Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 101 to 124 of 124
  1. #101
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,046
    You're asking the wrong question...why do you need 203mm rotors on a rigid fat bike?


    Quote Originally Posted by dirt-nerd View Post
    Will xt brakes with 203 rotors/ adapter from Bluto work with Lauf?
    Thanks

  2. #102
    mtbr member
    Reputation: jpfurn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    384
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    I checked sag and looked at how it was responding to input, and I would not say that the light springs were too light, though I did bottom it off a jump. If I bought one, I'd go with heavy springs.

    The biggest thing that stands out in my mind is that the Lauf is not a a suspension fork, so if you're expecting suspension, then the Lauf is not for you. It does provide some give, but it's not even as signfincat as riding a Bluto 80mm fork.

    I hear what you're saying about being used to one system, then moving to another, but the reality is that if I want to ride hard, real suspension is the only answer or I will get beat up.
    After spending recent time on all three as well(Bluto, Rigid, and Lauf) I have to agree with you about the Lauf no being the best choice for riding hard.
    I have found the Lauf to be great when riding under 75% effort. Once I tried pushing it in the corners and rough I lost confidence quickly. It is defiantly smoother then full rigid but a lot less predictable. I'm going to take my advice and ride it all winter, but will definitely be going with the Fox plus unless Fox enters the full fat game.

    After riding the Bluto all summer it was a fresh breathe of air going back to rigid. I was really hoping the Lauf would be exactly what I was looking for so I'm really going to give it a chance before selling or throwing it in my wife's Farley!

  3. #103
    mtbr member
    Reputation: schnee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,793
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    You're asking the wrong question...why do you need 203mm rotors on a rigid fat bike?
    Speaking for myself: 265 pounds, plus gear, on long long swoopy downhills = no fade for once
    Yamaguchi Cross • YT Jeffsy • Salsa Mukluk & Vaya • Canyon Commuter

  4. #104
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,046
    Quote Originally Posted by schnee View Post
    Speaking for myself: 265 pounds, plus gear, on long long swoopy downhills = no fade for once
    Good calipers are far more important than rotor size, my wife and I are #350 plus kit, tandem fatbike, and 180's are plenty with Guides. Before we got decent calipers we tried lesser calipers and large rotors...not as good.

    ...and it's a big no way on a 203mm rotor for a Lauf.

  5. #105
    mtbr member
    Reputation: baltobrewer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    ...and it's a big no way on a 203mm rotor for a Lauf.
    Curious as to why you say this. I ask because I'm running BB7s with my Lauf and had to add a couple of washers to the post to clear the caliper body, so I will need to either 1) get hydros to replace the mechs (Guides are the likely choice here) and keep my 180 rotors, or 2) keep the BB7s, get a 20mm post spacer and go to 200s/203s. New rotors are by far the cheaper route, and as I'm not displeased with the performance of the BB7s, I'll likely go this route. They are more fiddly, but fine once they're dialed. Thoughts?

  6. #106
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Läskimasa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    110
    ^ That's right. 20 mm spacer and it's ok for Ø 200 or 203 mm disc and BB7.
    Quote Originally Posted by Läskimasa View Post
    I have. Works fine with Ø200 mm disc, maybe not possible with Ø180 mm.
    Fatter is better

  7. #107
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,046
    Quote Originally Posted by baltobrewer View Post
    Curious as to why you say this. I ask because I'm running BB7s with my Lauf and had to add a couple of washers to the post to clear the caliper body, so I will need to either 1) get hydros to replace the mechs (Guides are the likely choice here) and keep my 180 rotors, or 2) keep the BB7s, get a 20mm post spacer and go to 200s/203s. New rotors are by far the cheaper route, and as I'm not displeased with the performance of the BB7s, I'll likely go this route. They are more fiddly, but fine once they're dialed. Thoughts?
    Because the mfg says so, which means it voids your warranty if you break the post mounts. That is a huge lever you've creating with those long mounts, on a front brake, mounted to a carbon fork, with an enormous contact patch. Good luck.

  8. #108
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Läskimasa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    110
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    Because the mfg says so
    Mfg said to me when I asked about spacer for Ø 200 mm disc, "just standard 160 to 180 mm PM spacer bridge or equivalent amount of spacer shims."
    Fatter is better

  9. #109
    mtbr member
    Reputation: schnee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,793
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    Good calipers are far more important than rotor size, my wife and I are #350 plus kit, tandem fatbike, and 180's are plenty with Guides.
    Your hills aren't as steep as mine I guess
    Yamaguchi Cross • YT Jeffsy • Salsa Mukluk & Vaya • Canyon Commuter

  10. #110
    mtbr member
    Reputation: baltobrewer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    183
    Ok, so:

    Nurse Ben says no.

    Laskimasa says yes.

    What sayeth Lauf? Straight from the horse's mouth:

    Lauf' Carbonara Fork?-screen-shot-2016-12-09-2.27.21-pm.jpg

  11. #111
    sluice box
    Reputation: Co-opski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    793
    you must spread some reputation around before giving it to baltobrewer again.
    thx4ß
    ptarmigan hardcore

  12. #112
    mtbr member
    Reputation: blekenbleu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    129

    bearing race?

    What bearing race fits well?
    That included with Cane Creek's ECC44/40 seems too tight;
    the seal seems nice, though..

  13. #113
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by blekenbleu View Post
    What bearing race fits well?
    That included with Cane Creek's ECC44/40 seems too tight;
    the seal seems nice, though..
    I used the Cane Creek crown race and it was an extremely tight fit! Use lots of grease and hit it hard!

  14. #114
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,046
    Quote Originally Posted by schnee View Post
    Your hills aren't as steep as mine I guess
    Wahahaha!

    North Cascades dude, moto trails, not a lot of stuff steeper or more sustained in NA.

    I ran 180mm rotors on a tandem...you dont need unless you're a pro downhiller; do those guys even run 200mm rotors these days?

    The issue with big rotors is warpage anf flex under load. The Lauf twists noticeably under load, a big rotor is more likely to rub.

    The Lauf needs damping, something like a steering damper from a moto, doesnt needto be much.

    The travel is kinda harsh, I much prefer a rigid or a suspension fork.

  15. #115
    This place needs an enema
    Reputation: mikesee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    9,950
    Quote Originally Posted by mohrgan View Post
    I used the Cane Creek crown race and it was an extremely tight fit! Use lots of grease and hit it hard!

    Or stick the fork in your chest freezer for ~3 or 4 hours (or, um, outside in most of North America right now...) then immediately bang the race on.

  16. #116
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee View Post
    Or stick the fork in your chest freezer for ~3 or 4 hours (or, um, outside in most of North America right now...) then immediately bang the race on.
    Thanks Mike! I will have to remember that for the future!

  17. #117
    mtbr member
    Reputation: blekenbleu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    129

    re: crown bearing race

    Quote Originally Posted by mikesee View Post
    Or stick the fork in your chest freezer for ~3 or 4 hours
    Doh! no chest freezer since Matthew..
    Further research reveals Cane Creek offering 3 different crown races:
    10 series - polymer
    40 series - steel with seal
    110 series - alloy with (double?) seal

    Polymer or alloy likely would be better for carbon fiber crown.

  18. #118
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    80
    +1
    tight fit cane creak race on Carbonara fork, put it on my Beargrease a few rides ago. I found even working on the Thomson stem on to steerer tube to be more snug than normal but no issues...

  19. #119
    mtbr member
    Reputation: blekenbleu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    129

    re: crown race

    Quote Originally Posted by blekenbleu View Post
    no chest freezer since Matthew
    OK, crown race setter upgraded from plastic to aluminum
    (1.75" OD 0.065" wall tube fits well, avoiding seal contact)
    seated crown race, but not fully.
    Aligning with sun illuminated a small gap on one side.
    Race does not appear to be crooked;
    is Carbonara crown imperfectly square to steerer tube?

  20. #120
    Elitest thrill junkie
    Reputation: Jayem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    26,025
    Quote Originally Posted by blekenbleu View Post
    OK, crown race setter upgraded from plastic to aluminum
    (1.75" OD 0.065" wall tube fits well, avoiding seal contact)
    seated crown race, but not fully.
    Aligning with sun illuminated a small gap on one side.
    Race does not appear to be crooked;
    is Carbonara crown imperfectly square to steerer tube?
    I've always just used PVC pipe to set the race. In these temps, I could just put the fork outside and it'd end up a lot colder than most freezers
    "It's only when you stand over it, you know, when you physically stand over the bike, that then you say 'hey, I don't have much stand over height', you know"-T. Ellsworth

    You're turning black metallic.

  21. #121
    mtbr member
    Reputation: blekenbleu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    129
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayem View Post
    I've always just used PVC pipe to set the race.
    With PVC, mine seemed to stop about 2mm from seated,
    and damaging Cane Creek's integrated seal was a concern.

    In these temps, I could just put the fork outside and it'd end up a lot colder than most freezers
    It was warm enough here today for shorts and tee.

  22. #122
    mtbr member
    Reputation: solarplex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    877
    Quote Originally Posted by baltobrewer View Post
    Ok, so:

    Nurse Ben says no.

    Laskimasa says yes.

    What sayeth Lauf? Straight from the horse's mouth:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2016-12-09 at 2.27.21 PM.jpg 
Views:	100 
Size:	62.5 KB 
ID:	1109459
    Ditch the bb7 for a trp spyke. Its narrower than shimano hydro, dual piston movement.
    Fatbike, XC bike, Gravel Bike....

  23. #123
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    97
    I've got 2 Lauf forks, a TR29 on my gravel whip and the Carbonara on a Framed Alaska Carbon. My opinion only, it beats the heck out of rigid for small bump compliance (especially on the gravel bike) and takes the sting out of hard to coordinate drops on the fattie.
    Compared to my Spec Fuse plus-bike with Manitou Magnum- the Lauf will never be truly plush in the big hits. It is plush for the smaller stuff, super compliant. It doesn't pump like an old 4" fork without lockout. First, it doesn't have that range. Second, the resistance is progressive. It won't be a Bluto, it shouldn't have to be.
    It is worth noting that it doesn't seem to care about temperature as compared to elastomers and hydraulics. The maintenance kit is a soft cloth.
    It's simple, and it does it's thing. For serious questions, as about, contact Lauf directly. They're more than happy to reply.

  24. #124
    Jammin' Econo
    Reputation: Smithhammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    1,947
    First little test ride on the Carbonara today. We've been in and out of freeze/thaw cycles all week, so things are a lumpy, crusty mess right now - perfect testing grounds.

    The amount of squish is more noticeable than I thought it would be, but in a good way, and smoother than I was expecting. For this type of chunky, uneven surface riding, it didn't feel bouncy at all, just felt like it was doing what it was supposed to.

    The Blackborow isn't my year-round primary trail bike - it's my winter ride and occasional bikepacking rig, and for these uses, I think the Lauf is going to be exactly what I was looking for.

    I dream of a day when my children will live in a world without the shackles of cause and effect.” - S. Colbert

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Lauf fork reviews?
    By MAX LLOYD in forum Shocks and Suspension
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 08-23-2016, 06:57 PM
  2. Lauf Trail Racer Fork. The lightest 29er suspension fork ever?
    By Shalom in forum Shocks and Suspension
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-11-2015, 05:45 AM
  3. Fat Lauf leaf spring suspension fork
    By Drew Diller in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-06-2015, 12:58 PM
  4. Lauf TR29 fork
    By Testmule in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 09-05-2013, 10:41 PM
  5. Lauf trail racer 980 gram fork
    By Hogdog in forum Shocks and Suspension
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-12-2013, 08:15 AM

Members who have read this thread: 241

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •