|
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
-
Nice, ~$100 less than others.
Uh, there's some weird info contained at the link. A carbon fork made of titanium with conflicting weights and 40mm of clearance? And the shop link is a CX fork?
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
Yeah I know the Carver's website is really weirdly made.
I've contacted them and they confirmed me the infos diplayed on bikeman.com
-
That's not carvers real website, cxrace.com is just a front for them, the real website that should be used is Home thought they haven't updated anything yet, and the bikeman link takes you to a cross carbon fork.
A bikeman link that works:
Bikeman Carver Bikes O-Beast Full Carbon Fork, fits 4.7'' tires
Still not sure why they choose a rear hub option...
-
Thanks for that info. Ordered one too.
As little bike as possible, as silent as possible.
Latitude: 57º36' Highlands, Scotland
-
Mee tooooo!
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
Looks like a nice clean fork.
-
Damn...wish it was available in 450mm A to C...sigh!
-
525 grams?? i would like to see this verified, crazy!
-
-
 Originally Posted by atom29
Meh.
Do you need a hug? 
More fat options are always good.
"No one's interested in something you didn't do."
FREE BEER! (tomorrow)
-
think of it as compensation.
heavy rims and tires combined with heavy frame and fork means heavy everywhere.
ANY part you can drop weight off is a good thing!
I feel slightly goofy riding Gazzis in a Niner carbon fork but it works, WELL.
If steel is real then aluminium is supercallafragiliniun!
-
Anyone want to trade one of these for my Fatback fork? 
I like the curvy look of this one more than the big rectangle look of the Fatback fork.
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
465mm axle to crown and made for 26" wheels? What is that, suspension corrected for a 140mm fork?
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
 Originally Posted by Yogii
465mm axle to crown and made for 26" wheels? What is that, suspension corrected for a 140mm fork?
Pretty much all fat bike forks are offered in the 450mm to 470mm axle to crown range.
-
Front Range Cyclist
Reputation:
 Originally Posted by ak greeff
525 grams?? i would like to see this verified, crazy!
I'm with you there. 520 grams....that's a chunk over even the White Brothers fork. Like almost 400 grams.
In the immortal words of Socrates..."I drank what?"
Facebook.com/monstercrosser
Twitter: @monstercrosser
-
Looks like a carbon steerer, so entirely possible.
As little bike as possible, as silent as possible.
Latitude: 57º36' Highlands, Scotland
-
Front Range Cyclist
Reputation:
 Originally Posted by Velobike
Looks like a carbon steerer, so entirely possible.
400 grams dropped by going carbon steerer alone? Sorry, but entirely not possible 
Even taking into consideration you can create a laminate schedule with less design restrictions going all carbon, that's a bit of weight.
Take into account an ENVE disc cyclocross work weighs in 460 grams....for pretty much the nicest fork you can buy in the category with clearance for 35mm-40mm tires....a carbon fat bike fork weighing in at less than 100 grams more seems like a typo.
In the immortal words of Socrates..."I drank what?"
Facebook.com/monstercrosser
Twitter: @monstercrosser
-
 Originally Posted by juansevo
400 grams dropped by going carbon steerer alone? Sorry, but entirely not possible...
Well, I won't know until mine arrives, but I'm not going to complain if it's a few grams heavier.
As little bike as possible, as silent as possible.
Latitude: 57º36' Highlands, Scotland
-
I'm with ya juansevo. That claim is *really* light, and I have doubts. Anyone who buys this fork, get yourself a scale.
-
If it's made with no aluminium inserts it should be pretty light though.
Comparisons:
My On-One carbon fork weighs 930gms with a aluminium steerer, fork ends, and crown.
My Ti fork weigh 560gms.
However I won't argue, whatever it is will be a question of fact, and we'll soon find out. Be a bit silly of Carver to put a fanciful weight on it because we'll all start whining.
As little bike as possible, as silent as possible.
Latitude: 57º36' Highlands, Scotland
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
I got one from UPS Friday and it felt like an empty box. I didn't have a chance to weigh it but it is amazingly light and very cool looking. Unfortunately the a-c was too much for my Pugsley so I drove it back to their store and traded it in towards an XTR 1x10 setup. Awsome shop to deal with.
-
mtbr member
Reputation:
I think the weiht is not unreasonable. Some of the other forks have a lot of metal in them.
Would a fat fork require LOTS of extra material over a CX fork? I don't think so. But my guess is that the weight is "optimized" as well...
-
 Originally Posted by Drew Diller
I'm with ya juansevo. That claim is *really* light, and I have doubts. Anyone who buys this fork, get yourself a scale.
anyone buying this fork (like myself, who is waiting on delivery) already owns a scale.... or two
your 29er may float over roots and rocks, but my superlight 26 just plain floats
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|