|
-
-
thats nice
Alu right ?
wonder what weight it is
I like the split top tube
-
Aluminum, yes.
Can't really see them, but it hints at having the swap outs. This would allow someone to get a single speed set up, and then trade out the drop outs for a geared set up when wanted.
Obviously we'll have to wait for more details, but I like the styling, and frame bags should work well with this.
-
Mmmmmm...... Shiney 
Just needs a truss fork .....
Green,not mean
and Floating in a Floatilla :)
-
need better pics, 170 rear?
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
The head set looks large to me -1.5" ?
-
Large for internal bearings (says so on Brants site).
I could go for this big time in raw or polished........just needs a TRUSS fork
Green,not mean
and Floating in a Floatilla :)
-
I have a 1.5" head tube on my diy frame, and a Cane Creek ZS44 headset was relatively cheap, and works okay. Very future proof, you could run forks with tapered steer tubes.
-
Ding, Ding, Ding we have a winner!
Man I'm definitely interested in more details. Brant???? Shiggy???
"I ride to clear my head, my head is clearer when I'm riding SS. Therefore, I choose to ride SS."~ Fullrange Drew
-
Mmmmm I could make something cool out of it.
-
It's Shiggy's design. There are two of them. Headtube is 44mm. Doesn't really need to be, but hey, why not, it fits the downtube nicely and maybe we can make some mad singlesided fork like I keep wanting to make. Long way to go yet.
ps: I did Iditabike in '96 (14th) and '97(6th), but did it on Snowcats and Conti 2.2in tyres.
-
 Originally Posted by brant
It's Shiggy's design. There are two of them. Headtube is 44mm. Doesn't really need to be, but hey, why not, it fits the downtube nicely and maybe we can make some mad singlesided fork like I keep wanting to make. Long way to go yet.
ps: I did Iditabike in '96 (14th) and '97(6th), but did it on Snowcats and Conti 2.2in tyres.
Just keep going
Green,not mean
and Floating in a Floatilla :)
-
very nice - they gonna be around before this winter?
hope so
-
The top tube / chain stay thing suggests vertical compliance but how does that match with using aluminum?
Twin top tubes make me worry about the width and hitting my knees on them. I've never ridden a bike with twin top tubes, so my worry could be totally groundless.
"it IS possible that you are faster or slower than anybody else who is having at least as much if not more or less fun"
-
looks like my size too - argh
and made worse by the fact Im only 25 miles away
and that its not for sale !
-
 Originally Posted by perttime
The top tube / chain stay thing suggests vertical compliance but how does that match with using aluminum?
Twin top tubes make me warry about the width and hitting my knees on them. I've never ridden a bike with twin top tubes, so my worry could be totally groundless.
Fatbikes have 100mm wide bbshells with 148mm wide bottom brackets.......your knees are safe but your wallet is not
Green,not mean
and Floating in a Floatilla :)
-
 Originally Posted by cozz
very nice - they gonna be around before this winter?
hope so
No.
Infact Shiggy wants to deflect the issue that we're "late" for this year (but in time for next) by calling it a "Rock Crawler". I wonder what a bike with a slack head angle and a 6in suspension fork would be like with a 4in rear tyre (I'd just take off, right?).
Lots of fun, no doubt.
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
I like that, well done! Hurry up and get it to the market place, I've got money waiting!
Richard.
-
 Originally Posted by brant
I wonder what a bike with a slack head angle and a 6in suspension fork would be like with a 4in rear tyre (I'd just take off, right?).
 
Can you tell us what axle to crown length it is designed off of?
This frame may have just answer a lot of debate for me!
"I ride to clear my head, my head is clearer when I'm riding SS. Therefore, I choose to ride SS."~ Fullrange Drew
-
It's absolutely stunning. Good job Shiggy! I'm excited to see it all built up.
-
 Originally Posted by nitrousjunky

Can you tell us what axle to crown length it is designed off of?
This frame may have just answer a lot of debate for me!
Currently is 470mm a/c with a 71deg head angle. This may change. I certainly want to mess around with head angles a bit.
-
 Originally Posted by brant
Currently is 470mm a/c with a 71deg head angle. This may change. I certainly want to mess around with head angles a bit.
Oh sweet, I was so hoping my Enabler fork would work well with it.
Now please tell me it's a symmetrical design?????
Any hints to chainstay length?
"I ride to clear my head, my head is clearer when I'm riding SS. Therefore, I choose to ride SS."~ Fullrange Drew
-
About the only thing different I'd want on that is an EBB, and that's simply because it allows you to make adjustments to the chainline at the front.
As little bike as possible, as silent as possible.
Latitude: 57º36' Highlands, Scotland
-
 Originally Posted by nitrousjunky
Oh sweet, I was so hoping my Enabler fork would work well with it.
Now please tell me it's a symmetrical design?????
Any hints to chainstay length?
Symmetrical, 170mm (it says on the drawing), 445mm chainstays.
But it's just these two first samples. Anything could change. And might/probably will.
-
A slacker head angle please, more like 68. The fork can be 2-3" of travel. Maybe a soft tail?
Similar Threads
-
By Dooms101 in forum Beginner's Corner
Replies: 8
Last Post: 03-12-2011, 06:45 PM
-
By WarpdSpazm in forum Giant
Replies: 1
Last Post: 05-23-2010, 08:39 AM
-
By xls in forum Singlespeed
Replies: 4
Last Post: 02-18-2009, 08:06 PM
-
By tomsmoto in forum Bike and Frame discussion
Replies: 4
Last Post: 10-05-2008, 05:51 PM
-
By grnxb in forum The ReCycle Bin
Replies: 52
Last Post: 02-19-2008, 12:03 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|