Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 200 of 558

Thread: Foes Mutz

  1. #151
    mtbr member
    Reputation: HDTVdevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    289
    How is yours coming along?

  2. #152
    pit
    pit is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    118
    Weel, the money was used for the purposes of more priority things these last monthes....
    Next week i'll order my new set of wheels i hope

  3. #153
    mtbr member
    Reputation: HDTVdevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    289
    Quote Originally Posted by pit View Post
    Weel, the money was used for the purposes of more priority things these last monthes....
    Next week i'll order my new set of wheels i hope
    Yeah, that can happen. Luckily I could transfer most from my old fatbike. Just need re-lace the nextie rims on Tune hubs to loose a bit of weight on the wheels. Running on a pair of Jackalopes for now.

  4. #154
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,902
    Wow, dig all those colors!

    I got the stock red, was just droppling over it lunch, heading to my LBS to order the rest of the parts today.

    Compared to my other bikes and my "typical" cockpit layout, these frames run long. I'm 6'/32" inseam, I ride mediums in a Honzo, Atlas, KHS 6500, Lurch, etc... and I went with a medium Mutz. The TT is a good inch longer than my medium Atlas Carbon.

    Anyone try 29+ in this frame yet??

    Quote Originally Posted by Exiger77 View Post
    Our local dealer just got in these awesome frames! Colour galore, be forewarned!
    https://m.facebook.com/gravityracing..._comment_reply

  5. #155
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    148

    Cool-blue Rhythm Coming together….

    Foes Mutz-20150529_191236_resized.jpgFoes Mutz-20150529_191303_resized.jpgFoes Mutz-20150529_191951_resized.jpg

    My King headset showed up yesterday so time to start assembling…27.5 x3.5 Fat be Nimbles are on the way. Hoping to ride this Baby by the end of next week.

  6. #156
    pit
    pit is offline
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    118
    Nice !!!
    I've just order the same rims but in 26 inches.....let us see How it'll look like with tire clearance in 27,5 ;-)

  7. #157
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by railntrail View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20150529_191236_resized.jpg 
Views:	923 
Size:	126.0 KB 
ID:	992252Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20150529_191303_resized.jpg 
Views:	135 
Size:	119.3 KB 
ID:	992253Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20150529_191951_resized.jpg 
Views:	884 
Size:	146.2 KB 
ID:	992254

    My King headset showed up yesterday so time to start assembling…27.5 x3.5 Fat be Nimbles are on the way. Hoping to ride this Baby by the end of next week.
    You may already know this but there have been some denting issues with 1st gen Hugo's. Supposedly solved with 2nd gen wheels although few, if any actual experiences reported. 2nd gen wheels are 110-120 g heavier but hard to tell the difference without weighing. Lots of info here http://forums.mtbr.com/27-5-29/stans...ms-960271.html and here Notubes Hugo 52mm Rim from page 4 and on.

    Good luck with your build! Love the Mutz!!

    update: I believe all 1st gen Hugo's are suspect as the design is the same.
    Last edited by AZMB'er; 06-01-2015 at 11:59 AM. Reason: Updated to include all Hugo's.
    Hard work MUST have killed someone

  8. #158
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,902
    I'm building up a second set of wheels for my Jefe Tandem, 29+ Dirt Wizards on WTB Scrapers and Onyx Racing hubs, got the rear wheel done and threw it on the Mutz.

    The tire fits, but just barely, leaves 5-6mm at 20psi at the seat and BB bridges. Supposedly the DW is a low profile 29+ tire, so anything taller would not be rideable.

    As it sits, the 29+ DW is usable on the Mutz in dry conditions only.

    I'll be running 27+ once I get the Mutz finished.

    I called Foes and asked about getting a longer swingarm and I asked if they had plans to modify the swingarm for 29+, but they said no

    Sorry, no pics, for some reason I can't upload them from this computer...

  9. #159
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    78
    Foes Mutz-img_5032.jpgFoes Mutz-img_5025.jpgFoes Mutz-img_5003.jpgHere is my Mutz:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Foes Mutz-img_5024.jpg  


  10. #160
    Broken Hipster
    Reputation: Barman1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    781
    ^^Beautiful^^
    I'm trying very hard to not buy one of these.

  11. #161
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by pplucena View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5032.JPG 
Views:	139 
Size:	330.3 KB 
ID:	994747Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5025.JPG 
Views:	584 
Size:	381.2 KB 
ID:	994746Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5003.JPG 
Views:	344 
Size:	314.2 KB 
ID:	994749Here is my Mutz:
    Very cool photos. The raw frame looks great

  12. #162
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    78
    Thanks.More photos coming:Foes Mutz-foes-2-.jpgFoes Mutz-img_4976.jpgFoes Mutz-foes-1.jpgFoes Mutz-img_5031.jpgFoes Mutz-img_5030.jpgFoes Mutz-img_5019.jpgFoes Mutz-img_5009.jpgFoes Mutz-img_5024.jpgFoes Mutz-img_4997.jpgFoes Mutz-img_2019.jpg

  13. #163
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    393
    I have the FXR 275 in raw and love it, everyone at the bike park comes over to look at the bare aluminum. That Mutz is awesome. You are inspiring me to get rid of my Santa Cruz Heckler and pick up a Mutz and my every day trail bike....

  14. #164
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    63

    Built one week ago, tuned up and ready

    Foes Mutz-wp_20150608_10_36_42_pro-1.jpg

  15. #165
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by Nefariousd View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	WP_20150608_10_36_42_Pro 1.jpg 
Views:	110 
Size:	220.0 KB 
ID:	995850
    Raw AND naked.....nice look'n Mutz!

  16. #166
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,902
    I posted this over on the FS Fatty Compare thread:

    Got my Mutz built over the weekend, everything went together fine (no weirdness), running 650 x 3.25 Trax Fatty on Scrapers, 120 Bluto, Cane Creek in line set in "high position".

    This bike is a winner.

    No bob when pedaling uphill; climbs better than my Atlas, no weave when pedaling slow uphill, and it just plain slays it on the down.

    Granted, its still a lot of bike compared to an xc bike, but it's a whole lot more fun.

    How does it compare to the BS, well, i don't want anyone to get their hackles up, but suffice to say, I am very glad i waited

    I havent ridden a Khan, I'm sure its a fine bike, but I am satisfied now...though a beefy fork would be nice.

    Me: 6', 195, 32" inseam, long arms, average torso length.
    Current bikes: Atlas 29 fs medium, El Gran Jefe fat tandem lrg, Taro 29 med, Honzo 29 med (sold), khs 6500 med/lrg (sold), Lurch fat bike med, 650b/29"/36" munis.

    Med Mutz, Red
    120 Bluto, 110psi, two volume spacers
    Cane Creek in line, 100psi
    Race Face 170 Cinch, 26/36
    Scrapers, Onyx Racing Hubs, Trax Fatty 650 x 3.25 tube less, 11-40 (Wolf + 16t)
    TRP Spyke brakes, Speed Dial levers
    X Fusion hilo dropper post, wtb volt seat
    Mag pedals
    Kore bar and stem, ergo grips
    34.5#

    Update: Did some suspension tweaking last night while out riding, ended up dropping the fork pressure and shock pressure to make the ride more supple. I coudl see bumping pressures up or down depending on the terrain.

    It's a great bike, so much fun to ride, I can't really see any downsides. The bike rides short, the chainstay lengths are not an issue, it climbs great but it also manuals easilly.

    Just one post build pic:

    Foes Mutz-mutz.jpg

  17. #167
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    97
    Does anyone have a reaction to the MBA review of the mutz? They claim that the bike prefers slow speeds. More concerning for me is their conclusion that it will make a poor rider faster and a good rider slower.

    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

  18. #168
    mtbr member
    Reputation: HDTVdevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    289
    Quote Originally Posted by Stu Pidassle View Post
    Does anyone have a reaction to the MBA review of the mutz? They claim that the bike prefers slow speeds. More concerning for me is their conclusion that it will make a poor rider faster and a good rider slower.

    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
    I don't agree on the slow speed part. I only have my previous fatbike to compare with but I am definitely going faster than before.... Unless I would fall in their 'poor rider' category. But since I already have several top-10 times on some local strava segments (single-tracks), not that poor either.

    Sent from my SM-T905 using Tapatalk

  19. #169
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by HDTVdevil View Post
    I don't agree on the slow speed part. I only have my previous fatbike to compare with but I am definitely going faster than before.... Unless I would fall in their 'poor rider' category. But since I already have several top-10 times on some local strava segments (single-tracks), not that poor either.

    Sent from my SM-T905 using Tapatalk
    Thanks, the conclusions seemed odd to me given my current fat bike and the other feedback on the mutz. Probably another example of MBA not liking anything that is not produced by specialized.

    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

  20. #170
    mtbr member
    Reputation: HDTVdevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    289
    Quote Originally Posted by Stu Pidassle View Post
    Thanks, the conclusions seemed odd to me given my current fat bike and the other feedback on the mutz. Probably another example of MBA not liking anything that is not produced by specialized.

    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
    Both uphill and downhill, I am faster than my riding buddies who have skinny tires in 26" and 29" (all hardtails though). On flat paved, they have gears advantage (triples with 54:11 vs my 32:10 xx1)

    Sent from my SM-T905 using Tapatalk

  21. #171
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by Stu Pidassle View Post
    Does anyone have a reaction to the MBA review of the mutz? They claim that the bike prefers slow speeds. More concerning for me is their conclusion that it will make a poor rider faster and a good rider slower.

    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
    I was a little bummed: My frame was in the mail when I read the article, imagine my chagrin having just spent a grip on the frame, shock, etc.

    Frame came and I built it up apprehensively, hoping I hadn't done a bad thing.

    During my first ride I decided I won't be subscribing to MBA.

    You know what they say about opinions.

    Those guys aren't me and apparently have an entirely different personal definition of having fun.

    This is not me trying to make myself feel better for having spent big loot on a two wheeled tractor.

    I'm well aware of what it is and isn't and happen to be having fun.

  22. #172
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    23
    Well, I must also be one of those poor riders made faster, cuz my skinny riding buddies don't seem to keep up with me when I'm bombing. Damn, I was gonna buy that issue of MBA....should I save my money?(I am a Mutz owner afterall, and every cent helps! lol)

  23. #173
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by CRWLN View Post
    Damn, I was gonna buy that issue of MBA....should I save my money?(I am a Mutz owner afterall, and every cent helps! lol)
    The pictures are nice

  24. #174
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    97
    Thanks guys, you have restored my dream. Until I read that article, I beleived the mutz was the love child of my kona satori and my hardtail fat bike. The perfect combo of fun and trail shredding capability.

    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

  25. #175
    mtbr member
    Reputation: HDTVdevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    289
    Gonna try my 35mm gopro mount on mine this weekend, maybe I will have some trail shredding or downhill blasting to share

    Sent from my SM-T905 using Tapatalk

  26. #176
    alias chicken
    Reputation: matt45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    181
    Foes Mutz by Monkeyhead-cycles from Switzerland
    14.40 kg!

    Foes Mutz-1455860_1588081041453214_656465787549913233_n.jpgFoes Mutz-10420419_1588081061453212_7528539172101137612_n.jpgFoes Mutz-11407026_1588081078119877_8265506078852541325_n.jpg

  27. #177
    mtbr member
    Reputation: slowrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    2,737

    Monster bike

    Quote Originally Posted by matt45 View Post
    Foes Mutz by Monkeyhead-cycles from Switzerland
    14.40 kg!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1455860_1588081041453214_656465787549913233_n.jpg 
Views:	1264 
Size:	125.6 KB 
ID:	996820Click image for larger version. 

Name:	10420419_1588081061453212_7528539172101137612_n.jpg 
Views:	962 
Size:	131.7 KB 
ID:	996821Click image for larger version. 

Name:	11407026_1588081078119877_8265506078852541325_n.jpg 
Views:	560 
Size:	142.7 KB 
ID:	996822
    Looks fantastic, one was for sale locally for $3k built but it was far too large, which is good for my wallet because I would have jumped on it.

  28. #178
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,902
    Ummm, it's a bike, bikes roll, to say a bike has a speed preference suggests the reviewer either didn't have experience riding a fat bike or the bike was not properly set up. Their conclusion, "that it will make a poor rider faster and a good rider slower." is outright silliness.

    If anything, fat tires and a slack HA will increase downhill stability, so a bike like the Mutz is faster downhill in certain situations than other bikes. At the same time, a Mutz is not going to keep up with an XC bike on a straight, flat, level surface. Apples and oranges.

    In terms of how does the Mutz compare to other bikes of it's kind? Probably very similar, kind alike comparing similar bikes in other classes. I have limited time on a Bucksaw, but what I notice most in comparing the two bikes is that the Mutz climbs better (longer CS), has a higher "profile" (120 vs 100mm suspension), and is more playful (Foes design?).

    I think it's important to evaluate what you want from a bike and pick the class that maximizes your needs.

    In my case, since I'm running the Mutz as a 650b+, I could have gotten by or even done better with a dedicated B+ FS rig, BUT, the Mutz is also my winter bike, so I want to run fat tires too.

    My conclusion is that fat bikes have a higher fun factor than a typical mtb, not sure if that extra cush from the fat tires, the gnarly sounding buzz of the tires, or the feel I get from mowing down small children Fat bikes are not about efficiency any more than buying a lifted dually diesel is about increasing gas mileage.

    Oh, and the Mutz is a friggin fantastic bike

    Quote Originally Posted by Stu Pidassle View Post
    Does anyone have a reaction to the MBA review of the mutz? They claim that the bike prefers slow speeds. More concerning for me is their conclusion that it will make a poor rider faster and a good rider slower.
    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

  29. #179
    mtbr member
    Reputation: HDTVdevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    289
    How many links do you guys add to the chain to account for the suspension. I have 2 broken KMC chains (at full 116 links length) in 6 weeks.

  30. #180
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    63
    I haven't added any. I have a 32 in front, 42 WT, goat link, 1051 chain (114 link), xt long cage. Still have quite a bit of slack in the cage at full compression. I'm using full travel on landings.

    I was told by Timberline I would probably have to add some so I
    bought two chains, but when I was setting it up I cycled the suspension w/o shock and it seemed like I had enough give.

    Maybe I'm just lucky?

    now if I could just figure out the creaky a$$ bottom bracket................Nothing like a $5k bike that sounds like my 1973 huffy
    Last edited by Nefariousd; 06-21-2015 at 11:06 PM. Reason: added info

  31. #181
    mtbr member
    Reputation: HDTVdevil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    289
    Quote Originally Posted by Nefariousd View Post
    I haven't added any. I have a 32 in front, 42 WT, goat link, 1051 chain (114 link), xt long cage. Still have quite a bit of slack in the cage at full compression. I'm using full travel on landings.

    I was told by Timberline I would probably have to add some so I
    bought two chains, but when I was setting it up I cycled the suspension w/o shock and it seemed like I had enough give.

    Maybe I'm just lucky?

    now if I could just figure out the creaky a$$ bottom bracket................Nothing like a $5k bike that sounds like my 1973 huffy
    Strange. Am running sram xx1 with 32t front, so should work with the same length. Yesterday, at the bottom of a steep single-track and powering to climb a steep one, it broke. I will check the length when the new Chai is delivered.
    Even 2 breakage points:

    Sent from my SM-T905 using Tapatalk

  32. #182
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,902
    None, I'm running 2 x 10, which works killer BTW

    Chain break is the price you pay running 1 x.

    Add a chain guard and then increase the chain length.

    Quote Originally Posted by HDTVdevil View Post
    How many links do you guys add to the chain to account for the suspension. I have 2 broken KMC chains (at full 116 links length) in 6 weeks.

  33. #183
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    40
    This is interesting. I'm gonna put a 32 on one, and explore this closer. In the meantime, you might like a 30t on there... or even a 28?

    Once you get your new chain on there, definitely put 'er in the 42t, remove the rear shock bolt, and cycle the swingarm. If there's any forward spring still available in the xx1 at full travel, you're good. But I'd still consider that 30t to ease some of the chain trauma.

    Quote Originally Posted by HDTVdevil View Post
    How many links do you guys add to the chain to account for the suspension. I have 2 broken KMC chains (at full 116 links length) in 6 weeks.

  34. #184
    alias chicken
    Reputation: matt45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    181

    Foes Mutz "USA"

    Look at the Details...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Foes Mutz-1960939_1034942116516667_5530737920777204712_o.jpg  

    Foes Mutz-10317756_1034942106516668_7104973195528607468_o.jpg  

    Foes Mutz-10506765_1034940383183507_6884479432362804802_o.jpg  

    Foes Mutz-10524284_1034940346516844_8793669064422871813_o.jpg  

    Foes Mutz-11412186_1034941326516746_1973778334196778068_o.jpg  

    Foes Mutz-11428175_1034941276516751_5367919009367036854_o.jpg  


  35. #185
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    393
    Though I had fun doing the Snowshoe Enduro this weekend on my FXR275, my greatest regret is holding off on the purchase of a Mutz. The absolutely horrible weather causing nonstop mud would have been the perfect conditions for the Mutz to excel in the enduro format. That race has sealed the deal, as soon as i can save my pennies, I will get one...

  36. #186
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,902
    More Mutz:

    Foes Mutz-kimg1027.jpg

    Foes Mutz-kimg1023.jpg

    Great friggin bike, hauls arse, I'm riding waaaay to fast

    I'm pining for some Nobby Nic 3"; the Trax Fattys are a bit slippery on loose soils.

    I have a 120mm Bluto, no volume spacers, ~90psi and a CC Inline, set close to factory specs, (I increased low speed rebound a bit because it felt spongy), ~ 120psi which uses up 90-95% of the travel on a big hit ride.

    I've played around with the fork quite a bit, looking for a good set up that matched the shock. Started with two volume spacers and higher air pressure, gradually worked down to a softer overall setting.

    The shock is still a mystery to me, so I am only making small changes. I probably need to get on the CC Inline set up thread and do some edumacating.

    I'm 5'11", 31-32" inseam, 195#, normal arms and legs, and I ride a medium frame. Mine is set up with 730mm bars, 80mm stem, 170mm crank, and a non setback dropper (seat centered). I could probably ride a large frame, though I'd need a much shorter stem (50-60mm).

    So here's the thing: The Mutz is looong, this is not a bad thing, but if you pick a bigger frame it makes it even longer and taller. The ETT on the Mutz is typical for the frame size, but the top tube is set fairly high for a bike of this kind, the seat tube ends low (lots of seat post showing), the BB is set back (promotes seat set back), and the chainstays are long.

    If you like air, riding fast, and come from a more enduro mindset, the Mutz is a better choice than the BS; it just plain has more suspension and burl. I'll admit, the KK is pretty darn beautiful and I am a Weagle suspension fanboy, BUT the Mutz single pivot suspension works well on the up and down; ie this should be a non issue when making a decision.

    I run a 2 x 10 and the KK is a 1 x 10, admittedly I rarely use the big chairing, BUT I like choices and I like to go fast. I do wish the Mutz had a place for a water bottle as my dog often goes with me; the KK has a bottle cage mount. I tried mounting to the stem and seat post, those were a no go, so I'll probably end up mounting something up high on the seat or strapping a big bottle crossways on the bar.

    The Mutz is not cheap, the KK is really expensive, but when you're spending big money it probably doesn't matter a lot.

    Mutz wish list:
    Water bottle mount
    Sliding drop outs to accommodate a 27.5 x 2.8 to a 29 X 3
    A beefier fork than the Bluto

  37. #187
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    More Mutz:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	KIMG1027.jpg 
Views:	126 
Size:	157.3 KB 
ID:	998737

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	KIMG1023.jpg 
Views:	146 
Size:	174.7 KB 
ID:	998738

    Great friggin bike, hauls arse, I'm riding waaaay to fast

    I'm pining for some Nobby Nic 3"; the Trax Fattys are a bit slippery on loose soils.

    I have a 120mm Bluto, no volume spacers, ~90psi and a CC Inline, set close to factory specs, (I increased low speed rebound a bit because it felt spongy), ~ 120psi which uses up 90-95% of the travel on a big hit ride.

    I've played around with the fork quite a bit, looking for a good set up that matched the shock. Started with two volume spacers and higher air pressure, gradually worked down to a softer overall setting.

    The shock is still a mystery to me, so I am only making small changes. I probably need to get on the CC Inline set up thread and do some edumacating.

    I'm 5'11", 31-32" inseam, 195#, normal arms and legs, and I ride a medium frame. Mine is set up with 730mm bars, 80mm stem, 170mm crank, and a non setback dropper (seat centered). I could probably ride a large frame, though I'd need a much shorter stem (50-60mm).

    So here's the thing: The Mutz is looong, this is not a bad thing, but if you pick a bigger frame it makes it even longer and taller. The ETT on the Mutz is typical for the frame size, but the top tube is set fairly high for a bike of this kind, the seat tube ends low (lots of seat post showing), the BB is set back (promotes seat set back), and the chainstays are long.

    If you like air, riding fast, and come from a more enduro mindset, the Mutz is a better choice than the BS; it just plain has more suspension and burl. I'll admit, the KK is pretty darn beautiful and I am a Weagle suspension fanboy, BUT the Mutz single pivot suspension works well on the up and down; ie this should be a non issue when making a decision.

    I run a 2 x 10 and the KK is a 1 x 10, admittedly I rarely use the big chairing, BUT I like choices and I like to go fast. I do wish the Mutz had a place for a water bottle as my dog often goes with me; the KK has a bottle cage mount. I tried mounting to the stem and seat post, those were a no go, so I'll probably end up mounting something up high on the seat or strapping a big bottle crossways on the bar.

    The Mutz is not cheap, the KK is really expensive, but when you're spending big money it probably doesn't matter a lot.

    Mutz wish list:
    Water bottle mount
    Sliding drop outs to accommodate a 27.5 x 2.8 to a 29 X 3
    A beefier fork than the Bluto
    Nice ride and a very helpful post. I am the same height and inseam and have come to the same conclusion on sizing. I hope to set up a test ride to make the final call. What are you running for rim width?

    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

  38. #188
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,902
    I run WTB Scrapers (45mm id).

    Where do you live?

    I'm helping a buddy with a Mutz build, size Large, once it's done I can post pics and measurements.

    Quote Originally Posted by Stu Pidassle View Post
    Nice ride and a very helpful post. I am the same height and inseam and have come to the same conclusion on sizing. I hope to set up a test ride to make the final call. What are you running for rim width?

    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

  39. #189
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    97
    I live in Mass, we have pretty rough trails. I think a wider rim would take a beating in the summer. the shop I plan on going through is Likin' Bikin' in Alton, nh. Kind of new to fat bike set up would like to see your buddies set up.

    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

  40. #190
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,902
    I just moved from TN, similar terrain to MA, tons of rocks and roots, I'm now living in the land of rocks (Central WA). Rim shots are rare with fat tires, the Scraper takes them as well as any. I'm not sure CF is better for rocks, after building a set for a buddy I get the impression that they would chip vs scratch, so maybe that's worse?

    For rough terrain, loose rocks, jumbled rock, a 2.8-3" tires is good; big rocks ping off stuff more. I like the fatter tires for packed or slickrock.

    Quote Originally Posted by Stu Pidassle View Post
    I live in Mass, we have pretty rough trails. I think a wider rim would take a beating in the summer. the shop I plan on going through is Likin' Bikin' in Alton, nh. Kind of new to fat bike set up would like to see your buddies set up.

    Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

  41. #191
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    I just moved from TN, similar terrain to MA, tons of rocks and roots, I'm now living in the land of rocks (Central WA). Rim shots are rare with fat tires, the Scraper takes them as well as any. I'm not sure CF is better for rocks, after building a set for a buddy I get the impression that they would chip vs scratch, so maybe that's worse?

    For rough terrain, loose rocks, jumbled rock, a 2.8-3" tires is good; big rocks ping off stuff more. I like the fatter tires for packed or slickrock.
    I realized after my reply that you seem to by riding a 27.5+ where I am looking at a traditional fat bike with 4 inch tires. I am thinking that I should go with 65mm rims on a year round bike, based on my limited experience with a hardtail fat bike and comments from others who ride their wide rims in the summer. This also seems like a good opportunity to save a bit of weight. The issue is that there does not seem to be a lot of options if I don't stick with 80mm.

    Am I over thinking this?

  42. #192
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by Stu Pidassle View Post
    I realized after my reply that you seem to by riding a 27.5+ where I am looking at a traditional fat bike with 4 inch tires. I am thinking that I should go with 65mm rims on a year round bike, based on my limited experience with a hardtail fat bike and comments from others who ride their wide rims in the summer. This also seems like a good opportunity to save a bit of weight. The issue is that there does not seem to be a lot of options if I don't stick with 80mm.

    Am I over thinking this?
    I'm actually running 80's with Fat B Nimbles. I'm using cheap origin8 wheels at ~$80 per because I tend to try things that often result in bent rims. I almost went 27.5+, but I was pressed for time and could only get one tire.

    My experience has been pretty positive with the wide wheels, though I must admit I'm still really curious about taking down the rolling resistance on hard pack a bit since that is the surface I primarily ride on.

    Nurse Ben where in WA are you? I'd be interested in checking out your set up before I spend the coin to build a second wheel set

  43. #193
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,902
    Wenatchee.

    The Mutz is great with a fat 650b, the 3.25 Trax Fatty are kinda rotund but still skinny compared to 26" fatties. I'm waiting on some more aggressive 650 tires to finish the dry season, then for winter I'll revert to 26 x 4 studded.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nefariousd View Post
    I'm actually running 80's with Fat B Nimbles. I'm using cheap origin8 wheels at ~$80 per because I tend to try things that often result in bent rims. I almost went 27.5+, but I was pressed for time and could only get one tire.

    My experience has been pretty positive with the wide wheels, though I must admit I'm still really curious about taking down the rolling resistance on hard pack a bit since that is the surface I primarily ride on.

    Nurse Ben where in WA are you? I'd be interested in checking out your set up before I spend the coin to build a second wheel set

  44. #194
    RedRocket
    Reputation: LAWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    5
    I've been riding my Mutz on all mountain terrain since winter. Lots of snow, mud, rocks, jumps, drops, and everything in between. Mostly at 6,000-10,000 feet altitude.
    I trashed the Bluto pretty quickly, and that fork definitely didn't like a 203mm rotor up front. Way too much flex and chatter with the bigger front brake.
    I had Mike V. from Timberline Cycles order me up a new Risse Trixxy double crown inverted fat bike fork. The one for up to 5" tires. ABSOLUTELY LOVE THIS FORK!! Stiff as a DH fork, but not much heavier than the Bluto. And it's smooth as butter!

  45. #195
    RedRocket
    Reputation: LAWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    5
    Here is my Mutz with the Trixxy fork. As you can see, it has taken me 7 years to figure out how to post pictures on here. Lol.





  46. #196
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,902
    Thanks for the heads up, I had tried to get ahold of Risse a couple months back when I built my Jefe Tandem, but they never returned my calls or emails. I tried them again tonight after I saw your fork and they answered the phone!!

    My fork is ordered, a week or two lag time, I am sooooo stoked!!

    If it works out, then my Mutz will get one too.

    How I ordered:

    150 x 15, spacers are inset into the fork legs to adjust down from 20mm.

    Travel range is user dependent, I wanted 80-120 adjusted by changing internal spacers, I chose to have it preset at 100mm.

    I got a taper steer tube, total length is ~10", so ample for a tall head tube and mucho spacers.

    The legs can be adjusted in the clamps to change ride height. I'm running 29+ Dirt Wizards, so they may need to build it with a longer damper

    Total weight is ~6.5#, kinda hefty, but for a tandem with a team weight of 340#, we need that burliness.

    All I need now are fork leg protectors


    [QUOTE=LAWS;12069179]Here is my Mutz with the Trixxy fork. As you can see, it has taken me 7 years to figure out how to post pictures on here. Lol.
    QUOTE]

  47. #197
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    393
    What is the weight of the trixxy for the Mutz? Or is it the same weight for as the one you mentioned for the tandem?

    Spoke with my shop about a Mutz with a CCDB air CS and a set of I9 and whiskey rims. The fork is still the question in the build.

  48. #198
    RedRocket
    Reputation: LAWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by JCHKeys View Post
    What is the weight of the trixxy for the Mutz? Or is it the same weight for as the one you mentioned for the tandem?

    Spoke with my shop about a Mutz with a CCDB air CS and a set of I9 and whiskey rims. The fork is still the question in the build.
    I think mine came in at about 6lbs. Don't remember exactly. The bike is a big fat tank, so I'm not too concerned about a pound here or a pound there.
    The way I see it, if the bike is heavier, you get stronger. And the ability to blast over any terrain with confidence and have big brakes made it worth it for me! The Bluto made me very nervous.

  49. #199
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,902
    A big fat tank that rides very well.

    I hadn't been on my Atlas 29er for three weeks, ever since I brought the Mutz home.

    I blew the damper n my Bluto, so I had to ride the Atlas yesterday. All I can say is that the Mutz is better in every way other than it's heft.

    The Mutz is not huge by any stretch, but the heft it has is important in how a bike like the Mutz rides. It's sorta like wanting a truck to tow a trailer and not wanting to get a full sized truck: You get blown around and you bog up the hills.

    The Bluto doesn't make me nervous, it works fine, but it is kinda skinny/flexy and it's not the best performing fork I have ridden. I haven't ridden a Trixxy, so I'll try it on my tandem first. If it is a great fork, then I'll consider adding one to my Mutz. I am also waiting on RS to release a burly fat bike fork...

    Anyone wanna buy a carbon Atlas?

    Quote Originally Posted by LAWS View Post
    I think mine came in at about 6lbs. Don't remember exactly. The bike is a big fat tank, so I'm not too concerned about a pound here or a pound there.
    The way I see it, if the bike is heavier, you get stronger. And the ability to blast over any terrain with confidence and have big brakes made it worth it for me! The Bluto made me very nervous.

  50. #200
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    97
    i have a test ride scheduled for tomorrow. my hope is that the bike will bring fat tire benefits to a trail/am/enduro platform. i am looking for the fat tire version of a go anywhere do anything bike. for those who have real world experience, is there anything that i should pay attention to on the ride?

Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Foes meets Foes 2014
    By matt45 in forum Foes
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-16-2014, 08:59 PM
  2. Let's see those new Foes!!!!
    By oakhills in forum Foes
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 07-30-2013, 12:44 PM
  3. Foes meets Foes 2013
    By matt45 in forum Foes
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-30-2013, 12:42 PM
  4. Foes 275!!!
    By slowrider in forum 27.5
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-16-2012, 10:48 AM
  5. Foes FXR
    By fafaafooie in forum Foes
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 09-07-2011, 06:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •