear. Not sure the reason for the harsh rear on this bike but noticed that as well. My Mukluk feels like it has a suspension back their. Could it be the tires?
    I was initially surprised by how the firm rear is as well. I honestly expected it to be somewhat plush because of the large tires. The last time out I think I was riding at 6 psi and it wasn't bad, but was nervous about being that low. Do you think tires would be the main influence?

  37. #237
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Windigo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    447
    I honestly don't know but run about 9 psi in the front and 8 or so in the rear on Surly Nates. No self steer and the rear feels good.

  38. #238
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    62

    Sugru = Wonderstuff

    Quote Originally Posted by urmb View Post
    I did not know what Sugru was, so I looked it up. Looks like great stuff. Any experience with its durability? Thanks for posting.

    urmb
    Pardon for the small thread-jack here, but I was asked.

    Sugru is just amazingly versatile stuff. I've been using it for years. It's a self-setting rubber compound. Comes in a pack with a play-doh moldable consistency and once exposed to air, cures to a solid, yet still pliable silicone-like finish. You use it to fix stuff or make things better. I've created a flashlight mount for my commuting helmet, custom mounts for gadgets, patched my shoes and rain-covers and so much more. The stuff stays pliable and waterproof in all temperatures. I used it to fix the strap on an old favourite sports watch, made handles for bathroom cabinets, patched my wife's wellies, the stuff is great. So many things I've fixed instead of thrown out or replaced. So many things I've made work better. I'm a super fan. There are hundreds of uses on their website and they have a magnet kit that's giving me a ton of ideas too.

    Using it to make plugs for the downtube cable holes is great because I can remove them later if I ever want to use a front derailleur. I can mold them exactly to the fittings and make them smooth and waterproof. As for durability, it lasts a long time. I just snapped part of a watch band I fixed two years ago. Just patched it up and it's good to go again. It's great for the temple pads on the arms of my riding glasses too. Makes 'em a lot more comfortable. Handy stuff.

    And now, back to our regularly scheduled thread...

    Cheers, CC

  39. #239
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    62
    If anyone is looking for a way to accurately gauge their fat-tire air pressure, I recently bought a great low-pressure presta air guage on eBay that measures from 0-15 psi.

    Accu Gauge Fat Bike Tire Presta Valve Dial Low Air Pressure Gauge Max 15PSI | eBay

    I'm hoping it will help me experiment with air pressure on the trail. That and a CO2 inflator, naturally.

    Cheers,

    CC

  40. #240
    mtbr member
    Reputation: trailrabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    39
    Cool! Thanks for posting the accu gauge ebay link. I've been looking for that exact one but they were sold out everywhere i looked. Good ol ebay...
    2015 Framed Alaskan Alloy
    2006 Stumpjumper FSR International
    1994 Kona Kula
    1992 Diamond Back Response comp

  41. #241
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    15

    Blizzard

    The Blizzard is a fun ride! No regrets on selling the Pugsley–the Blizzard with the Bluto rides like a mountain bike. Upgraded brakes, dropper post, bar and stem to my specs-lovin it! Hope the rear hub doesn't explode with my 200lbs and steep climbs.

    Has anyone gone tubeless with the Blizzard? Obviously the outer rim edge needs to be taped to cover the rim holes however I'm questioning if the center wrap is air tight. Any beta out there? Thanks!

  42. #242
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by fernieoldgoat View Post
    The Blizzard is a fun ride! No regrets on selling the Pugsley–the Blizzard with the Bluto rides like a mountain bike. Upgraded brakes, dropper post, bar and stem to my specs-lovin it! Hope the rear hub doesn't explode with my 200lbs and steep climbs.

    Has anyone gone tubeless with the Blizzard? Obviously the outer rim edge needs to be taped to cover the rim holes however I'm questioning if the center wrap is air tight. Any beta out there? Thanks!
    I just converted mine to tubleless over the weekend. I've only ridden it once so far, but it seems to be holding up. I'm not completely convinced about how well it last in the long haul, I used tape on the rim and rim holes, but if I press on the square "bubbles" of the center wrap some stan's and air will seep out. This is the first fat wheel and tire I've converted to tubeless so I may be overlooking something that more experienced people may already know how to deal with.

  43. #243
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    15
    Did you tape the entire rim or just the sides to cover the holes? Thanks!

  44. #244
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    145
    Rocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike-image3.jpgRocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike-image5.jpgRocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike-image9.jpg

    Took 3.5 lbs off the bike w/ Nextie/ Rims/Sarma Hubs/Tubeless set up. 3.5 lbs off the rolling weight makes a world of difference, bike rides so much better.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Rocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike-image1.jpg  

    Rocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike-image2.jpg  

    Rocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike-image4.jpg  

    Rocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike-image7.jpg  

    Rocky Mountain Blizzard Fat Bike-image8.jpg  


  45. #245
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    764
    I injected silicon in the last 2 holes each side of the rim join jonction this way it close the circuit. So now, no air is leaking from the joint.
    And then couple of turn of a fiber tape to keep everything from popping out. couple of turn of electric tape on the nippples, couple of turns of clear duct tape and finish with construction red vapor tape. no stan for now

    edit: forgot to add, at the end put tire and tube, inflate at 30psi. This way all the tape layers will be pressed together, and let it rest for the night.
    Remove tube from one side of the rim and pour some brew.

  46. #246
    Loser
    Reputation: Jisch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,532
    I just saw one of these at the LBS. Impressive looking bike and nicely outfitted for the price. If I didn't have a Fatboy, this bike would be on my list for sure.

  47. #247
    Muskoka
    Reputation: BlackCanoeDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    3,304
    Quote Originally Posted by lstone84 View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image3.jpg 
Views:	309 
Size:	143.1 KB 
ID:	939668Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image5.jpg 
Views:	2045 
Size:	132.9 KB 
ID:	939659Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image9.jpg 
Views:	573 
Size:	150.5 KB 
ID:	939664

    Took 3.5 lbs off the bike w/ Nextie/ Rims/Sarma Hubs/Tubeless set up. 3.5 lbs off the rolling weight makes a world of difference, bike rides so much better.
    Very nice!! What are your thoughts on that half-frame bag...is it roomy enough to be worthwhile?
    https://get.google.com/albumarchive/...127?source=pwa

    RSD Bikes "The Mayor"
    Rocky Mountain Sherpa Overland

  48. #248
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    508
    I wanted to experiment with air pressure levels on the Bliz, so went high last ride. Had only a light snow fall (around an inch with no old snow). I pumped up to ~20psi. Did a 16 mile ride with 3048 vertical feet of climbing. Bike handled predictably. trails had roots, rocks (snow and leaf covered) sweet buff sections and many tight turns. Had a few slide outs on bigger wet rocks but never went down. On the fast smooth sections of frozen trail tread, I flew past my bud with 5 psi in his tires. Still getting use to fast turns with the big tires. More lean and more scanning and planning ahead. Severe off camber side hill sections are a bit more challenging with the big tires too. Next ride going to try the 5psi range.

    Istone84--thanks for posting the pictures of your ride. Nextie rims look nice. What is your total weight with dropper and bag?

    urmb
    “Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of riding a \mountain or fat/ bike.” ~ John F. Kennedy

  49. #249
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackCanoeDog View Post
    Very nice!! What are your thoughts on that half-frame bag...is it roomy enough to be worthwhile?
    Yes, I am liking the frame bag alot. I've never rode with one before but I'm finding it very useful and convenient for a variety of uses.

    Quote Originally Posted by urmb View Post
    I wanted to experiment with air pressure levels on the Bliz, so went high last ride. Had only a light snow fall (around an inch with no old snow). I pumped up to ~20psi. Did a 16 mile ride with 3048 vertical feet of climbing. Bike handled predictably. trails had roots, rocks (snow and leaf covered) sweet buff sections and many tight turns. Had a few slide outs on bigger wet rocks but never went down. On the fast smooth sections of frozen trail tread, I flew past my bud with 5 psi in his tires. Still getting use to fast turns with the big tires. More lean and more scanning and planning ahead. Severe off camber side hill sections are a bit more challenging with the big tires too. Next ride going to try the 5psi range.

    Istone84--thanks for posting the pictures of your ride. Nextie rims look nice. What is your total weight with dropper and bag?

    urmb
    Interesting. I started out riding with 8 PSI front and rear and was liking it a lot. I wanted to try a little higher so I went up to 11 PSI and a few minutes into the ride I took a nasty fall over the bars crawling along in a rock garden. Subsequently I put the front to 6.5 and the rear to 7.5 and did a 65 mile ride and loved it. I also weigh 210 lbs and am on the 90mm Nextie's now.

    The weight with frame bag, dropper, and Shimano XT PD-M785 Pedal pedals is 32.5 lbs. Those pedals are almost a pound and the frame bag is 1/2 lb.
    Last edited by lstone84; 11-18-2014 at 02:24 PM.

  50. #250
    Muskoka
    Reputation: BlackCanoeDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    3,304
    did you guys get any discount from msrp from the lbs? i'm guessing not since they are just out and starting to ship? how about on the frame bag?
    https://get.google.com/albumarchive/...127?source=pwa

    RSD Bikes "The Mayor"
    Rocky Mountain Sherpa Overland

Page 5 of 13 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 1992 Rocky Blizzard?
    By RockyWanderer in forum Vintage, Retro, Classic
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 01-27-2014, 08:34 PM
  2. 1996ish Signature Addition Rocky Mountain Blizzard
    By sdsyver in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-07-2013, 08:33 AM
  3. "86.5" Rocky Mountain Blizzard Number 9
    By WETYC... in forum Vintage, Retro, Classic
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-31-2012, 07:50 PM
  4. Rocky Mountain Blizzard Frame
    By cyclesoflife in forum Rocky Mountain
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-22-2011, 03:28 PM
  5. Trek or Rocky Mountain? - My first bike
    By negrobeltran in forum Beginner's Corner
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-09-2011, 01:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •