Page 1 of 39 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 100 of 3847
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    261

    Moto / bikes direct fatbikes!


  2. #2
    It aint gonna ride itself
    Reputation: MauricioB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    585
    W00t?!

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    480
    Thank you Matt!

  4. #4
    turtles make me hot
    Reputation: NYrr496's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,595
    Holy crap. It's an epidemic.
    I like turtles

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,015
    Well the claim that they will float over 3' of powder snow might be stretching it a bit.
    Latitude 61

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    480
    Love bd!

  7. #7
    Location: SouthPole of MN
    Reputation: duggus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,711

    Re: Moto / bikes direct fatbikes!

    Ahhhh.... WOW.... there's your best fat bike for the $$$
    ...Be careful what you're looking at because it might be looking back...

  8. #8
    dvn
    dvn is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dvn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    711
    What's up with the front rim? Is it really that wide or some sort of optical illusion???
    "Either way it doesn't really matter, I just got back from a bike ride."
    > dbhammercycle

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    4,211
    Heads are going to explode.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,042
    Quote Originally Posted by dvn View Post
    What's up with the front rim? Is it really that wide or some sort of optical illusion???
    Looks like the old Choppers US hundies.

  11. #11
    Cleavage Of The Tetons
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,063
    what's the catch? the unpublishable weights?
    Why the wholesale dump?
    hmmmn.
    "We LOVE cows! They make trails for us.....

    And then we eat them."

  12. #12
    turtles make me hot
    Reputation: NYrr496's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,595
    Quote Originally Posted by dvn View Post
    What's up with the front rim? Is it really that wide or some sort of optical illusion???
    If you look at the specs, they show two different widths on the rims. The front rim is probably 4 1/4 inches and the rear is 3"... Then it's probably cheaper to drill two rows of round holes than to CNC a big oblong hole like a Clownshoe.
    I like turtles

  13. #13
    dvn
    dvn is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation: dvn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    711
    Quote Originally Posted by MiniTrail View Post
    two rows of rim holes has to be better
    surprised no one else mentioned that

    me thinks it's just the picture
    IDK. They do list the rims as: ALLOY RIM, 26"x3.0-4 1/4" Could be rear = 3.0" and front = 4 1/4" width
    "Either way it doesn't really matter, I just got back from a bike ride."
    > dbhammercycle

  14. #14
    Location: SouthPole of MN
    Reputation: duggus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,711

    Re: Moto / bikes direct fatbikes!

    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    what's the catch? the unpublishable weights?
    Why the wholesale dump?
    hmmmn.
    Its not anything funny going on... its bikes direct... they sell all their bikes at just over cost.

    And if you want to get on a fatbike, who cares about the weight at that cost. I'm guessing under 40, maybe 38... still a million times better than the walgoose. Hydro brakes... good name brand tires.
    ...Be careful what you're looking at because it might be looking back...

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: damnitman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,290
    ...yeah, I just sent the link to my brother in-law...he's "fat curious" but won't commit a ton of cash...
    If Huffy made an airplane, would you fly in it?

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    456
    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    what's the catch? the unpublishable weights?
    Why the wholesale dump?
    hmmmn.
    It's called marketing, they're selling it at exactly the price they intend to sell it at.
    We have a stores here that will import product just for the weeks the ad runs in the paper, then claim it's on sale... it's sorta like that

    Otherwise, I would say my (kids/wifes) next fatbike would likely be On-One or BD at this point, but not for me.
    Of my bikes I bought new 3/4 were LBS bikes and the 4th I built myself. I would only replace my Fatbike frame, not the whole bike.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    480
    BD puts out some excellent bikes at lower price points than what the LBS can deliver

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    229
    As someone who was strongly considering a Mukluk 3 as my best choice on the lower end of the price-range... I'm now even more strongly considering this Motobecane thingamajig. It might not look as sharp, but it seems decent, and is half the price.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jvm051's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    360
    Had I not just purchased an One One Fatty, I would have been all over this. Could have got a Pro and a Comp for the price of what mine cost after building. Hell, pick up the Pro, and purchase the Carver suspension fork, for under 2 bills. Good job Bikes Direct.

    Looking at the specs, are they using 135mm hubs?

  20. #20
    Fat & Single
    Reputation: ozzybmx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,094
    The wally-worlders will be all over those.

    Its awesome you guys have somewhere like BD to fill the gaps in
    Evil Following
    Trek 9.9 Superfly SL
    IndyFab Deluxe 29
    FM190 Fatty
    Pivot Vault CX
    Cervelo R3 Disc

  21. #21
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tunalic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    507
    I emailed BD a few days before I ordered my Fatty asking when and if they planned on some fat bikes....they emailed me back after I had put my order in and said to keep checking the website, the plan was to have em before the end of the year.

    I kinda glad I went ahead and got my Fatty....love it!

  22. #22
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    76
    I think I might give one a try. Don't know what model to go for though. I am thinking the cheapest one, I have an x9 rd and shifter I can put on it. Is the break upgrade worth $200?

  23. #23
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    4,211
    Quote Originally Posted by yellowzx View Post
    I think I might give one a try. Don't know what model to go for though. I am thinking the cheapest one, I have an x9 rd and shifter I can put on it. Is the break upgrade worth $200?
    If the pictures are correct, there also seems to be a difference in rims.

  24. #24
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,611
    SAMOX cranks FTW!

    Seems like a bunch of pretty low-spec parts, so you do get what you pay for, but at the same time this is a much better route than the Wal-Goose option. I do like the idea of the competition- we have enough $1500-2000 hardtail fat bikes out there and they are virtually all the same. With prices like this, the bigger companies might go after building full-suspension fat and 29+ compatible frames and forks.

  25. #25
    bhc
    bhc is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    442
    Quote Originally Posted by jvm051 View Post
    Had I not just purchased an One One Fatty, I would have been all over this. Could have got a Pro and a Comp for the price of what mine cost after building. Hell, pick up the Pro, and purchase the Carver suspension fork, for under 2 bills. Good job Bikes Direct.

    Looking at the specs, are they using 135mm hubs?
    Looking at the specs it might be 135 front, 145 rear. Did you see the two numbers listed?

  26. #26
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fat_tires_are_fun's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    517
    Good for them and good for the fat bike world. Without question a great value. They seem to have hit this out of the park! Unfortunately, with 19 inch as the largest frame size, this is not a reasonable option fir me.,,,need 21 or 22.
    Thats okay though, I may get the 15 for my son,,,,much cheaper than the on one baby fat.
    - MOOTS Mooto X
    - Salsa Fargo
    - Niner RLT9

  27. #27
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    76
    So I am 6'1 the sizing chart recommends the large but I would have more stand over with the medium. Would I be cramped on the medium or would it work. I have no fat bike experience

  28. #28
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fat_tires_are_fun's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    517
    Quote Originally Posted by yellowzx View Post
    So I am 6'1 the sizing chart recommends the large but I would have more stand over with the medium. Would I be cramped on the medium or would it work. I have no fat bike experience
    This is completely a guess without seeing you on the bike, but I think at 6'1 you would be way to bigbfor a medium. In fact, I think anyone taller than 6'2 would have issues in the larger 19 size....too much post sticking out, cocpit too short without big adjustments.
    - MOOTS Mooto X
    - Salsa Fargo
    - Niner RLT9

  29. #29
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    39
    Can anybody recommend a USA - UK buy and ship company ?

  30. #30
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    480
    Nvm!

  31. #31
    mtbr member
    Reputation: vikb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,314
    Quote Originally Posted by deuxdiesel View Post
    , but at the same time this is a much better route than the Wal-Goose option.
    +1 - The Wallbeast was only a BSO [Bike Shaped Object] while this actually looks like a bike.

    I would hold off until some of these are in the wild and being ridden before I pulled the trigger though. Let someone else beta test the bike for you and get some real world reviews.

    The Wallbeast was hotter than hell for a few months until the new toy vibe was gone and folks actually had to get on with the riding part of the equation.

    The BD fatty might be just great, but it also might be pretty lame.

    Time will tell.
    Safe riding,

    Vik
    www.vikapproved.com

  32. #32
    mtbr member
    Reputation: lancelot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    996
    Vikb - "The Wallbeast was only a BSO [Bike Shaped Object]"

    Good one vikb! Almost pissed myself.
    The LPG

  33. #33
    mtbr member
    Reputation: buckfiddious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    893
    Difference in rims aside, is it just me or have they made a symmetrical frame with a 145 hub? because that's kind of awesome if they did.

  34. #34
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,015
    Quote Originally Posted by buckfiddious View Post
    Difference in rims aside, is it just me or have they made a symmetrical frame with a 145 hub? because that's kind of awesome if they did.
    If they really did go 145 symmetrical, that would explain the 3" rear rim. I don't think it will be possible to use a full range of gears with an 80 mm rim which is sort of too bad.
    Latitude 61

  35. #35
    AZ
    AZ is offline
    banned
    Reputation: AZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    19,201
    If this is the only Fat Bike you will ever own then it might make sense.

  36. #36
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,996

    Re: Moto / bikes direct fatbikes!

    Could someone please talk me into or out of this bike?
    I'd like to know if you all think geometry is trail worthy for rocky bumpy san Diego.
    Also, any more insight into wheels, max tire width, etc would be very appreciated.
    It's. SO HARD not to pull the trigger...

    Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2

  37. #37
    mtbr member
    Reputation: damnitman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,290
    If Huffy made an airplane, would you fly in it?

  38. #38
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    229
    I really think I might pull the trigger, in a couple weeks if the pre-orders are still available. The only thing really holding me back is that I'm good buddies with the owner of my local shop, and have been talking about buying a Mukluk from him. I don't want him to hate me when he sees me with this thing.

    So,it says the rear hub is "9/10 speed disc" with a "Shimano cassette body". I don't know much about switching out cassettes. Would one be able to simply replace the cassette (and chain, crankset, etc) with a 10 speed cassette, or would you need to replace the body too? In other words, with a "9/10speed hub", is the "cassette body" able to accept either a 9 or 10 speed cassette?

  39. #39
    All fat, all the time.
    Reputation: Shark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    7,256
    No experience with these bikes, but couple weeks ago I had my 9zero7 in San Diego and Kernville, it was awesome!! The fat tires were perfect for all the loose stuff.


    Quote Originally Posted by tfinator View Post
    Could someone please talk me into or out of this bike?
    I'd like to know if you all think geometry is trail worthy for rocky bumpy san Diego.
    Also, any more insight into wheels, max tire width, etc would be very appreciated.
    It's. SO HARD not to pull the trigger...

    Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2

  40. #40
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    220
    just buy it,, if you really enjoy the fatbike world (which you will), you will likely end up moving up scale in a year or two.... if you don't enjoy the fat experience (what's wrong with you!) you can likely unload it for 2/3 the cost....

    just do it. (and then let us know how you like it)

  41. #41
    MTBR member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    803
    Thanks for the tip! I ordered the 19" comp (cheap one). I've been lurking on the Fat forums for awhile. I can always sell it locally if I don't like it. I plan on buying a new carbon 29er in the spring, so I can't afford two bikes over the next 6 months. For $695.00 shipped (no tax)-why the hell not?

  42. #42
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,996

    Re: Moto / bikes direct fatbikes!

    Quote Originally Posted by Shark View Post
    No experience with these bikes, but couple weeks ago I had my 9zero7 in San Diego and Kernville, it was awesome!! The fat tires were perfect for all the loose stuff.
    Yeah! I think I looked at your thread about that trip. Looked really fun. I have been coveting a fat bike for many years now. I need too decide what size to get. I am 5'7, and I ride a 50cm in road and cross and a 17" ibis tranny.
    I am thinking the small as sticking a long stem on (if I need to) would just slow the handling down, which might be nice for a rigid bike?
    Any advice here is appreciated.
    Thanks!

    Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2

  43. #43
    Cleavage Of The Tetons
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,063
    Quote Originally Posted by roobydoo View Post
    It's called marketing, they're selling it at exactly the price they intend to sell it at.
    We have a stores here that will import product just for the weeks the ad runs in the paper, then claim it's on sale... it's sorta like that

    Otherwise, I would say my (kids/wifes) next fatbike would likely be On-One or BD at this point, but not for me.
    Of my bikes I bought new 3/4 were LBS bikes and the 4th I built myself. I would only replace my Fatbike frame, not the whole bike.
    Well after over 30 years in the bike biz, I can tell you this. These bikes will be full of hidden compromises, from weld and metal qualities, alignments, substandard bearings, poorly prepped and faced cut surfaces, marginal hubs/moving parts, really inferior rubber and other wear items, poorly built wheels, and other such things.
    I think they have their place, though, but I do say 'Caveat Emptor'.
    I don't sell fat bikes, so this is just observations from decades of watching direct to consumer offerings almost NEVER quite match up.
    I have no vested interest one way or the other.
    I wish the project luck, though.
    "We LOVE cows! They make trails for us.....

    And then we eat them."

  44. #44
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,106
    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    Well after over 30 years in the bike biz, I can tell you this. These bikes will be full of hidden compromises, from weld and metal qualities, alignments, substandard bearings, poorly prepped and faced cut surfaces, marginal hubs/moving parts, really inferior rubber and other wear items, poorly built wheels, and other such things.
    I think they have their place, though, but I do say 'Caveat Emptor'.
    I don't sell fat bikes, so this is just observations from decades of watching direct to consumer offerings almost NEVER quite match up.
    I have no vested interest one way or the other.
    I wish the project luck, though.

    Meanwhile, thousands of happy people are riding around on bikes they bought from BD.

  45. #45
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    61
    I say this is good for rocky san diego and if its to ruff you could go with a 11nine shock or the carver which I am going to add for dirt riding!

  46. #46
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    61
    Since I cant seem to get the local shops on board with the fattys I have been pushing these to the not sure about spending the money on a Fatty.. I at least want my friends getting the bug.

  47. #47
    Cleavage Of The Tetons
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,063
    Quote Originally Posted by fightnut View Post
    Meanwhile, thousands of happy people are riding around on bikes they bought from BD.
    Hence wishing the project good fortune.
    "We LOVE cows! They make trails for us.....

    And then we eat them."

  48. #48
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,996

    Re: Moto / bikes direct fatbikes!

    Quote Originally Posted by fightnut View Post
    Meanwhile, thousands of happy people are riding around on bikes they bought from BD.
    True. He is right though, also. There are a lot of cut corners and you definitely need to do a lot of tightening. If this gets the job done though... otherwise it might be awhile before I get one. Might be worth it have just for a year or two.

    Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2

  49. #49
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,996

    Re: Moto / bikes direct fatbikes!

    Quote Originally Posted by MiniTrail View Post
    Life span of a fat bike is pretty long. We had a post today in the daily pic thread with a sweet Wildfire Fatbike. A little more $ up front can save a ton down the road
    I'm not sure what your opinion is. Could you expand?

    Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2

  50. #50
    Cleavage Of The Tetons
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,063
    Yup.
    I am not really trying to dissuade or promote, just providing some insight from my POV.
    These bikes will make some people quite happy, but naturally frustrate more than a few.
    Looks like a good 'starter' bike, to see if all the rest that goes along with fat biking is, indeed, your cup of tea.
    Most of us on these forums are used to fairly high bike quality standards, these won't be in the same league, from what I see.
    That is all.
    "We LOVE cows! They make trails for us.....

    And then we eat them."

  51. #51
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,996

    Re: Moto / bikes direct fatbikes!

    That all makes sense. To be fair, you do know how I'll be riding it, that's a few posts up.

    I would absolutely love a carbon bear grease, but my spend limit is not that high, or at least, it'll be 18 months to 2 years before I could even think about it. The on one is much closer, but I don't see an enormous difference in components. If this was durable enough to get a couple good years out of, then for my uses it would be a go.

    But I don't know much about geometry and I'm not super educated in wheels, so that's why I ask. I might have to just do some more research on the unknown parts and see what I find.

    Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2

  52. #52
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    115
    Here's another fun fact: The Bikesdirect bikes are actually a copy of these: Diamant / Nakamura ? Mammut / BigBob Prototype(s) ? Norwegian Fatness! | FAT-BIKE.COM
    These were again the same bikes which were used as a prototype by Norco for their fatbike.

  53. #53
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,996

    Re: Moto / bikes direct fatbikes!

    Thanks for the info. Can someone decipher for me what the HS is? For the headset I'm not sure I understand their description.

    Meanwhile, I emailed them to see if rear clearance is limited by the frame or the drive train. And what fork clearance looks like.

    Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2

  54. #54
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    115
    Rear clearance is limited by drivetrain. Front takes up to 4,8" tires I think.

  55. #55
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    709
    so, anybody figure out how they are getting a 3x9 to work with 4" tire and a 135-145mm hub, and what appears to be a standard 68/73mm BB?

    And as for the rims being different sizes, in the specs pages Weinmann lists the size as 3.0-4 1/4 for their fat bike/chopper rims.

    They also list ERTO size(including inside width), and have a picture with the width measurement for each model. The model name pretty much gives away the outside width, with the DHL65 being 65mm wide, DHL80 at 80mm, and DHL100 being 100mm wide.

    interesting is the new DHL101, and 102 models. The DHL101 is a lighter double wall 100mm rim, while the DHL102 is a hybrid single/double wall 100mm rim that is basically a single wall with two hollow tubes near the center. The weight is still pretty heavy at 1270g, but might be comparable to, or even lighter than a Clownshoe when drilled out or maybe milled in a Pratt truss design(Northpaw).

  56. #56
    Oslo, Norway
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    594
    It looks suspiciously similar to our Diamant Mammut/ Nakamura BigBob Mk2 models, so they likely run the same 17.5mm offset frame and 100mm BB.
    The rims are likely DHL80 rear and DHL100 front.
    Undrilled, the DHL101 is lighter, but DHL100 is lighter, with the same 2 rows of 32mm hole pattern that we developed with Weinmann for these rims. DHL102 sits at 990g drilled with the same pattern.
    Looks like our assembly factory decided to make our design/spec an open model, not sure if we are too psyched about that, but since BD won't ship to Norway, it is not a big deal for us. However, if they start selling out our new 25lb 100mm/100mm fatbike or the new 23lb 100mm/100mm fat in development, we'll be less than enthusiastic.
    Espen Wethe
    www.kindernay.com
    Kindernay on BikeRumor: https://goo.gl/iQtWxu

  57. #57
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,631
    Quote Originally Posted by lancelot View Post
    Vikb - "The Wallbeast was only a BSO [Bike Shaped Object]"

    Good one vikb! Almost pissed myself.
    Ditto!

  58. #58
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    480
    vikb: then this guy should have been disqualified for not using a bike in the rice..

    Fat Bike Slays Sea Otter Classic


  59. #59
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    4,010
    hope they don't go up too quick before i can get one.
    roccowt.
    rocnbikemeld

  60. #60
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    47
    One of my friends just ordered the Fantom FB4 Comp ($700 model). Once he gets it, I'll put up a decent review, and comparing it to my Muk3

  61. #61
    Oslo, Norway
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    594
    Hmm... from the product description:

    Check the large holes in the rim. Most fat bike rims today are single-wall, one layer of material in the rim. With the cutout single wall rims, the one cool side effect is that you can see the rim tape that bulges out due to the pressure in the tube.

    Well. Weinmann DHL80 and DHL100 are both double wall rims. Don't think BD/Motobecane were too involved with the details of development of these bikes, probably because we were the ones who did it for the assembly factory in China. No big deal, though, as they don't ship to Europe. Imitation and flattery and all that.
    Espen Wethe
    www.kindernay.com
    Kindernay on BikeRumor: https://goo.gl/iQtWxu

  62. #62
    Location: SouthPole of MN
    Reputation: duggus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,711

    Re: Moto / bikes direct fatbikes!

    Quote Originally Posted by wookie View Post
    Thanks for the tip! I ordered the 19" comp (cheap one). For $695.00 shipped (no tax)-why the hell not?
    I'm seeing $895 and $995... where did you get $695?
    ...Be careful what you're looking at because it might be looking back...

  63. #63
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    480

    Moto / bikes direct fatbikes!

    The anti bd ppl crack me up ..

    Yes bd sell bikes mostly in the sub 1k range. The bike biz guy picks apart bd bikes as if a like priced trek or diamondback at the lbs doesn't have similar cut corners...

    Sigh..

  64. #64
    mtbr member
    Reputation: damnitman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,290
    ...scroll right...
    If Huffy made an airplane, would you fly in it?

  65. #65
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,015
    Quote Originally Posted by autodoctor911 View Post
    so, anybody figure out how they are getting a 3x9 to work with 4" tire and a 135-145mm hub, and what appears to be a standard 68/73mm BB?
    Either they are wrong about a 145 rear end, and/or wrong about it being centered, or they are not getting full use on the 3 X 9. And that would be with 100 mm bottom bracket. It will be good to see some clarification of what the bikes really have been built to.
    Latitude 61

  66. #66
    All fat, all the time.
    Reputation: Shark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    7,256
    I think these are a great option between expensive fat bikes and the horrible walgoose....

  67. #67
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    47
    The bright green one, for $695, on the right. As with all BD bikes that I've bought/friends bought, they need a complete tear down and rebuild. The cabling jobs are especially crappy in most cases.

    I think it should suffice for a while, just ride it til you break stuff, then replace. I definitely think the durability will be lower compared to any of the higher priced competitors, but I'd love to be surprised if these are comparable.

  68. #68
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    229
    The green one, and cheapest spec, is $695. I notice, in the picture, it appears to have a different front rim, perhaps the narrower rear rim also used on its front. I just emailed them to ask about it, as I was considering buying one, but want the wider front rim.

  69. #69
    Location: SouthPole of MN
    Reputation: duggus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,711

    Re: Moto / bikes direct fatbikes!

    Quote Originally Posted by falkry05 View Post
    The bright green one, for $695, on the right.
    Wow... space cadet! I'm on my tablet and it cropped to the two on the left. :beer:
    ...Be careful what you're looking at because it might be looking back...

  70. #70
    mtbr member
    Reputation: sasquatch rides a SS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    4,559
    I'm interested to see some user pics starting to show up on here.

  71. #71
    Cleavage Of The Tetons
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    5,063
    Quote Originally Posted by boogman View Post
    The anti bd ppl crack me up ..

    Yes bd sell bikes mostly in the sub 1k range. The bike biz guy picks apart bd bikes as if a like priced trek or diamondback at the lbs doesn't have similar cut corners...

    Sigh..
    Nobody has posted an 'anti BD' post here. Just 'caveat emptor' advice. There is a big difference.
    And. By 'bike biz'...I don't sell bikes. At all. I'll pick apart any potential crap I see.
    Last edited by rideit; 09-15-2013 at 02:55 PM.
    "We LOVE cows! They make trails for us.....

    And then we eat them."

  72. #72
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,106
    Quote Originally Posted by Espen W View Post
    Hmm... from the product description:

    Check the large holes in the rim. Most fat bike rims today are single-wall, one layer of material in the rim. With the cutout single wall rims, the one cool side effect is that you can see the rim tape that bulges out due to the pressure in the tube.

    Well. Weinmann DHL80 and DHL100 are both double wall rims. Don't think BD/Motobecane were too involved with the details of development of these bikes, probably because we were the ones who did it for the assembly factory in China. No big deal, though, as they don't ship to Europe. Imitation and flattery and all that.
    Espen, how do the specs on these "Motobecanes" compare to the specs on the BigBoy? Can you give us an idea of weight on the BigBoy?

  73. #73
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jhmeathead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    178
    The green one dressed up with purple parts would be sick. Hulk themed. ( comic nerd lol)

  74. #74
    bhc
    bhc is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    442
    I too missed that green one for $695. Guessing that one will weigh in over 40 pounds. I bought a BD 3 speed for one of my daughters this spring. Decent enough for the riding she does, but her riding is not out on snowmobile trails when temps are near 0. I will let someone else be the guinea pig.

  75. #75
    Oslo, Norway
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    594
    Quote Originally Posted by boogman View Post
    The anti bd ppl crack me up ..

    Yes bd sell bikes mostly in the sub 1k range. The bike biz guy picks apart bd bikes as if a like priced trek or diamondback at the lbs doesn't have similar cut corners...

    Sigh..
    Well, I know the Product Managers at both Diamondback and Trek, and I know that they would not take another brands bike, repaint, slap their stickers on it and market it as their own, even though they also have models made at the same assembly factory (in this case Ideal China). I wonder what Specialized would do if some other brand asked the Merida factory (who assembles Fatboy) to build 200 extra Fatboys so that they could sell it under their own brand.
    Still, we don't care, since Ideal only produced 200pcs of these bikes, and they are not sold to Europe. In fact, having someone else copy our bikes is just good marketing for us.
    Last edited by Espen W; 09-16-2013 at 04:32 AM.
    Espen Wethe
    www.kindernay.com
    Kindernay on BikeRumor: https://goo.gl/iQtWxu

  76. #76
    Oslo, Norway
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    594
    Quote Originally Posted by fightnut View Post
    Espen, how do the specs on these "Motobecanes" compare to the specs on the BigBoy? Can you give us an idea of weight on the BigBoy?
    Their top of the line bike is essentially the same, but they use FSA stem/bar/post, since we use our own C4 branded parts here.
    Out of the box, the Mk2 Nakamura BigBob/Diamant Mammut sits at right under 15kg (33lbs) in size 15''. Heavy but durable. Mk3 sheds a huge amount of weight (see below). Mk2 comes with with heavy 4.0 inner tubes (vary from 460-520g a piece). Tubeless setup (120g total with goo), Schwalbe 13F (180-200g) or Maxxis Freeride (295g) is the easiest way to shed a bunch of weight right off the bat.
    What will be interesting to see is if the factory will sell our MY14 designs to others as well. That includes a 25lb BigBob 5.0/Mammut F3 with 100mm rims front and rear, 650g fork, 1500g frame, custom Samox PF30 100mm crankset, etc. Production cost of that one is approx 60% higher than the Mk2 bikes, but around 3kg lighter. My own prototype is even lighter at 23lbs, still 100/100 rims and alloy frame and fork (1295g experimental frame), but some of the components are not suitable for mass production.
    Espen Wethe
    www.kindernay.com
    Kindernay on BikeRumor: https://goo.gl/iQtWxu

  77. #77
    Oslo, Norway
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    594
    Quote Originally Posted by MiniTrail View Post
    looks like you can give more detail than BD

    What made you decide to go with the fatter front rim only?
    Clearance issue. The Vee Rubber Mission has a 4.4'' casing width when mounted on the 100mm Weinmann rims, so we had to use 80mm and 4.0 casing width in the rear in order to have chain clearance in the lower gears with the cranks available as OEM at the time the bike was designed (last fall)
    Our first Mk3 prototypes managed to have clearance with 100mm rear rim and the 17.5mm offset design, but for production, we are going with 190mm spacing/hub in order to make room for the new 4.6/4.7'' tire with 6mm knobs that we are developing with Vee-Rubber.
    We made it slightly smaller than the Bud/Lou in order to fit all those frames where Lou just barely don't fit. In addition, it will have holes for up to 300 studs (like the Escalator, just more volume and more studs)
    It will be called Vee-Rubber Snowshoe, and they will show the first prototypes at Interbike.
    Espen Wethe
    www.kindernay.com
    Kindernay on BikeRumor: https://goo.gl/iQtWxu

  78. #78
    mtbr member
    Reputation: 69tr6r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    661
    I just ordered a green one, 15 inch. My kids will have a blast on this thing!

  79. #79
    aka bOb
    Reputation: bdundee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    7,926
    Quote Originally Posted by Espen W View Post
    Clearance issue. The Vee Rubber Mission has a 4.4'' casing width when mounted on the 100mm Weinmann rims, so we had to use 80mm and 4.0 casing width in the rear in order to have chain clearance in the lower gears with the cranks available as OEM at the time the bike was designed (last fall)
    Our first Mk3 prototypes managed to have clearance with 100mm rear rim and the 17.5mm offset design, but for production, we are going with 190mm spacing/hub in order to make room for the new 4.6/4.7'' tire with 6mm knobs that we are developing with Vee-Rubber.
    We made it slightly smaller than the Bud/Lou in order to fit all those frames where Lou just barely don't fit. In addition, it will have holes for up to 300 studs (like the Escalator, just more volume and more studs)
    It will be called Vee-Rubber Snowshoe, and they will show the first prototypes at Interbike.
    Thanks for the info especially on the tires!

    Now rant time: Why are they in just in the prototype stage? When are companies that are making fat bike related parts and complete bikes going to realize that our winter riding starts in November and to make products available for wholesale early enough so people aren't scrambling to get ready and that's if the stuff comes in at all. That is all.
    Last edited by bdundee; 09-16-2013 at 10:38 AM.

  80. #80
    Fat & Single
    Reputation: ozzybmx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,094
    Cuz winter happens all over the world at different times and we don't even get snow

    We need your late winter tyres for our winter... thought we ride them in summer.
    Evil Following
    Trek 9.9 Superfly SL
    IndyFab Deluxe 29
    FM190 Fatty
    Pivot Vault CX
    Cervelo R3 Disc

  81. #81
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Velobike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,563
    I'm looking forward to seeing a Go-Pro film of the new DB fatbike owners chortling merrily as they "Float over three feet of soft powder snow or deep sugar sand and laugh!"


    Hopefully someone will oblige...
    As little bike as possible, as silent as possible.
    Latitude: 57ļ36' Highlands, Scotland

  82. #82
    MTBR member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    803
    I received this confirmation email this morning:


    "Hi, Thank you for pre-ordering a New Motobecane FatBike.

    These bikes are being ordered at a rate that has shocked us; and they are sure to sell out before they land. We feel you will be extremely happy with this bike and look forward to your direct feedback on it. Please send your comments to Chris at bd4salesteam@aol.com or post on mtbr.com.

    Your new Fat Bike is built by the same factory that builds bikes for Kestrel, Fuji, Specialized, and dozens of other quality brands [including Motobecane]. Even though the price we are selling the FB4 models at is rather low; we feel certain you will find itís construction is equal in quality to that of any $2000 Fat Bike.

    Bikesdirect has not decided how broad to go in the Fat Bike market. We are considering bikes down to $399 and bikes up to $2500 Ti versions. Your purchase and input will be valuable in our decision making process. "


    Thanks again


    Be Safe and Have Fun
    Order Processing Team at Bikes Direct

  83. #83
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Tincup69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    492
    $399 fat bike? Wow.
    2016 Trek Farley 7
    2015 Specialized Fatboy Comp
    2014 Trek Fuel EX8
    2015 GT Grade 105

  84. #84
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,133

    Re: Moto / bikes direct fatbikes!

    I dislike bikes direct. Their "fire sale" marketing and false msrp numbers are misleading at best and criminal at worst. Some people order from them, thinking they are getting a $2500 bike for $899, but they are just getting an $899 mail order bike. The bikes that are sold on their website aren't sold anywhere else. How can you have msrp numbers for items that aren't sold by retailers?

    Also using names of once respected, defunct bicycle brands like Motobecane, Windsor, and Mercier to slap onto cheap chinese bikes that said companies would never touch with a barge pole is also pretty low.

    Their bikes may be a decent value, but their marketing practices are pure slimeball stuff.

  85. #85
    Location: SouthPole of MN
    Reputation: duggus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,711
    Quote Originally Posted by wookie View Post
    Even though the price we are selling the FB4 models at is rather low; we feel certain you will find itís construction is equal in quality to that of any $2000 Fat Bike.
    I'm all for these... but this info is false on BD's part... just in tires and wheelset alone. I guess they said "we feel" which basically is an empty thought. Anyway... my 2 cents on that


    Quote Originally Posted by ultraspontane View Post
    The bikes that are sold on their website aren't sold anywhere else. How can you have msrp numbers for items that aren't sold by retailers?
    Exactly.
    ...Be careful what you're looking at because it might be looking back...

  86. #86
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,042
    Quote Originally Posted by boogman View Post
    The anti bd ppl crack me up ..

    Yes bd sell bikes mostly in the sub 1k range. The bike biz guy picks apart bd bikes as if a like priced trek or diamondback at the lbs doesn't have similar cut corners...

    Sigh..
    I bought a Motobecane frame from BD that had the head tube bored incorrectly. The headset cup bores were not parallel- not something that a reaming/facing tool is designed to deal with. With a fork installed, the headset bearings would bind up.

    BD wouldn't warranty it because they said I "modified" it by installing a headset (which is how I discovered the problem in the first place). In my conversations with several different employees, it was clear that they had very little knowledge of how bikes work.

    For what I paid for the frame, I wasn't surprised by the low QC- but I was quite surprised by the poor customer service I received from BD, particularly when you consider what those frames probably cost them. So, yeah- these look like a good value for someone who doesn't need to spend two grand on a fat bike, but wants something better than a Mongoose- but caveat emptor.

  87. #87
    mtbr member
    Reputation: fat_tires_are_fun's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    517
    Quote Originally Posted by 69tr6r View Post
    I just ordered a green one, 15 inch. My kids will have a blast on this thing!
    Cool ... Enjoy it
    - MOOTS Mooto X
    - Salsa Fargo
    - Niner RLT9

  88. #88
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,279
    If you care about service or support after the sale...shop at your local bike shop.
    Jason
    Disclaimer: www.paramountsports.net

  89. #89
    will rant for food
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,684
    Quote Originally Posted by JAGI410 View Post
    If you care about service or support after the sale...shop at your local bike shop.
    That's pretty much it. A coworker was grousing about this concept of bikes that are cheap but don't last, or bikes that are quality and expensive but he knows his teenager won't use it enough to justify the price. So I recommended bikesdirect to him and told him to assemble it as best he could, and I'd clean up the rest and educate him a bit on maintenance.

    There are definitely things missing, like the rear disc tabs weren't faced on his bike (a 29er), and tightening the calipers into position only caused them to lose their position.

    If you are mechanically inclined and don't mind a few extra pounds, it's certainly one way to go.
    Disclaimer: I run Regular Cycles (as of 2016). As a profiteer of the bicycle industry, I am not to be taken very seriously.

  90. #90
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    255
    man if I can swing it. I will get one. I like the fatbike I tired (carbon beargrease) but for just fun recreational riding I can not justify spending $6000 for it

  91. #91
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5
    I have a bd full sus... couldn't afford a Santa Cruz Bronson, but not many can. For what I paid, it is a great bike.

  92. #92
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    480
    yo espen is right.. this BD fatbike is basically the diamant mammut bike rebranded

    BD haters don't have a fight in this deal!



    In video




    Diamant / Nakamura ? Mammut / BigBob Prototype(s) ? Norwegian Fatness! | FAT-BIKE.COM

    Utpakking av BIG BOB ? FATBIKE ę Elisabeth Sveum

  93. #93
    MTBR member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    803
    Quote Originally Posted by boogman View Post
    yo espen is right.. this BD fatbike is basically the diamant mammut bike rebranded

    I checked that out too. If I calculated the Krone to dollar conversion correctly, the cost is just under $1,700.00 American for the Diamant-for whatever that's worth?

  94. #94
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    480

  95. #95
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,107
    Quote Originally Posted by JAGI410 View Post
    If you care about service or support after the sale...shop at your local bike shop.
    Buying something online doesn't excuse the seller from good service. There are many framebuilders and web stores with excellent customer service. Most of my lbs's don't sell or even know the first thing about fatbikes, so I buy lots of stuff online, from small parts to a $5k complete bike. A crappy service experience gets that supplier crossed off my list.

  96. #96
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    480
    bd offers great cust support... not face to face however.. but great support over emails and shipping replacement parts etc..

    I've requested for support from BD for very trivial matters on a $300 bike. I've also requested support from Surly on something similarly trivial on a $1500 pugsley.

    Result:

    BD: responded over email within a day and resolved the matter quickly by shipping out replacement parts

    Surly: never an email response, despite several follow ups.. I guess the douche bags were too busy grooming beards and taking selfies for the blog

    Before you say "should work with your lbs yada yada yada..." yea no $it sherlock. but why would they have a contact email on their website? Plus I wanted to hear directly from the mfgr.
    Last edited by boogman; 09-17-2013 at 05:58 AM.

  97. #97
    nothing to see here
    Reputation: Stevob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,251
    BD will sell plenty of these, no doubt.

    I will continue to save for my On-One Fatty bundle as I appreciate building a bike with quality components that don't need replacing within weeks.
    I see hills.

    I want to climb them.

  98. #98
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,042
    Quote Originally Posted by boogman View Post
    bd offers great cust support... not face to face however.. but great support over emails and shipping replacement parts etc..
    Not always... read post #94.

  99. #99
    Oslo, Norway
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    594
    Quote Originally Posted by wookie View Post
    I checked that out too. If I calculated the Krone to dollar conversion correctly, the cost is just under $1,700.00 American for the Diamant-for whatever that's worth?
    Norwegian retail is 9999NOK, so that is $1695 at todays rate.
    Note that this price includes the Norwegian sales tax that is 25%, so the comparable (to US) pricing (w/o sales tax) is $1355. We presold these bikes back in winter and customers could order from the shops at $1085 (before sales tax).
    Note that this includes a 2 year warranty (5 year on frame/fork).
    Also note that Norway pretty much has the highest cost of living in the world. Gas is close to $11 per gallon, etc.
    Espen Wethe
    www.kindernay.com
    Kindernay on BikeRumor: https://goo.gl/iQtWxu

  100. #100
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    480
    I know BD jacks up their MSRP.. this is obvious... I have never used their claimed MSRP to sway my decision. This goes to pretty much anything I buy... REI might have a jacket on sale for 20%, but their original price might be 20% higher than anyone else...

    It's always a comparison of the purchase price vs the complete bike I'm getting. Any savvy buyer surely takes the same route.

    The fact - This bike is cheaper than if you could import it from Norway.. Its much cheaper than any other options available in the US that still gets you a very capable bike.. haters will focus on the claimed MSRP.. ok have a ball

Page 1 of 39 1234511 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. bikes direct question
    By Craven Moorehead in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 08-20-2014, 08:01 AM
  2. Do fatbikes play well with other bikes?
    By Raidthefridgeguy in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 11-06-2012, 05:39 PM
  3. Bikes Direct?
    By Bluerambo88 in forum Bike and Frame discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-28-2011, 12:12 PM
  4. Bikes Direct Bikes Vs. Big Name Brands. Bike Comparisons Only.
    By firemark in forum Bike and Frame discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-18-2011, 06:21 AM
  5. Bikes Direct. com ????
    By apoint in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 03-25-2011, 12:24 PM

Members who have read this thread: 17

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •