Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iliketexmex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    464

    Fat Bike Comparenator

    Hello Guys

    I started this to try to decide what Bike to buy for an upgrade. I started with a few factors and a few brands... Then I thought "Why not do all the bikes?"...
    That was a horrible idea. It was a much bigger job than I thought.

    I managed to include 85 models from 28 different brands.
    I gathered the data from the specs & MSRP listed on brand websites.

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...bKU/edit#gid=0
    If you want to sort by price, select column C (the whole column), hit "Data" then select "Sort A-Z".
    Before you look at it I apologize:
    • I did not include 27" fats, it was too much work.
    • If I miscopied, crossed my eyes or otherwise got anything wrong. I think it is mostly OK.
    • to the brands toward the end of the alphabet, I ran out of steam and did not include all your models (I included a good chunk of them). If you email me a table string I can cut and paste, then I will add it.
    • I was halfway through before I realized I could have made it a lot better (more data). Oh well, it is more comprehensive than what I found elsewhere.


    Note the prices are MSRP (with the exception of Bikesdirect brands, those bikes are never sold at list, the bikes are OK but the way they advertise is silly). You can often find lower prices than MSRP.

  2. #2
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iliketexmex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    464
    By the way, if this is useful comment so it stays near the top and others see it.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation: CHIEF500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    546
    Nice job. How long did that take you.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iliketexmex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    464
    It's hard to say, a few hours probably. Manufacturers do not compile their information in a way to make it easy, that's for sure.

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Wombat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,104
    Thanks That's a good job. One correction: I think the Wednesdays have a 177x12 rear hub.

    Tim

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iliketexmex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    464
    Fixed, thanks

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    4,691
    Lot of work, nice job, but the real meat and potatoes is in the frame design. Id rather see the geometry in a graph than outfitting.

    HTA
    STA
    Reach
    ETT
    CS
    B.B. drop
    Dropper Insertion
    SO
    Stack
    Lrg GG Pedalhead 29
    XMed GG Smash 29
    Lrg Devinci Hendrix 27+
    Med Specialize Levo FSR 27+ (wife)

  8. #8
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iliketexmex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    464
    Yeah, That would be nice but I don't have that kind of time. It surprised me how long this took. If someone wants to send me compiled data, I will add it. At least This will help you narrow down the bikes for which you want to dig up those details.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation: BlueCheesehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    545
    Quote Originally Posted by Nurse Ben View Post
    Lot of work, nice job, but the real meat and potatoes is in the frame design. Id rather see the geometry in a graph than outfitting.

    HTA
    STA
    Reach
    ETT
    CS
    B.B. drop
    Dropper Insertion
    SO
    Stack
    Sounds like a nice project Ben, get to it.

    iliketexmex,

    Very nice job. The information provided will point people in the right direction from a price point and desired build perspective. They can then delve into geometries of a few models they may be interested in.

  10. #10
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    474
    There's a decent graphic included here.

    https://www.ridefatbikes.ca/sr-index...tack-and-reach

    i have no affiliations...

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iliketexmex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    464
    Updated with Cube. Thank you JackWare!

  12. #12
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Scooby609's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    2
    The 2019 Mongoose Argus details can be found here: https://issuu.com/mongoosebikes/docs...45c2be4eaed45e They should be available for retail sometime in September.

  13. #13
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iliketexmex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    464
    FrozenMonkey, those tables are great!

  14. #14
    mtbr member
    Reputation: mikeetheviking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    248
    Id get something with thru axles

    and maybe a GX Eagle drivetrain at a minimum... nice to have WIDE range with fatbikes

    spiderless cranks are rad too

    a dreamy rear hub could spice things up too!

  15. #15
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iliketexmex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    464
    I'm leaning towards something steel.

  16. #16
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    438
    It looks like I chose the right bike.

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    140

    Good job!

    Thanks! Very helpful to see the range of parts used. Looks like 197/150 is now the norm. Too bad it will be out of date as the 2019's come out, and with Shimano going 1x12 there will be more choices in the gearing dept.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    61
    Iliketexmex,

    What bike are you considering getting? I'm from the same area as you are. I put my Bucksaw up for sale and am thinking about picking up a hardtail. I am either getting a Wozo or a Middlechild. I dont like the Wozo for the steep head tube angle, dont know if I'm going to miss full fat if I go to the Middlechild.

    As much as I love my Bucksaw, I keep thinking about how much fun a plus or fat hardtail could be with a mastodon, but I can't have both.

    Sorry to hijack, didn't want to make another thread for something that isn't that big of a deal. Anyone can comment that has made the jump from full sus back to hardtail.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iliketexmex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    464
    I kind of like the 509 Cycles, but I am not sure yet.

  20. #20
    mtbr member
    Reputation: iliketexmex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    464
    Quote Originally Posted by k.b. View Post
    Thanks! Very helpful to see the range of parts used. Looks like 197/150 is now the norm. Too bad it will be out of date as the 2019's come out, and with Shimano going 1x12 there will be more choices in the gearing dept.
    do you really think there will be acceptance of a new standard? I would think you can't get much wider before the ergonomics kick in. I guess we'll see

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 12-05-2011, 11:45 AM
  2. Fat bike lite or fat bike
    By Gingerdamous in forum Fat bikes
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-11-2011, 09:18 AM
  3. Fat Skinny Fat Skinny Fat
    By Bob the Wheelbuilder in forum Surly
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-13-2007, 11:34 PM
  4. fat fat fatty fat fat fat
    By evilbeaver in forum Passion
    Replies: 94
    Last Post: 12-10-2006, 01:23 PM
  5. Fat rider, fat arse, fat saddle
    By GrumpySmurf in forum Beginner's Corner
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-17-2006, 08:00 PM

Members who have read this thread: 128

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

mtbr.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.