Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 82
  1. #1
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    126

    Carbon Fatbike at Iceman

    Little birdy told me that a company out of Colorado will be at Iceman race expo hall with a USA made carbon snowbike??? anyone?

  2. #2
    NMBP
    Reputation: gfs69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,145
    Quote Originally Posted by tazducks View Post
    Little birdy told me that a company out of Colorado will be at Iceman race expo hall with a USA made carbon snowbike??? anyone?
    Nice, I will be sure to check it out.

  3. #3
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,282
    Yes, looking forward to that as well. I'm sure 616 and Quiring will have their fat bikes as well. But just like regular MTB's, you save maybe 3 pounds off of a frame by going carbon. The real weight loss/performance potential will be in carbon rims and lighter tires.

  4. #4
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Velobike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,820
    Quote Originally Posted by deuxdiesel View Post
    Yes, looking forward to that as well. I'm sure 616 and Quiring will have their fat bikes as well. But just like regular MTB's, you save maybe 3 pounds off of a frame by going carbon. The real weight loss/performance potential will be in carbon rims and lighter tires.
    But in the meantime, any weight saving is appreciated...
    As little bike as possible, as silent as possible.
    Latitude: 5736' Highlands, Scotland

  5. #5
    mtbr member
    Reputation: GTR2ebike's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,881
    Quote Originally Posted by deuxdiesel View Post
    Yes, looking forward to that as well. I'm sure 616 and Quiring will have their fat bikes as well. But just like regular MTB's, you save maybe 3 pounds off of a frame by going carbon. The real weight loss/performance potential will be in carbon rims and lighter tires.
    Your not saving 3 lbs compared to an alloy frame.

  6. #6
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    155
    Personally this is really exciting. FatCarbon can give shapes that are doable but heavier w aluminium. i want my next fatbike (aka this spring....) to be carbon w front suspension and sub 29lbs.

  7. #7
    mtbr member
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    784
    Am I the only one who LIKES the fact that their fat bike is like a rolling pig? I've got my super light, super fast carbon HT (19lb custom Scott Scale), it's got it's place in the quiver. When winter comes and the trails are covered in snow going fast is the last thing on my mind. After a long year of XC, road and cross racing fat biking is my time to kick back, forget about lactic acid and have fun with my buds.

    I like the heavy wheels too (holy rolling darryls, heavy surly tubes, 120tpi Lardomorph). I find when I get off the packed line into the deep snow the gobs of rotational inertia help me keep plowing through until I can make my way back to the packed snow.

  8. #8
    Living the thug life.
    Reputation: Logantri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    731
    Quote Originally Posted by GTR2ebike View Post
    Your not saving 3 lbs compared to an alloy frame.
    Say what?

    A carbon fat bike would be cool, but with 4"+ wide tires the ride qualities that are deemed an upgrade would be heavily muted. Weight savings MAYBE 1-2 pounds.
    I proudly ride for these guys.

    My blog.

  9. #9
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Velobike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,820
    Quote Originally Posted by Kris View Post
    Am I the only one who LIKES the fact that their fat bike is like a rolling pig?...
    Depends how you're using your fat bike.

    Sometimes it's taking me, other times I'm taking it - methods ranging from carrying it a thousand feet up a scree slope, dragging it through dense heather, lifting it over 7' deer fences, to throwing it across deep creeks.

    If I was just pedalling the bike, I wouldn't care, but for the way I use my bike, light is good.
    As little bike as possible, as silent as possible.
    Latitude: 5736' Highlands, Scotland

  10. #10
    All Lefty's, all the time Moderator
    Reputation: MendonCycleSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    12,865
    First step towards the downfall of a niche.

    First carbon, then, Trek will discover them and "perfect" them by making it hopelessly proprietary, and convincing the uneducated masses that they are in fact, the pioneering brand.

    I'll take life without fat carbon, thank you.
    This is a Pugs not some carbon wannabee pretzel wagon!!

    - FrostyStruthers



    www.mendoncyclesmith.com

  11. #11
    mtbr member
    Reputation: buckfiddious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    877
    Quote Originally Posted by Kris View Post
    Am I the only one who LIKES the fact that their fat bike is like a rolling pig? I've got my super light, super fast carbon HT (19lb custom Scott Scale), it's got it's place in the quiver. When winter comes and the trails are covered in snow going fast is the last thing on my mind. After a long year of XC, road and cross racing fat biking is my time to kick back, forget about lactic acid and have fun with my buds.

    I like the heavy wheels too (holy rolling darryls, heavy surly tubes, 120tpi Lardomorph). I find when I get off the packed line into the deep snow the gobs of rotational inertia help me keep plowing through until I can make my way back to the packed snow.
    I agree, to a point...

    I've watched mountain bikes evolve from the original, 30+ pound, first generation, cobbled together out of odds and ends, overbuilt monsters to the lightweight, swift, underbuilt and over-focused racers that they are now.

    I don't want to see that happen to fatbikes- I don't want them to become 19 pound racebikes.

    But I really wouldn't mind seeing the weight come down in rational ways. most of us don't need overbuilt DH cranks, we just use them because they're the cheapest option. Large Marge rims are probably overbuilt for motocross. And I suspect that sometimes, surly specs the heaviest steel tubes they can find, just because.

    I don't want a carbon fatbike, but I appreciate the sentiment- we don't have to just accept that these bikes will weigh 36 pounds.

    And the thing is, that's what you find so much on this forum- "hey, 47 mm trials rims weigh and cost less, and they work really well!" or "You can use regular tubes and save money and weight!"

  12. #12
    will rant for food
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,018
    I think most of you are blowing this concept out of proportion.

    With all the weight weenie-ing that has gone on to get mountain bikes to their conventionally sold state that they're in now... you do realize that people still buy a lot of Surly brand bikes *because* of their durable reputation and not exactly svelte weight?

    I don't think it's going to change anything. Not going to reduce weight all that much. Just an additional option for people that nerd out on carbon. Self included.

    Here's one thing that hasn't been brought up about carbon, and surprises me. Special down tube. Make room for a significantly larger frame bag while completely ditching any suspension fork compatibility. I think it's a reasonable idea.
    Latitude: 44.93 N

  13. #13
    addicted to chunk
    Reputation: Shark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    5,082
    Come on fat carbon mojo or fat carbon tallboy.

    My wallet is waiting lol
    Riding.....

  14. #14
    short timer
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    165
    Will it be purple?

  15. #15
    Dinner for wolves
    Reputation: buddhak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,549
    Carbon fiber fat bike tech certainly will not appeal to everyone, but for the folks who are taking fatbikes into the AM/XC race realm (I am thinking of bikes like the Sandman Hoggar) it makes as much sense as titanium. How bad ass would a sub 25lb carbonium trail fatbike on 47mm rims be? I'd ride a bike like that in a second. I'd still keep my Pugs, though.
    Responds to gravity

  16. #16
    Dirt Huffer
    Reputation: AC/BC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,451
    Carbon frames are typically only about pound or so less then hydroformed aluminum "race" frames. So take that off a Beargrease frame and there is a reasonable expectation of weight. But in no way is it going to make a very dramatic difference in the weight of these bikes. It's the combination of parts you use that really cut the fat

  17. #17
    mtbr member
    Reputation: nvphatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5,817
    Quote Originally Posted by deuxdiesel View Post
    Yes, looking forward to that as well. I'm sure 616 and Quiring will have their fat bikes as well. But just like regular MTB's, you save maybe 3 pounds off of a frame by going carbon. The real weight loss/performance potential will be in carbon rims and lighter tires.
    I contacted Quiring about a full squish and would he be the guy to venture this way...answer i'm probably not that guy.

  18. #18
    mtbr member
    Reputation: gcappy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,563
    Well, I like going fast! I have been riding my 9-0-7 Lefty, BFL's on Clownshoes, 32-33#'s, on all the trails I can find and I am riding with my bud's on their 26 and 29 er's. They can't believe the fatty is not a slow pig. I let everyone ride it to see for themselfes. This bike rocks the technical trails instilling confidence because of the extra traction. Also the super tire diameter helps it roll over logs and rocks better than my 29er.

    I will take a carbon frame and anything else carbon if it saves weight and is strong enough to withstand my riding style.

  19. #19
    mtbr member
    Reputation: Velobike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,820
    Quote Originally Posted by gcappy View Post
    ...I will take a carbon frame and anything else carbon if it saves weight and is strong enough to withstand my riding style.
    Sums it up nicely.

    Every 1,000' you have to carry a pound when you're knackered leads to less appreciation of that pound.
    As little bike as possible, as silent as possible.
    Latitude: 5736' Highlands, Scotland

  20. #20
    Karma Vampire
    Reputation: 29Again's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    251
    Did not think CF frames were still made in the USA? I am waiting on the "Fat Chinese Carbon" thread to appear, even before Trek/Giant/Specialized get into the market. CF frames are not my cup of tea because I crash too much.

    A little weak internet sleuthing has me guessing it will be Funk Cycles from CO, that shows up at the 2012 Bells Niceman Expo with a "Carbon Fatbike frame". They should have plenty of metal based Fatbike company at the Expo.
    http://www.funkcycles.com/about.php

    tazducks, are you lining up fat in Kalkaska on Nov 3rd? Fat Triple Crown in play?

  21. #21
    Fat & Single
    Reputation: ozzybmx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,920
    Quote Originally Posted by Logantri View Post
    Say what?

    A carbon fat bike would be cool, but with 4"+ wide tires the ride qualities that are deemed an upgrade would be heavily muted. Weight savings MAYBE 1-2 pounds.
    Theres quite a few alloy and Ti fatbike frames already around 1600-1700g mark, a carbon frame would probably come in around 1200g going on regular carbon frame weights.
    Ti O'Beast
    Indy Fab
    One9
    Dirty Disco CX

  22. #22
    Fat & Single
    Reputation: ozzybmx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,920
    Quote Originally Posted by 29Again View Post
    I am waiting on the "Fat Chinese Carbon" thread to appear
    This ^^^ and 200 of them for sale on ebay from 50 different sellers at $350 a frame
    Ti O'Beast
    Indy Fab
    One9
    Dirty Disco CX

  23. #23
    Single Speed Junkie
    Reputation: crux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,107
    Would be cool to have a "HEAVY" (metal) and "light" weight (carbon) wheel set. Get your training in during the week then go play on the weekend. Carbon frame would be cool as well. Waiting for the clunker carbon fat bike to hit the market.

    Think it would be cool crossing the lines of this bike



    With the fat bike


    and be in carbon

  24. #24
    will rant for food
    Reputation:
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,018
    A carbon fat twin top tube cruiser you say?

    That sounds ridiculous....ly appealing for some reason.
    Latitude: 44.93 N

  25. #25
    mtbr member
    Reputation: sylus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    65
    Isn't a carbon fat bike a bit like putting a light weight jumper on a fat girl?

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •